> I use RCM - what is involved exactly in maintaining? - I have always
> just installed RCM from the zip file . .
like for all RPM:
- update version or at least security fix
- Packaging Guidelines compliance
Ex, among other things
- system integration (logrotate...)
Remi,
On 2017-04-14 02:48, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On 04/12/2017 08:06 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
Hi,
I try to maintain Wordpress and Roundcubemail,
but I will prefer to have some co-owner on these.
Especially to allow (security) update when I'm offline,
or busy with some important downstream work (P
On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 22:23 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 3:17 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 07:04:57AM -, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 04:05 +, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote:
> > > > Because we think it
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 3:17 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 07:04:57AM -, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 04:05 +, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote:
>> > Because we think it's fundamentally a wrong approach.
>> >
>> > It's not really a quest
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 11/97 (x86_64), 3/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170410.n.0):
ID: 80852 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_up
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 10:39:21PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 10:34:41PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 10:58:20PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > > As Omair pointed out the check should be skipped for any non-executable
> > > file. So c
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 10:34:41PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 10:58:20PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > As Omair pointed out the check should be skipped for any non-executable
> > file. So check
>
> $ ls -l /usr/lib64/afl/afl-llvm-rt-64.o
> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root r
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 02:23:44PM -0400, Omair Majid wrote:
> * Richard W.M. Jones [2017-04-13 12:01]:
> > So is there a way to get find-debuginfo.sh to tolerate these files?
> > (A cursory look at find-debuginfo.sh doesn't show anything obvious,
> > but I could be missing something). Or maybe t
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 10:58:20PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Right. That is not supposed to happen. ET_REL files (except kernel
> modules) should be skipped by the check.
>
> > While it's a bit odd that LLVM is using an object file instead of a
> > shared library, I guess it does that for ...
Hi Rich,
On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 16:59 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I'm trying to compile native LLVM support into American Fuzzy Lop.
> Unfortunately debuginfo generation fails with:
>
> + /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh --strict-build-id -m --run-dwz
> --dwz-low-mem-die-limit 1000 --dwz
Fedora now have cockpit, it is a nice shell for some administrative tasks
in the system
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 04/13/2017 09:59 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I'm trying to compile native LLVM support into American Fuzzy Lop.
> Unfortunately debuginfo generation fails with:
>
> + /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh --strict-build-id -m --run-dwz
> --dwz-low-mem-die-limit 1000 --dwz-max-die-limit 11
* Richard W.M. Jones [2017-04-13 12:01]:
> So is there a way to get find-debuginfo.sh to tolerate these files?
> (A cursory look at find-debuginfo.sh doesn't show anything obvious,
> but I could be missing something). Or maybe there's another way to
> solve this?
For a hacky workaround, does fin
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 04:06:37PM +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I try to maintain Wordpress and Roundcubemail,
> but I will prefer to have some co-owner on these.
>
> Especially to allow (security) update when I'm offline,
> or busy with some important downstream work (PHP).
>
> Feel free
Missing expected images:
Atomic qcow2 x86_64
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 12/110 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 26-20170412.n.0):
ID: 80671 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_updates_nfs
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/80671
ID: 80722
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 09:14 -0400, Christian Schaller wrote:
>> Actually isn't Cockpit our 'YAST', I mean it is not a 1to1 thing, but
>> for a lot of things Cockpit provides the featureset a sysadmin would
>> want.
>
We could always bring
Le 13/04/2017 à 18:48, Kevin Fenzi a écrit :
> I requested ACLs
Thanks Kevin :)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 04/12/2017 08:06 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I try to maintain Wordpress and Roundcubemail,
> but I will prefer to have some co-owner on these.
>
> Especially to allow (security) update when I'm offline,
> or busy with some important downstream work (PHP).
>
> Feel free to contact me, or
On 04/13/2017 11:59 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I'm trying to compile native LLVM support into American Fuzzy Lop.
> Unfortunately debuginfo generation fails with:
>
> + /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh --strict-build-id -m --run-dwz
> --dwz-low-mem-die-limit 1000 --dwz-max-die-limit 11
On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 09:14 -0400, Christian Schaller wrote:
> Actually isn't Cockpit our 'YAST', I mean it is not a 1to1 thing, but
> for a lot of things Cockpit provides the featureset a sysadmin would
> want.
Yeah, Cockpit is an interesting one. But I see it as being a sort of
webapp 'desktop e
On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 07:45 +, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 07:04:57AM -, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote:
> >
> > You seem to have missed this in Adam's email
>
> No, I don't missed anything.
>
> > i) just getting things right so we don't need a giant pile of
>
I have a trio of reviews looking for reviewers. I'll be happy to swap for
them. Two Python libraries, and an app that depends on them:
python-camel: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441841
python-yamlordereddictloader:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441842
linchpin: https
I'm trying to compile native LLVM support into American Fuzzy Lop.
Unfortunately debuginfo generation fails with:
+ /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh --strict-build-id -m --run-dwz
--dwz-low-mem-die-limit 1000 --dwz-max-die-limit 11000
/home/rjones/d/fedora/american-fuzzy-lop/master/afl-2.4
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 26 Branched 20170413.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 03:52:32PM +0200, Kai Engert wrote:
> In my opinion, a little bit of space saving shouldn't be a sufficient
> argument for removing existing security functionality.
Space saving is nice, but that's not the real issue. It's a given that
all security libraries will have criti
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 04:05 +, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote:
>> Hello, SUSE distributions have a system control panel that can configure
>> many aspects of the system. It is the best feature I saw in SUSE, it is very
>> interesting, useful
You either love YaST or you don't. The advantage is it's one stop
shopping. But like any shopping mall, it can be confusing to find what
you're looking for, and that lasts until you've successfully left the
parking lot.
It has a ton of options. Discoverability is a problem until you're
fairly fami
On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 04:05 +, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote:
> Hello, SUSE distributions have a system control panel that can configure many
> aspects of the system. It is the best feature I saw in SUSE, it is very
> interesting, useful and beneficial for all users.
>
> * Why Fedora does not
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2017-04-13 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. uitime):
Day: Thursday =
2017-04-13 09:00 PDT US/Pacifi
Actually isn't Cockpit our 'YAST', I mean it is not a 1to1 thing, but
for a lot of things Cockpit provides the featureset a sysadmin would
want.
Christian
- Original Message -
> From: "Adam Williamson"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 20
Once upon a time, David Woodhouse said:
> I'm not sure what reasoning there was for switching to OpenSSL instead
> of GnuTLS...?
I think the general idea is to move things to what upstream considers
the "preferred" library. If you had all the relevant -devel packages
installed and ran configure
On Thursday, April 13, 2017 10:45:13 David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-04-10 at 15:52 +0200, Kai Engert wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-04-10 at 15:31 +0200, Kamil Dudka wrote:
> > > Anyway, I guess we should move this discussion to some curl- or
> > > nss-related channel...
> >
> > The question rema
>
> "so we don't need" What is his mean about "WE" ?!
>
I believe "WE" should be read as the Community, and the Community includes a
lot of different type of users.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 11:57 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> that for example we run 20 servers on top of Fedora from mail, web, sfp
> over fileservers, routers, firewalls and *none* of them has GnuTLS
> installed at all - even not the build and deployment machine?
Ah, OK. I thought it was more
On Mon, 2017-04-10 at 15:52 +0200, Kai Engert wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-04-10 at 15:31 +0200, Kamil Dudka wrote:
> > Anyway, I guess we should move this discussion to some curl- or nss-related
> > channel...
>
> The question remains, if it makes sense to switch back to openssl, if the
> consequence i
On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 12:57 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > Also, wasn't there an issue with the OpenSSL's licensing and GPL?
> > > If it still is, could it affect any of the packages that are now using
> > > libcurl?
> > There is this: https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2017/03/22/license/
W
On Friday, April 07, 2017 18:46:33 Kai Engert wrote:
> You convinced me, that it would be good to have test cases to demonstrate
> how nss/openssl/gnutls are behaving related to the distrust rules.
>
> I setup the following page, wich provides multiple test cases, and
> intructions how to test:
>
Hi,
I have updated some LV2 related packages in F26, as announced some days
ago.
The packages are:
lv2
serd
sord
sratom
lilv
suil
FWIU any packages that depend on these should rebuild.
There are no soname bumps, so old packages should work fine, but you
could get enhancements if dependent packa
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 07:04:57AM -, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote:
>
> You seem to have missed this in Adam's email
No, I don't missed anything.
> i) just getting things right so we don't need a giant pile of
> configuration tools
> ii) tools written at more appropriate layers, mainly des
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 07:04:57AM -, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 04:05 +, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote:
> > Because we think it's fundamentally a wrong approach.
> >
> > It's not really a question of resources, but of not thinking this is
> > the correct appr
> On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 04:05 +, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote:
> Because we think it's fundamentally a wrong approach.
>
> It's not really a question of resources, but of not thinking this is
> the correct approach.
What is the correct approach?! Wasting lots of time on:
* reading bad-stru
41 matches
Mail list logo