Proposal [draft]: introduction default ld --as-needed and koji new functionality (Was: Re: Static libraries in Fedora distribution)

2017-03-16 Thread Tomasz Kłoczko
On 16 March 2017 at 22:11, Kevin Kofler wrote: [..] > FYI, this is what Mandriva (back then), now Mageia and OpenMandriva, have > been doing for years (and still do). > > https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Overlinking_issues_in_packaging > > > As long as I've done many times full recompilation on the sca

Fedora 26 Alpha 1.1 compose check report

2017-03-16 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Server dvd i386 Xfce raw-xz armhfp Server boot i386 Minimal raw-xz armhfp Failed openQA tests: 21/107 (x86_64), 1/2 (i386) ID: 66151 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/66151 ID: 66154 Test: x86

New packager, needing reviews for some GNOME Shell extensions

2017-03-16 Thread Andrew Toskin
I've just been sponsored into the packagers group, but I'm still fairly new. I started out with a few GNOME Shell extensions. I've been working on these for a little while now, and I believe they're ready to ship now -- I just need someone to do a final review, and then approve the packages. *

Re: spice-xpi not working in Firefox 52+

2017-03-16 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Thu, 2017-03-16 at 15:00 +0100, Juan Orti Alcaine wrote: > I guess this is going to be forever, as Firefox 52+ disables the > NPAPI plugins. Do you know any alternative? Is it a standard NPAPI plugin or a custom Firefox XPI extension? If it's just NPAPI then you could try Epiphany, the GNOME we

[Test-Announce] Fedora 26 Candidate Alpha-1.1 Available Now!

2017-03-16 Thread rawhide
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 26 Candidate Alpha-1.1 is now available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation testing! For more information on release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan Test coverage information for the c

Re: Default permissions on /dev/kvm

2017-03-16 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
As part of the discussion at the systemd bugtracker [1], people from Debian said that they prefer 0660 mode, group kvm, because this limits the exposure to kernel bugs in the kvm module. Those are not frequent, but they do happen, so it's hard to argue that increases security at least a bit. Curre

Fedora 26-20170316.n.0 compose check report

2017-03-16 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Server dvd i386 Server boot i386 Failed openQA tests: 16/108 (x86_64), 1/2 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in 26-20170315.n.0): ID: 65968 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/65

Fedora Rawhide-20170316.n.0 compose check report

2017-03-16 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Server dvd i386 Xfce raw-xz armhfp Server boot i386 Failed openQA tests: 9/107 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170315.n.0): ID: 65745 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tes

Re: Static libraries in Fedora distribution (Was: Re: [Help Wanted] PPC64LE build for thrift)

2017-03-16 Thread Kevin Kofler
Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > BuildRequires:qt5-qtbase*-static* There are a few small libraries that Qt upstream ships only as static, because they are not covered by the binary compatibility guarantees: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/qt5-qtbase.git/tree/qt5-qtbase.spec#n874 The main p

Re: Move Fedora 25 Vinagre / Weston dependency to FreeRDP 1.2 compatiblity package

2017-03-16 Thread Kevin Kofler
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > That seems fine, but compat-freerdp12 should've been named freerdp1.2, > according to current naming guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Naming#Multiple_packages_with_the_same_base_name Hmmm, "compat-" was always controversial, and I think

Re: Static libraries in Fedora distribution (Was: Re: [Help Wanted] PPC64LE build for thrift)

2017-03-16 Thread Kevin Kofler
Jonathan Wakely wrote: > If glibc-static was removed from Fedora and that change propagated to > RHEL I know of companies that might stop being customers of Red Hat. > > Being unable to statically link their applications would be a > showstopper for some, and would cause them to move to a differen

Re: Static libraries in Fedora distribution (Was: Re: [Help Wanted] PPC64LE build for thrift)

2017-03-16 Thread Kevin Kofler
Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > Long time ago I've been able to gain minimize number of dependencies by > injecting LDFLAGS="-Wl,--as-needed" into %configure macros. As on mean > time cmake emerged this move will be not so effective as it was decade > ago. Today I think that better solution could apply sma

Re: Gitignore configuration for packages

2017-03-16 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 03/16/2017 08:44 AM, Athos Ribeiro wrote: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:33:15PM +0100, Guido Aulisi wrote: >> Il giorno gio, 16/03/2017 alle 11.10 +, Tom Hughes ha scritto: >>> On 16/03/17 10:47, Guido Aulisi wrote: Il giorno gio, 16/03/2017 alle 10.38 +, Tom Hughes ha scritto: >

Re: How to fix 'E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/debug"' in cross-gcc?

2017-03-16 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 03/16/2017 08:47 AM, David Howells wrote: > Hi, > > When creating an update for cross-gcc, I see: > > cross-gcc.src:388: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/debug" > > from dist.rpmlint. > > cross-gcc's spec file does stuff to /usr/lib/debug because it's a compiler and > the debuginf

Re: Fedmsg notifications not work with this options

2017-03-16 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 2017-03-16 at 13:47 +0200, Cătălin George Feștilă wrote: > reported issue to https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedmsg-notify/issues/29 > > :) maybe I will got a badge Thanks for reporting it. There's also a bad redirect on the infrastructure side: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/

Re: Static libraries in Fedora distribution (Was: Re: [Help Wanted] PPC64LE build for thrift)

2017-03-16 Thread Josh Stone
On 03/15/2017 05:32 PM, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > ./r/rust.git/rust.spec:BuildRequires: llvm-static This one is conditional, generally disabled. We use it to break rust's bootstrap dependency when llvm is being rebased to a new soname. ___ devel mailing

Re: Static libraries in Fedora distribution (Was: Re: [Help Wanted] PPC64LE build for thrift)

2017-03-16 Thread Jan Kratochvil
On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 01:32:06 +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > OK here is full list of spec files which have glibc-static in BuildRequires: > > ./g/gdb.git/gdb.spec:BuildRequires: glibc-static%{bits_local} This is a false positive as it is enclosed by: %if 0%{?_with_testsuite:1} I have no i

Re: -Wno-format vs. -Werror=format-security

2017-03-16 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 02/27/2017 01:35 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > As you might know, redhat-rpm-config is adding -Wall -Werror=format-security > into $RPM_OPT_FLAGS/%{optflags} by default. > I've recently fixed a bug #1425825 where -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wall > or -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wform

Re: Rotation logs - use or not to use

2017-03-16 Thread Fernando Nasser
On 2017-03-16 2:04 PM, Samuel Rakitničan wrote: Cheers all, I'm trying to do something with a patch in MariaDB, but I need to know current situation about rotation logs. *What's the problem:* Upstream ship rotation log, we drop it out. This started sometimes between F15 and F16. Mostly because

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2017-03-17)

2017-03-16 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '20

Re: Rotation logs - use or not to use

2017-03-16 Thread Samuel Rakitničan
> Cheers all, > > I'm trying to do something with a patch in MariaDB, but I need to know > current situation about rotation logs. > > *What's the problem:* > Upstream ship rotation log, we drop it out. > This started sometimes between F15 and F16. Mostly because (for what I > read) Fedora didn't

Fedora 26 Alpha status is NO-GO

2017-03-16 Thread Jan Kurik
Release status of the Fedora 26 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting is NO-GO. Due to late blockers we are missing RC of Fedora 26 Alpha release. As such the decision is to slip the Fedora 26 Alpha release for one week. There is going to be one more Go/No-Go meeting the next Thursday, March 23rd, 2017 at 17:00

Outlook email suport

2017-03-16 Thread jhon6wirte
phone number Microsoft Outlook tech support phone number Microsoft Outlook support phone Number Microsoft Outlook tech support phone number Microsoft Outlook tech support phone phone number Microsoft Outlook tech support phone number Microsoft Outlook tech support phone Number Microsoft Outlook

Announce: Fedora Layered Image Release

2017-03-16 Thread Adam Miller
Hello all, On behalf of the Fedora Atomic WG[0] and Fedora Release Engineering[1], I am pleased to announce the latest Fedora Layered Image Release. This follows the latest Atomic Host Release that came out yesterday[2]. At this time the following Container Images are available in the Fedora R

Re: Static libraries in Fedora distribution (Was: Re: [Help Wanted] PPC64LE build for thrift)

2017-03-16 Thread Tomasz Kłoczko
On 16 March 2017 at 12:20, Jonathan Wakely wrote: [..] > I can only repeat that such people should consider linking own binaries >> against uClibc as this implementation is not affected by issue with hidden >> loading NSS DSOs which probably make such binaries useless on moving >> around >> again

Re: spice-xpi not working in Firefox 52+

2017-03-16 Thread M A Young
On Thu, 16 Mar 2017, Juan Orti Alcaine wrote: > Hi, it looks like the Spice XPI addon no longer works in Firefox 52. > > I guess this is going to be forever, as Firefox 52+ disables the NPAPI > plugins. Do you know any alternative? I manage a RHEV farm and this is going > to be a big deal. > > I

Re: spice-xpi not working in Firefox 52+

2017-03-16 Thread Juan Orti Alcaine
2017-03-16 15:00 GMT+01:00 Juan Orti Alcaine : > Hi, it looks like the Spice XPI addon no longer works in Firefox 52. > > I guess this is going to be forever, as Firefox 52+ disables the NPAPI > plugins. Do you know any alternative? I manage a RHEV farm and this is > going to be a big deal. > > If

How to fix 'E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/debug"' in cross-gcc?

2017-03-16 Thread David Howells
Hi, When creating an update for cross-gcc, I see: cross-gcc.src:388: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/debug" from dist.rpmlint. cross-gcc's spec file does stuff to /usr/lib/debug because it's a compiler and the debuginfo shouldn't be extracted from some of the compiled bits it ship

Re: Gitignore configuration for packages

2017-03-16 Thread Athos Ribeiro
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:33:15PM +0100, Guido Aulisi wrote: > Il giorno gio, 16/03/2017 alle 11.10 +, Tom Hughes ha scritto: > > On 16/03/17 10:47, Guido Aulisi wrote: > > > Il giorno gio, 16/03/2017 alle 10.38 +, Tom Hughes ha scritto: > > > > On 16/03/17 10:32, Guido Aulisi wrote: > > >

Unretire nodejs-grunt-contrib-copy

2017-03-16 Thread Randy Barlow
Hello! I would like to unretire nodejs-grunt-contrib-copy[0], and have filed a package re-review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432995 [0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432995 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part _

spice-xpi not working in Firefox 52+

2017-03-16 Thread Juan Orti Alcaine
Hi, it looks like the Spice XPI addon no longer works in Firefox 52. I guess this is going to be forever, as Firefox 52+ disables the NPAPI plugins. Do you know any alternative? I manage a RHEV farm and this is going to be a big deal. If there is no other alternative to open the Spice consoles fr

Re: Move Fedora 25 Vinagre / Weston dependency to FreeRDP 1.2 compatiblity package

2017-03-16 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 01:47:16PM +0100, Simone Caronni wrote: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/search?match=glob&type=package&terms=compat-* > > Shall we file a bug for all of them? I don't think it's worth the churn. Eventually, most of these will be retired and we'll move on with the new

Re: Move Fedora 25 Vinagre / Weston dependency to FreeRDP 1.2 compatiblity package

2017-03-16 Thread Simone Caronni
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 1:47 PM, Simone Caronni wrote: > > Ah, I missed that guidelines. I would need a re-review of it. > Re-review for the rename created: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432975 Dominik, I've added you in CC. Regards, --Simone -- You cannot discover new oceans

Re: Move Fedora 25 Vinagre / Weston dependency to FreeRDP 1.2 compatiblity package

2017-03-16 Thread Simone Caronni
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski < domi...@greysector.net> wrote: > Hello, Simone. > > On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 10:27, Simone Caronni wrote: > [...] > > Guacamole / Vinagre / Weston: latest 1.2 release (compat-freerdp12) > > Remmina: latest snapshot (freerdp) -

Re: Static libraries in Fedora distribution (Was: Re: [Help Wanted] PPC64LE build for thrift)

2017-03-16 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 15/03/17 19:26 +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: On 15 March 2017 at 18:53, Jonathan Wakely wrote: There are people who use the static libraries, for their own reasons, and don't expect support when they do so. I can only repeat that such people should consider linking own binaries against uC

Re: Move Fedora 25 Vinagre / Weston dependency to FreeRDP 1.2 compatiblity package

2017-03-16 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Hello, Simone. On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 10:27, Simone Caronni wrote: [...] > Guacamole / Vinagre / Weston: latest 1.2 release (compat-freerdp12) > Remmina: latest snapshot (freerdp) - usually the same date as the FreeRDP > snapshot. > > This would also allow me to close a lot of bugs related

Re: Fedmsg notifications not work with this options

2017-03-16 Thread Cătălin George Feștilă
reported issue to https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedmsg-notify/issues/29 :) maybe I will got a badge 2017-03-16 12:49 GMT+02:00 Cătălin George Feștilă : > Need to fix links from fedmsg-notify-config > > I think is need to fix this into package the corect link > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/v

Re: Gitignore configuration for packages

2017-03-16 Thread Guido Aulisi
Il giorno gio, 16/03/2017 alle 11.10 +, Tom Hughes ha scritto: > On 16/03/17 10:47, Guido Aulisi wrote: > > Il giorno gio, 16/03/2017 alle 10.38 +, Tom Hughes ha scritto: > > > On 16/03/17 10:32, Guido Aulisi wrote: > > > > > > > I was thinking about adding some default gitignores to packa

Re: Gitignore configuration for packages

2017-03-16 Thread Tom Hughes
On 16/03/17 10:47, Guido Aulisi wrote: Il giorno gio, 16/03/2017 alle 10.38 +, Tom Hughes ha scritto: On 16/03/17 10:32, Guido Aulisi wrote: I was thinking about adding some default gitignores to package repositories, I think we need at least: /results_* /*.src.rpm This is to ignore fedp

Re: Static libraries in Fedora distribution (Was: Re: [Help Wanted] PPC64LE build for thrift)

2017-03-16 Thread Tomasz Kłoczko
On 16 March 2017 at 04:50, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: [..] > > And one more clarification: remove static libraries from glibc distro > > packages does not blocks static linking. > > It will only removes possibility linking against static glibc libraries. > > Yes. This is a blocker for some people,

Re: Fedmsg notifications not work with this options

2017-03-16 Thread Cătălin George Feștilă
Need to fix links from fedmsg-notify-config I think is need to fix this into package the corect link https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/ The fedmsg-notify-config come with option on/off button and link to the notification event. Just click to the link about Fedora Elections and will give you t

Re: Gitignore configuration for packages

2017-03-16 Thread Guido Aulisi
Il giorno gio, 16/03/2017 alle 10.38 +, Tom Hughes ha scritto: > On 16/03/17 10:32, Guido Aulisi wrote: > > > I was thinking about adding some default gitignores to package > > repositories, I think we need at least: > > > > /results_* > > /*.src.rpm > > > > This is to ignore fedpkg mockbuil

Re: Gitignore configuration for packages

2017-03-16 Thread Tom Hughes
On 16/03/17 10:32, Guido Aulisi wrote: I was thinking about adding some default gitignores to package repositories, I think we need at least: /results_* /*.src.rpm This is to ignore fedpkg mockbuild output What do you think about that? Should I add that gitignore lines by myself in every pack

Gitignore configuration for packages

2017-03-16 Thread Guido Aulisi
Hi list, I was thinking about adding some default gitignores to package repositories, I think we need at least: /results_* /*.src.rpm This is to ignore fedpkg mockbuild output What do you think about that? Should I add that gitignore lines by myself in every package I manintain or should it be a

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide and 26): ldns (libldns.so.1 -> libldns.so.2)

2017-03-16 Thread Sinny Kumari
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 10:02 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 03/14/2017 12:15 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 06:35:17AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: >>> On Thu, 2017-03-09 at 15:10 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: ldns was updated from 1.6.17 to 1.7.0 for Rawhid

[Bug 1429902] perl-Net-Amazon-EC2-0.32 is available

2017-03-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1429902 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-Amazon-EC2-0.32-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ea29000e2c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

Move Fedora 25 Vinagre / Weston dependency to FreeRDP 1.2 compatiblity package

2017-03-16 Thread Simone Caronni
Hi all, I would like to move Vinagre / Weston in Fedora 25 to use the new FreeRDP 1.2 compatibility package that I created. This would allow me to update FreeRDP and Remmina to the same snapshot that is in Fedora 26/rawhide. Both of these things have been done already in Fedora 26/rawhide. FreeRD

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora 26 Alpha Release Readiness Meeting

2017-03-16 Thread jkurik
Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Fedora 26 Alpha Release Readiness Meeting on 2017-03-16 from 19:00:00 to 21:00:00 UTC At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: We will meet to make sure we are coordinated and ready for the Alpha release of Fedora 26.