Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> That seems fine, but compat-freerdp12 should've been named freerdp1.2,
> according to current naming guidelines:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Naming#Multiple_packages_with_the_same_base_name
Hmmm, "compat-" was always controversial, and I think it makes sense that it
was dropped, but when was the decision made to encourage using the dot? All
the existing packages were omitting dots in Name (e.g., gcc296, gcc33,
gcc34, etc.).
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
