Re: Call to retire gstreamer-0.10

2017-02-13 Thread Scott Talbert
On Tue, 31 Jan 2017, Sérgio Basto wrote: How about handling it the same way we handle old GtkWebKit versions? As soon as F26 is branched from Rawhide (expected in 2017-02-21), retire this package? This would give package maintainers enough time to get their packages fixed (about 9 months) until

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Office Hours

2017-02-13 Thread nils
Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Modularity Office Hours on 2017-02-14 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC At https://meet.jit.si/fedora-modularity The meeting will be about: This is where you ask the Fedora Modularity Team questions (and we try to answer them)! Join us [per vid

Re: Spec files maintained in external source control: *please* mention this in the spec file

2017-02-13 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 09:44:50AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! So I got bitten again today by the situation where the > primary contact for a given package considers the 'canonical' source > for the spec file to be some external SCM, and finds it a problem when > someone (e.g. a prove

Re: What if you only want to package part of upstream?

2017-02-13 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 08:46:19PM -0500, Randy Barlow wrote: > Hello! > > In working on packaging Ampache, I found a dependency that has a > bundled version of this file: > > https://github.com/kazuhikoarase/qrcode-generator/blob/master/js/qrcode.js > > I started working on doing the right thin

Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Container Minimal Image

2017-02-13 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 12:21 PM Matthew Miller > It is the DNF team. I have a hope that these will be fronted by a > command called "yum" which will implement close-to-full compatibility > with Yum Classic > Would be nice to have this available in general Fedora releases by default as well. The

What if you only want to package part of upstream?

2017-02-13 Thread Randy Barlow
Hello! In working on packaging Ampache, I found a dependency that has a bundled version of this file: https://github.com/kazuhikoarase/qrcode-generator/blob/master/js/qrcode.js I started working on doing the right thing and packaging that file separately, but it seems that the repository also ha

Re: BuildRequire debuginfo for debugging?

2017-02-13 Thread Sandro Mani
On 13.02.2017 21:35, Dan Horák wrote: ask Fedora infra guys for a ppc64/ppc64le VM and debug it locally? Well the debuginfo trick would have been a quick way to get a stacktrace, but sure, if there are any VMs available that would also work. ___ de

Re: Self Introduction: Yu Qi Zhang (yzhang)

2017-02-13 Thread Josh Berkus
On 02/13/2017 01:48 PM, Jerry Zhang wrote: > I am looking for sponsor/reviewers if anyone is interested. I also hope > to be more active in the fedora community in the future. Thank you! Wow, thank you for building these! -- -- Josh Berkus Project Atomic Red Hat OSAS

Self Introduction: Yu Qi Zhang (yzhang)

2017-02-13 Thread Jerry Zhang
Hello everyone, I am Yu Qi Zhang, a student from the University of Toronto. Currently I am an intern at Red Hat's Project Atomic - Platform Infrastructure team. For the past few months I have been working with Giuseppe on System Containers: read-only production containers intended to run systemd s

Re: BuildRequire debuginfo for debugging?

2017-02-13 Thread Dan Horák
On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 21:30:44 +0100 Sandro Mani wrote: > Hi > > I'm trying to gather a good stacktrace of a qbs crash on > aarch64/ppc64/ppc64le and I managed to collect something by prepending > > gdb -batch -ex "run" -ex "bt full" --args > > to the qbs calls. So far so good [1], but now I'm

BuildRequire debuginfo for debugging?

2017-02-13 Thread Sandro Mani
Hi I'm trying to gather a good stacktrace of a qbs crash on aarch64/ppc64/ppc64le and I managed to collect something by prepending gdb -batch -ex "run" -ex "bt full" --args to the qbs calls. So far so good [1], but now I'm wondering if there is a way to get some *-debuginfo packages installe

Re: hardlink building issue in F26 armv7hl and i686

2017-02-13 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2017-02-13 at 20:39 +0100, Francisco J. Tsao Santin wrote: > Hi all, > > We have a problem with the hardlink package. The koji build made by Fedora > Release Engineering failed in armv7hl and i686 architectures. I saw the logs > and I tried a mock build in my own machine too, the problem i

Re: hardlink building issue in F26 armv7hl and i686

2017-02-13 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2017-02-13 at 11:48 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2017-02-13 at 20:39 +0100, Francisco J. Tsao Santin wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > We have a problem with the hardlink package. The koji build made by Fedora > > Release Engineering failed in armv7hl and i686 architectures. I saw the

Re: hardlink building issue in F26 armv7hl and i686

2017-02-13 Thread Dan Horák
On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 20:39:00 +0100 (CET) "Francisco J. Tsao Santin" wrote: > Hi all, > > We have a problem with the hardlink package. The koji build made by > Fedora Release Engineering failed in armv7hl and i686 architectures. > I saw the logs and I tried a mock build in my own machine too, the

hardlink building issue in F26 armv7hl and i686

2017-02-13 Thread Francisco J. Tsao Santin
Hi all, We have a problem with the hardlink package. The koji build made by Fedora Release Engineering failed in armv7hl and i686 architectures. I saw the logs and I tried a mock build in my own machine too, the problem is always the same: + gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_F

Re: Attempt at building YafaRay

2017-02-13 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
Hello David, I noticed this error at list line + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-bytecompile /usr/bin/python 1 Compiling /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/YafaRay-3.2.0-0.2.20170212git.fc25.x86_64/usr/share/blender/2.78/scripts/addons/yafaray/ot/yafaray_presets.py ... File "/usr/share/blender/2.78/scripts/addo

Re: Fixing kmodtool / dropping kmodtool from redhat-rpm-config

2017-02-13 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 13-02-17 14:27, Stanislav Kozina wrote: >> >> Hello Hans, >> >> (adding some more folks on CC..) >> >> You've correctly mentioned one of the problems with the kmod tools, that >> there are several versions in a various stages of l

Spec files maintained in external source control: *please* mention this in the spec file

2017-02-13 Thread Adam Williamson
Hi folks! So I got bitten again today by the situation where the primary contact for a given package considers the 'canonical' source for the spec file to be some external SCM, and finds it a problem when someone (e.g. a provenpackager like me...) changes the package directly in dist-git. This is

Re: unheeded ACL requests

2017-02-13 Thread Globe Trotter
From: Matthias Runge To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 7:48 AM Subject: Re: unheeded ACL requests On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 03:05:04AM +, Globe Trotter wrote: > Hello, > > For a long time (almost 2 years), dilo (and a number of packages) have not

Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Container Minimal Image

2017-02-13 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2017-02-01 at 11:12 -0500, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > On 01/31/2017 09:54 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 09:00:01AM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote: > > > = Proposed Self Contained Change: Container Minimal Image = > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Containe

Re: heads up: update of python-docker-py to 2.x in rawhide

2017-02-13 Thread James Hogarth
On 13 February 2017 at 16:40, James Hogarth wrote: > On 13 February 2017 at 15:36, Tomas Tomecek wrote: >> Hello, >> >> am planning to update package python-docker-py from 1.x series to 2.x series >> in >> rawhide. The update should happen rather soon, so we're sure it gets to F26 >> (and >> he

Re: Fixing kmodtool / dropping kmodtool from redhat-rpm-config

2017-02-13 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 13-02-17 14:27, Stanislav Kozina wrote: Hello Hans, (adding some more folks on CC..) You've correctly mentioned one of the problems with the kmod tools, that there are several versions in a various stages of loneliness. The other problem is that the usage of them is not trivial, eg. t

Re: heads up: update of python-docker-py to 2.x in rawhide

2017-02-13 Thread James Hogarth
On 13 February 2017 at 15:36, Tomas Tomecek wrote: > Hello, > > am planning to update package python-docker-py from 1.x series to 2.x series > in > rawhide. The update should happen rather soon, so we're sure it gets to F26 > (and > hence we can have docker-compose 1.11 in F26). The reason this

Re: ceph / boost broken in koji Rawhide

2017-02-13 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 01:45:53PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Ken Dreyer wrote: > > My money's on ceph-debuginfo's horrible size. We have to bump HTTP > > server resource limits upstream to handle this, eg. > > https://github.com/ceph/chacra/issues/130 . > > WTF, how does ceph-debuginfo manage t

Re: Fedora 25 Respin 20170210 compose check report

2017-02-13 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2017-02-13 at 09:57 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > F25 Respin? What is this? https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/live-respins/ -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _

heads up: update of python-docker-py to 2.x in rawhide

2017-02-13 Thread Tomas Tomecek
Hello, am planning to update package python-docker-py from 1.x series to 2.x series in rawhide. The update should happen rather soon, so we're sure it gets to F26 (and hence we can have docker-compose 1.11 in F26). The reason this is important is that 2.x is not backwards compatible with 1.x. Here

Re: Fixing kmodtool / dropping kmodtool from redhat-rpm-config

2017-02-13 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Stanislav Kozina wrote: > Hello Hans, > > (adding some more folks on CC..) > > You've correctly mentioned one of the problems with the kmod tools, that > there are several versions in a various stages of loneliness. The other > problem is that the usage of them is

Re: Fixing kmodtool / dropping kmodtool from redhat-rpm-config

2017-02-13 Thread Stanislav Kozina
Hello Hans, (adding some more folks on CC..) You've correctly mentioned one of the problems with the kmod tools, that there are several versions in a various stages of loneliness. The other problem is that the usage of them is not trivial, eg. the %kernel_module_package macro (as the main use

Reviews Weekly

2017-02-13 Thread nobody
Start Date: 2017-02-06 10:08:02.397538 End Date: 2017-02-13 10:08:02.397538 Parag AN(पराग) : 7 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1411195 js-jquery-iframe-transport https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1420153 js-jquery-jstree https://bugzilla.redh

Re: unheeded ACL requests

2017-02-13 Thread Matthias Runge
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 03:05:04AM +, Globe Trotter wrote: > Hello, > > For a long time (almost 2 years), dilo (and a number of packages) have not > been updated. So, I decided to request commit privileges. But the request has > sat unheeded for the last several months. Unfortunately, this

Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2017-02-13)

2017-02-13 Thread opensource
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If y

Re: Fixing kmodtool / dropping kmodtool from redhat-rpm-config

2017-02-13 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 13-02-17 10:05, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: 2017-02-13 9:29 GMT+01:00 Hans de Goede : Hi all, redhat-rpm-config in Fedora still contains an ancient copy of kmodtool back from the days when Fedora allowed kmods directly into the main Fedora repo, rather then only allowing them in 3th party re

Re: Fixing kmodtool / dropping kmodtool from redhat-rpm-config

2017-02-13 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
2017-02-13 9:29 GMT+01:00 Hans de Goede : > Hi all, > > redhat-rpm-config in Fedora still contains an ancient copy of kmodtool > back from the days when Fedora allowed kmods directly into the main > Fedora repo, rather then only allowing them in 3th party repositories. > > Currently 3th party repos

Re: Fedora 25 Respin 20170210 compose check report

2017-02-13 Thread Vít Ondruch
F25 Respin? What is this? Vít Dne 10.2.2017 v 22:32 Fedora compose checker napsal(a): > Missing expected images: > > Xfce live x86_64 > Workstation live x86_64 > > Failed openQA tests: 1/11 (x86_64) > > ID: 56785 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi > URL: https://openqa.fedorapro

Fixing kmodtool / dropping kmodtool from redhat-rpm-config

2017-02-13 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi all, redhat-rpm-config in Fedora still contains an ancient copy of kmodtool back from the days when Fedora allowed kmods directly into the main Fedora repo, rather then only allowing them in 3th party repositories. Currently 3th party repositories like rpmfusion (I've put Nicolas and Leigh fr