Fedora Rawhide-20161105.n.2 compose check report

2016-11-05 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Kde live x86_64 Kde raw-xz armhfp Workstation live x86_64 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 15/79 (x86_64), 3/15 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20161031.n.0): ID: 45968 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso ins

Re: Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-11-04)

2016-11-05 Thread Josh Boyer
On Nov 5, 2016 6:54 AM, "Ms Sanchez" wrote: > > > Hello, > > I know that isn't the same and I'm not in FESCo, but I've seen this happening in other Fedora IRC meetings. Maybe is it symptom of something else? Don't think so. Many said they would be missing this week in advance. josh > > Cheers

Re: Private Bugzilla bugs

2016-11-05 Thread Christian Stadelmann
> The UID can actually matter. We have a frequently reported non-bug that > graphical KDE applications will not work (and abort with a qFatal, which > fires the SIGABRT signal) if you run them under tools like su or sudo > because they won't find some resources (usually the D-Bus session service

Re: Bodhi For Rawhide?

2016-11-05 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, 05 Nov 2016 04:44:05 +0100 Kevin Kofler wrote: > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Actually we have autosigning all setup, but it needs a fedpkg update > > flag day. (Which we hope to do after f25 is out). So, it doesn't > > depend on this feature. > > Why does a pure server-side feature (autosig

Fedora 25-20161105.n.0 compose check report

2016-11-05 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 7/101 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386) New failures (same test did not fail in 25-20161104.n.0): ID: 45744 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/45744 ID: 45745 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-i

Fedora 25 compose report: 20161105.n.0 changes

2016-11-05 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-25-20161104.n.0 NEW: Fedora-25-20161105.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:0.00 B Size of

Re: Strange mldonkey build error

2016-11-05 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 12:45:07PM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > Should be easy enough to cherry-pick the commit to all the branches and > push the fix without a new build so it doesn't catch the next person out. OK all fixed now, thanks. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat h

Re: BUG - Moving many files in Nautilus often takes a very long time to complete

2016-11-05 Thread Ms Sanchez
Hello Jack, I just commented and added the link you sent to your bug report. Hope this get solved soon. Cheers, Sylvia On 04/11/16 13:01, jack smith wrote: Hello, are you aware of this bug ? Moving many files in Nautilus often but not always takes a very long time to complete https://bug

Re: Strange mldonkey build error

2016-11-05 Thread Peter Robinson
On 5 Nov 2016 12:24, "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 12:12:37PM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > $ fedpkg build --target=f26-ocaml > > > Building mldonkey-3.1.5-10.fc26 for f26-ocaml > > > Created task: 16300957 > > > Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo

Re: Strange mldonkey build error

2016-11-05 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 12:12:37PM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > > $ fedpkg build --target=f26-ocaml > > Building mldonkey-3.1.5-10.fc26 for f26-ocaml > > Created task: 16300957 > > Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16300957 > > Watching tasks (this may be safely interr

Re: Strange mldonkey build error

2016-11-05 Thread Peter Robinson
> $ fedpkg build --target=f26-ocaml > Building mldonkey-3.1.5-10.fc26 for f26-ocaml > Created task: 16300957 > Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16300957 > Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... > 16300957 build (f26-ocaml, > /rpms/mldonkey:8013f45d7fdb60959

Re: Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-11-04)

2016-11-05 Thread Ms Sanchez
Hello, I know that isn't the same and I'm not in FESCo, but I've seen this happening in other Fedora IRC meetings. Maybe is it symptom of something else? Cheers, Sylvia On 04/11/16 17:14, Jared K. Smith wrote: On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Jared K. Smith mailto:jsm...@fedoraproject.o

Re: Python3-numpy

2016-11-05 Thread Ms Sanchez
Oh, perfect, thank you Cheers, Sylvia On 04/11/16 19:44, Christian Dersch wrote: Hi, for Fedora it is part (subpackage) of the regular numpy source package. So you can install python3-numpy there too ;) Greetings, Christian On 11/04/2016 07:42 PM, Ms Sanchez wrote: Hello everybody, I jus

Re: dnf should not update debuginfo if not updating packgages

2016-11-05 Thread Jan Kratochvil
On Sat, 05 Nov 2016 05:20:10 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Because -debuginfo is per SRPM, not per subpackage, so you can need the > -debuginfo without having all subpackages (or even the main package) > installed. There could be for example: Conflicts: %{name} != %{version}-%{release} But that ha

Strange mldonkey build error

2016-11-05 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
$ fedpkg build --target=f26-ocaml Building mldonkey-3.1.5-10.fc26 for f26-ocaml Created task: 16300957 Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16300957 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 16300957 build (f26-ocaml, /rpms/mldonkey:8013f45d7fdb6095949016e6135c6c

Re: [Fwd: Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: why the Group tag is obsolete ?]

2016-11-05 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Sérgio Basto wrote: >> yeah, so the group tag shouldn't be obsolete , we should use it as >> fallback . > > I don't see how the text you quoted support this in any way. None of the KDE > tools support the Group tag. (They never did.) > That's