On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 3:32 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > I had the talk [1] about Fedora Sponsorship process at Flock. And we had
> > very interesting follow-up discussion.
> >
> > We come up with several improvements, which should be easy to
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 12:24 AM, Parag Nemade wrote:
> Right not for all SIGs but at least for those where its possible. Just
> see there are many such common pattern named packages are waiting in
> queue for their package review. I can think of some patterns like
> perl, python, golang, nodejs,
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 1:49 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> On 08/05/2016 10:31 AM, Parag Nemade wrote:
>>> b) fedora-review is run automatically by some bot/script just after review
>>> have been submitted.
>>
>> Can a new utility be written for this as I don't think that long
>> fedora-revie
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 11:07 PM, wrote:
> Sometimes a maintainer doesn't want to approve ACLs for "reasons" but
> doesn't want to reject the request for various reasons including the
> requestor re-request of denied requests.
>
To add few things here,
1) Why do we need such "Pending ACLs"
On Sáb, 2016-08-06 at 20:40 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> >
> > Hello,
> > After Fedora 25 Mass Branching , should be mock update with fedora-
> > 25
> > configurations ?
> > Other question where I should ask it ? bugzilla ?
> bugzilla +1
Thanks, https://bugzilla.redhat.com
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hello,
> After Fedora 25 Mass Branching , should be mock update with fedora-25
> configurations ?
> Other question where I should ask it ? bugzilla ?
bugzilla +1
-- Rex
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@li
Peter Robinson wrote:
> There will be a slight change that a failure in an arch won't cancel
> the other arches and each one will run to completion (pass/fail) but
> the overall primary task will still fail.
I don't see how wasting Koji resources on completing an already failed build
helps anybod
Peter Robinson wrote:
> We are planning to change the way Alternate Architectures (non x86_64)
> are handled in terms of "primary" vs "secondary".
Let me repost here what I already posted at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1592#comment:14
There, I wrote:
| IMHO, it is entirely unacceptable
rkolathu wrote:
> Hi Bjorn,
>
> Thanks for the feedback
>
> It will be great if you could share your thoughts on improving the
> interface. It will be useful for incorporating that into our survey
> which ultimately will benefit the re-design process.
On my relation to Bodhi:
I've been using
Sent from my iPhonesA
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hello,
After Fedora 25 Mass Branching , should be mock update with fedora-25
configurations ?
Other question where I should ask it ? bugzilla ?
Thanks,
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.or
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 09:32:28AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> I had the talk [1] about Fedora Sponsorship process at Flock. And we
> had very interesting follow-up discussion.
So I kinda missed it, since for some reason, i tought this was
about financial sponsorship.
(Given that I forgot words
On 08/06/2016 05:36 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 03:48:36PM +0100, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 08:41:56PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>> Your email needs a "call to action" link, otherwise no one will know
>>> what they are supposed to
Sometimes a maintainer doesn't want to approve ACLs for "reasons" but doesn't
want to reject the request for various reasons including the requestor
re-request of denied requests.
Dennis
On August 5, 2016 3:34:58 PM GMT+02:00, Helio Chissini de Castro
wrote:
>I have a strong opinion over thi
On Sat, 6 Aug 2016 19:11:07 +0200
bitlord wrote:
> On Sat, 06 Aug 2016 15:26:12 -
> ba...@laposte.net wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > i use fortran in my university : is it possible to have the last GNU
> > fortran (version 6) integrated in the spin distribution !
> >
> gcc-gfortran package
On Sat, 06 Aug 2016 15:26:12 -
ba...@laposte.net wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i use fortran in my university : is it possible to have the last GNU
> fortran (version 6) integrated in the spin distribution !
>
gcc-gfortran package (6.1.x on >=f23)?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
h
On Sat, 6 Aug 2016 17:23:31 +0100
Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 04:36:34PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > I've checked again just now, and I still don't see those ACLs.
>
> My guess is that it's a PkgDB bug and for this reason I'm trying to
> get in touch with
On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 10:26:36AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Fabio Alessandro Locati
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 03:34:58PM +0200, Helio Chissini de Castro wrote:
> >> I have a strong opinion over this
> >>
> >> All the ACL's should be accepted, doesn't m
On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 04:36:34PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I've checked again just now, and I still don't see those ACLs.
My guess is that it's a PkgDB bug and for this reason I'm trying to get
in touch with Pingou.
Cheers,
Fale
--
Fabio Alessandro Locati
Red Hat - Senior Consultant
On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 03:48:36PM +0100, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 08:41:56PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Your email needs a "call to action" link, otherwise no one will know
> > what they are supposed to do about it. In this case it's probably:
> >
> >
Hello,
i use fortran in my university : is it possible to have the last GNU fortran
(version 6) integrated in the spin distribution !
bests regards
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> On the subject of RISC-V, I'm still plugging away at this. It's
>>> rather slow going, but you can take a look at:
>>>
>>> http://git.annexia.org/?p=fedora-riscv.git;a=summary
>>>
>>> There is nothing much usable at the moment, and many stumbling blocks.
>>
>>
>> Yes, but this is an "experim
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 08:41:56PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Your email needs a "call to action" link, otherwise no one will know
> what they are supposed to do about it. In this case it's probably:
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acl/pending/
>
> However I visited the above
Hello everyone,
As promised in the previous email thread, I've updated my db with today
dump and I've improved the query to exclude watchbugzilla and
watchcommits reuqests.
Please take care of your ACL requests!
You should be able to see those in:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acl/pend
On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Fabio Alessandro Locati
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 03:34:58PM +0200, Helio Chissini de Castro wrote:
>> I have a strong opinion over this
>>
>> All the ACL's should be accepted, doesn't matter the level.
>> And why i think of this ?
>>
>> Two simple reasons:
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 03:34:58PM +0200, Helio Chissini de Castro wrote:
> I have a strong opinion over this
>
> All the ACL's should be accepted, doesn't matter the level.
> And why i think of this ?
>
> Two simple reasons:
> - The packager abandoned the package, because several reasons, and th
On Sat, 6 Aug 2016 07:24:51 +0100
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 04:29:19PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Aug 2016 22:10:14 +0100
> > "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> >
> > > I might have imagined this, but I'm sure I read that the Fedora
> > > Project reserves a
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 25 Branched 20160806.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
28 matches
Mail list logo
