>
>
> rpms/hawaii-icon-theme -- Icon themes for Hawaii desktop environment (
> master f24 f23 f22 )
>
>
Took this package
--
Out of the box experience
http://hawaiios.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject
On 27/02/16 04:51, Dave Johansen wrote:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/daveisfera/devtoolset2/epel-6-x86_64/00163443-devtoolset-2-valgrind/build.log.gz
It looks like the valgrind build process is doing some sort of check
against the kernel version and that's returning the versio
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 8:10 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> rpms/zopfli -- Zlib compatible better compressor ( master f24 f23 f22 )
Took this one.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/daveisfera/devtoolset2/epel-6-x86_64/00163443-devtoolset-2-valgrind/build.log.gz
It looks like the valgrind build process is doing some sort of check
against the kernel version and that's returning the version of the
underlying OS and not that of EL 6
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 8:56 PM, Dave Johansen
wrote:
> Is there a way to remove builds from a COPR? Or even to just clear it out
> and start over?
>
Nevermind, I thought I was logged in but I guess I wasn't. I now see a
Delete button.
Sorry for the noise,
Dave
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.
Is there a way to remove builds from a COPR? Or even to just clear it out
and start over?
Thanks,
Dave
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Friday, February 26, 2016 08:08:56 PM Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> = DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =
> Package: scilab-6.0.0-0.1.beta1.fc25
> Old package: scilab-6.0.0-0.3.alpha2.fc24
> Summary: Scientific software package for numerical computations
> RPMs: scilab scilab-devel scilab
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160226.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160226.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 75
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 165.45 KiB
Size of dropped packages:263.63 KiB
Size of upgraded packages: 1.10 GiB
Reasons:
- it's effectively dead upstream (and has been for about 5 years...)
- it has a variety of crashers I haven't gotten around to finding time to fix
- I don't really use it any more anyways
Suggestions: use hexchat, or polari, or irccloud, or really anything else.
Or take it if you want
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 7:22 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 22, 2016 7:14 AM, "Neal Gompa" wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:11 AM, Ondřej Vašík wrote:
>>> > Ville Skyttä píše v Po 22. 02. 2016 v 14:12 +0200:
>>> >> On Mon
Hello,
I'm orphaning nmon since I'm not using it anymore.
Best regards.
- Athmane
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
I've taken:
dmenu
i3
i3-ipc
i3lock
i3status
Greetings,
Christian
On 02/26/2016 07:20 PM, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> I have orphaned all these packages now.
>>
>> Please take on any that you wish to be point of contact on.
>
> I've t
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I have orphaned all these packages now.
>
> Please take on any that you wish to be point of contact on.
I've taken some package I use:
lynis
pcapfix
python-pefile
unhide
Best regards.
- Athmane
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedo
I have orphaned all these packages now.
Please take on any that you wish to be point of contact on.
I've taken libowfat (I need this for opentracker which we use on
torrent.fedoraproject.org), co-maintainers welcome.
kevin
--
rpms/2ping -- Bi-directional ping utility ( master f24 f23 f22 ep
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2016-02-26)
===
Meeting started by dgilmore at 17:01:12 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-02-26/fesco.2016-02-26-17.01.log.html
.
Meeting summary
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285421
Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|i...@cicku.me |extras-orphan@fedoraproj
On Sex, 2016-02-26 at 16:28 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 07:59:17AM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> >
> > On 02/26/2016 01:50 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 05:06:58AM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Qui, 2016-02-25 a
On 22/02/16 06:54, Courtney Pacheco wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've spent some time trying to minimize the footprint of the Fedora
> docker base image. Overall, I managed to reduce its size by 39.9%.
Excellent.
You might want to keep in mind the use of "coreutils-single"
for Fedora 24 (or backpo
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Friday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2016-02-26 17:00 UTC'
Links to all tickets below c
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 08:33:10AM -0500, Honza Šilhan wrote:
> > From: "Dennis Gilmore"
> >
> > I have unpushed from f24 and rawhide dnf-1.1.7-1 and revoked the requests
> > for
> > updates. The main reason being that the api changed ina way that broke our
> > ability to create install media.
>
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Greg Hellings wrote:
> I have three outstanding reviews that I'd like to push through so I
> can work out the next layer of my dependency tree. I'd be happy to
> swap reviews with someone. Links below:
>
> rubygem-async_sinatra https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug
Hi,
On 26-02-16 11:51, Peter Robinson wrote:
Peter Robinson wrote:
It's an issue we see occasionally where the package thinks it knows
better than the explicit CFLAGs being set, I'll get it sorted out.
But why are those intrinsics now requiring NEON at all? Those are GCC byte
swap intrinsics
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 8:54 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 26 February 2016 at 13:25, Parag Nemade wrote:
>> Please have a look at New Langpacks Change[1] information.
>
> Thanks for the information -- this looks a lot better than the current
> logic and so a huge thanks for driving this. O
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 08:56:27AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 02/26/2016 08:39 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Dne 26.2.2016 v 11:20 Carlos O'Donell napsal(a):
> >> No languages are available by default, we did this because otherwise
> >> you keep carrying forward locales that you can't rem
On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 10:06 -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> Correct, 'glibc-all-langpacks' will solve the problem immediately.
OK, I've added this to comps, to take care of new installs. If anyone
implements support for language pack installation in both gnome-
initial-setup and gnome-control-cent
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 07:59:17AM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 02/26/2016 01:50 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 05:06:58AM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >>On Qui, 2016-02-25 at 10:56 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >>>On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:46:55 -0500
> >>>Martin Langhof
On 26 February 2016 at 13:25, Parag Nemade wrote:
> Please have a look at New Langpacks Change[1] information.
Thanks for the information -- this looks a lot better than the current
logic and so a huge thanks for driving this. One more question: Would
you be against me adding (translated) metainf
On 02/26/2016 09:44 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 12:25 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
>> What happens if the user isn't using DNF? For the workstation we have
>> to support users using just the graphical tools, and we can't rely on
>> command line tools for this kind of thing.
On 02/26/2016 01:50 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 05:06:58AM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Qui, 2016-02-25 at 10:56 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:46:55 -0500
Martin Langhoff wrote:
Hoping to raise the profile of BZ#1311814 ; seems to break anything
On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 12:25 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> What happens if the user isn't using DNF? For the workstation we have
> to support users using just the graphical tools, and we can't rely on
> command line tools for this kind of thing. I'm happy to add support
> for installing lang packs
Hi all,
Please fine the last two days rawhide reports
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20160225.n.0/logs/changelog-Fedora-Rawhide-20160225.n.0.verbose
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20160226.n.0/logs/changelog-Fedora-Rawhide
On 02/26/2016 07:33 AM, Parag Nemade wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>> On 02/26/2016 04:47 AM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>>> The glibc in Fedora rawhide and F24 is now split by
>>> language packs. We have over 180 supported languages
>>> in glibc, and those
On 02/26/2016 08:39 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 26.2.2016 v 11:20 Carlos O'Donell napsal(a):
>> No languages are available by default, we did this because otherwise
>> you keep carrying forward locales that you can't remove.
>
> For this reasons we have weak dependencies. I guess that:
> Rec
Dne 26.2.2016 v 11:20 Carlos O'Donell napsal(a):
> No languages are available by default, we did this because otherwise
> you keep carrying forward locales that you can't remove.
For this reasons we have weak dependencies. I guess that:
Recommends: glibc-all-langpacks
can do the work (install or
> From: "Dennis Gilmore"
>
> I have unpushed from f24 and rawhide dnf-1.1.7-1 and revoked the requests for
> updates. The main reason being that the api changed ina way that broke our
> ability to create install media.
>
> lorax --product=Fedora --version=24 --release=24
> --source=file:///mnt/ko
Hi Richard,
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:55 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 26 February 2016 at 09:47, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>> We have over 180 supported languages
>> in glibc, and those have been split into langpacks
>> for transparent install and support via dnf.
>
> What happens if the user isn
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On 02/26/2016 04:47 AM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>> The glibc in Fedora rawhide and F24 is now split by
>> language packs. We have over 180 supported languages
>> in glibc, and those have been split into langpacks
>> for transparent inst
> What happens if the user isn't using DNF? For the workstation we have
> to support users using just the graphical tools, and we can't rely on
> command line tools for this kind of thing. I'm happy to add support
> for installing lang packs into gnome-software but need to know how the
> langpack p
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:39:02 +
José Matos wrote:
> On Friday, February 26, 2016 11:58:38 AM Dan Horák wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > seems there was a new build of armadillo in the last days that broke
> > at least gdal in F-22 and F-23
> >
> > from http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?task
On 26 February 2016 at 09:47, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> We have over 180 supported languages
> in glibc, and those have been split into langpacks
> for transparent install and support via dnf.
What happens if the user isn't using DNF? For the workstation we have
to support users using just the gra
On Friday, February 26, 2016 11:58:38 AM Dan Horák wrote:
> Hi,
>
> seems there was a new build of armadillo in the last days that broke
> at least gdal in F-22 and F-23
>
> from http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13135380
> ...
> DEBUG util.py:399: Error: Package: gdal-libs-1.1
Hi,
seems there was a new build of armadillo in the last days that broke
at least gdal in F-22 and F-23
from http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13135380
...
DEBUG util.py:399: Error: Package: gdal-libs-1.11.4-1.fc22.x86_64 (build)
DEBUG util.py:399: Requires: libarma
>> Peter Robinson wrote:
>>> It's an issue we see occasionally where the package thinks it knows
>>> better than the explicit CFLAGs being set, I'll get it sorted out.
>>
>> But why are those intrinsics now requiring NEON at all? Those are GCC byte
>> swap intrinsics documented as being architectur
On 02/26/2016 04:47 AM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> The glibc in Fedora rawhide and F24 is now split by
> language packs. We have over 180 supported languages
> in glibc, and those have been split into langpacks
> for transparent install and support via dnf. This
> greatly reduces the size of a glibc
On 02/26/2016 05:02 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> You also forget to mention what Rawhide users are supposed to do.
>
> I assume that I should do:
>
> # dnf install langpacks-cs
>
> to have only czech language available and English should be available by
> default, right?
No languages are available
You also forget to mention what Rawhide users are supposed to do.
I assume that I should do:
# dnf install langpacks-cs
to have only czech language available and English should be available by
default, right?
Vít
Dne 26.2.2016 v 10:47 Carlos O'Donell napsal(a):
> The glibc in Fedora rawhide
The glibc in Fedora rawhide and F24 is now split by
language packs. We have over 180 supported languages
in glibc, and those have been split into langpacks
for transparent install and support via dnf. This
greatly reduces the size of a glibc install from 130MB
down to a couple of megs. It drops sup
On Thu 25 Feb 2016 08:04:44 PM CET "Richard W.M. Jones"
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 07:54:57PM +0100, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
>> On Thu 25 Feb 2016 06:22:26 PM CET Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> > On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 18:00:09 +0100
>> > Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Thu 25 Feb 2016
On 02/18/2016 08:37 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Peter Robinson wrote:
>> It's an issue we see occasionally where the package thinks it knows
>> better than the explicit CFLAGs being set, I'll get it sorted out.
>
> But why are those intrinsics now requiring NEON at all? Those are GCC byte
> swap in
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 05:06:58AM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Qui, 2016-02-25 at 10:56 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:46:55 -0500
> > Martin Langhoff wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Hoping to raise the profile of BZ#1311814 ; seems to break anything
> > > that requires graphviz
50 matches
Mail list logo
