On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 7:22 AM, Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Andrew Lutomirski <l...@mit.edu> wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 22, 2016 7:14 AM, "Neal Gompa" <ngomp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:11 AM, Ondřej Vašík <ova...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> > Ville Skyttä píše v Po 22. 02. 2016 v 14:12 +0200:
>>> >> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Thomas Moschny
>>> >> <thomas.mosc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> > However, for the same reasons, shouldn't the filesystem package also
>>> >> > own the "new" /usr/share/bash-completion/completions location?
>>> >>
>>> >> Why not. Note however that if going this route, the dirs
>>> >> /usr/share/bash-completion and /usr/share/bash-completion/helpers
>>> >> should be owned by it as well.
>>> >
>>> > Hmmms, makes sense... will add the ownerships in next rawhide filesystem
>>> > package build.
>>> >
>>> > Regards,
>>> > Ondrej
>>> >
>>>
>>> If you're doing that, you might as well do the same for the other
>>> shells we support completions for (zsh, fish, etc.).
>>
>> Fish is slightly in flux here, so maybe wait a little bit on that one? I'll
>> file a bug when the dust settles.
>>
>
> Okay, wait a bit on fish, but afaik, zsh and ksh have completion
> directories. I'm a bit hazy on ksh, but I know zsh does.
>
Can you make filesystem own:
/usr/share/fish/vendor_completions.d
(Actually, it should probably be:
%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fish/vendor_completions.d
which is roughly the same thing)
Later on, we'll want vendor_conf.d, too, but that feature isn't a
clean backport, so I'll probably wait for a new upstream release. If
you need to coordinate
with the fish package to avoid a conflict, ping me off-list.
Thanks!
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
