On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 05:32:50AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 01/27/2016 01:22 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 12:51:03PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >>On 01/27/2016 11:32 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> >>>Hi, Ralf.
> >>>
> >>>On Wednesday, 27 January
On 01/26/2016 12:48 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
This can bring bugs because, as noted in the orignal message, some
people use to change wrong permissions coming from %install section.
Can you give a concrete example where doing this actually acco
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 7:59 AM, Josh Boyer
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 7:51 AM, Martin Stransky
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > does anyone use the xulrunner package? (and gecko-devel actually).
> Mozilla
> > does not maintain it any more and the XUL as technology is going to be
> > removed/depre
On 01/27/2016 10:13 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
"RC" == Ralf Corsepius writes:
RC> Are you sure the owners list you used is current?
I pulled them directly from pkgdb at the time I generated the list.
There's no way that they could have been any more current when I sent
the mail.
I real
On 01/27/2016 09:37 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 January 2016 at 12:51, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 01/27/2016 11:32 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Hi, Ralf.
On Wednesday, 27 January 2016 at 09:28, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 01/25/2016 11:34 PM, Jason L Tib
On 01/27/2016 01:22 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 12:51:03PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 01/27/2016 11:32 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Hi, Ralf.
On Wednesday, 27 January 2016 at 09:28, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 01/25/2016 11:34 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III
On 25/01/16 19:43 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> I think that the "gateway" override should not be conflated with
> always letting the gethostname(2) return value resolve.
>
> I also think that the whole gethostname(2) mechanism is terminally
> screwed up. We abuse the hostname for multiple pu
> "RC" == Ralf Corsepius writes:
RC> Are you sure the owners list you used is current?
I pulled them directly from pkgdb at the time I generated the list.
There's no way that they could have been any more current when I sent
the mail.
- J<
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.or
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2016-01-28 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2016-01-28 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PST
2016-01-28 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EST
2016-01-28 1
On Wednesday, 27 January 2016 at 12:51, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 01/27/2016 11:32 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> >Hi, Ralf.
> >
> >On Wednesday, 27 January 2016 at 09:28, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >>On 01/25/2016 11:34 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>
> >>>fakeroot (athimm, rathann
On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 19:28 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 01/27/2016 06:26 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 09:11 +0100, Martin Stransky wrote:
> > > Will exist a browser which can run this plugin? Firefox is going
> > > to
> > > remove NPAPI plugin support (it's disabled b
On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 11:35 -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> What can use the plugins if the major user no longer does?
Nothing. You should switch to using HTML 5 technologies. Chrome dropped
support for NPAPI already. Firefox will drop support by the end of the
year. This has been in the maki
Whoops, chess-scene is not part of the convenience library, so that has
nothing to do with this issue. Totally wrong about that, sorry.
On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 08:39 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> It seems that g_cclosure_user_marshal_ENUM__VOID invokes the callback
> with an int return value, but t
On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 01:37 -0600, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> Not that I'm sure what the root cause is but sounds a bit like what
> sugar-toolkit-gtk3 did that that comes to the top of my head:
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15309
>
> JerryV
I think your problem here is differ
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 06:41:55PM +, Richard Hughes wrote:
>> On 27 January 2016 at 18:35, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> > What can use the plugins if the major user no longer does? Don't the other
>> > tools rely on xulrunner to use
On 27 January 2016 at 18:53, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> So why is all this functionality being removed? What is supposed to
> replace NPAPI, and can our plugins be modified to work with whatever
> that new thing is?
https://www.chromium.org/developers/npapi-deprecation -- for GNOME
Software our pla
On 01/27/2016 07:28 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> As for building NPAPI plugins, there's a separate project that only
> ships the required headers. I've forgotten what it's called, but Debian
> uses it to build their NPAPI plugins and it probably needs just
> packaging up if the plan is to drop xulrunn
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 06:41:55PM +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 27 January 2016 at 18:35, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > What can use the plugins if the major user no longer does? Don't the other
> > tools rely on xulrunner to use the plugons
>
> I'm kinda thinking of removing the PackageKi
On 27 January 2016 at 18:35, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> What can use the plugins if the major user no longer does? Don't the other
> tools rely on xulrunner to use the plugons
I'm kinda thinking of removing the PackageKit plugin from Fedora just
because of this; if it exists and doesn't work,
On Jan 27, 2016 12:26, "Michael Catanzaro" wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 09:11 +0100, Martin Stransky wrote:
> > Will exist a browser which can run this plugin? Firefox is going to
> > remove NPAPI plugin support (it's disabled by default now), Chrome
> > already did so. Does Web (Epiphany) run
On 01/27/2016 06:26 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 09:11 +0100, Martin Stransky wrote:
>> Will exist a browser which can run this plugin? Firefox is going to
>> remove NPAPI plugin support (it's disabled by default now), Chrome
>> already did so. Does Web (Epiphany) run NPAP
On Jan 27, 2016 11:26, "Neal Gompa" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > LLVM upstream is (eventually) dropping their autotools build system in
> > favor of their cmake buildsystem. This wouldn't normally be something
> > you'd notice, but the two produce different
Missing expected images:
Kde disk raw armhfp
Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20160126:
Design_suite live x86_64
Design_suite live i386
No images in Rawhide 20160126 but not this.
Failed openQA tests: 17 of 69
ID: 4417Test: i386 workstation_live default_install
URL: https://open
On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 11:25 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> Aren't clang, lldb, and compiler-rt still part of the main LLVM
> package sources, though? It would make sense to continue building them
> as part of the LLVM package since they ship together.
They're distributed as separate tarballs, if that
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016, at 12:45 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> pygobject3 -- Python 2 bindings for GObject Introspection ( master f23 f22 )
In practice this is mostly a mirror of upstream that has automatic commits
from kalev, but I'll take it as primary point of contact for any downstream
issues.
If
Due to several fesco tickets and bugzilla requests, there's a number of
packages in the last week that have become orphaned and need a new
point of contact if they want to stay in the package collection.
Please do look over these and see if you are interested in taking them
on:
poco: C++ class
On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 09:11 +0100, Martin Stransky wrote:
> Will exist a browser which can run this plugin? Firefox is going to
> remove NPAPI plugin support (it's disabled by default now), Chrome
> already did so. Does Web (Epiphany) run NPAPI?
Yes, we intend to continue supporting NPAPI plugin
LLVM upstream is (eventually) dropping their autotools build system in
favor of their cmake buildsystem. This wouldn't normally be something
you'd notice, but the two produce different sets of shared libraries,
autotools gave you one big libLLVM and cmake gives you lots of
individual libraries.
Th
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> LLVM upstream is (eventually) dropping their autotools build system in
> favor of their cmake buildsystem. This wouldn't normally be something
> you'd notice, but the two produce different sets of shared libraries,
> autotools gave you one bi
Hello Gil,
Thank you!
As i'm not in java SIG and my java skills are basic (I just know how to
avoid it), it is probably not the best option to do a formal review of it.
I'll follow the guides for it but if something is not clear to me I think
the best would be to post an informal review in the t
Sorry for the noise
the right bug is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301589
.g
Il 26/01/2016 20:27, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto:
1) pgcenter - Top-like PostgreSQL statistics viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302053
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
h
Sorry for the noise
the right bug is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302003
.g
Il 27/01/2016 15:57, Christos Triantafyllidis ha scritto:
Hello,
I'm looking for a package review swap for a simple python package:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286867
Does anyone have
hi
take!
can you take this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302053
for me?
thanks in advance
.g
Il 27/01/2016 15:57, Christos Triantafyllidis ha scritto:
Hello,
I'm looking for a package review swap for a simple python package:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286867
Hello,
I'm looking for a package review swap for a simple python package:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286867
Does anyone have any similar package that needs review so that we can both
benefit?
Cheers,
Christos
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/27/2016 08:40 AM, Martin Bříza wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 14:35:56 +0100, Josh Boyer
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
>>> The correct name for this Change is "LiveUSBCreator as Primary
>>> Downloadable" instea
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Martin Bříza wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 14:35:56 +0100, Josh Boyer
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
>>>
>>> The correct name for this Change is "LiveUSBCreator as Primary
>>> Downloadable" instead of "LiveUserCreator as Primary Do
On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 14:35:56 +0100, Josh Boyer
wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
The correct name for this Change is "LiveUSBCreator as Primary
Downloadable" instead of "LiveUserCreator as Primary Downloadable". I
am sorry for the typo. The name has been fixed on the
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
> The correct name for this Change is "LiveUSBCreator as Primary
> Downloadable" instead of "LiveUserCreator as Primary Downloadable". I
> am sorry for the typo. The name has been fixed on the Wiki page as
> well.
I believe this Change is also Wor
The correct name for this Change is "LiveUSBCreator as Primary
Downloadable" instead of "LiveUserCreator as Primary Downloadable". I
am sorry for the typo. The name has been fixed on the Wiki page as
well.
Credit goes to Oyvind to catch this.
Regards,
Jan
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Jan Kur
Dne 26.1.2016 v 20:27 Mattias Ellert napsal(a):
> tis 2016-01-26 klockan 10:18 + skrev Peter Robinson:
> So it appears this thread was probably not enough. Which keeps us with
> interesting state where mock by default does not install weak
> dependencies where Koji installs them. It
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 12:51:03PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 01/27/2016 11:32 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> >Hi, Ralf.
> >
> >On Wednesday, 27 January 2016 at 09:28, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >>On 01/25/2016 11:34 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>
> >>>fakeroot (athimm, ratha
On 27/01/16 11:51, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 01/27/2016 11:32 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
The list is correct according to PackageDB. I don't rememeber if anyone
ever initiated the non-responsive packager process for athimm or
chitlesh.
I don't know if somebody filed one against a
On 01/27/2016 11:32 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Hi, Ralf.
On Wednesday, 27 January 2016 at 09:28, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 01/25/2016 11:34 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
fakeroot (athimm, rathann, corsepiu, moceap)
Are you sure the owners list you used is current? I stepped
Hi all,
Three CVEs were fixed in Nginx 1.8.1. I'd be very grateful for some
karma for the following updates.
(I pushed updates for them yesterday, but unfortunately the RPMs still
haven't hit updates-testing so you'll have to manually download the
nginx.rpm and nginx-filesystem.rpm from koji.)
F
On 2016-01-26, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>> "VS" == Ville Skyttä writes:
>VS> The original post's general case is the one immediately after
>VS> %files, that's what was grepped according to the poster.
>
> Yes, I limited the search to %defattr falling immediately after %files
> and setting
Hi, Ralf.
On Wednesday, 27 January 2016 at 09:28, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 01/25/2016 11:34 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>
> >fakeroot (athimm, rathann, corsepiu, moceap)
>
> Are you sure the owners list you used is current? I stepped down as
> fakeroot maintainer and removed myself many mo
= Proposed System Wide Change: LiveUserCreator as Primary Downloadable =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LUCasPrimaryDownloadable
Change owner(s):
* Jiri Eischmann
* Martin Briza
The new Fedora Liver USB Creator that is being finished has an
overhauled, more user friendly interface. Becau
On 01/25/2016 11:34 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
fakeroot (athimm, rathann, corsepiu, moceap)
Are you sure the owners list you used is current? I stepped down as
fakeroot maintainer and removed myself many months ago.
Also, I noticed a number of maintainers on your list, whose accounts
On 01/26/2016 06:48 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 26 January 2016 at 10:18, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On 2016-01-26 08:55, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 26 January 2016 at 12:51, Martin Stransky wrote:
does anyone use the xulrunner package? (and gecko-devel actually).
Mozilla
does not mainta
49 matches
Mail list logo
