On 18 Jan 2016 06:33, "Igor Gnatenko" wrote:
>
> I hope Heiko Adams and Reindl Harald should co-operate and write usable
and bug free package manager.
>
> Related to topic: Please prepare full list of bugs which you think
critical for you and write to each how to reproduce it.
>
> P.S. autoremove
I hope Heiko Adams and Reindl Harald should co-operate and write usable and
bug free package manager.
Related to topic: Please prepare full list of bugs which you think critical
for you and write to each how to reproduce it.
P.S. autoremove works here fine (fresh 23).
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016, 11:48
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 4:20 PM, David Shea wrote:
> Does anyone know how to contact Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams? I've been trying
> to contact him in regards to
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287273, and have also tried
> contacting him via the email address in bugzilla, and have not
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 2:24 AM, Tomáš Smetana wrote:
>
> I tend to use systemd-nspawn containers for building rpms. So for example,
> I
> have a Fedora 24 system and use its dnf to create e.g. Centos 7 container
> root and then build Centos rpms from within that container. If I
> understand
> t
On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 00:53:00 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
...snip...
>
> why?
>
> because you don't type "dnf install kernel" instead "dnf upgrade" and
> "kernel-headers" *is never installed* in multiple versions
Sure, you want upgrade/update to update installonly pkgs too.
In any case 'dnf
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 12:55:54AM +0100, Heiko Adams wrote:
> But it seems to be broken since Feb 2015, which is IMHO unacceptable
> since a default package manager and all of its features have to work
> absolutely reliable.
When was the last time you saw a program bigger then /bin/true that was
Am Montag, den 18.01.2016, 00:00 +0100 schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon:
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 11:48:23PM +0100, Heiko Adams wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, den 17.01.2016, 23:27 +0100 schrieb Reindl Harald:
> > > may i suggest to forget that dnf ever existed and switch back to
> > > yum?
> > >
> > > ongoing
Am 18.01.2016 um 00:48 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 00:01:13 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
...snip...
"dnf update *.rpm" is the way which has to work
Why? It works fine as a install. It's installing a new kernel, since
kernels can have many versions installed at a time it makes m
On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 00:01:13 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
...snip...
> "dnf update *.rpm" is the way which has to work
Why? It works fine as a install. It's installing a new kernel, since
kernels can have many versions installed at a time it makes more sense
for it to be a install than an upgrad
On Mon, 2016-01-18 at 00:00 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 11:48:23PM +0100, Heiko Adams wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, den 17.01.2016, 23:27 +0100 schrieb Reindl Harald:
> > > may i suggest to forget that dnf ever existed and switch back to
> > > yum?
> > >
> > > ongoing probl
Am 18.01.2016 um 00:08 schrieb Neal Gompa:
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 6:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.01.2016 um 23:54 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
I'd encourage you to re-read our code of conduct
( https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct ) and try and be more
respectful in bugs and here. We are a
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 6:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 17.01.2016 um 23:54 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
>>
>> I'd encourage you to re-read our code of conduct
>> ( https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct ) and try and be more
>> respectful in bugs and here. We are all trying to improve things, lets
Am 17.01.2016 um 23:54 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 23:27:02 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
for localupdate i switched back to yum-deprecated long ago, but for
ordinary kernel updates pretend unsolved deps is simply unacceptable
*no* i am not the only one - see karma comments for 4.
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 11:48:23PM +0100, Heiko Adams wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 17.01.2016, 23:27 +0100 schrieb Reindl Harald:
> > may i suggest to forget that dnf ever existed and switch back to yum?
> >
> > ongoing problems in the core-task solve dependencies is not
> > production
> > ready AND
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 23:27:02 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
> for localupdate i switched back to yum-deprecated long ago, but for
> ordinary kernel updates pretend unsolved deps is simply unacceptable
>
> *no* i am not the only one - see karma comments for 4.3.3-300.fc23
But your comment doesn't e
Am Sonntag, den 17.01.2016, 23:27 +0100 schrieb Reindl Harald:
> may i suggest to forget that dnf ever existed and switch back to yum?
>
> ongoing problems in the core-task solve dependencies is not
> production
> ready AND REMOVE THE DEPRECATED WARNINGS for "package-cleanup" and
> "yum-deprecat
for localupdate i switched back to yum-deprecated long ago, but for
ordinary kernel updates pretend unsolved deps is simply unacceptable
*no* i am not the only one - see karma comments for 4.3.3-300.fc23
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263888#c14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bu
On 17 January 2016 at 19:51, Mattia Verga wrote:
> Do also addons metainfo.xml files need to be validated in .spec file? I
> can't find anything about that on Packaging Guidelines.
Up to you; Kalev did try and get this validation automatic when
building rpms in koji. Kalev, did we stall on someth
Il 17/01/2016 18:58, Richard Hughes ha scritto:
Are you using non-breaking UTF-8 spaces perhaps? Have a look in vim
and see if it has lots of control chars showing. At the moment even
xmllint won't validate it. Richard.
Thanks, yes. That was the problem.
Using validate-relax now is ok.
Do als
kpmcore is now built in Rawhide.
Can I move ahead and retire KPMcore or should I wait some time before
doing that?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 10:42:07PM +0530, Kushal Das wrote:
> On 16/01/16, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Jan Kurik wrote:
> > > = Proposed Self Contained Change: Micro Bit =
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Micro_Bit
> > >
> > > Change owner(s):
> > > * Kus
On 17 January 2016 at 09:44, Mattia Verga wrote:
> Just curious: how can a metainfo.xml file be validated?
> I tried to use also appstream-util validate-relax, but it always fail:
> $ appstream-util validate-relax blenderplayer.metainfo.xml
> blenderplayer.metainfo.xml: failed to parse blenderplay
Hello list,
A while ago, I've created a Whirlpool hash function library [1] based on
the original implementation of Whirlpool algorithm by Vincent Rijmen and
Paulo S. L. M. Barreto.
It's packaged as 'libwhirlpool' in Fedora and EPEL [2].
Also provides 'whirlpoolsum' utility to calculate and check
On 16/01/16 13:34 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Here are a small collection of subject lines of emails sent
automatically to me by various Fedora systems in the past few days:
Subject: upgradepath PASSED for FEDORA-2015-850e89be8b
Subject: [Fedora Update] [comment] auto-buildrequires-1.2-1.f
On 16/01/16 21:54 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
Jonathan,
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Jonathan Wakely
wrote:
How soon will you be doing the rebuilds?
gazebo also needs to be rebuilt for Boost 1.60, which I'm currently
doing in the f24-boost side tag. If you're going to be rebuilding it
soon
On 16/01/16, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Jan Kurik wrote:
> > = Proposed Self Contained Change: Micro Bit =
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Micro_Bit
> >
> > Change owner(s):
> > * Kushal Das
> >
> > Enable the use of BBC Micro Bit on Fedora systems. Users
ants to grab it and have a look, you can get the failing
image at:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide-20160117/rawhide/x86_64/os/images/boot.iso
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassa
Missing expected images:
Kde disk raw armhfp
Cloud disk raw i386
Cloud disk raw x86_64
Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64
Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20160116:
Design_suite live x86_64
Workstation live x86_64
Workstation live i386
Cinnamon live i386
Mate live i386
Workstation disk raw armhf
> eclipse-findbugs (richardfearn)
Fixed - thanks!
Richard
--
Richard Fearn
richardfe...@gmail.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Compose started at Sun Jan 17 05:15:02 UTC 2016
Broken deps for i386
--
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0
Just curious: how can a metainfo.xml file be validated?
I tried to use also appstream-util validate-relax, but it always fail:
$ appstream-util validate-relax blenderplayer.metainfo.xml
blenderplayer.metainfo.xml: failed to parse blenderplayer.metainfo.xml:
Errore alla riga 2 carattere 2: Il docu
31 matches
Mail list logo
