Cannot open logs of Taskotron jobs

Hi, I'm trying to open the logs of a couple of failed Taskotron jobs, but I get a forbidden error. These are the jobs: https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/resultsdb/results/5025942 https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/resultsdb/results/5025972 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-2

Re: Gradle Packaging

On 12/02/2015 09:16 PM, Dennis Chen wrote: > There are a couple of Java libraries that are built using the Gradle > system, which should have been incorporated in the F22 release. What is > the status of the use of Gradle in building packages for Fedora? It > seems that there are no macros specific

Re: redeclipse

Redirect to games Mailing List.  On Ter, 2015-12-01 at 12:04 +, mastaiza wu wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204600 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285313 -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/a

Re: RFC: switching from grubby to grub2-mkconfig

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Colin Walters wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015, at 10:30 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: >> Since the old proposal to have the bootloader automatically enumerate >> boot options never went anywhere, can we do the next best thing? >> >> Specifically, these days grub2-mkcon

Re: RFC: switching from grubby to grub2-mkconfig

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Josh Boyer > wrote: >> Maybe you could start by listing the problems you have with grubby >> (and apparently grub2) instead of just saying get rid of it? >> >> josh > > > My big pain point right now is that w

Re: RFC: switching from grubby to grub2-mkconfig

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 12:54:43PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: >> > >> > > Frankly, I'd like to see Fedora move away from grub2 even on x86. But >> > I'd >> > > also like to see grubby go away. >> > >> > Maybe you could start by listing the probl

Re: RFC: switching from grubby to grub2-mkconfig

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Josh Boyer >> wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: >

Re: RFC: switching from grubby to grub2-mkconfig

On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 12:54:43PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > > Frankly, I'd like to see Fedora move away from grub2 even on x86. But > > I'd > > > also like to see grubby go away. > > > > Maybe you could start by listing the problems you have with grubby > > (and apparently grub2) instead o

upgrade path

why in the world can the "offical" upgrade tools not handle things which are with "yum --releasever=XX distro-sync" or now "dnf --releasever=XX distro-sync" are a nobrainer for many years just because such packages are get *downgraded* implicitly and so the "release"-tag don't matter at all?

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2015-12-03 16:00 UTC)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2015-12-03 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. rktime): 2015-12-03 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PST 2015-12-03 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EST 2015-12-03 1

Re: Gradle Packaging

Il 02/12/2015 22:13, gil ha scritto: Il 02/12/2015 21:16, Dennis Chen ha scritto: There are a couple of Java libraries that are built using the Gradle system, which should have been incorporated in the F22 release. What is the status of the use of Gradle in building packages for Fedora? It s

Re: Gradle Packaging

Il 02/12/2015 21:16, Dennis Chen ha scritto: There are a couple of Java libraries that are built using the Gradle system, which should have been incorporated in the F22 release. What is the status of the use of Gradle in building packages for Fedora? It seems that there are no macros specific t

Re: RFC: switching from grubby to grub2-mkconfig

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Josh Boyer >>> wrote: And you would do that via a single command how? By wrapping

Re: RFC: switching from grubby to grub2-mkconfig

Am 02.12.2015 um 21:46 schrieb Andrew Lutomirski: The fact that you assert your absolute correctness on a frequent basis even when you're not correct makes me, and probably other people, likely to discount everything you say even in the cases when you are correct. If you want your opinion to b

Re: RFC: switching from grubby to grub2-mkconfig

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 02.12.2015 um 21:31 schrieb Andrew Lutomirski: >> >> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Reindl Harald >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Am 02.12.2015 um 21:16 schrieb Andrew Lutomirski: On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Josh Boyer

Re: RFC: switching from grubby to grub2-mkconfig

Am 02.12.2015 um 21:31 schrieb Andrew Lutomirski: On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 02.12.2015 um 21:16 schrieb Andrew Lutomirski: On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: That's a matter of preference. If I have a newer kernel version installed that d

Re: RFC: switching from grubby to grub2-mkconfig

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 02.12.2015 um 21:16 schrieb Andrew Lutomirski: >> >> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Josh Boyer >> wrote: >>> >>> That's a matter of preference. If I have a newer kernel version >>> installed that doesn't actually work, I want the o

Re: RFC: switching from grubby to grub2-mkconfig

Am 02.12.2015 um 21:16 schrieb Andrew Lutomirski: On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: That's a matter of preference. If I have a newer kernel version installed that doesn't actually work, I want the older kernel I _just_ installed to be the default and top entry so my machine

Re: relicensing mailing list?

On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 09:52:06 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I've set the list to reject all posts. Thank you! > Will check with the owner if it's still needed or if we can just remove > it now. Note that my initial mail had the two list owner addresses in Cc. > FYI, an infrastructure ticket migh

Gradle Packaging

There are a couple of Java libraries that are built using the Gradle system, which should have been incorporated in the F22 release. What is the status of the use of Gradle in building packages for Fedora? It seems that there are no macros specific to Gradle, and the Java distribution guidelines ra

Re: RFC: switching from grubby to grub2-mkconfig

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: >>> And you would do that via a single command how? By wrapping it in an >>> architecture/bootloader agnostic wrapper. Which is wha

Re: RFC: switching from grubby to grub2-mkconfig

Am 02.12.2015 um 20:35 schrieb Andrew Lutomirski: 1. grubby puts the most recently-installed kernel on top. grub2-mkconfig puts the highest version on top. In the cases where they differ, I'd argue that the latter is better it's not better it's pure crap when you have to downgrade because t

Re: RFC: switching from grubby to grub2-mkconfig

Am 02.12.2015 um 20:35 schrieb Andrew Lutomirski: On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: And you would do that via a single command how? By wrapping it in an architecture/bootloader agnostic wrapper. Which is what grubby is. But it's not. grubby does things like adding kernels

Re: RFC: switching from grubby to grub2-mkconfig

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: >>> >>> On Dec 2, 2015 8:38 AM, "Reindl Harald" wrote: Am 02.12.2015 um 17:23 schrieb Andrew Lutomirski:

Re: RFC: switching from grubby to grub2-mkconfig

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: >> >> On Dec 2, 2015 8:38 AM, "Reindl Harald" wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Am 02.12.2015 um 17:23 schrieb Andrew Lutomirski: On Dec 2, 2015 8:15 AM, "Josh Boyer" >>>

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2015-12-02)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2015-12-02) === Meeting started by paragan at 18:00:15 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-12-02/fesco.2015-12-02-18.00.log.html . Meeting summary --

Review Swap Request

Hello all, I would like to request a review for the OpenShift Origin package and would be happy to review someone else's package in return. origin - OpenShift Open Source Container Management by Red Hat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287822 Thank you, -AdamM -- devel mailing

Orphaned package available for new point of contact: yarock

Per request of the point of contact, I have orphaned the 'yarock' package, so it's looking for new maintainer(s). Note that the latest upstream may require some additional new packages be submitted. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213155 and https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticke

Re: RFC: switching from grubby to grub2-mkconfig

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > > > > On Dec 2, 2015 8:38 AM, "Reindl Harald" wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> Am 02.12.2015 um 17:23 schrieb Andrew Lutomirski: > >>> > >>> > >>> On Dec 2, 2015 8:15 AM, "Josh Boyer" >>>

Re: RFC: switching from grubby to grub2-mkconfig

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > > On Dec 2, 2015 8:38 AM, "Reindl Harald" wrote: >> >> >> >> Am 02.12.2015 um 17:23 schrieb Andrew Lutomirski: >>> >>> >>> On Dec 2, 2015 8:15 AM, "Josh Boyer" >> > wrote: >>> > >>> > On Tue, Dec 1, 20

Re: RFC: switching from grubby to grub2-mkconfig

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015, at 10:30 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > Since the old proposal to have the bootloader automatically enumerate > boot options never went anywhere, can we do the next best thing? > > Specifically, these days grub2-mkconfig appears to produce output > that's functionally identica

Re: f23: How to capture the lid close event and ...

Someone can help me? I was able to do that with acpid via /etc/acpi/actions/ and /etc/acpi/events/, but now all is gone: it is arrived systemd Many thanks Il giorno mar, 01/12/2015 alle 21.04 +0100, Dario Lesca ha scritto: > ... do some action, like execute a custom shell, independently from > t

Re: LibreOffice packaging is a messy dependency graph

On 12/02/2015 07:04 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 12/02/2015 04:44 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote: On 12/02/2015 02:42 PM, David Tardon wrote: On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 02:20:34AM -0500, Dan Book wrote: I have run into this before and it was very confusing, it really should be a separate command from

BioPython: non-responsive maintainer

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi all, does anybody know how to contact 'python-biopython' maintainers? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274276 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285861 - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org ht

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2015-12-02)

There are two Changes for FESCo review opened by me, however I will not be able to attend today due to a meeting conflict. However I am going read updates in these tickets after the meeting. So, if there will be anything needed from my side, please put a comment into the ticket and I will answer it

Re: RFC: switching from grubby to grub2-mkconfig

On Dec 2, 2015 8:38 AM, "Reindl Harald" wrote: > > > > Am 02.12.2015 um 17:23 schrieb Andrew Lutomirski: >> >> >> On Dec 2, 2015 8:15 AM, "Josh Boyer" > > wrote: >> > >> > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:30 PM, Andrew Lutomirski > > wrote: >> > >

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2015-12-02)

Due to a business travel, I'll be missing this week meeting. I'll make sure to review all the tickets though. Regards, H. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: LibreOffice packaging is a messy dependency graph

On 12/02/2015 04:44 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote: On 12/02/2015 02:42 PM, David Tardon wrote: On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 02:20:34AM -0500, Dan Book wrote: I have run into this before and it was very confusing, it really should be a separate command from remove for when you actually want to remove wha

Re: relicensing mailing list?

On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 17:41:23 +0100 Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 11:17:50 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/relicensing > > > > It's not that scary. > > Not? Scary! ;-) 48+ months of archived spam links and still > collecting

Re: conditionalizing %license

Sérgio Basto writes: > On Ter, 2015-12-01 at 16:44 +, Dave Love wrote: >> What's the correct way to write a spec file that obeys the %license* >> stipulation but also works for epel6? >> >> Some time ago I was told to follow >> https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/411 and write >> >>   %{!?_

[Test-Announce]Fedora 21 End Of Life

As of the 1st of December 2015, Fedora 21 has reached its end of life for updates and support. No further updates, including security updates, will be available for Fedora 21. A previous reminder was sent on 27th of May [0]. Fedora 22 will continue to receive updates until approximately one month

holcapek pushed to perl-Log-Log4perl-Appender-Socket-UNIX (el6). "fixup! Fix EPEL6 build"

>From 451b876ce75aeb9d95c83d6585843507749e07d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Holcapek Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 17:41:47 +0100 Subject: fixup! Fix EPEL6 build --- perl-Log-Log4perl-Appender-Socket-UNIX.spec | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/perl-Log-Log4per

Re: relicensing mailing list?

On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 11:17:50 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/relicensing > > It's not that scary. Not? Scary! ;-) 48+ months of archived spam links and still collecting. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject

Re: RFC: switching from grubby to grub2-mkconfig

Am 02.12.2015 um 17:23 schrieb Andrew Lutomirski: On Dec 2, 2015 8:15 AM, "Josh Boyer" mailto:jwbo...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:30 PM, Andrew Lutomirski mailto:l...@mit.edu>> wrote: > > Since the old proposal to have the bootloader automatically enumerate > >

Re: RFC: switching from grubby to grub2-mkconfig

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:30 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: >> Since the old proposal to have the bootloader automatically enumerate >> boot options never went anywhere, can we do the next best thing? >> >> Specifically, these days grub2-mkconfig

Re: RFC: switching from grubby to grub2-mkconfig

On Dec 2, 2015 8:15 AM, "Josh Boyer" wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:30 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > > Since the old proposal to have the bootloader automatically enumerate > > boot options never went anywhere, can we do the next best thing? > > > > Specifically, these days grub2-mkconfig

Re: Bugzilla "Fedora Components" group

On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 10:56:24 + "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > I wonder if someone can remove the "Fedora Components" group from this > bug. (I cannot do it). > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286432 > > It has the effect of making the bug private, which we don't want and > d

Re: relicensing mailing list?

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > Scary: > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/relicensing > > No description. It's not that scary. In Oct 2011, there were a number of applications that Fedora developed that were being relicensed to GPLv2+. They needed

Re: RFC: switching from grubby to grub2-mkconfig

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:30 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > Since the old proposal to have the bootloader automatically enumerate > boot options never went anywhere, can we do the next best thing? > > Specifically, these days grub2-mkconfig appears to produce output > that's functionally identical

relicensing mailing list?

Scary: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/relicensing No description. Only spam since Oct 2011. Is it still being used? What purpose does it serve other than collecting spam? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lis

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

On 02.12.2015 14:03, Neal Becker wrote: > Neal Becker wrote: > >> P J P wrote: >> >>> Hello Neal, >>> On Wednesday, 2 December 2015 1:03 AM, Neal Becker wrote: For example, when I'm at work, I can access hostA.work.com where resolving hostA only works by talking to dnsserverA.work.c

Re: LibreOffice packaging is a messy dependency graph

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 8:42 AM, David Tardon wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 02:20:34AM -0500, Dan Book wrote: > > I have run into this before and it was very confusing, it really should > be > > a separate command from remove for when you actually want to remove what > > dnf thinks is n

Re: How to collect "bundled" virtual provide

On 12/02/2015 03:46 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dne 2.12.2015 v 15:30 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a): In accordance with the bundling policy, it *is* carrying a virtual Provides to allow us to identify whether it is affected by discovered CVEs. This

Fedora Rawhide 20151202 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud disk raw i386 Cloud disk raw x86_64 Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64 Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151201: Cloud docker x86_64 No images in Rawhide 20151201 but not this. -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-qa.git/t

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

> On Wednesday, 2 December 2015 6:33 PM, Neal Becker wrote: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287607 Thank you for filing the bug. > * howto prevent dnsmasq from starting (right now I'm just manually killing > it for testing) # systemctl disable dnsmasq > * howto get domai

Re: LibreOffice packaging is a messy dependency graph

On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 15:44 +0100, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > On 12/02/2015 02:42 PM, David Tardon wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 02:20:34AM -0500, Dan Book wrote: > > > I have run into this before and it was very confusing, it really > > > should be > > > a separate command from remove for whe

How to collect "bundled" virtual provide

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dne 2.12.2015 v 15:30 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a): > > > In accordance with the bundling policy, it *is* carrying a virtual > Provides to allow us to identify whether it is affected by discovered > CVEs. > This brings me to interesting question, ho

Re: LibreOffice packaging is a messy dependency graph

On 12/02/2015 02:42 PM, David Tardon wrote: > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 02:20:34AM -0500, Dan Book wrote: >> I have run into this before and it was very confusing, it really should be >> a separate command from remove for when you actually want to remove what >> dnf thinks is now "unused". > > Why?

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Node.js 4.2

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/02/2015 07:39 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 2.12.2015 v 09:41 Tom Hughes napsal(a): >> On 02/12/15 08:27, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> >>> Is there some testing version of v8 somewhere? Will we have >>> time to play with rubygem-therubyracer, if we can

Re: LibreOffice packaging is a messy dependency graph

Hi, On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 02:20:34AM -0500, Dan Book wrote: > I have run into this before and it was very confusing, it really should be > a separate command from remove for when you actually want to remove what > dnf thinks is now "unused". Why? Remove is the opposite of install. "dnf install

ppisar uploaded Sereal-Encoder-3.009.tar.gz for perl-Sereal-Encoder

dd7c86cb9a8030e9a49fe655f433434e Sereal-Encoder-3.009.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Sereal-Encoder/Sereal-Encoder-3.009.tar.gz/md5/dd7c86cb9a8030e9a49fe655f433434e/Sereal-Encoder-3.009.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIG

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

Neal Becker wrote: > P J P wrote: > >> Hello Neal, >> >>> On Wednesday, 2 December 2015 1:03 AM, Neal Becker wrote: >>> For example, when I'm at work, I can access hostA.work.com >>> where resolving hostA only works by talking to dnsserverA.work.com, >>> which was setup by the usual dhcp and the

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

P J P wrote: > Hello Neal, > >> On Wednesday, 2 December 2015 1:03 AM, Neal Becker wrote: >> For example, when I'm at work, I can access hostA.work.com >> where resolving hostA only works by talking to dnsserverA.work.com, >> which was setup by the usual dhcp and then when I'm at home >> >> googl

ppisar changed ppisar's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Tie-Simple (f23) to 'Obsolete'

ppisar changed ppisar's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Tie-Simple (f23) to 'Obsolete' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Tie-Simple/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org ht

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Node.js 4.2

Dne 2.12.2015 v 09:41 Tom Hughes napsal(a): > On 02/12/15 08:27, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> Is there some testing version of v8 somewhere? Will we have time to play >> with rubygem-therubyracer, if we can convince it to run with recent v8 >> or what else have to be done? The same applies for MongoDB i

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

P J P wrote: > Hello Neal, > >> On Wednesday, 2 December 2015 1:03 AM, Neal Becker wrote: >> For example, when I'm at work, I can access hostA.work.com >> where resolving hostA only works by talking to dnsserverA.work.com, >> which was setup by the usual dhcp and then when I'm at home >> >> googl

Re: Freerdp update with bundle in guacamole-server

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 12:20 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > Simone, > > Could the old version of FreeRDP be temporarily bundled into guacamole > server for F23 so that everything else can be updated and rebuilt? > We can, but it's not up to me to decide. I can change the spec file and make a %global va

rawhide report: 20151202 changes

Compose started at Wed Dec 2 05:15:04 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [IQmol] IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0

Bugzilla "Fedora Components" group

I wonder if someone can remove the "Fedora Components" group from this bug. (I cannot do it). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286432 It has the effect of making the bug private, which we don't want and didn't ask for. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http:

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Fedora 24 Boost 1.60 uplift

[I've dropped devel-announce from the CC] On 01/12/15 21:22 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 09:15:38PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 02:57:53PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 28/11/15 20:05 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >On Fri, Nov 2

Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2015-12-02)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2015-12-02 18:00 UTC' Links to all tickets belo

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Node.js 4.2

On 02/12/15 08:27, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Is there some testing version of v8 somewhere? Will we have time to play > with rubygem-therubyracer, if we can convince it to run with recent v8 > or what else have to be done? The same applies for MongoDB if I am not > mistaken. Stephen Gallagher built no

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Node.js 4.2

Is there some testing version of v8 somewhere? Will we have time to play with rubygem-therubyracer, if we can convince it to run with recent v8 or what else have to be done? The same applies for MongoDB if I am not mistaken. Vít Dne 1.12.2015 v 17:58 Jan Kurik napsal(a): > = Proposed F24 System

Re: login failed @ koji.fedoraproject.org

Il 02/12/2015 08:46, Mattia Verga ha scritto: Have you imported your FAS SSL certificate in Firefox? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_the_Koji_build_system#The_web_interface yes, every time it expires Anyway, for canceling tasks I found more straightforward the use of commandline: "k