Am 02.12.2015 um 17:23 schrieb Andrew Lutomirski:
On Dec 2, 2015 8:15 AM, "Josh Boyer" <jwbo...@fedoraproject.org <mailto:jwbo...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:30 PM, Andrew Lutomirski <l...@mit.edu <mailto:l...@mit.edu>> wrote: > > Since the old proposal to have the bootloader automatically enumerate > > boot options never went anywhere, can we do the next best thing? > > > > Specifically, these days grub2-mkconfig appears to produce output > > that's functionally identical to what grubby generates. Can we switch > > new-kernel-pkg to just regenerate the grub2 config using > > grub2-mkconfig instead of using grubby? > > I don't think so. Despite the similarity in name, grubby does more > than just deal with grub stuff. Namely, it handles bootloaders that > aren't grub. We're close to having all arches on grub2, but I believe > armv7hl won't ever get there and it's a primary arch. Could we switch for grub2 architectures and keep using grubby for other architectures?
no - there is a world without grub2 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SyslinuxOption
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
