Hi,
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 09:11:48 +, James Hogarth wrote:
>
>> I was flicking through package review requests to see if anything jumped
>> out as interesting when I saw this:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422
>>
>>
Is there a way to deal with the following situation in Koji?
· Build tool B has a build-time dependency on itself.
· B is linked to library L version 1.
· L gets upgraded to version 2, which changes its soname.
B needs to be rebuilt to link to libL.so.2, but building B requires a
working B, which
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 12:21 AM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 12:10:07AM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
>> How come datagrepper lists FAF reports for the package from 2015-07-20,
>> when it hadn't been included yet?
>
> Who said it was not included? It was until now. It will be
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 12:10:07AM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> How come datagrepper lists FAF reports for the package from 2015-07-20,
> when it hadn't been included yet?
Who said it was not included? It was until now. It will be gone from the
mirrors after the next update push.
Regards
How come datagrepper lists FAF reports for the package from 2015-07-20,
when it hadn't been included yet?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 09:11:48 +, James Hogarth wrote:
> I was flicking through package review requests to see if anything jumped
> out as interesting when I saw this:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422
>
> Thought I'd take a look as I hadn't had time to review it when
On Sat, 28 Nov 2015 21:11:48 +
James Hogarth wrote:
> I was flicking through package review requests to see if anything
> jumped out as interesting when I saw this:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422
>
> Thought I'd take a look as I hadn't had time to review it when it
On Sat, 28 Nov 2015 10:19:06 +0100
Pavel Zhukov wrote:
> Before I didn't see links to deleted files at all and it was fine.
> Now there are links and misleading message.
Theres an issue around one of the files mock/koji now outputs not being
removed by garbage collection, so the directory it's i
Planned Outage: fedorainfracloud.org / copr - 2015-12-01 00:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2015-12-01 00:00 UTC, which will
last approximately 1 hour.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run:
date -d '2015-12-01
I was flicking through package review requests to see if anything jumped
out as interesting when I saw this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422
Thought I'd take a look as I hadn't had time to review it when it first
appeared and the requester had fixed the github breaking fedora-
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 09:24:21AM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
> = System Wide Change: Fedora 24 Boost 1.60 uplift =
Does this mean "upgrade" or "update"?
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.
On 28/11/15 17:12, Mattia Verga wrote:
This is a quite simple review:
kpmcore https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285042
I can take another package to swap reviews, but I'm not a sponsor.
I've taken it, if you wouldn't mind looking at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231
This is a quite simple review:
kpmcore https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285042
I can take another package to swap reviews, but I'm not a sponsor.
Thanks
Mattia
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Missing expected images:
Cloud disk raw i386
Cloud disk raw x86_64
Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64
Workstation live i386
Workstation live x86_64
No images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151127
No images in Rawhide 20151127 but not this.
Failed openQA tests: 48 of 49
ID: 9173Test: i386
Hi all,
if someone of you (provenpackagers) have few minutes to commit patch and
build lapack and then rebuild scipy in Rawhide -- would be great.
Bug with patch: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286349
--
-Igor Gnatenko
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lis
Hi!
I'm sorry for too late answer.
Simone thank you for the update. As I do not use guacamole and it is ok
just drop rdp support there it just most easy way off course.
And yes, as current version of Remmina has much errors in Fedora 23 I
want update it to 1.2.0-rcgit.5 in that branch too.
$subj-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208077
--
Pavel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Compose started at Sat Nov 28 05:15:02 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[3Depict]
3Depict-0.0.18-2.fc23.i686 requires libmgl.so.7.3.0
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0
27.11.2015, 19:55, "Kevin Fenzi" :
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 17:26:15 +0100
> Pavel Zhukov wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>>
>> I've opened koji after some time and found new features:
>> - It's not possible to download scratch built packages (You don't
>> have permission to
>> access /work/tasks/9935/1162993
19 matches
Mail list logo
