On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 1:06 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 05:32:02PM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
> >> = Proposed System Wide Change: Systemd package split =
> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/systemd_package_split
>
On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 07:04:30 +
Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 3:14 AM, Dave Johansen
> wrote:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256839
> > I don't have access to PowerPC hardware, so can anyone give any
> > advice on how to fix the above issue?
>
> Not sure t
On 18/11/15 15:55 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> After FESCo approval of https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1499 I
> have modified the review process document:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process
> to indicate that any packager is welcome to complete the initial packa
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 3:14 AM, Dave Johansen wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256839
> I don't have access to PowerPC hardware, so can anyone give any advice on
> how to fix the above issue?
Not sure that rs6000 would be supported on ppc64le but it's likely a
question best
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 05:32:02PM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
>> = Proposed System Wide Change: Systemd package split =
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/systemd_package_split
>>
>> Change owner(s):
>> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>>
>>
> "ZJ" == Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes:
ZJ> Sure I'm happy to coordinate. I wrote up the Change page because of
ZJ> the potential for breakage (as with anything systemd related) and
ZJ> the need for a mass rebuild for the change to take effect.
I'm not entirely sure there's a need for
On Mon, 16 Nov, 2015 at 00:42:10 GMT, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Till Maas wrote:
>> It also breaks git clean which is used to clean files. What is the
>> reason that making .gitignore append-only would be useful btw?
>
> If I don't bother cleaning away the old tarballs, I don't want them to show
> up
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 03:09:34PM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> To the bug in question: probably we should make it so 'sudo gedit' does
> work, but I'd still strongly discourage anyone from actually doing so.
Actually, there's a better way. The authors of sudo already considered
this. Set "VISUAL"
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256839
I don't have access to PowerPC hardware, so can anyone give any advice on
how to fix the above issue?
Thanks,
Dave
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 05:06:48PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "JK" == Jan Kurik writes:
>
> JK> * Update the macros provided by systemd and add appropriate file
> JK> triggers.
>
> This is great, but FPC is working on file trigger stuff so please do try
> and coordinate. We we
Neal Gompa wrote:
> Done[1]. This is just getting dumb and we need something simpler. I
> can't even figure out how to do pre-release/post-release anymore...
+1. I added a comment to the FPC ticket as well.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.f
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 10:15:58PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 02:01:56PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > Is there any progress on
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Glibc_locale_subpackaging
>
> I think it's this BZ:
>
> https://bugzilla.redha
> "JLT" == Jason L Tibbitts writes:
JLT> On my custom install (which just lists the packages I need in my
JLT> kickstart file) I have:
JLT> NetworkManager-glib-1.0.6-8.fc22.x86_64
JLT> NetworkManager-1.0.6-8.fc22.x86_64
JLT> NetworkManager-libnm-1.0.6-8.fc22.x86_64
JLT> NetworkManager-config
Am 19.11.2015 um 01:00 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 19.11.2015 um 00:57 schrieb Ian Malone:
On 18 November 2015 at 23:38, Reindl Harald
wrote:
Am 18.11.2015 um 19:49 schrieb Adam Jackson:
That's kind of a non sequitur. To a first order, there are zero root-
owned files you need to edit routin
On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 17:19 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Adam Williamson (adamw...@fedoraproject.org) said:
> > > You really really want libselinux-python(2) for that as well - it's needed
> > > for any file/copy/templating you'd do on the node to ensure proper SELinux
> > > contexts. (In fact,
Am 19.11.2015 um 00:57 schrieb Ian Malone:
On 18 November 2015 at 23:38, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 18.11.2015 um 19:49 schrieb Adam Jackson:
On Tue, 2015-11-17 at 17:30 +, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 11/02/2015 03:05 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
But, why take the risk exposure, when you could
On 18 November 2015 at 23:38, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 18.11.2015 um 19:49 schrieb Adam Jackson:
>>
>> On Tue, 2015-11-17 at 17:30 +, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/02/2015 03:05 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
But, why take the risk exposure, when you could simply not?
>>>
>>>
>>> H
On 18/11/15 22:34, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 04:34:16PM +, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> On 18/11/15 03:31, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
"PB" == Pádraig Brady writes:
>>>
>>> PB> Is $subject possible?
>>>
>>> I don't think so, since at the end of %install you have e
Am 18.11.2015 um 21:09 schrieb Adam Jackson:
On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 11:53 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
I don't understand. If a user who has the right to act as root asks
to authorize a program to run as root on their behalf, we should grant
that request. And, once we grant it, we shouldn
On 17/11/15 17:03, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 17/11/15 01:39, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> (Please keep responses on the devel@ list; I've set it in the Reply-To.)
>>
>> To jump right to the premise: The default Fedora Server install is Way
>> Too Big(TM) and the minimal install (also available on th
Am 18.11.2015 um 19:49 schrieb Adam Jackson:
On Tue, 2015-11-17 at 17:30 +, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 11/02/2015 03:05 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
But, why take the risk exposure, when you could simply not?
How else would I edit root-owned files? I don't get it. I mean,
I guess I could run a
> "SB" == Sérgio Basto writes:
SB> When we fix the .spec and don't change the source, we bump rightmost
SB> version, when we change the source, we bump the left version, so we
SB> can distinguish when we update the source and when we updated the
SB> .spec, this contrast for me is important.
> "JK" == Jan Kurik writes:
JK> * Update the macros provided by systemd and add appropriate file
JK> triggers.
This is great, but FPC is working on file trigger stuff so please do try
and coordinate. We weren't planning on pushing any of this through the
feature process as it's pretty muc
> "BCL" == Brian C Lane writes:
BCL> I don't think we need a technical solution, we just need the people
BCL> who feel the need to modify packages they aren't normally involved
BCL> with to ask first. It doesn't matter how simple or complicated the
BCL> change is, just be polite.
I disagree.
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 04:34:16PM +, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 18/11/15 03:31, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >> "PB" == Pádraig Brady writes:
> >
> > PB> Is $subject possible?
> >
> > I don't think so, since at the end of %install you have exactly one set
> > of files in one buildroot.
David Airlie wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Brian C. Lane"
>> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Sent: Thursday, 19 November, 2015 7:05:57 AM
>> Subject: Re: Dealing with the "my packages" problem
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 02:24:37PM -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
>>> Ma
Adam Williamson (adamw...@fedoraproject.org) said:
> > You really really want libselinux-python(2) for that as well - it's needed
> > for any file/copy/templating you'd do on the node to ensure proper SELinux
> > contexts. (In fact, Ansible will abort on the node without it if it detects
> > SELin
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 02:01:56PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Is there any progress on
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Glibc_locale_subpackaging
I think it's this BZ:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=156477
in which case it looks like it's done (I didn't test
After FESCo approval of https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1499 I
have modified the review process document:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process
to indicate that any packager is welcome to complete the initial package
review(s) for a new contributor. Contributors still need
On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 10:04 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 06:08:24PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > After some IRC discussion I've come to the following proposal: that
> > maintainers have some way to easily indicate how open they are to
> > external contributions.
On 18 November 2015 at 20:24, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 15:09 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 11:53 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> > I don't understand. If a user who has the right to act as root asks
>> > to authorize a program to run as root on th
On 18 November 2015 at 20:09, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 11:53 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>
>> I don't understand. If a user who has the right to act as root asks
>> to authorize a program to run as root on their behalf, we should grant
>> that request. And, once we grant i
- Original Message -
> From: "Brian C. Lane"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, 19 November, 2015 7:05:57 AM
> Subject: Re: Dealing with the "my packages" problem
>
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 02:24:37PM -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> > Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > On Tu
I will be at the regional FBI headquarters attending a conference.
While I had thought that I would be able to pull out my laptop and
participate, I've now found out that they're so paranoid that I can't
even wear my watch inside of the building, much less have a laptop with
connectivity. I have t
On Nov 18, 2015 14:06, "Brian C. Lane" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 02:24:37PM -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> > Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 06:08:24PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > >> After some IRC discussion I've come to the following proposal: that
> > >>
Yet again, I failed to fix the UTC time in the Subject, hopefully by
next week I'll remember.
To confirm, it is 17:00 UTC ... automatic rktime output is always more
reliable than james UTC time :).
On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 16:19 -0500, James Antill wrote:
> Following is the list of topics that will
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2015-11-19 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2015-11-19 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PST
2015-11-19 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EST
2015-11-19 1
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 02:24:37PM -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 06:08:24PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >> After some IRC discussion I've come to the following proposal: that
> >> maintainers have some way to easily indicate how open they
I have these reviews for exchange:
1. gnome-shell-extension-panel-osd: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bu
g.cgi?id=1246904
a small extension, that makes the placement of shell-notifications on
the desktop configurable.
2. aeskulap: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269649
a DICOM-view
Missing expected images:
Cloud disk raw i386
Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64
Workstation live x86_64
Workstation live i386
Minimal disk raw armhfp
Kde disk raw armhfp
Kde live i386
Cloud disk raw x86_64
Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151117:
Games live i386
Images in Rawhide 20151117 but
2015-11-18 21:24 GMT+01:00 Adam Williamson :
> On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 15:09 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 11:53 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> > I don't understand. If a user who has the right to act as root asks
>> > to authorize a program to run as root on their behal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/18/2015 03:21 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 14:36 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> Adam Williamson (adamw...@fedoraproject.org) said:
>>> On Tue, 2015-10-13 at 22:21 -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote:
Does anyone have a good
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 15:09 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 11:53 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> > I don't understand. If a user who has the right to act as root asks
>> > to authorize a program to run as root o
On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 15:09 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 11:53 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>
> > I don't understand. If a user who has the right to act as root asks
> > to authorize a program to run as root on their behalf, we should grant
> > that request. And, once we
On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 14:36 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Adam Williamson (adamw...@fedoraproject.org) said:
> > On Tue, 2015-10-13 at 22:21 -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> > >
> > > Does anyone have a good solution for this? Obviously it would be nice
> > > if ansible went to python3 but I think th
On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 11:53 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> I don't understand. If a user who has the right to act as root asks
> to authorize a program to run as root on their behalf, we should grant
> that request. And, once we grant it, we shouldn't be
> passive-aggressive and say "sure you
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-11-17 at 17:30 +, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 11/02/2015 03:05 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> > But, why take the risk exposure, when you could simply not?
>>
>> How else would I edit root-owned files? I don't get it. I mean,
>>
Adam Williamson (adamw...@fedoraproject.org) said:
> On Tue, 2015-10-13 at 22:21 -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone have a good solution for this? Obviously it would be nice
> > if ansible went to python3 but I think they have stated clearly that
> > they are sticking with python2 for b
Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 06:08:24PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>> After some IRC discussion I've come to the following proposal: that
>> maintainers have some way to easily indicate how open they are to
>> external contributions. Basically this would take the form of
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:26 AM Christopher
wrote:
> What's the best way to deal with resolving ivy dependencies in EPEL7? I'm
> trying to package zookeeper for EPEL7, and am running into problems.
>
> I see there's ivy-local for F21 and later, which comes with xmvn 2, but it
> looks like EL7/EP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/18/2015 01:43 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 11:32 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>>> "DW" == Dan Williams writes:
>>
>> DW> I suppose NM-tui could be pulled out of Server since not
>> that many DW> other things require
On Tue, 2015-11-17 at 17:30 +, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 11/02/2015 03:05 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > But, why take the risk exposure, when you could simply not?
>
> How else would I edit root-owned files? I don't get it. I mean,
> I guess I could run an editor in a text window, but I don't w
On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 11:32 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > > > > > "DW" == Dan Williams writes:
>
> DW> I suppose NM-tui could be pulled out of Server since not that
> many
> DW> other things require newt, and nmcli is always going to be there
> DW> anyway.
>
> For some reason I thought
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCo (2015-11-18)
===
Meeting started by rishi` at 18:03:44 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-11-18/fesco.2015-11-18-18.03.log.html
.
Meeting summary
---
On 11/18/2015 05:26 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
Is $subject possible?
For example generating subpackages like:
%{name}-small-but-slow-binaries
%{name}-fast-but-big-binaries
I can %prep and %install into separate areas,
though was then wondering how to adjust
the buildroot for subpackages?
A
> "DW" == Dan Williams writes:
DW> I suppose NM-tui could be pulled out of Server since not that many
DW> other things require newt, and nmcli is always going to be there
DW> anyway.
For some reason I thought NM-tui _was_ nmcli. There's no reason to have
anything other than the command line
On Tue, 2015-11-17 at 17:36 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > > > > > "DW" == Dan Williams writes:
>
> DW> Could you confirm what NetworkManager-* packages are installed on
> DW> F23 server?
>
> On my custom install (which just lists the packages I need in my
> kickstart file) I have:
>
>
Hi,
I plan to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.38.0 during the next week.
There are several API changes and soname bump of the base library
libpoppler.so.*.
I've prepared a scratch build of poppler-0.38.0 against which you can
test your packages. You can find the build here:
http://koji.f
On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 09:57 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 07:38:43PM -0800, adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> > for Fedora 24 Rawhide 20151117. Please help run some tests for this
> > nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
> > release validation
= Proposed System Wide Change: Systemd file triggers =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/systemd_file_triggers
Change owner(s):
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
systemd daemon-reload is invoked once or twice per rpm transaction.
== Detailed Description ==
Instead of having every package which c
= Proposed System Wide Change: Systemd package split =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/systemd_package_split
Change owner(s):
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Two new subpackages will be split out from the main systemd package.
systemd-container will contain stuff for launching and managing VM
= Proposed System Wide Change: GHC 7.10 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GHC_7.10
Change owner(s):
Jens Petersen
Update Fedora's version of the GHC Haskell compiler to version 7.10.
== Detailed Description ==
GHC 7.10 is major new version of the de facto standard Haskell
compiler releas
> "PB" == Pádraig Brady writes:
PB> What I've done in %post is to mv the conflicting files from a temp
PB> to standard location, overwriting any existing files.
You really, really shouldn't do that. Really.
- J<
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproj
On 18/11/15 03:31, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>> "PB" == Pádraig Brady writes:
>
> PB> Is $subject possible?
>
> I don't think so, since at the end of %install you have exactly one set
> of files in one buildroot.
Right. There was talk of potential support for this ages ago:
https://www.re
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 18.11.2015 v 15:53 Neal Gompa napsal(a):
>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Panu Matilainen
>> wrote:
>>> Right. Only took eight years for anybody to notice ;)
>>>
>>> - Panu -
>>>
>> At this point, I'm wondering why we don't use
On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 10:10:52 +0100
Juan Hernández wrote:
> On 11/18/2015 12:57 AM, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote:
> > Adding Juan into the loop. He might be interested.
> >
>
> I'm have been maintaining these package for a while, and I'm
> interested in continue to maintain them. Can you s
I've run all openQA tests on 20151117 and it seems to work OK (after some
fixes in our tests).
Only two things (from what we are testing) don't work: KDE Live doesn't
boot and upgrade
(from F22 Desktop) doesn't work (it works with minimal though).
2015-11-18 15:57 GMT+01:00 Matthew Miller :
> On
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 03:30:54PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>> > b'dnf-plugins-core': 117
>> Nice to have, however Minimal installation can live without it.
>
> Since protected_packages is part of this, I don't agree. Sure, it's
> techn
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 03:30:54PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > b'dnf-plugins-core': 117
> Nice to have, however Minimal installation can live without it.
Since protected_packages is part of this, I don't agree. Sure, it's
technically removable, but if someone starts from minimal and builds
up
Dne 18.11.2015 v 15:53 Neal Gompa napsal(a):
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Panu Matilainen
> wrote:
>> Right. Only took eight years for anybody to notice ;)
>>
>> - Panu -
>>
> At this point, I'm wondering why we don't use the ~/+ operators to
> more explicitly declare the ordering of
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 06:08:24PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> After some IRC discussion I've come to the following proposal: that
> maintainers have some way to easily indicate how open they are to
> external contributions. Basically this would take the form of a few
> options in pkgdb w
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 07:38:43PM -0800, adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> for Fedora 24 Rawhide 20151117. Please help run some tests for this
> nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
> release validation testing, see:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_valida
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Panu Matilainen
wrote:
>
> Right. Only took eight years for anybody to notice ;)
>
> - Panu -
>
At this point, I'm wondering why we don't use the ~/+ operators to
more explicitly declare the ordering of versions like Debian does. As
far as I know, RPM does
On 11/18/2015 04:15 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
On Sat 07 Nov 2015 10:18:14 AM EST Panu Matilainen
wrote:
Frankly I didn't even realize the 0.rc1.X scheme was against the
guidelines since to me this is the (obviously) correct way to do it with
predictable pre-release names (its predictable
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 17.11.2015 v 02:39 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
>> b'dnf-plugins-core': 117
> Nice to have, however Minimal installation can live without it.
>
>> b'plymouth-scripts': 121
>> b'plymouth': 121
> This really does not need to be on minimal
Dne 17.11.2015 v 02:39 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
> b'dnf-plugins-core': 117
Nice to have, however Minimal installation can live without it.
> b'plymouth-scripts': 121
> b'plymouth': 121
This really does not need to be on minimal installation.
And you can save a lot of data if you purge locale
Please add https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1498 for today's agenda.
Regards, Irina.
- Original Message -
From: "Debarshi Ray"
To: "Fedora Development"
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 7:31:59 AM
Subject: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2015-11-18)
Following is the list of
On Sat 07 Nov 2015 10:18:14 AM EST Panu Matilainen
wrote:
> Frankly I didn't even realize the 0.rc1.X scheme was against the
> guidelines since to me this is the (obviously) correct way to do it with
> predictable pre-release names (its predictable when you're the one doing
> the upstream tarball
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/17/2015 06:17 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-11-16 at 20:39 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> b'NetworkManager': 138
>
> NM does have a larger dep-chain than we'd like, however we did
> split the package apart a couple releases ago and
> Hi,
>
> > It's certainly the case that *gnome* might do something ridiculous if
> > you 'sudo gedit' something, but 'sudo emacs' really ought to be
> > equally acceptable regardless of whether you're using the terminal or
> > X frontend.
> emacs is probably okay, just by virtue of the fact that
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2015-11-18 18:00 UTC'
Links to all tickets belo
Dne 17.11.2015 v 11:00 Stef Walter napsal(a):
> On 17.11.2015 02:39, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> (Please keep responses on the devel@ list; I've set it in the Reply-To.)
>>
>> To jump right to the premise: The default Fedora Server install is Way
>> Too Big(TM) and the minimal install (also availab
2015-11-18 1:08 GMT+01:00 Jason L Tibbitts III :
> tl; dr: I have submitted the following RFE for pkgdb:
> https://github.com/fedora-infra/pkgdb2/issues/274
> Please add comments there if you have any.
>
> I know I'm not the only provenpackager to have applied a bugfix to
> someone's package only
Compose started at Wed Nov 18 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0
On Wednesday, 18 November 2015 at 08:06, Germano Massullo wrote:
> Hi, I would like to ask "lua" and "compat-lua" maintainers if it is
> possible to have a packaged 5.2 lua version.
> A use case? Upstream Darktable ships a bundled Lua version 5.2, and it is
> not compatible with Lua 5.3. Fedora's D
On 17/11/15 22:57, Nikos Roussos wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> Fedora Talk was based on Asterisk.
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Asterisk Asterisk has
>> lots of great features (voicemail, queues, etc) but it is mainly for
>> voice, it empha
86 matches
Mail list logo
