Hello,
I built an update for f22-backgrounds package which includes the missing
supplemental backgrounds.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/f22-backgrounds/
Unfortunately, I do not have permission to commit the change although I
uploaded the latest tar.xz file as f22-background-22.1
Matthew Miller wrote:
> Find all the bundled libraries in all of Fedora, even with minor
> variations in code and version. When there's a vulnerability,
> automatically generate patches, bump the RPMs, rebuild test builds, run
> them through automated testing (including a new test for whatever
> ju
Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> Hey, you sound pretty upset. The analogy on offer is quite extreme,
> presumably in proportion to how bothered you are, and unfortunately
> suggests a negative view of the those who proposed/supported the
> change. Let's try a different analogy: Fedora is the house, the o
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 12:58:05AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Only if you call patches to the build system (with little to no changes to
> the actual code) a "fork".
There might be some wording change to "upstreams allow" in the new
policy to include this as should-be-unbundled cases — although
Haïkel wrote:
> This was discussed, I remember that this very point being raised by rishi.
> We agreed (but not voted) that packages with dead upstream should
> unbundle.
But it is only policy if it is written down in the letter of the policy.
> => I don't think anyone is against strict unbundlin
On 10/08/2015 03:32 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Friday, 09 October 2015 at 00:14, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
On 10/08/2015 08:48 AM, Haïkel wrote:
[snip]
Please keep in mind, that Fesco is aware this is not a perfect
solution, and we''ll gladly review any proposals to improve this
Adam Jackson wrote:
> From the consumer's perspective it makes zero difference whether a
> particular library is bundled or not, as long as the app works.
Only until they run into their first symbol conflict due to conflicting
bundled libraries.
And even if there are no symbol conflicts, they WI
Haïkel wrote:
> Not that I'm 100% happy with the way it happened but this has been a
> very long-lived topic. To some, it'll be a hasty decision, to others,
> it's already a late one.
There's a REASON it had always been shot down so far!
> Please keep in mind, that Fesco is aware this is not a pe
Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Nothing can stop you fighting against bundling, checking packages,
> reporting bundling, working with upstream on unbundling etc. You could
> at least try to take a positive view, not the most negative you can.
If the maintainer refuses to unbundle against upstream's wishes, u
Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> * Kevin Kofler [08/10/2015 02:33] :
>>
>> The thing is, it should NOT matter at all how upstream feels. If we treat
>> unbundling as something to do with upstream, we already failed.
>> Unbundling must be done whether upstream likes it or not, even in
>> upstream's spite!
Christopher Meng wrote:
> IMO motif should 'Obsoletes' lesstif in Fedora since motif is free now.
The reason we kept lesstif even after OpenMotif was finally freed is because
OpenMotif only implements the Motif 2 API, whereas lesstif implemented the
Motif 1 API. Back then, a lot of Motif applica
2015-10-09 0:42 GMT+02:00 Kevin Kofler :
> Neal Gompa wrote:
>> Not that I don't agree that we should pursue unbundling whenever
>> possible, but I don't remember any contract or terms that explicitly said
>> *packagers* do the work of *developers* to re-architect
>> applications/services/etc to do
Matthew Miller wrote:
> In many cases, this effectively means creating a Fedora-specfic fork of
> the project.
Only if you call patches to the build system (with little to no changes to
the actual code) a "fork".
> Even if we accept unbundling as goal in itself is a given, there just
> aren't en
2015-10-09 0:08 GMT+02:00 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
:
> On Wednesday, 07 October 2015 at 21:17, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> Meeting summary
>> ---
> [...]
>> * #1483 Decision on bundling policy in the Fedora Package Collection
>> (sgallagh, 18:11:40)
>> * LINK: http://paste.fed
Neal Gompa wrote:
> Not that I don't agree that we should pursue unbundling whenever
> possible, but I don't remember any contract or terms that explicitly said
> *packagers* do the work of *developers* to re-architect
> applications/services/etc to do stuff like that. In fact, I thought *the
> w
On Friday, 09 October 2015 at 00:14, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> On 10/08/2015 08:48 AM, Haïkel wrote:
> [snip]
> >Please keep in mind, that Fesco is aware this is not a perfect
> >solution, and we''ll gladly review any proposals to improve this
> >policy. But we can keep discussing this for years, or
On 10/08/2015 08:48 AM, Haïkel wrote:
[snip]
Please keep in mind, that Fesco is aware this is not a perfect
solution, and we''ll gladly review any proposals to improve this
policy. But we can keep discussing this for years, or try to solve
this issue incrementally. We chose the latter.
[snip]
R
On Wednesday, 07 October 2015 at 21:17, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Meeting summary
> ---
[...]
> * #1483 Decision on bundling policy in the Fedora Package Collection
> (sgallagh, 18:11:40)
> * LINK: http://paste.fedoraproject.org/276064/44243383/ is sgallaghs
> proposal without
Am Mittwoch, den 07.10.2015, 23:21 +0200 schrieb Till Maas:
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 11:03:07PM +0200, Jens Lody wrote:
>
> > I just filed a (re-)review request on bugzilla [2].
>
> The re-review needs to be done by a fellow packager until the
> unretirement can happen.
>
> > I don't know exact
On 10/08/2015 12:39 PM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 08.10.2015 um 21:06 schrieb arnaud gaboury:
Downloading from Intel website the parallel studio 2016. There is a
folder with all rpm packages and a script to install them. I
understand this
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 08.10.2015 um 21:06 schrieb arnaud gaboury:
>>
>> Downloading from Intel website the parallel studio 2016. There is a
>> folder with all rpm packages and a script to install them. I
>> understand this package is NOT part of Fedora, but
Am 08.10.2015 um 21:06 schrieb arnaud gaboury:
Downloading from Intel website the parallel studio 2016. There is a
folder with all rpm packages and a script to install them. I
understand this package is NOT part of Fedora, but neither part of RPM
fusion. So I must not installed it?
no, but it
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 10/08/2015 07:10 PM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>> I wrote a .spec file to build a pacakge with many shared
>> librairies installed by Intel parallel studio 2016.
>>
>> There is no Fedora pa
On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 03:37:32PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Maybe we're trying to do too much.
>
> I suppose it's a question of choosing to do something which from a
> software engineering perspective is not the best practice or not
> including a package at all. I'd certainly prefer to see a s
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 8:52 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 08.10.2015 um 20:44 schrieb arnaud gaboury:
>>
>> I must have done some errors in my spec file and I am looking for any
>> hint why my rpm claims these shared libraries when they are installed
>
>
> installed how?
Downloading from Inte
Am 08.10.2015 um 20:44 schrieb arnaud gaboury:
I must have done some errors in my spec file and I am looking for any
hint why my rpm claims these shared libraries when they are installed
installed how?
if the are not present in any RPM, well, they are not installed even if
they are present,
No missing expected images.
No images in this compose but not 23 Branched 20151007
Images in 23 Branched 20151007 but not this:
Cloud docker x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 7 of 52
ID: 5127Test: x86_64 generic_boot default_install@uefi
ID: 5124Test: x86_64 kde_live default_install
Am 08.10.2015 um 20:44 schrieb arnaud gaboury:
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 10/08/2015 11:10 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
I wrote a .spec file to build a pacakge with many shared librairies
installed by Intel parallel studio 2016.
This doesn't belong on Fedora dev
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 10/08/2015 11:10 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>> I wrote a .spec file to build a pacakge with many shared librairies
>> installed by Intel parallel studio 2016.
>
> This doesn't belong on Fedora devel, it has nothing to do with Fedora
> dev
No missing expected images.
No images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151007
Images in Rawhide 20151007 but not this:
Scientific_kde live i386
Scientific_kde live x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 49 of 52
ID: 5128Test: i386 universal server_btrfs
ID: 5072Test: x86_64 workstation_l
On 10/08/2015 11:10 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> I wrote a .spec file to build a pacakge with many shared librairies
> installed by Intel parallel studio 2016.
This doesn't belong on Fedora devel, it has nothing to do with Fedora
development.
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 10/08/2015 07:10 PM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>> I wrote a .spec file to build a pacakge with many shared
>> librairies installed by Intel parallel studio 2016.
>>
>> There is no Fedora pa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 10/08/2015 07:10 PM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> I wrote a .spec file to build a pacakge with many shared
> librairies installed by Intel parallel studio 2016.
>
> There is no Fedora package for Intel, but the installation script
> install many .rpm
I wrote a .spec file to build a pacakge with many shared librairies
installed by Intel parallel studio 2016.
There is no Fedora package for Intel, but the installation script
install many .rpm packages, and all are correctly listed when running
$ dnf list
Building my package goes fine. I am no le
On 10/08/2015 05:47 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 10/08/2015 05:30 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > On 10/08/2015 05:19 PM, Jakub Jelen wrote:
> >> On 10/08/2015 03:13 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
> >>> On 10/01/2015 05:35 PM, Antonio Trande wr
On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 04:57:27PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 8.10.2015 v 16:44 gil napsal(a):
> > hi
> > i missing somethings...
> > how can set InitialCC with java-sig in pkgdb for a new package?
> > regards
> > thanks in advance
> > gil
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/re
On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 10:55 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> Yes, it seems the quantity over quality view won. :(
This is a false dichotomy. The ultimate metric of quality is whether
the distribution contains a working copy of the software you want to
run. Bundling is a maintenance concern for _peopl
On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 04:07:20PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Qui, 2015-10-08 at 16:57 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > Dne 8.10.2015 v 16:44 gil napsal(a):
> > > hi
> > > i missing somethings...
> > > how can set InitialCC with java-sig in pkgdb for a new package?
> > > regards
> > > thanks in
On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 00:06:06 +0200
Jules Bashizi wrote:
> I got admission into some British university and I am to buy a
> laptop . wish to know a machine which is good with Linux . any advice
> on which and where to get it please !
Hey Jules.
Welcome to the world of linux.
You likely want t
IMO motif should 'Obsoletes' lesstif in Fedora since motif is free now.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://awk.io
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 10/08/2015 12:24 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
>
>> W dniu 08.10.2015 o 12:06, Marcin Juszkiewicz pisze:
>>
>>> W dniu 02.10.2015 o 13:33, Jon Ciesla pisze:
>>>
Lesstif being basically dead upstream and motif being available, I thin
On 10/08/2015 05:30 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 10/08/2015 05:19 PM, Jakub Jelen wrote:
On 10/08/2015 03:13 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
On 10/01/2015 05:35 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
Hi all.
I need
2015-10-08 10:55 GMT+02:00 Tomas Mraz :
> On Čt, 2015-10-08 at 00:06 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> > * #1483 Decision on bundling policy in the Fedora Package Collection
>> > (sgallagh, 18:11:40)
>> > * LINK: http://paste.fedoraproject.org/276064/44243383/ is sgallag
On 10/08/2015 12:24 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
W dniu 08.10.2015 o 12:06, Marcin Juszkiewicz pisze:
W dniu 02.10.2015 o 13:33, Jon Ciesla pisze:
Lesstif being basically dead upstream and motif being available, I think
it's probably time to retire lesstif.
If anyone knows of other packages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 10/08/2015 05:19 PM, Jakub Jelen wrote:
> On 10/08/2015 03:13 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
>> On 10/01/2015 05:35 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
>>>
>>> Hi all.
>>>
>>> I need XSD on EPEL7. Is it possi
On 10/08/2015 03:13 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
On 10/01/2015 05:35 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi all.
I need XSD on EPEL7. Is it possible a build?
Package: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/xsd/
Bugzilla request: https://bugzilla.redha
On Qui, 2015-10-08 at 16:57 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 8.10.2015 v 16:44 gil napsal(a):
> > hi
> > i missing somethings...
> > how can set InitialCC with java-sig in pkgdb for a new package?
> > regards
> > thanks in advance
> > gil
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/
Dne 8.10.2015 v 16:44 gil napsal(a):
> hi
> i missing somethings...
> how can set InitialCC with java-sig in pkgdb for a new package?
> regards
> thanks in advance
> gil
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/476
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/477
> htt
hi
i missing somethings...
how can set InitialCC with java-sig in pkgdb for a new package?
regards
thanks in advance
gil
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/476
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/477
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/47
On 10/08/2015 02:01 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 02:50:59PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>> There was a middle ground there that could have been pursued a little
>> more: the sandbock repo which less strict guidelines keeping the
>> current Fedora repo with the current po
On 10/01/2015 05:35 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi all.
>
> I need XSD on EPEL7. Is it possible a build?
>
> Package: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/xsd/
> Bugzilla request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251682
>
>
On 10/07/2015 06:06 PM, Jules Bashizi wrote:
> I got admission into some British university and I am to buy a laptop .
> wish to know a machine which is good with Linux . any advice on which
> and where to get it please !
>
>
>
Hi,
I have been using Linux on X series Lenovo Thinkpads for many
On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 02:50:59PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> There was a middle ground there that could have been pursued a little
> more: the sandbock repo which less strict guidelines keeping the
> current Fedora repo with the current policies.
I'm still generally in favor of that (and
On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 08:44:07AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> An unbundling triangle:
>
>
> inclination
>
> /\
> / \
>/\
> / all \
> A / three→ \ B
> / ideal \
>/
An unbundling triangle:
inclination
/\
/ \
/\
/ all \
A / three→ \ B
/ ideal \
/ unbundled \
/package \
/\
/
Compose started at Thu Oct 8 05:15:02 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[CableSwig]
CableSwig-3.20.0-13.fc23.i686 requires gccxml
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.f
* Kevin Kofler [08/10/2015 02:33] :
>
> The thing is, it should NOT matter at all how upstream feels. If we treat
> unbundling as something to do with upstream, we already failed. Unbundling
> must be done whether upstream likes it or not, even in upstream's spite! And
At this point, you're bet
Hi everyone,
Fedorapackager eclipse plugin has been neglected for quite some time and
updates are broken after the Bodhi2 update.
So are there any users left? Is anyone interested in maintaining it? Enhancing
it?
Any feedback is more than welcome as it might be time to let it rest in peace
if
Compose started at Thu Oct 8 07:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[CableSwig]
CableSwig-3.20.0-13.fc23.armv7hl requires gccxml
[apache-scout]
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:uddi-ws)
On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 12:41:36AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> The current situation with packages stuck in the review queue forever,
> exception requests to FPC skyrocketing, etc. is the result of rampant
> packager laziness.
So, what's your proposed solution here? How do would we make package
On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 02:33:34AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > I think this strikes a fair balance between promoting packaging hygiene
> > and recognizing that not all upstream communities feel the same way Fedora
> > packagers do about bundled libraries.
> The thing is, it should NOT matter at
On 10/08/2015 12:31 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
>Badges was supposed to be that carrot for the mule's so perhaps there's
>just missing new set of badges for this...
>
>1.https://badges.fedoraproject.org/
Those "badges" are completely useless as a reward
As real as a
W dniu 08.10.2015 o 12:06, Marcin Juszkiewicz pisze:
W dniu 02.10.2015 o 13:33, Jon Ciesla pisze:
Lesstif being basically dead upstream and motif being available, I think
it's probably time to retire lesstif.
If anyone knows of other packages using it, please let me know and I can
migrate the
On 10/07/2015 10:05 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Per this fesco ticket:
>
> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1484#comment:3
>
> I have orphaned all of the packages that had chitlesh as a point of
> contact:
>
> liborigin -- Library for reading OriginLab OPJ project files ( master f23 f22
> f21
W dniu 02.10.2015 o 13:33, Jon Ciesla pisze:
Lesstif being basically dead upstream and motif being available, I think
it's probably time to retire lesstif.
If anyone knows of other packages using it, please let me know and I can
migrate them.
dinotrace
fbb
xastir
xmbdfed
xvarstar
Those are
On Čt, 2015-10-08 at 00:06 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > * #1483 Decision on bundling policy in the Fedora Package Collection
> > (sgallagh, 18:11:40)
> > * LINK: http://paste.fedoraproject.org/276064/44243383/ is sgallaghs
> > proposal without the critpath disti
Hello,
I'll orphan radiusclient-ng with the purpose of dropping it from the
next releases of Fedora. This is an old unmaintained library replaced
by any of the following packages (the latter has an API compatible
subpackage).
* https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/freeradius-client/
* htt
On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 10:15:07AM +0200, Jiri Popelka wrote:
> I can't find a way how to remove
> https://release-monitoring.org/project/5554/
>
> What am I missing ?
Regular users cannot, but you can flag the project asking an admin to delete a
version found or the entire project :)
Pierre
--
Dne 8.10.2015 v 10:15 Jiri Popelka napsal(a):
> I can't find a way how to remove
> https://release-monitoring.org/project/5554/
>
> What am I missing ?
>
> thanks
>
> --
> Jiri
There is orange "Flag" button you should use for this purpose.
Vít
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
I can't find a way how to remove
https://release-monitoring.org/project/5554/
What am I missing ?
thanks
--
Jiri
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
I will take Ktechlab
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz
wrote:
> W dniu 08.10.2015 o 01:29, Eduardo Mayorga Téllez pisze:
>
>> El 07/10/2015 2:05 pm, Kevin Fenzi escribió:
>>
>>> xcircuit -- Electronic circuit schematic drawing program ( master f23
>>> f22 f21 el6 el5 )
>>>
>>
>>
W dniu 08.10.2015 o 01:29, Eduardo Mayorga Téllez pisze:
El 07/10/2015 2:05 pm, Kevin Fenzi escribió:
xcircuit -- Electronic circuit schematic drawing program ( master f23
f22 f21 el6 el5 )
Taken.
Can you also take ngspice? Otherwise one of xcircuit build dependencies
will be removed from F
perl-Hardware-Verilog-Parser -- Complete grammar for parsing Verilog code using
perl ( master f23 f22 f21 el6 el5 )
perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Lexer -- Split VHDL code into lexical tokens ( master f23
f22 f21 el6 el5 )
perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Parser -- Complete grammar for parsing VHDL code using perl
( m
On 10/08/2015 07:42 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 10/08/2015 07:11 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 09:56:53PM +, opensou...@till.name wrote:
>>> Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the
>>> affected
>>> packages or a package that depends on one. P
74 matches
Mail list logo
