On Wed, 16 Sep, 2015 at 16:24:02 GMT, Alexander Todorov wrote:
> Please let me know which packages need to genuinely be excluded and what
> should
> we do with these packages ? Some will probably be fixed once they are rebuilt
> but that may take a while.
>
> Any package maintainers out there -
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 6:16 AM, David Airlie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So I've been updating rawhide to llvm 3.7 upstream, so we can get OpenGL 4.1
> support on the radeonsi GPUs.
>
> The two depends on llvm I don't control/know about were julia and pocl, I've
> done my best to make them work,
> pocl I'
Hi all,
I was just trying to build QMsgBox-0-6.20130830git94677dc, but the build
fails on all distros. The difference to the earlier release is that I
put in a qt5 build, and split the headers to a separate subpackage.
The packages build successfully, but crash in the postprocessing stage:
Hi,
So I've been updating rawhide to llvm 3.7 upstream, so we can get OpenGL 4.1
support on the radeonsi GPUs.
The two depends on llvm I don't control/know about were julia and pocl, I've
done my best to make them work,
pocl I've rebased to git, which seems to be upstream advice
julia I've upda
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Alexander Todorov wrote:
> Please let me know which packages need to genuinely be excluded and what
> should we do with these packages ? Some will probably be fixed once they are
> rebuilt but that may take a while.
Some language environments provide their own me
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 14:17:13 -0500,
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I have a dual MP system as my main desktop at home. I rebooted it a
couple of times this week with rawhide nodebug kernels (the base
system is rawhide) and haven't had a problem.
It won't boot from flash drives and I was unable
On 09/16/2015 07:35 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 09/15/2015 09:56 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I'll be building openmpi 1.10.0 for rawhide soon. This has soname
bumps so
I'll be rebuilding dependent packages as well:
hdf5 build is hanging in a test. I'll try to track that down. If I
can't q
Hi,
On Qua, 2015-09-16 at 08:49 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> This came in in Bugzilla filed against the
> fedora-productimg-workstation, which isn't the right place for it, so
> I'm passing it on: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263565
Well , after some analyze the bug report is
Missing expected images:
Cloud atomic Disk x86_64
Cloud base Disk i386
No images in this compose but not 23 Branched 20150915
Images in 23 Branched 20150915 but not this:
Cloud base Vagrant x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 18 of 24
ID: 2666Test: x86_64 universal server_no_swap
ID: 2665
Missing expected images:
Cloud atomic Disk x86_64
Cloud base Disk i386
Cloud base Disk x86_64
Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20150915:
Kde Live i386
Kde Live x86_64
Scientific_kde Live x86_64
Scientific_kde Live i386
Kde Disk armhfp
Images in Rawhide 20150915 but not this:
Cloud base V
On 09/16/2015 01:19 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>> "AT" == Alexander Todorov writes:
>
> AT> offending packages. You can find links to the script and execution
> AT> log here:
> AT> http://atodorov.org/blog/2015/09/16/4000-bugs-in-fedora-checksec-failures/
>
> BTW to see if any packages
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 07:24:02PM +0300, Alexander Todorov wrote:
> Including fedora-devel on this topic.
>
> На 12.09.2015 в 08:48, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski написа:
> >>>
> >>>Question is how to deal with these because they appear to be in the
> >>>hundreds ?
> >>
> >>How many, exactly? W
Would it be possible to add more information to the emails sent to notify
about Koji Garbage Collection (
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Koji/GarbageCollection )? I receive these
emails and I usually know why I received them (usually an update was
obsoleted because of a fix for an issue that was ide
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:08:15 -0700,
Adam Williamson wrote:
If anyone reading this has an old 32-bit AMD system - the last range
of 32-bit AMD CPUs was the Athlon XPs from early 2003, anything
'Athlon 64' or later is 64-bit - and it's not too much trouble, could
you please grab a 23 Beta RC
Hi, folks!
We've found an issue in Fedora 23 Beta testing which seems to affect
AMD CPUs when booting the 32-bit images:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263762
unfortunately, so far all those who've tested have only had 64-bit
CPUs. So we know there's a problem booting the 32-bit im
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2015-09-16)
===
Meeting started by rishi at 18:00:05 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-09-16/fesco.2015-09-16-18.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 18:26 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> What is the proper fix to these issues? Having fixed some myself and
> ajax having looked at a bunch of them I don't think it's as simple as
> just mass rebuilding the packages.
A lot of it is libtool being shit, which is nothing new I su
On 09/16/2015 11:08 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 09/16/2015 10:24 AM, Alexander Todorov wrote:
>> From today's Rawhide snapshot my script counted around 4500 offending
>> packages. You can find links to the script and execution log here:
>> http://atodorov.org/blog/2015/09/16/4000-bugs-in-fedora
On 16/09/15 18:19, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
Of course, several packages I comaintain are on the list (mainly due to
Partial RELRO) and I have zero idea how to fix them. I read about what
RELRO means from the blog post but that doesn't tell me what I actually
need to do to make the errors go
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2015-09-17 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2015-09-17 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT
2015-09-17 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT
2015-09-17 1
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 18:09:44 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
>> On 15/09/15 13:58 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>> >I have been working on my first rpmbuild since quite a few days now.
>>
>> As a more gneral comment, why not try something
> На 12.09.2015 в 08:48, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski написа:
Question is how to deal with these because they appear to be in the
hundreds ?
>>>
>>>
>>> How many, exactly? We have around 2 SRPMs in the distribution.
>>
>>
>
> From today's Rawhide snapshot my script counted
> "AT" == Alexander Todorov writes:
AT> offending packages. You can find links to the script and execution
AT> log here:
AT> http://atodorov.org/blog/2015/09/16/4000-bugs-in-fedora-checksec-failures/
BTW to see if any packages you own are on the list, you can do:
wget
https://raw.githubuse
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Dave Love wrote:
> arnaud gaboury writes:
>
>> I have been working on my first rpmbuild since quite a few days now.
>>
>> The rpm is intendeed to install R[0] built with Intel MKL libraries
>> and Intel compiler. As a base for the spec file, I used the one from
>>
On 09/16/2015 09:24 AM, Dave Love wrote:
> Orion Poplawski writes:
>
>> I'll be building openmpi 1.10.0 for rawhide soon. This has soname bumps so
>> I'll be rebuilding dependent packages as well:
>
> Has the ABI actually changed? What I've seen about it suggested not,
> and NEWS doesn't say -
Including fedora-devel on this topic.
На 12.09.2015 в 08:48, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski написа:
Question is how to deal with these because they appear to be in the hundreds ?
How many, exactly? We have around 2 SRPMs in the distribution.
From today's Rawhide snapshot my script cou
On 09/14/2015 12:04 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 12:45 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
and much more important:
if Fedora changes to more and more recommend "pip", "gem" and "cpan"
like installs instead RPM packages it is no longer a distribution
over the long because that would
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 6:04 AM, Dave Love wrote:
> Dave Johansen writes:
>
> >> For what it's worth, you can use vagrant with the
> >> kaorimatz/fedora-rawhide-x86_64 box. A search on the hashicorp atlas
> >> finds it.
> >>
> >
> > Are there any instructions on how to use this for testing?
>
>
Orion Poplawski writes:
> I'll be building openmpi 1.10.0 for rawhide soon. This has soname bumps so
> I'll be rebuilding dependent packages as well:
Has the ABI actually changed? What I've seen about it suggested not,
and NEWS doesn't say -- just "based on the v1.8.x series, but with a few
ne
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2015-09-16 18:00 UTC'
Links to all tickets belo
it's similar to
"dnf does not report which packages cause conflicts"
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261887
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> YUM did show dependency problems down to the "library.so.version", DNF just
> says "skip" even with the -v flag
>
> "-v" is showing another bug, there is no need to mention "deltainfo" when
> "deltarpm=0" is confirgured and maybe that is why
On 09/16/2015 08:20 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:45:28PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>
>> Crickets ... https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/virt/
>>
>> The virt list has long been in an odd place. Fedora has best in class
>> virt support, because so many vi
YUM did show dependency problems down to the "library.so.version", DNF
just says "skip" even with the -v flag
"-v" is showing another bug, there is no need to mention "deltainfo"
when "deltarpm=0" is confirgured and maybe that is why DNF *is so
terrible slow* all the time
"yum update /downlo
arnaud gaboury writes:
> I have been working on my first rpmbuild since quite a few days now.
>
> The rpm is intendeed to install R[0] built with Intel MKL libraries
> and Intel compiler. As a base for the spec file, I used the one from
> Fedora R package[1].
Why? I ask as someone who supports
Michael Stahl writes:
>> Symbol interposition is used a lot for very useful features, blocking
>> interposition would break a lot of stuff.
>
> really? i've always thought that it was only useful for libc symbols,
> but maybe that's because i don't work on base OS stuff.
I'd guess most uses are
On 09/15/2015 09:56 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I'll be building openmpi 1.10.0 for rawhide soon. This has soname bumps so
I'll be rebuilding dependent packages as well:
hdf5 build is hanging in a test. I'll try to track that down. If I
can't quickly I'll rebuild without the test to build t
Dave Johansen writes:
>> For what it's worth, you can use vagrant with the
>> kaorimatz/fedora-rawhide-x86_64 box. A search on the hashicorp atlas
>> finds it.
>>
>
> Are there any instructions on how to use this for testing?
I don't understand. It provides a system in which you can do what yo
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 01:20:49PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:45:28PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > Crickets ... https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/virt/
> >
> > The virt list has long been in an odd place. Fedora has best in class
> > virt su
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:45:28PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> Crickets ... https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/virt/
>
> The virt list has long been in an odd place. Fedora has best in class
> virt support, because so many virt developers use it. It also follows
> upstream very
Compose started at Wed Sep 16 07:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[apache-scout]
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:uddi-ws)
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires
mvn(org.apache.juddi:
Crickets ... https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/virt/
The virt list has long been in an odd place. Fedora has best in class
virt support, because so many virt developers use it. It also follows
upstream very closely, with upstream packages like libvirt and qemu
going straight into Rawhid
Compose started at Wed Sep 16 05:15:04 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
[apache-scout]
On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 18:09:44 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 15/09/15 13:58 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> >I have been working on my first rpmbuild since quite a few days now.
>
> As a more gneral comment, why not try something *much* simpler for
> your first rpmbuild?
>
> Try something that
On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 18:31:57 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> >> >> These last lines are part of the %file section,
> >> >
> >> > Why have you deleted the lines?
> >> > What did they tell?
> >>
> >> I deleted nothing. These last few lines are the end of screen output
> >> when running rpmbuild. I th
With recent update of rubygem-maruku, the license was changed from
GPLv2+ to MIT and BSD.
Best regards.
Vít
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 3:07 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
> Also, when will you stop posting your failures at here? I see most of
> failures are caused by yourself.
Ha ha, of course ! It is my mistakes thus why I ask for hints.
Basically, I'd read docs first.
I did read a lot of rpm packages.
Fro
47 matches
Mail list logo
