Re: bodhi 2 now live

2015-08-21 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Fri, 21 Aug, 2015 at 05:20:32 GMT, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > Unlike yesterday, I am now seeing green "push to stable" buttons for > packages which have been in "testing" for longer times (weeks, months). > > However, I am not seeing these buttons for packages, which I had > submitted in recent p

Re: bodhi 2 now live

2015-08-21 Thread Johnny Robeson
On Sat, 2015-08-22 at 10:46 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > On 8/22/15, Haïkel wrote: > > Sometimes, I wonder if you're not doing this on purpose. > > > > Rather than preventing our infrastructure team to fix the actual > > issues > > with useless squabbles, just open tickets to let them know. >

Re: bodhi 2 now live

2015-08-21 Thread Christopher Meng
On 8/22/15, Haïkel wrote: > Sometimes, I wonder if you're not doing this on purpose. > > Rather than preventing our infrastructure team to fix the actual issues > with useless squabbles, just open tickets to let them know. > Forget the ridiculous github excuse, fedorahosted trac instance still > a

Re: Fedora Notifications - howto?

2015-08-21 Thread Ralph Bean
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:10:29AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 13:15:41 +0200 > Michael Schwendt wrote: > > I'm still in search of a howto. A howto about the user-interface, the > > various filters and rules, and real documentation about how to use it. > > I don't think there

Re: ncurses update to 6.0

2015-08-21 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 04:18:51PM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 12:18:15PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: > > According to http://www.gnu.org/software/ncurses/ the new ABI should include > > symbol versioning, which would hopefully avoid the need for a repeat of this > > pain

Re: Firefox testing - offscreen surfaces and OMTC

2015-08-21 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 03:38:49PM +0200, Martin Stransky wrote: > On 08/21/2015 03:34 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > >On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Martin Stransky wrote: > >>I see the same flickering on NVIDIA hardware. Intel seems to be fine. > > > >Which model? Is it using one of the old

Re: Rawhide plans

2015-08-21 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 09:18 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > * Matt opened a thread on the marketing list about renaming rawhide. > It > sounds like most people would prefer us to make the changes first, > then and only then look at renaming. Hate to resurrect the bikeshed, but I was looking thr

Re: Firefox testing - offscreen surfaces and OMTC

2015-08-21 Thread Michael Cronenworth
On 08/21/2015 03:33 AM, Martin Stransky wrote: And you're set now. Please report any oddity (different than the usual ones :)) at #BZ. Opened: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255917 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinf

[Test-Announce] 2015-08-24 @ 1600 UTC ** F23 Blocker Review Meeting

2015-08-21 Thread Mike Ruckman
# F23 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2015-08-24 # Time: 1600 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net This week we had an out of band blocker review where we plowed through a bunch of proposals. Next week we'll be having another meeting (at the usual day and time) to finish the r

Re: Firefox testing - offscreen surfaces and OMTC

2015-08-21 Thread Johnny Robeson
On Fri, 2015-08-21 at 15:24 +0200, Martin Stransky wrote: > I see the same flickering on NVIDIA hardware. Intel seems to be fine. > I'm getting flickering (but only when scrolling up) on the linked cairo xrender bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1015218 Adapter Description In

Re: Removing glibc librtkaio support in Fedora Rawhide.

2015-08-21 Thread Carlos O'Donell
On 08/21/2015 03:23 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > * Immediately remove rtkaio from Fedora Rawhide, deprecating the library, > and providing a system change notification about the library removal for > F24. Both the glibc 2.23 and librtkaio removal system change notifications have now been draft

Removing glibc librtkaio support in Fedora Rawhide.

2015-08-21 Thread Carlos O'Donell
On July 2003 the rtkaio add-on was added to Fedora in glibc 2.3.2-64. The rtkaio add-on provided a POSIX realtime API interface that used linux kernel Asynchronous IO support (KAIO) to provide high performance AIO for a small subset of files (those using O_DIRECT, and not all file types). Typica

Re: Package repositories missing both a spec file and a dead.package file

2015-08-21 Thread Jan Chaloupka
Hi On 08/21/2015 07:48 PM, Viktor Jancik wrote: Using an automated script I found 65 repositories that neither have a spec file or a dead.package among Fedora package repositories on the master branch. Is this desired? Here is the list: askbot-plugin-authfas autoconf268 bwping Django14 drupal

Re: F23 System Wide Change: Glibc locale subpackaging

2015-08-21 Thread Carlos O'Donell
On 06/22/2015 10:59 AM, Alexander Larsson wrote: > On mån, 2015-06-22 at 06:16 -0400, Jan Kurik wrote: >> = Proposed System Wide Change: Glibc locale subpackaging = >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Glibc_locale_subpackaging >> >> Change owner(s): >> * Mike Fabian >> * Siddhesh Poyarekar

Re: F23 System Wide Change: Glibc locale subpackaging

2015-08-21 Thread Carlos O'Donell
On 06/22/2015 09:01 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote: > On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 06:16 -0400, Jan Kurik wrote: >> Recently we made it possible to install a small number of locales by >> supplying the rpm-macro “_install_langs”, for example >> >>rpm -i -D _install_langs="en:de_DE" glibc-common.rpm >> >>

Re: bodhi 2 now live

2015-08-21 Thread Haïkel
Sometimes, I wonder if you're not doing this on purpose. Rather than preventing our infrastructure team to fix the actual issues with useless squabbles, just open tickets to let them know. Forget the ridiculous github excuse, fedorahosted trac instance still accepts tickets. Out of respect of the

Re: Package repositories missing both a spec file and a dead.package file

2015-08-21 Thread Kevin Kofler
Rex Dieter wrote: > At least some of these are epel-only packages (examples below) > > dead.package I thought was only applicable to packages that existed in > fedora, then were EOL'd. Should that case be handled differently? EPEL-only packages should have their devel branch (and any other Fedor

Re: bodhi 2 now live

2015-08-21 Thread Kevin Kofler
And another annoyance: The search box appears not to work in KHTML (Return/Enter does nothing) nor even in KWebKitPart/QtWebKit (I get sent to a URL with the search term in it, but it just displays the same front page as before). Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedorapr

Re: bodhi 2 now live

2015-08-21 Thread Kevin Kofler
Kevin Fenzi wrote: > It's markdown. But it eats all line breaks and so breaks basic Markdown formatting such as enumerations that worked fine in Bodhi 1. Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code

Re: bodhi 2 now live

2015-08-21 Thread Kevin Kofler
Kevin Fenzi wrote: > No. While we could roll back, it would be a great deal of pain and > outage, and IMHO things are not "completely and utterly broken". There > are bugs, we are fixing them, and much faster than we would be using > the old codebase. Given how we are dealing with data CORRUPTED b

Re: Firefox testing - offscreen surfaces and OMTC

2015-08-21 Thread Thomas Daede
I've been running nightly with this enabled for quite a while on Intel and it's been fine. Note that OMTC is required for e10s. The layer acceleration pref is a totally different thing and will stay off for the near future. It's affected by a bug in libxcb which has been patched but not made it t

Re: Package repositories missing both a spec file and a dead.package file

2015-08-21 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 13:02:41 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > dead.package I thought was only applicable to packages that existed in > fedora, then were EOL'd. Should that case be handled differently? It prevents new branches from being created. Will there be more empty branches in the future, if th

Re: Package repositories missing both a spec file and a dead.package file

2015-08-21 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 13:48:44 -0400 (EDT), Viktor Jancik wrote: > Using an automated script I found 65 repositories that neither have a spec > file or a dead.package among Fedora package repositories on the master branch. > > Is this desired? Here is the list: [...] > I came to the conclusion,

Re: Package repositories missing both a spec file and a dead.package file

2015-08-21 Thread Rex Dieter
Viktor Jancik wrote: > Using an automated script I found 65 repositories that neither have a spec > file or a dead.package among Fedora package repositories on the master > branch. At least some of these are epel-only packages (examples below) dead.package I thought was only applicable to packa

Package repositories missing both a spec file and a dead.package file

2015-08-21 Thread Viktor Jancik
Using an automated script I found 65 repositories that neither have a spec file or a dead.package among Fedora package repositories on the master branch. Is this desired? Here is the list: askbot-plugin-authfas autoconf268 bwping Django14 drupal7-honeypot drupal7-xmlsitemap fetch-crl3 gnuplot44

Re: Unable to buildroot override build

2015-08-21 Thread Jan Chaloupka
Hi, with bodhi 1.0 I was able to override a build. With bodhi 2.0 I can not. What packages should I updated? I am getting: $ bodhi --buildroot-override=golang-github-coreos-go-systemd-3-1.fc23 for f23-candidate --duration=20 --notes='temp non-stable dependecy waiting for stable' Traceback (

Fedora 23 Branched 20150821 compose check report

2015-08-21 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Generic Boot x86_64 Generic Boot i386 No images in this compose but not the previous. Images in the previous compose but not this: Generic Boot i386 Cloud base Disk i386 Cloud base Disk x86_64 Cloud base Vagrant x86_64 Cloud atomic Disk x86_64 Cloud atomic Vagrant x86_6

Fedora Rawhide 20150821 compose check report

2015-08-21 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Kde Live i386 Kde Live x86_64 Kde Disk armhfp No images in this compose but not the previous. Images in the previous compose but not this: Kde Live i386 Kde Live x86_64 Kde Disk armhfp Failed openQA tests: ID: 638 Test: x86_64 workstation_live default_install ID: 636

Re: bodhi 2 now live

2015-08-21 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 12:39:40 +0200 Michael Schwendt wrote: > Documentation, please! > > How to enter well-formatted comments? Is anything like BB-Code > supported? Or Wiki syntax? Or other formatting hints? > > I hope the comments field is not only for 2-3 words in twitter-style. It's markdown

Re: Unable to submit update for F22 (was Re: bodhi 2 now live)

2015-08-21 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 05:27:37 +0200 Ralf Corsepius wrote: > Upstreams, yes, but not Fedora. Fedora should be self-hosted. Can you please define "Fedora" and "self-hosted" as you use them above? Fedora is part of the larger open source community. Fedora Infrastructure uses 100% open source softwa

Re: Unable to submit update for F22 (was Re: bodhi 2 now live)

2015-08-21 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 01:56:02 +0200 Kevin Kofler wrote: > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Theres a bunch of tools out there to export issues from github > > They can turn this off at any moment, leaving you with no way to get > your data out. Yep. This is the case for any project using non free tools...

Re: bodhi 2 now live

2015-08-21 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 09:08:18 +0100 Tom Hughes wrote: > On 21/08/15 08:46, Till Hofmann wrote: > > > On 08/21/2015 09:00 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >> > >> Anywas, this time bodhi offered me a "push to testing" and "push to > >> stable" (!) button (Note: "push to stable") > >> > >> I used "pushe

Re: bodhi 2 now live

2015-08-21 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 08/21/2015 04:03 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 09:00:29 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 08/21/2015 08:34 AM, Till Hofmann wrote: Also, it seems like I can revoke other people's updates. At least I could press the 'Revoke' button and I received a confirmation notification.

Heads up: nss-3.20 now on Rawhide

2015-08-21 Thread Elio Maldonado
Upstream released nmss-3.20 and the NSS family of packages on Rawhide has been rebased to it. For details please see the upstream release notes at https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Projects/NSS/NSS_3.20_release_notes It should start showing up in updates-testing for stable branch

Re: Firefox testing - offscreen surfaces and OMTC

2015-08-21 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
There is also an issue with elements that are loaded asynchronously - they take longer to appear or it might take a bit of scrolling up and down until they are rendered (with the older nVidia card). -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinf

Re: ncurses update to 6.0

2015-08-21 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 12:18:15PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: > According to http://www.gnu.org/software/ncurses/ the new ABI should include > symbol versioning, which would hopefully avoid the need for a repeat of this > pain in the future, but as far as I can see none of the symbols in the > curren

Re: bodhi 2 now live

2015-08-21 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 09:00:29 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > On 08/21/2015 08:34 AM, Till Hofmann wrote: > >> Also, it seems like I can revoke other people's updates. At least I > >> could press the 'Revoke' button and I received a confirmation > >> notification. Also, instead of the Revoke butto

Re: Firefox testing - offscreen surfaces and OMTC

2015-08-21 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Martin Stransky wrote: > It's GeForce GTX 750 with nvidia binary drivers. So you are not on the legacy drivers. Could the problem be hardware-dependent? The graphics adapter of the laptop I tested is one generation ahead of yours and there is no flickering. -- de

Re: Firefox testing - offscreen surfaces and OMTC

2015-08-21 Thread Martin Stransky
On 08/21/2015 03:34 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Martin Stransky wrote: I see the same flickering on NVIDIA hardware. Intel seems to be fine. Which model? Is it using one of the older driver series? It's GeForce GTX 750 with nvidia binary drivers. ma. --

[Base] Meeting time question

2015-08-21 Thread langdon
Looking at fedocal vs the wiki page, I am not sure when the Base Meeting time & day is (or if there are multiple). Could someone please update fedocal if it is incorrect? Langdon -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Co

Re: Firefox testing - offscreen surfaces and OMTC

2015-08-21 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Martin Stransky wrote: > I see the same flickering on NVIDIA hardware. Intel seems to be fine. Which model? Is it using one of the older driver series? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedo

Re: bodhi 2 now live

2015-08-21 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 08/20/2015 07:40 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On 19 August 2015 at 22:24, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 08/20/2015 06:08 AM, Christopher Meng wrote: On 8/20/15, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Thanks for your patience as we roll out this new bodhi version. "This update has reached 3 days in testing

Re: Firefox testing - offscreen surfaces and OMTC

2015-08-21 Thread Martin Stransky
I see the same flickering on NVIDIA hardware. Intel seems to be fine. On 08/21/2015 03:06 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Martin Stransky wrote: - Install Firefox 40 on Fedora 22,23,Rawhide (you'd need Gtk3 build) - go to about:config, click to any key and add

Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets

2015-08-21 Thread Haïkel
2015-08-21 0:58 GMT+02:00 Orion Poplawski : > On 08/20/2015 02:50 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: >> >> I was just watching the ongoing reports of want-to-be-contributors how hard >> is to get sponsored; reports how Fedora >> Repository stalled [1]; discussion that we actually do not know how many >> a

Re: Unable to submit update for F22 (was Re: bodhi 2 now live)

2015-08-21 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Thursday, August 20, 2015 07:02:51 PM Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 08/20/2015 06:00 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 17:55:01 +0200 > > > > Kevin Kofler wrote: > >> Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >>> I share this view. I refuse to create a github account and do not > >>> consider using an

Re: Firefox testing - offscreen surfaces and OMTC

2015-08-21 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Martin Stransky wrote: > - Install Firefox 40 on Fedora 22,23,Rawhide (you'd need Gtk3 build) > - go to about:config, click to any key and add a new one, boolean type. The > new key name is "layers.use-image-offscreen-surfaces" and set it to true. > - enable "laye

Orphaning rubygem-celluloid

2015-08-21 Thread Vít Ondruch
Hi, I just orphaned rubygem-celluloid in F23 and Rawhide. It used to be dependency of rubygem-listen, but Listen recently dropped the dependency and the development of Celluloid move in a direction, where it will be virtually impossible to package it for Fedora. But if anybody has interest in this

F-23 Branched report: 20150821 changes

2015-08-21 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Fri Aug 21 07:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for armhfp -- [QuantLib] QuantLib-test-1.6.1-1.fc23.armv7hl requires libboost_unit_test_framework.so.1.58.0 [apache-scout] apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires

rawhide report: 20150821 changes

2015-08-21 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Fri Aug 21 05:15:04 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [ScientificPython] ScientificPython-2.8-20.fc22.i686 requires libmpi.so.1 [apache-scout] apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:ud

Re: ncurses update to 6.0

2015-08-21 Thread Tom Hughes
On 04/08/15 11:33, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: The ncurses upstream has released a first 6.0 version few months ago. The default ABI version has changed to 6, which enables some extensions to allow more colors, mouse wheel, etc. The ABI version 5 is still supported and can be selected with a configu

[Base] Agenda item proposal for next meeting

2015-08-21 Thread Honza Horak
On yesterday's Env & Stacks meeting [1] we agreed E&S WG needs talk with Base WG about ring0 and ring1 and how to cooperation will look like. I'd like to ask to add this item on the agenda on next meeting. The next meeting should be this Monday, right? [1] http://meetbot-raw.fedoraproject.org

Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets

2015-08-21 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 10:54:58 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Your script output does not tell anything at all about activity of all > > packagers in the package collection, in the normal review queue(s), in > > pkgdb. No clues about number of orphaned/retired packages. No clues about > > semi-dea

gloox 1.0.14 landed in rawhide + f23

2015-08-21 Thread Christopher Meng
Hi folks, gloox 1.0.14 is landing onto rawhide and f23. This version is not ABI compatible with previous versions(but API compatible). Thus following packages need to be rebuilt: 0ad licq (mine, will do it by myself) uwsgi-alarm-xmpp (from uwsgi) I've CCed maintainers of 0ad and uwsgi, hope the

Re: Firefox testing - offscreen surfaces and OMTC

2015-08-21 Thread drago01
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Martin Stransky wrote: > Folks, > > I'd use some testing for new Firefox feature - offscreen surfaces [1]. It > may also fix crashes when OMTC is enabled [2]. Browser should be a bit > faster with those features on. > > How to test? > > - Install Firefox 40 on Fed

Re: bodhi 2 now live

2015-08-21 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 21:45:56 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > After a longer than expected outage window, I'm happy to report that > bodhi2 is now live in production at > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates > or > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/ > > The web interface should be

Re: bodhi 2 now live

2015-08-21 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 21.08.2015 um 10:40 schrieb Charles-Antoine Couret: and somebody again didn't care about fedora-easy-karma which in 2015 is long broken than working with several issues - no, i don't want to log into a webinterface and seek packages for karma by hand while verify it's the same build running

Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets

2015-08-21 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 21.08.2015 um 08:41 schrieb Aleksandar Kurtakov: - Original Message - From: "Orion Poplawski" To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" Sent: Friday, 21 August, 2015 1:58:35 AM Subject: Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets On 08/20/2015 02:50 AM, Mir

Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets

2015-08-21 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 20.8.2015 v 13:42 Michael Schwendt napsal(a): > Your script output does not tell anything at all about activity of all > packagers in the package collection, in the normal review queue(s), in > pkgdb. No clues about number of orphaned/retired packages. No clues about > semi-dead packages where

Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets

2015-08-21 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 21.8.2015 v 00:58 Orion Poplawski napsal(a): > My gut reaction to this is, my god, we don't need *more* packages in Fedora, > we need more people maintaining the pile we already have. So I'd like to see > more packagers added as co-maintainers of packages. Hmm, so does it means that "becoming

Re: bodhi 2 now live

2015-08-21 Thread Charles-Antoine Couret
> and somebody again didn't care about fedora-easy-karma which in 2015 is long > broken than working with several issues - no, i don't want to log into a > webinterface and seek packages for karma by hand while verify it's the same > build running on my machine... > > Getting list of installed

Re: bodhi 2 now live

2015-08-21 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 20.08.2015 um 05:45 schrieb Kevin Fenzi: Greetings. After a longer than expected outage window, I'm happy to report that bodhi2 is now live in production at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates or https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/ The web interface should be available and working for ad

Firefox testing - offscreen surfaces and OMTC

2015-08-21 Thread Martin Stransky
Folks, I'd use some testing for new Firefox feature - offscreen surfaces [1]. It may also fix crashes when OMTC is enabled [2]. Browser should be a bit faster with those features on. How to test? - Install Firefox 40 on Fedora 22,23,Rawhide (you'd need Gtk3 build) - go to about:config, click

Re: bodhi 2 now live

2015-08-21 Thread Tom Hughes
On 21/08/15 08:46, Till Hofmann wrote: On 08/21/2015 09:00 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: Anywas, this time bodhi offered me a "push to testing" and "push to stable" (!) button (Note: "push to stable") I used "pushed to testing" to re-push it. I just tested "push to stable" on an unpushed updat

Re: bodhi 2 now live

2015-08-21 Thread Till Hofmann
On 08/21/2015 09:00 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > Anywas, this time bodhi offered me a "push to testing" and "push to > stable" (!) button (Note: "push to stable") > > I used "pushed to testing" to re-push it. > I just tested "push to stable" on an unpushed update: Despite the name, it pushes

Re: bodhi 2 now live

2015-08-21 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 08/21/2015 08:47 AM, Till Hofmann wrote: On 08/21/2015 08:34 AM, Till Hofmann wrote: Also, it seems like I can revoke other people's updates. At least I could press the 'Revoke' button and I received a confirmation notification. Also, instead of the Revoke button, there is now a "Push to Te