Hi

On 08/21/2015 07:48 PM, Viktor Jancik wrote:
Using an automated script I found 65 repositories that neither have a spec file 
or a dead.package among Fedora package repositories on the master branch.

Is this desired? Here is the list:

askbot-plugin-authfas
autoconf268
bwping
Django14
drupal7-honeypot
drupal7-xmlsitemap
fetch-crl3
gnuplot44
golang-github-mitchellh-cli

Known issue with golang-github-mitchellh-cli. Package owner just have not imported srpm. I have already contacted him. Jeff, can you finished the import?

Jan

gsview
infomas-asl
jama
jaxws-undertow-httpspi
kdelibs-webkit
kde-plasma-networkmanagement-extras
libgssh
mediawiki116-Cite
mediawiki116-ParserFunctions
mingw-libidl
mod_proxy_fcgi
nodejs-smart-buffer
nyancat
openmolar
openstack-selinux
php53-simplepie
pilas
pipsi
PyQt4-webkit
python26-imaging
python26-markupsafe
python26-msgpack
python26-numpy
python26-PyXML
python34
python-backport_collections
python-compyte
python-crypto2.1
python-genshi06
python-importlib
python-lmdb
python-multiprocessing
python-paramiko1.10
python-schema
python-webob1.4
qpid-snmpd
retrace-client
rubygem-amq-protocol
rubygem-connection_pool
rubygem-faker
rubygem-lumberjack
rubygem-sigdump
sahara-image-elements
sasquatch
senamirmir-washra-font
senna
status-report
stupid-package
sugar-paths
tesla-pom
tnt
trace-gui
vera++
withlock
xfce4-soundmenu-plugin
zabbix22

I came to the conclusion, that these repositories are simply missing a 
dead.package file. I apologize for any false positives.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Reply via email to