Non responsive maintainer: Jaromír Cápík

2015-07-03 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
Upstream version of phatch is available and also a patch provided on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192867 but the assignee is unresponsive. Unfortunately, I am not in proven packager group so it would be nice if someone can submitted and update that package. I understand the main ma

Re: Orphaning python-xhtml2pdf

2015-07-03 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 07/03/2015 12:00 AM, Matthias Runge wrote: I'm orphaning python-xhtml2pdf. It has been more or less dead upstream for years. Looks like it's at https://github.com/chrisglass/xhtml2pdf now and is somewhat active. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject

Re: dnssec-trigger + GNOME + NetworkManager integration

2015-07-03 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Fri, 2015-07-03 at 11:21 -0400, Mike Pinkerton wrote: > Isn't the whole point to eliminate the need for third party > certificate authorities entirely? Well I think you could choose to do that, or you could choose to use it as an additional security measure on top of traditional certificate a

Re: dnssec-trigger + GNOME + NetworkManager integration

2015-07-03 Thread Mike Pinkerton
On 3 Jul 2015, at 10:44, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Fri, 2015-07-03 at 15:43 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote: For the record, and all this can be solved by DNSSEC + DANE. See RFC 6698. I was planning to use DANE as a second required check in addition to the normal certificate chain. That is, if ei

Re: dnssec-trigger + GNOME + NetworkManager integration

2015-07-03 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Fri, 2015-07-03 at 15:43 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote: > For the record, and all this can be solved by DNSSEC + DANE. See RFC > 6698. I was planning to use DANE as a second required check in addition to the normal certificate chain. That is, if either the certificate chain doesn't check out or DAN

Re: dnssec-trigger + GNOME + NetworkManager integration

2015-07-03 Thread Paul Wouters
And dnssec-validator.cx for a Firefox/chrome plugin that you can see in action against fedoraproject.org that already deploys this Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 3, 2015, at 10:43, Petr Spacek wrote: > >> On 2.7.2015 17:56, Michael Catanzaro wrote: >>> On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 16:38 +0200, Reindl

rawhide report: 20150703 changes

2015-07-03 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Fri Jul 3 05:15:04 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [airsched] airsched-1.00.0-12.fc23.i686 requires libzmq.so.4 [apache-scout] apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:uddi-ws)

Re: dnssec-trigger + GNOME + NetworkManager integration

2015-07-03 Thread Petr Spacek
On 2.7.2015 17:56, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 16:38 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: >> this type of attitude? >> >> everybody who reads IT news over the past years about CA's issued >> certificates even for Google knows that a CA signed certificate does >> not >> prove anything

Re: Do appdata files installed by a package do anything?

2015-07-03 Thread Richard Shaw
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 6:15 AM, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 3 July 2015 at 06:29, Florian Weimer wrote: > > Any file change would be invisible until the appstream-data package > > contents is regenerated, right? I suspect that's what causes testing > > challenges. > > You can prefer local files

Re: Investigation of the F23 mass rebuild

2015-07-03 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 2.7.2015 v 16:49 Adam Jackson napsal(a): > There are 173 non-now binaries installed under /usr/share. 68 of those > are ircd-ratbox, and 56 are rubygem-gherkin. Filed bug for rubygem-gherkin: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1239048 This looks to be packager's overlook. Vít --

Re: Do appdata files installed by a package do anything?

2015-07-03 Thread Richard Hughes
On 3 July 2015 at 06:29, Florian Weimer wrote: > Any file change would be invisible until the appstream-data package > contents is regenerated, right? I suspect that's what causes testing > challenges. You can prefer local files over the distro-supplied data using: killall gnome-software gnome-

Re: F23 System Wide Change: Layered Docker Image Build Service

2015-07-03 Thread Steven Crothers
If you start creating “layers” in /whatever/ container system, how do you inform the RPM database of what is installed safely? It seems like the deltas in each image would start to cause some file integrity issues with RPM to me. Unless we’re specifically talking about layering without RPM, in

Re: F23 System Wide Change: Layered Docker Image Build Service

2015-07-03 Thread Jan Kurik
- Original Message - > From: "Pierre-Yves Chibon" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Cc: devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Friday, July 3, 2015 9:06:21 AM > Subject: Re: F23 System Wide Change: Layered Docker Image Build Service > > On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 02:59:48AM -0400

Re: F23 System Wide Change: Layered Docker Image Build Service

2015-07-03 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 02:59:48AM -0400, Jan Kurik wrote: > = Proposed System Wide Change: Layered Docker Image Build Service = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Layered_Docker_Image_Build_Service > > Change owner(s): > * Colin Walters > * Adam Miller > * Tomas Tomecek > * Tim W

Orphaning python-xhtml2pdf

2015-07-03 Thread Matthias Runge
Hello, I'm orphaning python-xhtml2pdf. It has been more or less dead upstream for years. Matthias -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

F23 System Wide Change: Layered Docker Image Build Service

2015-07-03 Thread Jan Kurik
= Proposed System Wide Change: Layered Docker Image Build Service = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Layered_Docker_Image_Build_Service Change owner(s): * Colin Walters * Adam Miller * Tomas Tomecek * Tim Waugh Fedora currently ships a Docker base image, but Docker supports a la