I have used Fedora 21 with 4k display for almost a year, but few weeks
ago some update broke support for 4k display resolution. I'm guessing
that intel driver is at fault.
Have any of have also noticed this issue with 4k displays on Intel
hardware or also on some other hardware?
Obligatory link t
MPIR 2.7.0 has arrived, and brings an soname bump with it. As far as
I can tell, nothing in Fedora uses mpir, so I don't think anything
needs to be rebuilt. If I'm wrong about that, send me some hate mail
and I'll rebuild your package.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing li
On 07/01/15 at 09:08am, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 1:36 AM, Dave Young wrote:
> > Pratyush,
> >
> > Thanks for the effort, let's cc Fedora devel list, see if we can get help
> > from Fedora experts.
> >
> > Summary the problem:
> > Latest kexec-tools koji build in rawhide resul
On Qua, 2015-07-01 at 21:46 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 9:44 PM, Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
>
>
> yeap , Xavier is the infrastructure maintainer of RPMFusion ,
> you find
> him in irc:#rpmfusion-admin with Nick: SmootherFrOgZ .
>
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 9:44 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> yeap , Xavier is the infrastructure maintainer of RPMFusion , you find
> him in irc:#rpmfusion-admin with Nick: SmootherFrOgZ .
> But we must insist a bit and wait a lot :)
It sounds like it's not a priority for him, it may be better to gi
On Qua, 2015-07-01 at 21:33 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I haven't gone through all the requirements but it seems pretty clear
> that brasero is unmaintained.
>
>
> There are 15 open bugs and looking through the package changelog I
> can't find the last time it was updated by it's maintainer, Xa
I haven't gone through all the requirements but it seems pretty clear that
brasero is unmaintained.
There are 15 open bugs and looking through the package changelog I can't
find the last time it was updated by it's maintainer, Xavier Lamien <
lxt...@gmail.com>.
There is also an unanswered admin
Am 02.07.2015 um 02:13 schrieb Michael Catanzaro:
On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 00:44 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
the more important question: who do gnome developers think they are
to
make such decisions?
Hi Reindl,
If you know enough about TLS to decide whether to click the Load Anyway
button in
Am 02.07.2015 um 02:30 schrieb Michael Catanzaro:
On Wed, 2015-07-01 at 19:59 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
Principles are good and well. But how many times did you actually USE
that option you so reluctantly implemented? :)
Actually, I honestly don't remember ever using it except testing it
dur
On Wed, 2015-07-01 at 19:59 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> Principles are good and well. But how many times did you actually USE
> that option you so reluctantly implemented? :)
Actually, I honestly don't remember ever using it except testing it
during development. I just don't visit broken sites. T
On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 00:44 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> the more important question: who do gnome developers think they are
> to
> make such decisions?
Hi Reindl,
If you know enough about TLS to decide whether to click the Load Anyway
button in your browser on a particular site, or enough abo
On Wed, 1 Jul 2015, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 19:26:55
From: Michael Catanzaro
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: dnssec-trigger + GNOME + NetworkManager integration
On Wed, 2015-07-01 at 18:40 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
That's the same as saying remove the "c
On Wed, 2015-07-01 at 18:40 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> That's the same as saying remove the "continue anyway" frmo the
> browser.
Yeah, I want to do that too; actually I added it to Epiphany myself,
not because it's a good idea, but because I know we'll be in for
complaints otherwise, because F
On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Bastien Nocera wrote:
Once DNSSEC is more widely deployed
What is "more widely deployed" ?
http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/2015-06-19-2015-06-19.png
There are 991 zones in the root and 814 are signed and securely delegated.
http://sta
Am 02.07.2015 um 00:40 schrieb Paul Wouters:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
What we basically do not want is to give the user an option for turning
a security feature off.
That's the same as saying remove the "continue anyway" frmo the browser.
Only the human can determine if i
On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
I'm confused on one point: why would the user ever want to turn off
DNSSEC validation (except to get past a for captive portal)? It sounds
like you have no shortage of safeguards in place to make sure this
always works: for it to break the user would
On Wed, 2015-06-24 at 13:53 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 12:56 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:21 AM, Peter Robinson <
> > pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Why are we even bothering with this when io.js is merging back
> > > into
> > >
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2015-07-02 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2015-07-02 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT
2015-07-02 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT
2015-07-02 1
The new libvirt-sandbox release 0.6.0 pushed to rawhide has a minor API
change and corresponding soname bump of the library.
I'll likely push this update to stable branches too, as it fixes a number
of problems and I think its unlikely there are downstream apps linking
to its library beyond the in
Il giorno mar, 30/06/2015 alle 06.13 -0400, Bastien Nocera ha scritto:
> It doesn't need updating, the error you're seeing is:
> "DMA: Out of SW-IOMMU space for 65536 bytes at device :09:00.1"
>
> Which I reported upstream here:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mmc/32629
> but whic
Kamil Paral a écrit:
>> Then, when the package N-udpate-V-R is later submitted to Bodhi, the
>> update creation process would query ResultDB for the result of the
>> relevant ABI check that happened at build time. The decision to allow
>> an automatic push of the update to stable will depend on
Hello,
Martin Krizek a écrit:
> From what I understood, the current status of the ABI comparison is that it
> only
> works with C/C++ programs.
Right.
> Have you given a thought on how do we know that the build under test
> includes a C program and so we should run the comparison on it?
The
Compose started at Wed Jul 1 05:15:04 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[airsched]
airsched-1.00.0-12.fc23.i686 requires libzmq.so.4
[apache-scout]
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:uddi-ws)
On 1 July 2015 at 14:02, Ahmad Samir wrote:
> On 1 July 2015 at 12:14, Ian Malone wrote:
>
>>
>> It appears to have broken the ability to install the gdata provider,
>> at least when I installed a new F22 system at the weekend I found I
>> couldn't install it because it requires the lightning pa
Hello everyone,
I would like to start with Mass bug filing process and as stated
at wiki, the first step is to gain consensus for what I want to make.
Note please that this mass bug filing is conditioned with acceptance of
'Python3 as default' change which will be discussed at todays (01-Jul)
me
- Original Message -
> From: "Dodji Seketeli"
> To: "Fedora Devel"
> Cc: kpa...@fedoraproject.org, mkri...@fedoraproject.org,
> skum...@fedoraproject.org, sgall...@fedoraproject.org,
> tfl...@fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 10:52:47 AM
> Subject: An update about: Checki
On 1 July 2015 at 12:14, Ian Malone wrote:
>
> It appears to have broken the ability to install the gdata provider,
> at least when I installed a new F22 system at the weekend I found I
> couldn't install it because it requires the lightning package which is
> obsoleted by current thunderbird.
>
I have question about
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DisabledRepoSupport
We (as Copr developers) are thinking about one RFE. We would like to create
package which would contains .repo files and
gpg keys for every Copr project.
All of them with
enabled=0
enabled_metadata=1
But I won
On 30 June 2015 at 16:33, Ahmad Samir wrote:
> On 30 June 2015 at 17:22, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 30.06.2015 um 17:02 schrieb Ahmad Samir:
>>>
>>> IIUC, what's happening here is that they bundle the extension with
>>> Thunderbird 38 so it's installed and enabled by default; so when you
>>
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 1:36 AM, Dave Young wrote:
> Pratyush,
>
> Thanks for the effort, let's cc Fedora devel list, see if we can get help
> from Fedora experts.
>
> Summary the problem:
> Latest kexec-tools koji build in rawhide results in a wrong kexec binary,
> kexec load fails with something
30 matches
Mail list logo
