Il 19/06/2015 23:20, Orion Poplawski ha scritto:
I have orphaned jericho-html. The only package that appears to require it is
ditaa, so perhaps that maintainter will pick it up. It currently fails to
build in rawhide:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10099283
fixed in je
Great,
Sure, I'll leave comments there once would achieve some progress.
19.06.2015, 07:21, "Rex Dieter" :
> Rex Dieter wrote:
>
>> Rex Dieter wrote:
>>
>>> Ruslan Nigmatullin wrote:
>>>
12.06.2015, 16:32, "Rex Dieter" :
> Ruslan Nigmatullin wrote:
>
>>> Are you willing to h
I have orphaned jericho-html. The only package that appears to require it is
ditaa, so perhaps that maintainter will pick it up. It currently fails to
build in rawhide:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10099283
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/jericho-html
--
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 2:43 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
> On Friday, 19 June 2015 at 01:10, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
>> # a regular expression that paths in an RPM
>> # must match to trigger the generator
>> %__openmpi_path ^%{_prefix}/lib(64)/(openmpi|mpich)/.*$
>
> Isn't the '.*$
Hi All,
the mass rebuild has been done and is baing tagged back into f23 in koji, so
it will land in the buildroots shortly and in rawhide tomorrow. Please check
and fix any of your packages that failed to build. they can be found at
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/mass-rebuild/f23-failures
From 8816169dfa933e499a36068081b30933325d876c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?=
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 15:11:45 +0200
Subject: Correct changelog entry
diff --git a/perl-Net-eBay.spec b/perl-Net-eBay.spec
index fe93e8e..106dced 100644
--- a/perl-Net-eBay.spec
+++ b
Thank you for the relevant information, much appreciated.
2015-06-18 19:55 GMT+02:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek :
>
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 05:27:22PM +0200, Soeren Moeller wrote:
> > I will try to comment on package reviews of other packages during the
next
> > few days, to get a feeling for
So, the current status is that things are mostly back to
normal/working, however there are still a few repos that we have old
metalink data for (fedora 22 updates testing x86_64).
We are working on updating all those and hopefully everything will be
back to normal later today.
http://status.fedo
==
#fedora-meeting-2: Env and Stacks (2015-06-18)
==
Meeting started by hhorak1 at 12:00:23 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2015-06-18/env-and-stacks.2015
Crikey good luck, hoping it doesn't spoil anyone's weekend.
Lee Fuller (via mobile)
On 19 Jun 2015 4:56 pm, "Sérgio Basto" wrote:
> On Sex, 2015-06-19 at 17:49 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >
> > Am 19.06.2015 um 17:47 schrieb Sérgio Basto:
> > > On Sex, 2015-06-19 at 16:40 +0200, Ralf Corsepius
On Tue, 2015-06-16 at 22:58 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> the list of current failures can be found at
> http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/mass-rebuild/f23-failures.html
If someone else happens to have their build fail on find-debuginfo.sh
...:
+ /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh --strict-bu
On Sex, 2015-06-19 at 17:49 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 19.06.2015 um 17:47 schrieb Sérgio Basto:
> > On Sex, 2015-06-19 at 16:40 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >> seems to me, as if "fedora 22 updates" is down:
> >>
> >> # dnf --refresh update
> >> RPM Fusion for Fedora 22 - Free - Updates
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 05:49:31PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> what about read other mails in the thread *before* reply to the OP?
Remember, email is an unreliable system. Sometimes they come in a
different rate (and, particularly, while we're having network
problems...). There's really not much
Am 19.06.2015 um 17:47 schrieb Sérgio Basto:
On Sex, 2015-06-19 at 16:40 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
seems to me, as if "fedora 22 updates" is down:
# dnf --refresh update
RPM Fusion for Fedora 22 - Free - Updates
12 kB/s | 395 B 00:00
RPM F
On Sex, 2015-06-19 at 16:40 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Hi,
>
> seems to me, as if "fedora 22 updates" is down:
>
> # dnf --refresh update
> RPM Fusion for Fedora 22 - Free - Updates
> 12 kB/s | 395 B 00:00
> RPM Fusion for Fedora 22 - Nonfree
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 05:39:47PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 06/19/2015 04:53 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Of course, you're right, it's likely a master repository,
> mirrormanager or mirroring issue, or similar.
> FWIW: I am now also observing a similar issue with yum and f21/updates:
[...]
On 06/19/2015 04:53 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 19.06.2015 um 16:40 schrieb Ralf Corsepius:
seems to me, as if "fedora 22 updates" is down:
# dnf --refresh update
RPM Fusion for Fedora 22 - Free - Updates
12 kB/s | 395 B 00:00
RPM Fusion for F
I have actually seen this happening for two days now, I don't have any
output to hand but a "dnf update" seems to intermittently hang for a long
time and eventually fail.
Lee Fuller (via mobile)
On 19 Jun 2015 3:53 pm, "Reindl Harald" wrote:
>
>
> Am 19.06.2015 um 16:40 schrieb Ralf Corsepius:
>
Am 19.06.2015 um 16:40 schrieb Ralf Corsepius:
seems to me, as if "fedora 22 updates" is down:
# dnf --refresh update
RPM Fusion for Fedora 22 - Free - Updates
12 kB/s | 395 B 00:00
RPM Fusion for Fedora 22 - Nonfree - Updates
Hi,
seems to me, as if "fedora 22 updates" is down:
# dnf --refresh update
RPM Fusion for Fedora 22 - Free - Updates
12 kB/s | 395 B 00:00
RPM Fusion for Fedora 22 - Nonfree - Updates
552 B/s | 395 B
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Rex Dieter wrote:
>
>> Ruslan Nigmatullin wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 12.06.2015, 16:32, "Rex Dieter" :
Ruslan Nigmatullin wrote:
>> Are you willing to help work on it? :)
>
> Sure, I may have a look. How can I start?
Start by identifying precisely
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Ruslan Nigmatullin wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> 12.06.2015, 16:32, "Rex Dieter" :
>>> Ruslan Nigmatullin wrote:
>>>
> Are you willing to help work on it? :)
Sure, I may have a look. How can I start?
>>>
>>> Start by identifying precisely what should be declared as private
Compose started at Fri Jun 19 05:15:04 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[apache-scout]
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:uddi-ws)
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires
mvn(org.apache.juddi:ju
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 02:21:35PM +0200, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-06-19 at 12:13 +, build...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> >
> > ocaml-config-file has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
> > On x86_64:
> > ocaml-config-file-1.2-4.fc23.x86_64 requires ocaml(runtime
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 06:26:22PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> This is complete now.
Oops, there were four stragglers which I'd missed out of my script but
were picked up by Fedora's own dependency checker:
- ocaml-config-file - done
and the following are currently being built:
- plpl
On Fri, 2015-06-19 at 12:13 +, build...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
>
> ocaml-config-file has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
> On x86_64:
> ocaml-config-file-1.2-4.fc23.x86_64 requires ocaml(runtime)
> = 0:4.02.1
> ocaml-config-file-1.2-4.fc23.x86_64 requires ocaml(Obj) =
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 2:49 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
>> >> It is written in a scope what does 'default' stands for.
>> >> Also from a additional porting POV (packages which ain't covered by scope
>> >> an
On Friday, 19 June 2015 at 01:10, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
[...]
> You should instead use the new depdendency generator hooks, which are
> also quite a bit nicer to work with. All you have to do is create a
> file %{_rpmconfigdir}/fileattrs/openmpi.attrs with something like:
>
> # the path to you
= Proposed Self Contained Change: IBus 1.6 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/IBus1.6
Change owner(s): Takao Fujiwara
IBus 1.6 will have the features of XKB prefix language icons on the panel in
KDE 5 and support $HOME/.XCompose file in non-GNOME desktops.
== Detailed Description ==
Pla
29 matches
Mail list logo
