Thank you for the relevant information, much appreciated. 2015-06-18 19:55 GMT+02:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl>: > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 05:27:22PM +0200, Soeren Moeller wrote:
> > I will try to comment on package reviews of other packages during the next > > few days, to get a feeling for the review process. > Welcome! > > http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus might be useful if you're looking > for review tickets. You'd want the "new tickets" subcategory... and start > at the bottom, with the newest ones, and ignore green ones. > I now have done a review comment, carrying out most of the items from the review guidelines on the orocos-bfl library: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1233240 > If you want to concentrate on scientific packages, you might want to add > yourself to CC list on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=FE-SCITECH, > and also look at current list of dependent tickets. Very interesting, I have but myself in cc and will use this as a starting point for doing more review comments in the next days. > > You mentioned rpmlint, but not fedora-review. I strongly suggest it, since > it does more interesting checks. I used fedora-review for the review comment on orocos-bfl, thank you for pointing it out. It is extremely effective in generating most of the files I wanted to look at and a nice overview and list of points to start out with. Best Sören
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
