# F22 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2015-05-14
# Time: 1600 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
As I suggested in my earlier mail, let's do a special blocker review
meeting to clear out the proposed blockers and FEs that have shown up
since Monday! Let's make it Thursday to
On Tue, 12 May 2015 21:26:42 -0300
Adrian Soliard wrote:
> Dennis,
>Once a time, someone told me that Beta RC4 was the final release,
For Fedora 22 Beta we had 3 RC's. So, 22_Beta_RC3 was the actual Beta
release.
> this final freeze is the same? If I install final freeze, then I need
> to
Dennis,
Once a time, someone told me that Beta RC4 was the final release,
this final freeze is the same? If I install final freeze, then I need
to update to the final release? Where can I download final freeze?
2015-05-12 10:59 GMT-03:00 Dennis Gilmore :
> Hi all,
>
> Today is an important day
Hi, folks! We're now frozen for F22 Final, but a pile of blocker and
FE nominations arrived after the review meeting, several with updates
attached. It would be good to get these reviewed before next week.
Especially of note, we have an FE request for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If y
Compose started at Tue May 12 07:15:02 UTC 2015
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[gooddata-cl]
gooddata-cl-1.2.73-1.fc21.noarch requires jackrabbit-webdav
[maven-wagon]
maven-wagon-webdav-jackrabbit-2.8-1.fc22.noarch requires
mvn(org
I use Unison, and I have 2.40.x in Fedora and on the CentOS box I sync with
on the other side. And since Debian and Ubuntu also ship 2.40, that would
work equally well.
Truthfully I didn't know there was a stable version 2.48. If I could get it
on CentOS and Debian, I'd be happy to run it in Fedor
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 12:01:49PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>Dne 12.5.2015 v 10:32 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 08:45:34AM +0200, Vit Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 12.5.2015 v 08:37 Aditya Prakash napsal(a):
>
> And this is list of small issues good for st
On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 09:56 +0200, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> While working for an updated ipcalc to support ipv6 transparently, I
> figured we have more tools which are not IPv6-ready and awkwardly
> provide an additional tool with a -6 suffix, supposedly for separate
> IPv6 support. That lo
On Mon, 2015-05-04 at 13:09 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> extremetuxracer: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9650861
> jack-audio-connection-kit:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9651019
Fixed.
Nils
--
Nils Philippsen "Those who would give up Essential L
2015-05-12 12:16 GMT-03:00 Samuel Sieb :
> On 05/12/2015 07:29 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>
>> I'm trying Fedora 22 and shows randomly stripes, my info:
>>
>> It didn't do this with F21? Can you describe the effect more or take a
> picture? I have some weird background image distortions on a simi
> While working for an updated ipcalc to support ipv6 transparently, I
> figured we have more tools which are not IPv6-ready and awkwardly
> provide an additional tool with a -6 suffix, supposedly for separate
> IPv6 support. That looks like a relic of the past, we still drag. IPv6
> support should
On 05/12/2015 07:29 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
I'm trying Fedora 22 and shows randomly stripes, my info:
It didn't do this with F21? Can you describe the effect more or take a
picture? I have some weird background image distortions on a similar
video controller with F21.
Video card:
Slot:
On Tue, 12 May 2015 09:39:26 +0100
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 09:12:38AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > An F22 update I've been trying to submit has been sitting there,
> > neither proceeding nor failing, for about 20 minutes now.
>
> Having said that, it co
On Tue, 12 May 2015 14:31:43 +0200
Alec Leamas wrote:
> On 12/05/15 13:36, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Ter, 2015-05-12 at 09:39 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> > This update is currently being pushed to the Fedora 22 testing
> > updates repository. But isn't pushed yet (12 hours later !?) .
On Tue, 12 May 2015 14:59:11 +0200
Timotheus Pokorra wrote:
> > what we (in secondary arches) primarily need is the decision how to
> > proceed - incremental rebuild over 3.4 or complete rebootstrap.
> > Naturally we prefer the complete rebootstrap as it allows bringing
> > up new arches. And bec
Hi,
I'm trying Fedora 22 and shows randomly stripes, my info:
Video card:
Slot: 00:02.0
Class: VGA compatible controller
Vendor: Intel Corporation
Device: 82945G/GZ Integrated Graphics Controller
SVendor:Elitegroup Computer Systems
SDevice:Device 1b76
Rev:02
Driver: i915
M
Hi all,
Today is an important day on the Fedora 22 schedule[1], with a
significant cut-offs.
Today is the Beta freeze[2]. This means that only packages which
fix accepted blocker or freeze exception bugs[3][4] will be marked as
'stable' and included in the Final composes. Other builds will remai
> btw, the monolite binary is a native binary prebuilt for x86 only or
> can it be easily built also for other arches?
according to http://www.mono-project.com/docs/compiling-mono/compiling-from-git/
this should work: make get-monolite-latest
Also have a look at
http://www.mono-project.com/docs/ab
> what we (in secondary arches) primarily need is the decision how to
> proceed - incremental rebuild over 3.4 or complete rebootstrap.
> Naturally we prefer the complete rebootstrap as it allows bringing up
> new arches. And because we are in no way Mono experts, we would
> appreciate the procedur
Hello,
>> So, I guess the failure needs to be resolved first.
>
> Upstream has fixed it and you can pull in their patch.
>
> https://github.com/mono/mono/commit/16ee0252305fbd4f40ea39c3c4421dc7f103f8a0
I have now applied this patch, and it builds on Copr:
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/tpok
On 12/05/15 13:36, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Ter, 2015-05-12 at 09:39 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
This update is currently being pushed to the Fedora 22 testing updates
repository. But isn't pushed yet (12 hours later !?) .
12 hours is nothing these days, infra seem to have problems. Curr
Compose started at Tue May 12 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[Macaulay2]
Macaulay2-1.6-10.fc22.i686 requires libntl.so.9
[dmlite-plugins-memcache]
dmlite-plugins-memcache-0.5.0-7.fc20.i686 requires libprotobuf.so.8
[
On Tue, 12 May 2015 13:42:46 +0200
Timotheus Pokorra wrote:
> Hello Dan,
>
> I was made aware on IRC, that Claudio or myself should answer this
> question.
>
> > as Mono 4 adds support for the ppc64le architecture (and aarch64
> > support was probably added earlier), we (the Secondary arches te
W dniu 12.05.2015 o 13:42, Timotheus Pokorra pisze:
as Mono 4 adds support for the ppc64le architecture (and aarch64
support was probably added earlier), we (the Secondary arches team)
would like to see a full bootstrap and subsequent update of %mono_arches
For any questions regarding secondary
On Tue, 12 May 2015 13:42:46 +0200
Timotheus Pokorra wrote:
> Hello Dan,
>
> I was made aware on IRC, that Claudio or myself should answer this
> question.
>
> > as Mono 4 adds support for the ppc64le architecture (and aarch64
> > support was probably added earlier), we (the Secondary arches te
Hello Dan,
I was made aware on IRC, that Claudio or myself should answer this question.
> as Mono 4 adds support for the ppc64le architecture (and aarch64
> support was probably added earlier), we (the Secondary arches team)
> would like to see a full bootstrap and subsequent update of %mono_arch
On Ter, 2015-05-12 at 09:39 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 09:12:38AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > An F22 update I've been trying to submit has been sitting there,
> > neither proceeding nor failing, for about 20 minutes now.
>
> Having said that, it comple
On 05/10/2015 05:00 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
More and more tests/builds appear to require a UTF-8 locale. Perhaps
it's time to have rpm set LANG=C.UTF-8?
Which?
IMO, these packages are broken. Packages must support "C" and be able to
fall back to "C"
Ralf
--
devel mailing list
devel@lis
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2015-05-10, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> If a build system needs a particular language, it should be in the
>> build scripts themselves. People do local, personal compilation in
>> environments that use other languages, and in 'LANG=C' or 'L
Dne 12.5.2015 v 10:32 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 08:45:34AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>Dne 12.5.2015 v 08:37 Aditya Prakash napsal(a):
>>
>>And this is list of small issues good for starters:
>>http://fedoraproject.org/easyfix/
>>
>> Thank you.
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:34:28AM +0200, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 09:04 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > While working for an updated ipcalc to support ipv6 transparently, I
> > > figured we have more tools which are not IPv6-ready and awkwardly
> > > provide an
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 09:12:38AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> An F22 update I've been trying to submit has been sitting there,
> neither proceeding nor failing, for about 20 minutes now.
Having said that, it completed in the end, after perhaps 30 mins.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtual
On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 09:04 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > While working for an updated ipcalc to support ipv6 transparently, I
> > figured we have more tools which are not IPv6-ready and awkwardly
> > provide an additional tool with a -6 suffix, supposedly for separate
> > IPv6 support. That
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 08:45:34AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>Dne 12.5.2015 v 08:37 Aditya Prakash napsal(a):
>
>And this is list of small issues good for starters:
>http://fedoraproject.org/easyfix/
>
> Thank you. But did you notice that most of links on the easy fix pag
Il giorno lun, 11/05/2015 alle 16.12 -0300, Diogo Campos (gmail) ha
scritto:
> a...@lists.fedoraproject.org
done.
Thanks
--
Dario Lesca
(inviato dal mio Linux Fedora 21 con Gnome 3.14)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fed
An F22 update I've been trying to submit has been sitting there,
neither proceeding nor failing, for about 20 minutes now.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-top is 't
On 12/05/15 09:07, Tom Hughes wrote:
Isn't that an issue for the upstream of each tool? It's hardly something
that can be addressed at the Fedora level. The relevant upstreams seem
to be:
ping, tracepath - https://github.com/iputils/iputils
traceroute - http://traceroute.sourceforge.net
On 12/05/15 08:56, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
While working for an updated ipcalc to support ipv6 transparently, I
figured we have more tools which are not IPv6-ready and awkwardly
provide an additional tool with a -6 suffix, supposedly for separate
IPv6 support. That looks like a relic of t
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 09:56:45AM +0200, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> While working for an updated ipcalc to support ipv6 transparently, I
> figured we have more tools which are not IPv6-ready and awkwardly
> provide an additional tool with a -6 suffix, supposedly for separate
> IPv6 support.
While working for an updated ipcalc to support ipv6 transparently, I
figured we have more tools which are not IPv6-ready and awkwardly
provide an additional tool with a -6 suffix, supposedly for separate
IPv6 support. That looks like a relic of the past, we still drag. IPv6
support should be transp
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 02:55:04PM +, Fedora Branched Report wrote:
> [syntastic]
> syntastic-d-3.5.0-1.fc22.noarch requires ldc
This is probably a package that is worth being resurrected.
Unfortunately it uses a macro to define all sub-packages, making it hard
to add a "ExcludeArch: %a
42 matches
Mail list logo
