Re: Is there a process for requesting packaging?

On 3/9/15, gil wrote: > hi > i prepared java3d spec file, GpsPrune's dependency > but seem do not build/support ARM arch (rawhide) > [exec] DrawingSurfaceObjectAWT.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x0): undefined reference > to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr0' > [exec] Canvas3D.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x18): undefined reference t

Re: FESCo Meeting Minutes (2015-03-04)

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > Here is my point . > Here is where you guys think it is --<30 light > years>> . I admit I like the irony of you complaining about my use of metaphor while yours fails to state whose point is on earth and th

Re: Is there a process for requesting packaging?

Il 09/03/2015 04:13, Christopher Meng ha scritto: On 3/9/15, gil wrote: hi i prepared java3d spec file, GpsPrune's dependency but seem do not build/support ARM arch (rawhide) [exec] DrawingSurfaceObjectAWT.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x0): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr0' [exec] Canvas

Re: Is there a process for requesting packaging?

On 3/9/15, gil wrote: > hi > i prepared java3d spec file, GpsPrune's dependency > but seem do not build/support ARM arch (rawhide) > [exec] DrawingSurfaceObjectAWT.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x0): undefined reference > to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr0' > [exec] Canvas3D.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x18): undefined reference t

Re: Package Review Request and FE-NEEDSPONSOR

> > > I think you should do a self introduction here first per guideline for newcomers. PS last year I gave a try on docx, its functionality was still patchy at best. -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://cicku.me -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedora

Package Review Request and FE-NEEDSPONSOR

Hi all, This is my first package and I need a sponsor and a reviewer. Could someone do a review for my first package : python-docx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194576 And if someone could sponsor me aswell.I can also do some unofficial reviews. Thanks, Kushal -- devel mailing l

Re: FESCO request to revert password confirmation change in F22

Am 08.03.2015 um 17:24 schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia: There's also a counterproductive effect. Passwords that are enforced, by policy, to be nonsensical gibberish tend to be written down, because no one can remember them. And because no one can remember them, they're written down in easily accessed

Re: FESCO request to revert password confirmation change in F22

On 8 March 2015 at 08:41, Mike Pinkerton wrote: > > > > Ok, to bring this back around to where we started -- password quality > checkers on Fedora: > > 1. By positing a "strategic" attacker, we have now reduced the time we > expect it to take him/her to crack our 29 character password (" > rasta

Re: some differences between "doc" stuff and "license" stuff

On 03/08/2015 07:48 AM, Björn Persson wrote: · Files under /usr/share/doc are automatically tagged as documentation files even if "%doc" isn't used. Files under /usr/share/licenses are not automatically tagged as license files, so they need to be preceded by "%license" in file lists. I noticed

Re: Is there a process for requesting packaging?

Il 08/03/2015 04:03, Pete Travis ha scritto: On Mar 7, 2015 6:15 AM, "Kevin Fenzi" > wrote: > > On Sat, 07 Mar 2015 10:53:27 +0100 > fed...@activityworkshop.net wrote: > > > Hi list, > > > > I'm an upstream developer and I'm unfami

Re: FESCO request to revert password confirmation change in F22

On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Björn Persson wrote: > Mike Pinkerton wrote: >> I was responding to Björn Persson's suggestion that, in discussions >> of password quality, correcthorsebatterystaple would be an example of >> a safe password. > > Safe_r_. Security in passphrases isn't a binary thing

Re: FESCO request to revert password confirmation change in F22

On 7 Mar 2015, at 20:35, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On 7 March 2015 at 15:33, Mike Pinkerton wrote: On 7 Mar 2015, at 15:52, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On 7 March 2015 at 11:53, Mike Pinkerton wrote: On 7 Mar 2015, at 10:41, Björn Persson wrote: Mike Pinkerton wrote: On 6 Mar

some differences between "doc" stuff and "license" stuff

While introducing "%license" in my packages I have noticed these differences that packagers should be aware of, which I haven't seen documented: · There is a macro named _licensedir which is analogous to _docdir, but there is no _pkglicensedir corresponding to _pkgdocdir. Use "%{_licensedir}/%{nam

Re: FESCO request to revert password confirmation change in F22

Mike Pinkerton wrote: > I was responding to Björn Persson's suggestion that, in discussions > of password quality, correcthorsebatterystaple would be an example of > a safe password. Safe_r_. Security in passphrases isn't a binary thing. XKCD 936 demonstrates that "correct horse battery staple

Re: FESCO request to revert password confirmation change in F22

Mike Pinkerton wrote: > On 7 Mar 2015, at 10:41, Björn Persson wrote: > > Mike Pinkerton wrote: > >> On 6 Mar 2015, at 23:49, Adam Williamson wrote: > >>> On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 23:09 +0100, Björn Persson wrote: > I hope https://xkcd.com/936/ will be among the inputs to that > discussion.