On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 15:58 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> The Fedora 21 mass rebuild took about 40 hours. ;)
BTW, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Mass_Rebuild is empty.
What are the goals of a mass rebuild now, given that we just had one
before F21 Beta?
> That's really not the reason for
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 01:23:36 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > * Last upstream release is from 2007 and the same as offered by Fedora.
>
> Then it's not the Fedora maintainer who is not doing his/her job.
At Fedora, it is _mispackaged_ and untested to begin with. The plugin
packages likely have ne
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:53 PM, P J P wrote:
> Hello Simo,
>
> > On Wednesday, 14 January 2015 2:29 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > Sorry this is false. You got enough emails telling you this
> > change is undesirable, that's the definition of opposition
> > and means you have no _consensus_.
>
>
>
Hello Simo,
> On Wednesday, 14 January 2015 2:29 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> Sorry this is false. You got enough emails telling you this
> change is undesirable, that's the definition of opposition
> and means you have no _consensus_.
IIUC, that was for disabling remote root access completely wi
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 02:40:47PM +0200, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> If anyone is interested in having USB/IP working in Fedora, I'm
> looking for someone to review the userspace tools at
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175270.
Taken.
Zbyszek
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorap
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:10:43 -0700
Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 01/12/2015 06:08 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > Dear Fedora developers,
> >
> > I'd like to collect some feedback about the $SUBJECT, i.e. making
> > minimal build root really minimal, explic
On 01/12/2015 06:08 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dear Fedora developers,
I'd like to collect some feedback about the $SUBJECT, i.e. making
minimal build root really minimal, explicitly specifying build
dependencies, etc.
Would it be technically feasible to have a different buildroot for arch
and n
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 12:45:39AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 04:26:00PM -0500, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > (Incidentally, this would be much less of a problem if we had a way
> > to add all the needed BuildRequires: automatically, and actually did
> > that. But the m
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 04:26:00PM -0500, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> (Incidentally, this would be much less of a problem if we had a way
> to add all the needed BuildRequires: automatically, and actually did
> that. But the mere presence of these BuildRequires: in spec files
> would still be accident
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:32:09AM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Of the 7742 that are arch specific, we do not know how many need to
> have gcc or gcc-c++ installed in the buildroot for them to compile.
> though we could likely look at the BuildRequires and make an educated
> guess.
auto-buildreq
Once upon a time, Kevin Fenzi said:
> So, while the mass rebuild itself is less than 2 days, it takes a while
> to stablize things after that. If we branched right after the mass
> rebuild we would have to then stablize both rawhide and f22.
One other thing that takes time (as a former mirror ad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:58:51 -0700
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:50:06 -0700
> Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> > You forgot "too many packages?" There are 15842 packages in Fedora
> > 21 and 16230 in Rawhide. That is a lot of packages
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:50:06 -0700
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> You forgot "too many packages?" There are 15842 packages in Fedora 21
> and 16230 in Rawhide. That is a lot of packages that have to be
> rebuilt possibly multiple times due to FTBFS, multiple architectures,
> etc.
>
> 2.5 weeks is
On 13 January 2015 at 15:39, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:24:53PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > > > > The reason for "tentative" was mostly so we could get feedback
> > > > > from rel-eng on whether this is actually feasible.
> > It is not even close to feasible.
> [...]
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 04:55:54PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to
> this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fesco,
> e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during
> the open floor topic. No
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:24:53PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > > > The reason for "tentative" was mostly so we could get feedback
> > > > from rel-eng on whether this is actually feasible.
> It is not even close to feasible.
[...]
> It is still not reasonable to get everything done in that per
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2015-01-14 18:00 UTC'
Links to all tickets bel
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015, at 04:06 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > == Scope ==
> > * Other developers:
> > *** Use systemd-tmpfiles instead of placing content in /var (TODO: better
> > docs
> > for this)
> Is this a strict dependency or a nice-to-have item? That is, are we talking
> about having to
> Dne 13.1.2015 v 08:12 Ralf Corsepius napsal(a):
> > On 01/13/2015 07:12 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> >> On Tue 13 Jan 2015 01:35:26 AM CET Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >>> Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > I basically see several issues:
> >
> > 1. The sheer amount of packages being affect.
By all accounts w
> On Tue 13 Jan 2015 01:35:26 AM CET Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > I actually think that cmake should be added to the minimal build root,
> > instead of removing stuff. Almost all the packages I work on BuildRequire
> > cmake (which also implies that they need make to build, and gcc-c++ is the
> > typica
> == Scope ==
> * Other developers:
> *** Use systemd-tmpfiles instead of placing content in /var (TODO: better
> docs
> for this)
Is this a strict dependency or a nice-to-have item? That is, are we talking
about having to change all such packages in Fedora (or some specific subset)
within the
Il 12/01/2015 14:00, Mattias Ellert ha scritto:
Hi!
I have a couple of packages submitted for review and I offer to make
swaps for them:
Globus Toolkit packages (C code - mostly loadable modules)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144800
globus-gridmap-eppn-callout
https://bugzil
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 17:09:16 + (UTC)
P J P wrote:
> Hello Dennis,
>
>
> > On Tuesday, 13 January 2015 10:05 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > There is no consensus on that.
>
> Well, no opposition as such either.
Sorry this is false.
You got enough emails telling you this change is undesi
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>> Jaroslav, there is a lot more information on the actual wiki page.
>> Like the fact that this is only for particular opt-in new installs and
>> that yum/dnf/RPM can only operate in read-only mode on such installs.
>> Could you resend this w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:02:09 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 13.01.2015 um 20:56 schrieb William B:
> > Unbound creates more flakiness than it solves. Unbound caches "no
> > answer" as a negative cache entry. If your wireless blips for an
> > inst
> Jaroslav, there is a lot more information on the actual wiki page.
> Like the fact that this is only for particular opt-in new installs and
> that yum/dnf/RPM can only operate in read-only mode on such installs.
> Could you resend this with the entirety of the text? It might lead to
> fewer ques
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 7:35 PM, Kevin Kofler
wrote:
> Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > I'd like to collect some feedback about the $SUBJECT, i.e. making
> > minimal build root really minimal, explicitly specifying build
> > dependencies, etc.
>
> -1, all the serious software requires gcc, gcc-c++ and make
Am 13.01.2015 um 20:56 schrieb William B:
Unbound creates more flakiness than it solves. Unbound caches "no
answer" as a negative cache entry. If your wireless blips for an
instant, that's it, result vanishes
simply not true
there is a *huge* difference between a NXDOMAIN response and not
re
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski
wrote:
> On 01/12/2015 02:08 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > Dear Fedora developers,
> >
> > I'd like to collect some feedback about the $SUBJECT, i.e. making
> > minimal build root really minimal, explicitly specifying build
> > dependencies, etc.
>
>
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 10:35:39AM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 09:15:39AM +0100, Petr Lautrbach wrote:
> > On 01/11/2015 09:22 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > People who have their names in the Fedora tcp_wrappers changelog added to
> > > CC list..
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> To install a local DNS resolver trusted for the DNSSEC validation
> running on 127.0.0.1:53. This must be the only name server entry
> in /etc/resolv.conf.
snip ...
> People use Fedora on portable/mobile devices which are connected to
> divers
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 05:17:08PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Sun, 11.01.15 21:29, Tomasz Torcz (to...@pipebreaker.pl) wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 12:16:38AM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I recently noticed Debian/Ubuntu has had support for "aclexec" i
On 13 January 2015 at 10:37, Marian Csontos wrote:
> On 01/12/2015 08:52 PM, Milan Keršláger wrote:
>
>> Dne 12.1.2015 v 20:46 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
>>
>>> On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 20:39:35 +0100
>>> Milan Keršláger wrote:
>>>
>>> ...snip...
>>>
>>> Hey Milan.
>>>
>>> I understand you have a s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 11:08:30 -0500
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 15:31 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > Dne 8.1.2015 v 15:03 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 10:40 +0100, Vít Ondruch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 15:14:03 -0500
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> * #1349 Fedora 22 scheduling strategy (and beyond) (sgallagh,
> 18:41:13)
> * LINK: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/22/Schedule
> (mattdm, 18:43:55)
> * change submission dead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 12:51:41 -0500
Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Dennis Gilmore
> wrote:
> > I could make that work but it is far from ideal as I would need to
> > make sure that its available over a network connection. For o
On 01/13/2015 06:53 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Marian Csontos"
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 7:52:07 PM
Subject: Re: Remove gcc, gcc-c++ and make from minimal build root
On 01/13/2015 06:46 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dn
- Original Message -
> From: "Marian Csontos"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 7:52:07 PM
> Subject: Re: Remove gcc, gcc-c++ and make from minimal build root
>
> On 01/13/2015 06:46 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > Dne 13.1.2015 v 18:20 Vít Ondruch napsal(
On 01/13/2015 06:46 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 13.1.2015 v 18:20 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 13.1.2015 v 18:09 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 13.1.2015 v 17:54 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
So lets try to find what is written in C/C++ by some different way. Is
that true, that every package in C/C++ compil
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> I could make that work but it is far from ideal as I would need to make
> sure that its available over a network connection. For one I would need
> to remember the url to the key so that it can be fetched.
That's not quite what I had in mi
Dne 13.1.2015 v 18:20 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> Dne 13.1.2015 v 18:09 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
>> Dne 13.1.2015 v 17:54 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> So lets try to find what is written in C/C++ by some different way. Is
> that true, that every package in C/C++ compiled using gcc depends on
> g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 12:26:04 -0500
Ben Cotton wrote:
> I updated the change page with a small change to the User Experience
> section. It now matches the effect of the updated proposal.
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Dennis Gilmore
> wrote:
On 01/12/2015 08:52 PM, Milan Keršláger wrote:
Dne 12.1.2015 v 20:46 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 20:39:35 +0100
Milan Keršláger wrote:
...snip...
Hey Milan.
I understand you have a strong opinion on this topic as does pjp.
This is however no reason to bring personal attacks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 17:54:03 +0100
Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 13.1.2015 v 17:42 Ralf Corsepius napsal(a):
> > On 01/13/2015 12:06 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >> Dne 13.1.2015 v 08:12 Ralf Corsepius napsal(a):
> >>
> >> So we are even not able to tell how
I updated the change page with a small change to the User Experience
section. It now matches the effect of the updated proposal.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> I suspect that to properly support making changes here
> it needs to be strongly tied into anaconda changes th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 13.1.2015 v 18:01 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a):
> lets get some
> concrete data to look at.
So please, is there any chance to get similar data from Koji? You are
probably the best person who could provide something similar to my tests.
Thanks
Vít
Dne 13.1.2015 v 18:09 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> Dne 13.1.2015 v 17:54 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
So lets try to find what is written in C/C++ by some different way. Is
that true, that every package in C/C++ compiled using gcc depends on
glibc? Then we can use this query to get the number
Hello Dennis,
> On Tuesday, 13 January 2015 10:05 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> There is no consensus on that.
Well, no opposition as such either. How is it done otherwise,
do we conduct votes to establish consensus, is that a usual practice?
> I do not do enough installs that I use kickstart
Dne 13.1.2015 v 17:54 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
>>> So lets try to find what is written in C/C++ by some different way. Is
>>> that true, that every package in C/C++ compiled using gcc depends on
>>> glibc? Then we can use this query to get the number of packages:
>>>
>>> $ repoquery --source --whatre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 10:28:36 -0500
Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Vít Ondruch
> wrote:
> > Dne 13.1.2015 v 14:02 Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 01:31:06PM +0100, Sven Lankes wrote:
> >
> > On Tue,
Dne 13.1.2015 v 17:42 Ralf Corsepius napsal(a):
> On 01/13/2015 12:06 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Dne 13.1.2015 v 08:12 Ralf Corsepius napsal(a):
>>
>> So we are even not able to tell how many packages are written in C or
>> C++ in Fedora, since we do not have the BuildRequires speficied
>> correctly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 14:08:24 +0100
Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dear Fedora developers,
>
> I'd like to collect some feedback about the $SUBJECT, i.e. making
> minimal build root really minimal, explicitly specifying build
> dependencies, etc.
>
> The topi
On 01/13/2015 12:06 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 13.1.2015 v 08:12 Ralf Corsepius napsal(a):
So we are even not able to tell how many packages are written in C or
C++ in Fedora, since we do not have the BuildRequires speficied
correctly.
Correct.
Because we have still the false feeling that eve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 04:53:43 + (UTC)
P J P wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 13 January 2015 3:06 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > (The general theme of this mail: Being flexible is fine, and
> > establishing this through this discussion is great; however,
> >
Dne 13.1.2015 v 16:35 Peter Robinson napsal(a):
>>> You can interpret these data yourself, but with less packages in build root,
>>> I can see:
>>>
>>> 1) Saved build time
>>> 2) Saved network bandwidth
>>> 3) Saved storage
>>> 4) Less things to break
>> Just to make sure I'm reading the data corre
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628655
Jan Pazdziora changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(andreas.bierfert@
On 01/13/2015 03:38 PM, Martin Stransky wrote:
> Please file a bug for that at bugzilla.redhat.com
Thanks for looking into this.
I opened the bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181719
> On 01/12/2015 08:59 PM, Nikos Roussos wrote:
>> I noticed that I'm unable to watch Vimeo videos
Hello,
Please see: (shared by 'fenrus02' on IRC)
-> https://stribika.github.io/2015/01/04/secure-secure-shell.html
Here are few more recommendations for sshd(8) configurations, mostly pertaining
to encryption algorithms.
Does it make sense to incorporate any of the suggestions from there?
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dear Fedora developers,
>
> I'd like to collect some feedback about the $SUBJECT, i.e. making
> minimal build root really minimal, explicitly specifying build
> dependencies, etc.
Hi,
I think this is a good idea, because overall I tend to avo
Hello Miloslav, all
> On Tuesday, 13 January 2015 10:26 AM, P J P wrote:
> So, we do seem to have consensus(at least no opposition) for
> 'PermitRootLogin=without-password' option. I'll update the feature
> page with it and details about the specific use-cases.
I have updated the feature pa
Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jan 2015, Neal Becker wrote:
>
>> How will this impact the following (common) situation?
>>
>> I carry my linux laptop between home and work. When at work, I need to use
>> my employer's dns to lookup names of (non-public) local machines.
>
> When connecting to
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 7:32 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> = Proposed System Wide Change: RpmOstree - Server side composes and atomic
> upgrades =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RpmOstree
>
> Change owner(s): Colin Walters
>
> The rpm-ostree [1] tool provides a new way to deploy and mana
>> You can interpret these data yourself, but with less packages in build root,
>> I can see:
>>
>> 1) Saved build time
>> 2) Saved network bandwidth
>> 3) Saved storage
>> 4) Less things to break
>
> Just to make sure I'm reading the data correctly, your tests show a
> maximum approximate savings
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 13.1.2015 v 14:02 Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 01:31:06PM +0100, Sven Lankes wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:16:42PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> That's simply an idiotic thing to say. What is the
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015, Neal Becker wrote:
How will this impact the following (common) situation?
I carry my linux laptop between home and work. When at work, I need to use my
employer's dns to lookup names of (non-public) local machines.
When connecting to work, dnssec-trigger will probe the D
How will this impact the following (common) situation?
I carry my linux laptop between home and work. When at work, I need to use my
employer's dns to lookup names of (non-public) local machines.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listin
Forgot to add this was measured on my Lenovo T440s, with SSD and 12 GB
RAM, running F21 with mock 1.2.3, configured to use LVM plugin and DNF
(see attached config files). And network? Who knows, probably fast.
Should be 1Gb/s if I am not mistaken.
Not sure how similar/different the tests could loo
Dne 13.1.2015 v 14:02 Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 01:31:06PM +0100, Sven Lankes wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:16:42PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>
>>> That's simply an idiotic thing to say. What is the progress involved
>>> in adding a new BR to thousands
Hi,
I juste open a FESCO request for kanarip :
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1387
He owns several perl and ruby package, including puppet !!!
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/kanarip/
I'm not a ruby user/dev so I won't be volunteer to take them
Marianne
Le 09/01/20
On 2015-01-13, 13:38 GMT, Martin Stransky wrote:
> Please file a bug for that at bugzilla.redhat.com
> ma.
You mean something like
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161059 ?
Matěj
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/de
Hello,
On 13 January 2015 at 14:55, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
> Dear Fedora Community,
> I'm orphaning the iscan-firmware package since I no longer have even
> one Epson scanner which would require it. Hopefully someone else
> with one of the supported scanne
Dear Fedora Community,
I'm orphaning the iscan-firmware package since I no longer have even
one Epson scanner which would require it. Hopefully someone else
with one of the supported scanners can take it.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfu
Please file a bug for that at bugzilla.redhat.com
ma.
On 01/12/2015 08:59 PM, Nikos Roussos wrote:
I noticed that I'm unable to watch Vimeo videos with Firefox without
Flash plugin. Same is not true if I use the Firefox build from upstream.
Do we disable something on our build that may be respon
Am Dienstag, den 13.01.2015, 11:51 + schrieb P J P:
> > On Tuesday, 13 January 2015 4:24 AM, Volker Sobek wrote:
> > Maybe this difference can be addressed together with what ever is
> > decided upon in this discussion? I think having some consistency here
> > would be good.
>
> IMO, the ins
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 01:28:56PM +0100, Richard Z wrote:
> - tune2fs -C 1 dev is apparently ignored on all devices
as pointed out on bugzilla that was my mistake, I have confused the
options in the hurry.
Richard
---
Name and OpenPGP keys available from pgp key servers
pgpu_SRmf_pZY.pgp
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 01:31:06PM +0100, Sven Lankes wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:16:42PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> > That's simply an idiotic thing to say. What is the progress involved
> > in adding a new BR to thousands of packages?
>
> Am I wrong assuming that it would be
On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 04:37 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > Hello everyone!
> > The nomination period for FESCo and Environments and Stacks Working
> > Group Elections is now open.
> >
> > We will be selecting five seats on FESCo [1] and four seats on Env and
> > Stacks Working Group [2]. If
= Proposed System Wide Change: RpmOstree - Server side composes and atomic
upgrades =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RpmOstree
Change owner(s): Colin Walters
The rpm-ostree [1] tool provides a new way to deploy and manage RPM-based
operating systems. Instead of performing a package-by-
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:16:42PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> That's simply an idiotic thing to say. What is the progress involved
> in adding a new BR to thousands of packages?
Am I wrong assuming that it would be rather easy to add the BR to all
packages semi-automatically previous to
Hi,
have very recently upgraded from F19 to F21 and notice scary log entires
after hibernation/resume.
Watch your logs!
The hardware (in combination with F19) was rock solid all the time and
is fairly boring. I am still running 32 bit x86. No sign of any problems
when not hibernating. I have c
The arguments on change the compiler not near enough is damn failed as well.
LLVM and now clang are growing towards a been a standard soon for many
applications.
Helio
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Richard W.M. Jones
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 02:38:44PM +0100, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
commit 79174afe576c52c8c9eee7daff1254ba05dd4d1d
Author: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Tue Jan 13 13:16:01 2015 +0100
1.633 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-DBI.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 02:38:44PM +0100, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> On 01/12/2015 02:30 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> > W dniu 12.01.2015 o 14:08, Vít Ondruch pisze:
> >
> >> I'd like to collect some feedback about the $SUBJECT, i.e. making
> >> minimal build root really minimal, explicitly spe
2015-01-13 6:33 GMT-03:00 Radek Holy :
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Jan Zelený"
>> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 8:33:21 AM
>> Subject: Re: A little problem with dnf
>>
>> On 12. 1. 2015 at 07:55:26, Adrian Soliard wrote:
>> > 2015-01-12 5:35 GMT-
> On Tuesday, 13 January 2015 4:24 AM, Volker Sobek wrote:
> Maybe this difference can be addressed together with what ever is
> decided upon in this discussion? I think having some consistency here
> would be good.
IMO, the install image consistency issues need to be handled separately and
cou
On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 20:41:30 -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> Devel,
>
> I would like to un-retire mumble, but that requires ice.
>
> I've just fixed ice to compile on f21 without much effort.
> So I think I'll un-retire ice and mumble and maintain them
> unless anyone objects.
>
> Is there any
Dne 13.1.2015 v 08:12 Ralf Corsepius napsal(a):
> On 01/13/2015 07:12 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
>> On Tue 13 Jan 2015 01:35:26 AM CET Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>> Vít Ondruch wrote:
I'd like to collect some feedback about the $SUBJECT, i.e. making
minimal build root really minimal, expli
Am 13.01.2015 um 10:31 schrieb Karel Zak:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 11:37:25AM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
any chance to see util-linux v2.26 in F21?
Ah sorry, I missed this your question...
no problem
Well, I'm going to push v2.26-rc1 to rawhide this week, and maybe
(depends on feedb
I guess ice got retired because I and the other maintainers ran out of time
to maintain it. Actually, I hadn't fully realised until now that it was
retired; I'll check shortly what the issue(s) were because I'd like it to
stay in (it was a LOT of work creating the package in the first place!).
MEF
> Hello everyone!
> The nomination period for FESCo and Environments and Stacks Working
> Group Elections is now open.
>
> We will be selecting five seats on FESCo [1] and four seats on Env and
> Stacks Working Group [2]. If you are interested in these roles, please
> add yourself to the lists of
- Original Message -
> From: "Jan Zelený"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 8:33:21 AM
> Subject: Re: A little problem with dnf
>
> On 12. 1. 2015 at 07:55:26, Adrian Soliard wrote:
> > 2015-01-12 5:35 GMT-03:00 Igor Gnatenko :
> > > On Mon, Jan 12, 201
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 11:37:25AM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> any chance to see util-linux v2.26 in F21?
Ah sorry, I missed this your question...
Well, I'm going to push v2.26-rc1 to rawhide this week, and maybe
(depends on feedback) later we can try to upgrade stable release in
f21-tes
Hello everyone!
The nomination period for FESCo and Environments and Stacks Working
Group Elections is now open.
We will be selecting five seats on FESCo [1] and four seats on Env and
Stacks Working Group [2]. If you are interested in these roles, please
add yourself to the lists of nominees at [1
Kevin Kofler wrote:
>I am user C. I don't need a log of blocked stuff, I'd only be worried
>about intruders DoSing the machine by filling the log. I really want
>ANY outside access to my machine silently dropped. My machine is NOT a
>server, period.
So you never use Bittorrent to download a new Fe
94 matches
Mail list logo
