Re: Status of weak dependencies support in Fedora 21+

2014-11-08 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, 8 Nov 2014 21:54:35 +0400 Peter Lemenkov wrote: > Hello All! > RPM shipped with Fedora 21+ has support for weak dependencies. What's > the current status of that feature? Is it ok to start using them > (building RPM with Recommends/Suggests tags)? My understanding: rpm - accepts them a

Re: Status of weak dependencies support in Fedora 21+

2014-11-08 Thread drago01
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > On 8 November 2014 10:54, Peter Lemenkov wrote: >> >> Hello All! >> RPM shipped with Fedora 21+ has support for weak dependencies. What's >> the current status of that feature? Is it ok to start using them >> (building RPM with Re

Re: Status of weak dependencies support in Fedora 21+

2014-11-08 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On 8 November 2014 10:54, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > Hello All! > RPM shipped with Fedora 21+ has support for weak dependencies. What's > the current status of that feature? Is it ok to start using them > (building RPM with Recommends/Suggests tags)? > > I have a real-world example where I'd like to

Note: polkit daemon now optional (notably with NM)

2014-11-08 Thread Colin Walters
I pushed: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/polkit.git/commit/?id=1224d7b427a507339087e2f72c481b560c85149b Built as: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8072916 Which makes polkit optional if NM (or anything else that links to libpolkit) is used. This is a follow up to http://c

Re: No more deltarpms by default

2014-11-08 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 08.11.2014 um 20:21 schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia: [root@rawhide ~]# rm -rf /var/cache/dnf/* I do think you also flushed all the historical data on what packages were installed from what repositories no - that would be rm -rf /var/lib/yum/* rm -rf /var/lib/dnf/* and yes i delete them regul

Re: No more deltarpms by default

2014-11-08 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > the meta-data are fat > look below The metadata are bulky, fairly monolithic databases. They cannot easily support incremental updates of the metadata because they are compressed, singular files storing data for all available packages. The b

Status of weak dependencies support in Fedora 21+

2014-11-08 Thread Peter Lemenkov
Hello All! RPM shipped with Fedora 21+ has support for weak dependencies. What's the current status of that feature? Is it ok to start using them (building RPM with Recommends/Suggests tags)? I have a real-world example where I'd like to mark a dependency as Suggests instead of Requires and want t

Re: Koji timeout

2014-11-08 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, 8 Nov 2014 15:47:51 +0100 Andrea Musuruane wrote: > On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Dan Horák wrote: > > > On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 14:45:43 +0100 > > Andrea Musuruane wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Christopher Meng > > > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Andr

Re: The Shimmer Project - Desktop Suites & GTK+ 3

2014-11-08 Thread poma
Sahoo, I need you to validate these two patches, for 'Blondie'[1] and 'Alba'[2], based on upstream one for 'Gandalf the Grey'[3] so folks downstreet can push it into the next release. poma [1] Bluebird https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=954818 [2] Albatross https://bugzilla.redha

Re: The Shimmer Project - Desktop Suites & GTK+ 3

2014-11-08 Thread poma
On 07.11.2014 10:44, Simon Steinbeiß wrote: > Hey!, > > Satya has pushed the patch for Greybird already and I've taken care of the > other two. > > Thanks a bunch! > Simon > > PS: In general, you can also just file merge-requests for stuff like this on > github or file issues. > Thanks man,

Re: Koji timeout

2014-11-08 Thread Andrea Musuruane
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Dan Horák wrote: > On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 14:45:43 +0100 > Andrea Musuruane wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Christopher Meng > > wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Andrea Musuruane > > > wrote: > > >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinf

Re: ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 ignored, SRPMs sent to arm builder?

2014-11-08 Thread Dan Horák
On Sat, 8 Nov 2014 16:35:39 +0200 Gilboa Davara wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm trying to push a fresh build of spring. > Currently spring upstream is limited to x86_64 and i686. > The SPEC has ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 (following a suggestion > from -devel ML), but never the less, its being sen

ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 ignored, SRPMs sent to arm builder?

2014-11-08 Thread Gilboa Davara
Hello all, I'm trying to push a fresh build of spring. Currently spring upstream is limited to x86_64 and i686. The SPEC has ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 (following a suggestion from -devel ML), but never the less, its being sent to the ARM builder and fails. What am I doing wrong? - Gilboa --

Re: Virtual network interface

2014-11-08 Thread Björn Persson
Tomasz Torcz wrote: >On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 03:37:53PM +0100, Björn Persson wrote: >> Vít Ondruch wrote: >> > * I don't understand why my Xchat should loose connection, when I >> > am switching from ethernet to WiFi (and they are both available >> > during interim period). >> >> For this use cas

F-21 Branched report: 20141108 changes

2014-11-08 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Sat Nov 8 07:15:03 UTC 2014 Broken deps for armhfp -- [PyQuante] PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc21.1.armv7hl requires libint(armv7hl-32) = 0:1.1.6-2.fc21 [audtty] audtty-0.1.12-9.fc20.armv7hl requires libaudcli

Re: Virtual network interface

2014-11-08 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 03:37:53PM +0100, Björn Persson wrote: > Vít Ondruch wrote: > > * I don't understand why my Xchat should loose connection, when I am > > switching from ethernet to WiFi (and they are both available during > > interim period). > > For this use case you want to run IRC over

rawhide report: 20141108 changes

2014-11-08 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Sat Nov 8 05:15:03 UTC 2014 Broken deps for i386 -- [3Depict] 3Depict-0.0.16-3.fc22.i686 requires libmgl.so.7.2.0 [Sprog] Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0) [audtty] audtt

Re: Mass orphan: iarnell

2014-11-08 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 05:18:34PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > During the mass-orphaned we found out a bug in pkgdb making it orphaned all > the > branches of the package, not just the ones for which the user is POC. > Unfortunately, this means we have orphaned branches that were maintaine

Re: The Shimmer Project - Desktop Suites & GTK+ 3

2014-11-08 Thread Satyajit Sahoo
Isn't Albatross being retired? @Simon On 8 November 2014 12:53, poma wrote: > On 07.11.2014 10:44, Simon Steinbeiß wrote: > > Hey!, > > > > Satya has pushed the patch for Greybird already and I've taken care of > the other two. > > > > Thanks a bunch! > > Simon > > > > PS: In general, you can al

Re: Mass orphan: iarnell

2014-11-08 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 08:41:11AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 11/07/2014 05:18 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > >Hi all, > > > >Following ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1360 I have just > >orphaned all the packages from iarnell on all branches. > > Would it be possible to some