On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 08:00 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > Ok, but on this case we have both vpnc and vpnc-script from
> > vpnc.spec. If vpnc-script becomes a separate package (with its own
> > repository), does it qualify as new package? If not (as it is
> > already there) what would be the
On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 19:13:14 +0200
Haïkel wrote:
> 2014-09-11 17:23 GMT+02:00 Matthew Booth :
> > I opened a ticket to become a package sponsor here:
> > https://fedorahosted.org/packager-sponsors/ticket/144
> >
> > I seem to have gained the requisite number of votes (thanks!), but I
> > don't ye
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 05:48:33PM +0200, Václav Pavlín wrote:
> I agree with Colin - Docker Base Image is what we should use when
> talking about Docker images which are then used in Docker Layered
> Images as a base layer on top of which you can build. Please don't
Yeah, after thinking about it
On Sep 11, 2014, at 2:51 AM, P J P wrote:
> Hello Chris,
>
>> On Wednesday, 10 September 2014 9:15 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> Well I have no idea what's on the screen at the time of the hang. Maybe a
>> cell phone photo would be useful. Or maybe you should use the debug kernel
>> which
>>
Today at Go/No-Go meeting it was decided to slip Fedora 21 Alpha release
by one week due to unresolved blocker bugs [1] and no release candidate
available. More details in meeting minutes [2].
Quoting Adam, we are moderately optimistic we could possibly actually be
done next week if the netinst st
On Sep 11, 2014 1:51 AM, "P J P" wrote:
>
>Hello Chris,
>
> > On Wednesday, 10 September 2014 9:15 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > Well I have no idea what's on the screen at the time of the hang. Maybe
a
> > cell phone photo would be useful. Or maybe you should use the debug
kernel which
> > was
2014-09-11 17:23 GMT+02:00 Matthew Booth :
> I opened a ticket to become a package sponsor here:
> https://fedorahosted.org/packager-sponsors/ticket/144
>
> I seem to have gained the requisite number of votes (thanks!), but I
> don't yet seem to be a sponsor. The docs suggest this is an automatic
>
On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 12:55 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> I think its a great idea. If you want to propose it, we can discuss it
> in the next WG meeting (I sadly saw this too late for the one that just
> ended...).
OK. I've filed this: https://fedorahosted.org/workstation/ticket/8
Tim.
*/
s
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2014-09-11 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2014-09-11 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT
2014-09-11 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT
2014-09-11 1
I opened a ticket to become a package sponsor here:
https://fedorahosted.org/packager-sponsors/ticket/144
I seem to have gained the requisite number of votes (thanks!), but I
don't yet seem to be a sponsor. The docs suggest this is an automatic
process, so I'm not sure what to prod. Can anybody po
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:36 AM, Sergio Pascual wrote:
> Could you review python-dill?
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1140577
>
> Thank you
Sure. Thanks, Sergio!
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapro
On 11.09.2014 15:25, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> On 09/11/2014 02:02 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>
>>> We don't have a working Release Candidate yet and we're still working
>>> out the mirror-manager issues ...
>>
>> What is happening with the mirrors?
>
> 1134524 -
On 11.09.2014 15:11, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 09/11/2014 09:01 AM, poma wrote:
>> On 09/11/2014 02:02 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>
>>> We don't have a working Release Candidate yet and we're still
>>> working out the mirror-manager issues
- Original Message -
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Stephen Gallagher
> wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 09/11/2014 09:01 AM, poma wrote:
> >> On 09/11/2014 02:02 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >>
> >>> We don't have a working Release Candidate ye
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 09/11/2014 09:01 AM, poma wrote:
>> On 09/11/2014 02:02 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>
>>> We don't have a working Release Candidate yet and we're still
>>> working out the mirror-ma
- Original Message -
> On 09/11/2014 02:02 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> > We don't have a working Release Candidate yet and we're still working
> > out the mirror-manager issues ...
>
> What is happening with the mirrors?
1134524 - Product-ized network install images do not offer fil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/11/2014 09:01 AM, poma wrote:
> On 09/11/2014 02:02 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>> We don't have a working Release Candidate yet and we're still
>> working out the mirror-manager issues ...
>
> What is happening with the mirrors?
>
Mostly
On 09/11/2014 02:02 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> We don't have a working Release Candidate yet and we're still working
> out the mirror-manager issues ...
What is happening with the mirrors?
poma
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/li
Guys, in case you didn't receive patches, here you can reach
Albatross - changes related to gtk+-3.13.[3-7]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=936324
Bluebird - changes related to gtk+-3.13.[3-7]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=936322
Greybird - changes related to gtk+-
On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 13:54:07 +0200, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> I'd like to split vpnc-script from vpnc [0], but I don't maintain the
> package, so I omitted the details. Anyway the issue is, that vpnc-script
> which has a different upstream [1] than vpnc, is used by both vpnc and
> openconne
- Original Message -
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 09/11/2014 07:54 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for this
> > important meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the
> > Fedora 21 Alpha.
> >
> > Thurs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/11/2014 07:54 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for this
> important meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the
> Fedora 21 Alpha.
>
> Thursday, September 11, 2014 17:00 UTC (1 PM EDT, 10
On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 13:54 +0200, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 12:25 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:15:49 +0200, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > > There is a package which includes a subpackage that I'd like it split
> > >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/11/2014 07:54 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 12:25 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:15:49 +0200, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello, There is a package which includes a subpackage t
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 21 Alpha.
Thursday, September 11, 2014 17:00 UTC (1 PM EDT, 10 AM PDT, 19:00 CEST)
"Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet
to determ
On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 12:25 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:15:49 +0200, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> > There is a package which includes a subpackage that I'd like it split
> > as a proper package (possibly with different maintainers). Is there some
> > s
Compose started at Thu Sep 11 07:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[APLpy]
APLpy-0.9.8-5.fc21.noarch requires pywcs
[PyKDE]
PyKDE-3.16.6-14.fc20.armv7hl requires sip-api(10) >= 0:10.0
[PyQuante]
PyQuante-libint-
Broken deps for i386
--
[PyQuante]
PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc22.1.i686 requires libint(x86-32) =
0:1.1.6-2.fc21
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0)
[audtty]
audtty-0.1.12-9.fc20.i686
On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:15:49 +0200, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> Hello,
> There is a package which includes a subpackage that I'd like it split
> as a proper package (possibly with different maintainers). Is there some
> special process for that or does it have to follow the full process for
Hello,
There is a package which includes a subpackage that I'd like it split
as a proper package (possibly with different maintainers). Is there some
special process for that or does it have to follow the full process for
new packages as in [0]?
regards,
Nikos
[0].
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
2014-09-10 23:36 GMT+02:00 Jerry James :
> Is anyone up for a review swap? I need python-gmpy2, which is a
> successor to the existing gmpy package.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138892
>
> Let me know what I can review for you in return.
>
Could you review python-dill?
https
Hello Chris,
> On Wednesday, 10 September 2014 9:15 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Well I have no idea what's on the screen at the time of the hang. Maybe a
> cell phone photo would be useful. Or maybe you should use the debug kernel
> which
> was one of Paul Wouters suggestions. Or you could go
32 matches
Mail list logo
