On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Go for it if you have time. If not then I'll ask in a few days.
Asked here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/fa.caml/C6_VauENVgo
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
On 08/28/2014 02:10 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 28.08.14 07:24, Daniel J Walsh (dwa...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> But regarding kmod/devicemapper, can we please get some stats about how
> big this individually are, and how much is saved by this? kmod at least
> is 150K or so on
On 28 August 2014 12:10, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 28.08.14 07:24, Daniel J Walsh (dwa...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > >>> But regarding kmod/devicemapper, can we please get some stats about
> how
> > >>> big this individually are, and how much is saved by this? kmod at
> least
> > >>> is 1
On Thu, 28.08.14 07:24, Daniel J Walsh (dwa...@redhat.com) wrote:
> >>> But regarding kmod/devicemapper, can we please get some stats about how
> >>> big this individually are, and how much is saved by this? kmod at least
> >>> is 150K or so only. Is there really any value in doing this weird stuf
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:55:56AM +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2014-08-25, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Or we can wait for F21, which will have weak dependencies in RPM. And
> > I anticipate that weak dependencies will break a lot of circles.
> >
> Does Fedora have guidelines what should and what s
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:46:02AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 04:25:54PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 03:28:56PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 10:05:25AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > > > Good Mo
Hi,
DNF 0.6.1 is out. For more info of this version see:
http://dnf.baseurl.org/2014/08/28/dnf-0-6-1-released/
Honza
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Ahhh... Japan. I haven't twitter, but it could be fixed in no time.
Thanks anyway. I'l try.
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote:
> > According to Policy for nonresponsive package maintainers.
> >
> > Takanori Matsuura did not respond on
> > https://bugzilla
On Thu, 28.08.14 08:40, Lukáš Nykrýn (lnyk...@redhat.com) wrote:
Heya,
> I think that there was a problem in communication. We are *not* going to
> create systemd-container in fedora. That was just for rhel, because at
> least I wanted some quick and dirty solution. Our current plan in fedora
> i
Hello,
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote:
> According to Policy for nonresponsive package maintainers.
>
> Takanori Matsuura did not respond on
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105916, contact email is silent
> too.
> Moreover, his last build on koji was
According to Policy for nonresponsive package maintainers.
Takanori Matsuura did not respond on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105916, contact email is silent
too.
Moreover, his last build on koji was in late 2012.
As for both above mentioned, I want to take ownership on CVector a
Broken deps for i386
--
[0ad]
0ad-0.0.16-9.fc22.i686 requires libicuuc.so.52
0ad-0.0.16-9.fc22.i686 requires libicui18n.so.52
[APLpy]
APLpy-0.9.8-5.fc21.noarch requires pywcs
[PyKDE]
PyKDE-3.16.6-14.fc20.i686 re
On 08/27/2014 03:15 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 27.08.14 21:00, Václav Pavlín (vpav...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>>> I also offered to split out the hwdb in Brno, if you remember. If this
>>> is about the hwdb, then let's just do that...
>> Talk to Michal Sekletar about it then - he is work
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 11:09:37AM +, Fedora Branched Report wrote:
> Broken deps for armhfp
> [libvirt]
> libvirt-lock-sanlock-1.2.7-2.fc21.armv7hl requires sanlock >= 0:2.4
> libvirt-lock-sanlock-1.2.7-2.fc21.armv7hl requires
> libsanlock_client.so.1
> Broken deps for i386
> ---
Compose started at Thu Aug 28 07:15:03 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[APLpy]
APLpy-0.9.8-5.fc21.noarch requires pywcs
[PyKDE]
PyKDE-3.16.6-14.fc20.armv7hl requires sip-api(10) >= 0:10.0
[PyQuante]
PyQuante-libint-
Hi, folks! Sorry for the late notice, but better late than never. Amita
mentioned this on Tuesday, but I figured a proper announcement mail
can't hurt!
Today (that is, 2014-08-28) is GNOME Test Day!
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2014-08-28_Gnome_3.14
We’ll be testing GNOME 3.14 pre-rel
>>> It's a package that fakes systemd presence in system. It's solely
>>> intended for Docker images as we don't want systemd there (at least
>>> as long as it takes to prepare systemd-container Michal is working
>>> on). I made a mistake and it ended up being pulled in buildroot.
>>>
>>> Ping me o
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:01:45PM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:05 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> >
> > I think you are readying way to much into a perfectly normal word that
> > means: "hey we are discussing stuff related to your project, would you
> > mind joi
On 08/28/2014 08:55 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 27.8.2014 22:42, James Antill napsal(a):
#topic #452 Crypto policies packaging guideline
.fpc 452
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/452
Looking into this topic and the proposed guidelines [1], I am not sure
how to apply them for Ruby.
FPC
19 matches
Mail list logo
