On 08/22/2014 06:57 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 20:46:05 -0700
Dave Johansen wrote:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7370474
There was a failure building odb during the rebuild. A later rebuild
worked, but is th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 20:46:05 -0700
Dave Johansen wrote:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7370474
> There was a failure building odb during the rebuild. A later rebuild
> worked, but is this something I should worry about or file a
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7370474
There was a failure building odb during the rebuild. A later rebuild
worked, but is this something I should worry about or file a report against?
Thanks,
Dave
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNE
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 11:10:54AM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> > On August 21, 2014 at 9:21 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 04:09:02 +0200
> > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 08:33:55PM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> > > > Hi All:
> > > >
> > > > I'
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 01:18:48PM -0300, Alexandre Aguiar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working with a fedora 19 vm but that for some reason cant enable
> services with systemctl.
Yes, this was fixed in
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9450/systemd-204-21.fc19,
which is currently wait
Greetings!
I've been a Fedora user since Fedora Core 3, but now I'm starting the
move to the next level - becoming a Fedora packager.
I'm interested in vintage hardware, especially older ATI/Radeon video,
and PPC (Macs & IBM).
I'm hoping to contribute to Fedora development in a couple of areas:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/25/2014 09:58 PM, Bob Lightfoot wrote:
> Dear Devel-List: Please consider this the initial introduction of
> myself as a potential/future packager / co-maintainer. I have been
> "lurking" / using Fedora for the past 7 years when Fedora 8
> releas
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 03:11:53PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> (a) The reason for wanting packages to be retired so quickly has not
> been made clear by rel-eng.
Miloslav explained this nicely.
> (b) The biggest reason for people to use one distro over another is
> based on number of pack
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 09:33:53 -0600
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
...snip...
> Will see about rebuilding all these and will check rawhide once it's
> done.
ok, there's just one more package affected in rawhide:
certmonger-0.75.13-1.fc22.x86_64.rpm
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
deve
Hello,
- Original Message -
> As part of that, I've reassigned most of my
> packages to others that can care for them.
This way I got pygpgme in EPEL v5, which I’m afraid I don’t have any time for;
so that branch is orphaned now as well. Comaintainers (for this branch or the
whole pack
Hi,
I'm working with a fedora 19 vm but that for some reason cant enable
services with systemctl.
[root@node0001 /]# systemctl status httpd.service
httpd.service - The Apache HTTP Server
Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/httpd.service; *disabled*)
Active: inactive (dead)
[root@node00
> On August 21, 2014 at 9:21 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 04:09:02 +0200
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 08:33:55PM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> > > Hi All:
> > >
> > > I'd like to point out that there are images/livecd's that are
> > > faili
On 08/21/2014 06:31 PM, quickbooks office wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
The recent mass rebuild for glibc/gcc fixes finished monday. However,
it was discovered that there was a rpm bug present for the last ~1300 or
so builds in the mass rebuild. This bug would cause
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 08:31:36 -0700
quickbooks office wrote:
> Wouldn't it be better / safer to just to do the mass rebuild all over
> again for all the packages?
That would be a lot of waste. Only a small subset of packages are
affected. Why shouldn't we just rebuild the ones that are affected?
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 11:19:52 +0300
Panu Matilainen wrote:
> Was about to post this separately but since there's already a
> relevant thread...
>
> There's another package generation affecting bug, present in
> 4.12.0-0.beta1.3 and 4.12.0-0.beta1.4. Any packages containing
> triggers which have
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> The recent mass rebuild for glibc/gcc fixes finished monday. However,
> it was discovered that there was a rpm bug present for the last ~1300 or
> so builds in the mass rebuild. This bug would cause packages that
> override provides/requires to
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 16:52:37 +0200
Haïkel wrote:
> 2014-08-21 16:23 GMT+02:00 Matthew Miller :
> > On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 04:19:17PM +0200, Haïkel wrote:
> >> > (c) An orphaned package is not necessarily a risk ("security"
> >> > has been mentioned here ...). Just because it might be a risk
> >
On 08/21/2014 04:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 15:11:53 +0100
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
...snip...
First to be clear, I am not sure I really care one way or the other on
this proposal, but happy to try and add more information... ;)
(a) The reason for wanting packages to be
Hello,
- Original Message -
> As requested on this ticket, I'm opening this up for discussion.
> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1332
> (a) The reason for wanting packages to be retired so quickly has not
> been made clear by rel-eng.
My reading of the ticket gives two reasons:
* Ma
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2014-08-21 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2014-08-21 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT
2014-08-21 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT
2014-08-21 1
2014-08-21 16:23 GMT+02:00 Matthew Miller :
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 04:19:17PM +0200, Haïkel wrote:
>> > (c) An orphaned package is not necessarily a risk ("security" has been
>> > mentioned here ...). Just because it might be a risk on rare
>> > occasions doesn't mean we have to throw out every
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 15:11:53 +0100
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
...snip...
First to be clear, I am not sure I really care one way or the other on
this proposal, but happy to try and add more information... ;)
> (a) The reason for wanting packages to be retired so quickly has not
> been made cle
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 04:19:17PM +0200, Haïkel wrote:
> > (c) An orphaned package is not necessarily a risk ("security" has been
> > mentioned here ...). Just because it might be a risk on rare
> > occasions doesn't mean we have to throw out every orphaned package.
> > Security bugs can sit arou
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 04:09:02 +0200
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 08:33:55PM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> > Hi All:
> >
> > I'd like to point out that there are images/livecd's that are
> > failing to build for rawhide[1]. With the change
> > in /etc/resolv.conf hand
2014-08-21 16:11 GMT+02:00 Richard W.M. Jones :
> As requested on this ticket, I'm opening this up for discussion.
> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1332
>
> There's a proposal to retire packages quite quickly (I think) after
> they are orphaned. At the moment packages are retired once per
>
As requested on this ticket, I'm opening this up for discussion.
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1332
There's a proposal to retire packages quite quickly (I think) after
they are orphaned. At the moment packages are retired once per
release. A notice is posted on devel list, see for exampl
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 02:13:43PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> David Howells wrote:
>
> > > I can see a "fedpkg retire" option for removing it from Rawhide
> >
> > Which doesn't work, possibly due to a script error:
> >
> > ERROR:rpkg:Could not retire package: 'Namespace' object has no
>
David Howells wrote:
> > I can see a "fedpkg retire" option for removing it from Rawhide
>
> Which doesn't work, possibly due to a script error:
>
> ERROR:rpkg:Could not retire package: 'Namespace' object has no
> attribute 'msg'
Fixed in fedpkg-1.18-1 (bz 1107646).
David
--
devel mai
David Howells wrote:
> I can see a "fedpkg retire" option for removing it from Rawhide
Which doesn't work, possibly due to a script error:
ERROR:rpkg:Could not retire package: 'Namespace' object has no
attribute 'msg'
David
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://
Hi,
The xtrace package has been renamed to the x11trace package due to a collision
with the name of a glibc tool. The xtrace package should now be removed from
Fedora.
I can see a "fedpkg retire" option for removing it from Rawhide, but is it
possible to remove it now from F21 and earlier?
Davi
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
>> We've been using git repos for packages since 2010. We don't use
>> tags. Mostly because that would require koji to write back to the
>> SCM, which it doesn't do. It does log whi
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> We've been using git repos for packages since 2010. We don't use
> tags. Mostly because that would require koji to write back to the
> SCM, which it doesn't do. It does log which sha1sum it built the
> SRPM/RPM from though, and that is immut
Hi everyone,
I'm mainly working on the OpenStack Ceilometer project, so I'll be trying to
make sure its dependencies are packaged and maintained in Fedora!
For a start, I'm working on getting a Python Zookeeper library, kazoo, packaged
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1125841). I'll
Christopher,
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 4:24 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
> I haven't seen any efforts from Claudio or whosoever to rebuild all
> mono packages (it's a MUST as Mono is not a _small_ package, he could
> use koji or his personal computer to do that) and feedback the results
> (most of s
On 08/21/2014 09:17 AM, Dan Horák wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 17:27:39 -0600
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Just thought I would drop a quick note to the list about the status of
various things, at least as I know them. ;)
First, astute readers will note that we were scheduled to go into
freeze for f21 ye
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 11:24:01AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> I haven't seen any efforts from Claudio or whosoever to rebuild all
> mono packages (it's a MUST as Mono is not a _small_ package, he could
> use koji or his personal computer to do that) and feedback the results
> (most of status
36 matches
Mail list logo
