Inactive maintainer: tmatsuu

2014-06-27 Thread Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich
Hi! FAS user tmatsuu is innactive for almost two years [1], he did not answered on email. Does anyone know how to contact him? Dmitrij [1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/userinfo?userID=1247 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinf

Re: Bugzilla column width - only 80+1 characters!?

2014-06-27 Thread poma
On 27.06.2014 19:03, DJ Delorie wrote: Welcome to the 21st century! Do we have different eyes and brains than we did last century? Because otherwise, excessively wide paragraphs are just as hard to read now as they were then. E.g. for me, 'bz.rh-cols90.png' is consistent, unlike 'bz.rh-col

Re: setterm impact changed

2014-06-27 Thread Felix Miata
On 2014-06-26 15:26 (GMT-0400) Felix Miata composed: On 2014-06-26 13:24 (GMT-0500) Chris Adams composed: Felix Miata said: Now that the kernel is no longer putting the display to sleep and I can start X, I find that setterm command no longer applies only to the vttys. It's now coloring my

Re: Corrupted ELF file in edelib-2.1-4.fc21.i686 in rawhide

2014-06-27 Thread Christopher Meng
I'm also investigating the results, as I also couldn't see what's wrong there. I fixed this package days ago and it at least could be built(it uses jam to build which is totally a mess to me). -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Re: boot.iso rawhide weirdness

2014-06-27 Thread Brian C. Lane
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 03:21:42PM -0700, Brian C. Lane wrote: > So be forewarned :) And if someone can help sort out what the heck is > causing this I'd sure be grateful. I've just fired off a new anaconda build with David Shea's signal patches which, in my testing here, seem to have solved the w

Retiring package: Synapse

2014-06-27 Thread Renich Bon Ciric
Hello, Dear Fedorian Community, I am to retire Synapse from the Fedora repos. The reason is clearly stated here: https://answers.launchpad.net/synapse-project/+question/246635#yui_3_10_3_1_1403917606540_250 If anybody has any last words, they're welcome. -- It's hard to be free... but I love to

Re: Very slow trackpad after install latest F20 updates

2014-06-27 Thread Andrew Price
On 27/06/14 23:58, Sergio Pascual wrote: Hello, I have updated two laptops runing F20 today. After the update, on both of them (Asus and Dell) the trackpad has turned very slow, and unaffected of any change in the gnome control panel. Try this update: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21 v3

2014-06-27 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On 2014-06-24 15:12, Till Maas wrote: The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two releases and will be retired when Fedora (F21) is branched, unless someone adopts them. More patches: alliance chitlesh, tnorth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?i

Very slow trackpad after install latest F20 updates

2014-06-27 Thread Sergio Pascual
Hello, I have updated two laptops runing F20 today. After the update, on both of them (Asus and Dell) the trackpad has turned very slow, and unaffected of any change in the gnome control panel. I'm not sure which update is responsible. Perhaps xorg-x11-server-*-1.14.4-10.fc20.x86_64? Has anybody

Re: delta rpms - can we turn them off

2014-06-27 Thread Ian Pilcher
On 06/27/2014 12:28 PM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > It may also be possible to compress-and-sign them on the fly. If the > gpg check can be done incrementally, you could compress the rpm to > /dev/null and gradually compute the signature. > > That leaves you a signature to check and a ready-to-inst

boot.iso rawhide weirdness

2014-06-27 Thread Brian C. Lane
I've spent my day trying to sort out what the heck is going on here, but failed. I'll do a new build of lorax in a bit so that the nightly rawhide compose will work tonight, but you may hit some problems. With my locally built boot.iso I am seeing a variety of failures at different points. There'

Re: Patches for trivial bugs sitting in bugzilla -> trivial patch policy?

2014-06-27 Thread Sandro Mani
On 27.06.2014 18:56, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Well, I think you are talking here about a patch that changes the code of the package. Many of the cases people were talking about for these 'trivial' or 'simple' patches didn't even touch the code... they simply modified the spec, so have little to do wit

Re: Corrupted ELF file in edelib-2.1-4.fc21.i686 in rawhide

2014-06-27 Thread Kyle McMartin
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 08:08:59PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > /usr/lib/libedelib.so.2.1.0 is quite corrupted. ldd thinks it's statically > linked, and readelf reports these errors (among others0. > > readelf: Error: Section 15 has invalid sh_entsize of 5a794 > readelf: Error: (Using the expec

Re: Patches for trivial bugs sitting in bugzilla -> trivial patch policy?

2014-06-27 Thread drago01
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Mukundan Ragavan wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > > I think having a "trivial patch" policy and proven packager route of > implementation is a great idea! > > On 06/26/2014 11:42 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> provenpackagers who would be

Re: Patches for trivial bugs sitting in bugzilla -> trivial patch policy?

2014-06-27 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On 2014-06-27 07:09, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: On 06/26/2014 08:01 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: As a newcomer to Fedora development, is there something else I should doing to get these patches reviewed and committed? I offered you on IRC applying any patches for Java packages, as this is my area

Re: Bugzilla column width - only 80+1 characters!?

2014-06-27 Thread DJ Delorie
> Welcome to the 21st century! Do we have different eyes and brains than we did last century? Because otherwise, excessively wide paragraphs are just as hard to read now as they were then. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Corrupted ELF file in edelib-2.1-4.fc21.i686 in rawhide

2014-06-27 Thread Florian Weimer
/usr/lib/libedelib.so.2.1.0 is quite corrupted. ldd thinks it's statically linked, and readelf reports these errors (among others0. readelf: Error: Section 15 has invalid sh_entsize of 5a794 readelf: Error: (Using the expected size of 12 for the rest of this dump) readelf: Error: Section 16 has

Re: delta rpms - can we turn them off

2014-06-27 Thread drago01
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 19:23:04 +0200 > drago01 wrote: > >> Why? > > My understanding of the process as it exists: > > Download drpm. > Take drpm contents + old package files installed locally that were not > changed and create updated rpm. > yum

Re: delta rpms - can we turn them off

2014-06-27 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 19:23:04 +0200 drago01 wrote: > Why? My understanding of the process as it exists: Download drpm. Take drpm contents + old package files installed locally that were not changed and create updated rpm. yum/dnf hands off this updated new version to rpm as normal. If they

Re: delta rpms - can we turn them off

2014-06-27 Thread Dridi Boukelmoune
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 19:11:53 +0200 > drago01 wrote: > >> That wasn't about "poor" as in slow vs. "great" as in fast but >> bandwith capped vs. not. >> >> If building deltas are slow the solution is not to disable them but to >> find out why th

Re: delta rpms - can we turn them off

2014-06-27 Thread drago01
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 19:18:15 +0200 > drago01 wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> > On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 19:11:53 +0200 >> > drago01 wrote: >> > >> >> That wasn't about "poor" as in slow vs. "great" as in fast bu

Re: delta rpms - can we turn them off

2014-06-27 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 19:18:15 +0200 drago01 wrote: > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 19:11:53 +0200 > > drago01 wrote: > > > >> That wasn't about "poor" as in slow vs. "great" as in fast but > >> bandwith capped vs. not. > >> > >> If building deltas ar

Re: delta rpms - can we turn them off

2014-06-27 Thread drago01
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 19:11:53 +0200 > drago01 wrote: > >> That wasn't about "poor" as in slow vs. "great" as in fast but >> bandwith capped vs. not. >> >> If building deltas are slow the solution is not to disable them but to >> find out why th

Re: delta rpms - can we turn them off

2014-06-27 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 19:11:53 +0200 drago01 wrote: > That wasn't about "poor" as in slow vs. "great" as in fast but > bandwith capped vs. not. > > If building deltas are slow the solution is not to disable them but to > find out why there are slow and fix that. One thing for instance is > that it

Re: delta rpms - can we turn them off

2014-06-27 Thread Dridi Boukelmoune
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Jon wrote: > I personally tend to agree with Troy. > > We should consider defaulting to disable delta rpm at most, and at > least comment the configs, or make things intelligent. > > For me, it takes longer to process delta rpm files than to download > the actual f

Re: delta rpms - can we turn them off

2014-06-27 Thread drago01
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Jon wrote: > I personally tend to agree with Troy. > > We should consider defaulting to disable delta rpm at most, and at > least comment the configs, or make things intelligent. > > For me, it takes longer to process delta rpm files than to download > the actual f

Re: [Base] The Base Design WG is looking for a new committee member!

2014-06-27 Thread Josh Boyer
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Phil Knirsch wrote: > Hi everyone. > > As Bill Nottingham has decided to resign from the committee we now have a > free seat that we'd like to fill with another person. That should be two seats. I also resigned. If there was confusion around that, my apologies.

Re: delta rpms - can we turn them off

2014-06-27 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Troy Daws > All that being said, what is the criteria for getting a default > configuration line put into yum.conf? > I'd really like to get the deltarpm= line put in there. > File a bug report in yum bug tracker or Red Hat bugzilla against yum as the compon

Re: Patches for trivial bugs sitting in bugzilla -> trivial patch policy?

2014-06-27 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 11:55:37 -0400 (EDT) Miloslav Trmač wrote: > That’s only in some ideal case where we can get all the manpower we > might need. > > Adding a non-upstream patch to a package by a non-owner of the > package essentially commits the owner of the package to either push > the patch

Bugzilla column width - only 80+1 characters!?

2014-06-27 Thread poma
Welcome to the 21st century! https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114075 poma -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Unresponsive maintainer: kanarip

2014-06-27 Thread Christopher Meng
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 12:34 AM, Juan Orti Alcaine wrote: > El Sábado, 28 de junio de 2014 00:31:26 Christopher Meng escribió: > Thank you. It's better to nofity him about his archaic email address IMO, as he uses his working address in the %changelog[1] but not in the whole system. [1]---http:

Re: Unresponsive maintainer: kanarip

2014-06-27 Thread Juan Orti Alcaine
El Sábado, 28 de junio de 2014 00:31:26 Christopher Meng escribió: > On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > He is or was a Red Hat employee. > > No. > > Please use this email address: (...) Thank you. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedor

Re: Unresponsive maintainer: kanarip

2014-06-27 Thread Christopher Meng
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > He is or was a Red Hat employee. No. Please use this email address: vanmeeuwen.kolabsys@com (@ <-> .) Thanks. Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng Noob here. http://cicku.me -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://

Re: delta rpms - can we turn them off

2014-06-27 Thread Jon
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Troy Dawson wrote: > > Cool, > I'm glad it's in the man pages now. It isn't in the man pages of my > older versions of yum. > And it's actually a very good section, talking about how it determines > how many threads to use. > > Now that we've established that, w

Re: Patches for trivial bugs sitting in bugzilla -> trivial patch policy?

2014-06-27 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 06/27/2014 05:50 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: - Original Message - - Should this be rawhide only? That would avoid 'trivial' patches that cause a problem from affecting users that aren't as able to debug them. Probably (or perhaps it could be up to the provenpackager applying the

Re: Unresponsive maintainer: kanarip

2014-06-27 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 17:50:31 +0200, Juan Orti Alcaine wrote: FAS user kanarip is comaintainer of one of my packages, and I receive mail bounces of their email address . It seems like the domain is no longer valid: Following the policy, I ask the list if anyone knows how to contact this

Re: delta rpms - can we turn them off

2014-06-27 Thread Jon
I personally tend to agree with Troy. We should consider defaulting to disable delta rpm at most, and at least comment the configs, or make things intelligent. For me, it takes longer to process delta rpm files than to download the actual full rpm, even on high end systems, or low end. I suppose

[Base] The Base Design WG is looking for a new committee member!

2014-06-27 Thread Phil Knirsch
Hi everyone. As Bill Nottingham has decided to resign from the committee we now have a free seat that we'd like to fill with another person. In order to fill this seat i'm therefore reaching out here to Fedora development to offer allow any applicant from the community to get in touch with u

Re: Comps change proposal: NetworkManager subpackages

2014-06-27 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2014-06-20 at 17:25 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > I've drafted a comps change (further to the quick one I did yesterday to > throw in NetworkManager-wifi to the desktop groups) to account for the > recent (March) split of several bits of NetworkManager functionality > into subpackages. As

Re: delta rpms - can we turn them off

2014-06-27 Thread Troy Dawson
On 06/27/2014 10:45 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Troy Dawson wrote: > > > > It is a hidden default that is not in any man page or documentation. > Yes, I used a poor choice of words. > > > man yum.conf > > deltarpm > > When n

Re: Patches for trivial bugs sitting in bugzilla -> trivial patch policy?

2014-06-27 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 06/27/2014 05:50 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Hi On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On 2014-06-27 10:17, Till Maas wrote: Yes, I missed this as well. Also IIRC the guidelines demand an patch status comment for each patch in the spec file, so just add

Re: Patches for trivial bugs sitting in bugzilla -> trivial patch policy?

2014-06-27 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 06/27/2014 05:17 PM, Till Maas wrote: On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 10:05:31AM +0200, Dan Horák wrote: oh, that's an impressive list, but I would like see to one more thing there - links to upstream bug reports where relevant (eg. fixing configure stuff), because we usually need them fixed in upst

Re: Patches for trivial bugs sitting in bugzilla -> trivial patch policy?

2014-06-27 Thread Miloslav Trmač
- Original Message - > On 06/27/2014 08:26 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: > > > I'm not sure if it's so great idea for all bugzillas. Some packagers > > prefer to add patches first into upstream then carry a patch for many > > releases. > This consideration actually is pretty much irrelevant

Re: Koji EPEL 6 building issue: warning: %post(shared-mime-info-0.70-4.el6.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 127

2014-06-27 Thread Dominic Hopf
2014-06-27 16:45 GMT+02:00 Miroslav Suchý : > Does koji use state plugin? If yes, it must be disabled: > /etc/mock/site-defaults.cfg > config_opts['plugin_conf']['package_state_enable'] = False > Because state plugin require yum-utils-1.1.31 which are not in el6. > Not sure about this, it's t

Re: Patches for trivial bugs sitting in bugzilla -> trivial patch policy?

2014-06-27 Thread Miloslav Trmač
- Original Message - > - Should this be rawhide only? That would avoid 'trivial' patches that > cause a problem from affecting users that aren't as able to debug > them. Probably (or perhaps it could be up to the provenpackager applying the patch, but with rawhide-only being the expec

Unresponsive maintainer: kanarip

2014-06-27 Thread Juan Orti Alcaine
Hello, FAS user kanarip is comaintainer of one of my packages, and I receive mail bounces of their email address . It seems like the domain is no longer valid: (expanded from ): Host or domain name not found. Name service error for name=kanarip.com type=A: Host found but no data record

Re: Patches for trivial bugs sitting in bugzilla -> trivial patch policy?

2014-06-27 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On 2014-06-27 10:17, Till Maas wrote: > >> Yes, I missed this as well. Also IIRC the guidelines demand an patch >> status comment for each patch in the spec file, so just adding patch >> without noting why it is not upstreamable or i

Re: delta rpms - can we turn them off

2014-06-27 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Troy Dawson wrote: > > > It is a hidden default that is not in any man page or documentation. > Yes, I used a poor choice of words. > man yum.conf deltarpm When non-zero, delta-RPM files are used if available. The value speci

Heads-up on rpm 4.12 coming to rawhide soon

2014-06-27 Thread Panu Matilainen
Hi all, Rpm 4.12 alpha just got released: http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-announce/2014-June/45.html The plan is to update rawhide to this shiny new version first thing on Monday morning and babysit as needed (ie the usual drill), but if you're feeling bored over the weekend or its a

Re: Patches for trivial bugs sitting in bugzilla -> trivial patch policy?

2014-06-27 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On 2014-06-27 10:17, Till Maas wrote: Yes, I missed this as well. Also IIRC the guidelines demand an patch status comment for each patch in the spec file, so just adding patch without noting why it is not upstreamable or information about when/how it was upstreamed is bad and should IMHO not be d

Re: delta rpms - can we turn them off

2014-06-27 Thread Andrew Price
Hi Troy, On 27/06/14 16:26, Troy Dawson wrote: It is a hidden default that is not in any man page or documentation. Did you look for deltarpm in the yum.conf man page? If it's missing then that might be the problem (it's there on my x86_64 F20 machines at least). Cheers, Andy -- devel maili

Re: delta rpms - can we turn them off

2014-06-27 Thread Troy Dawson
On 06/27/2014 09:17 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Troy Dawson wrote: > > The fact that Fedora practically forces people to use delta rpm's has > rattled my cage for quite a while. > > > [Snipped] > > --- Does it force you to do them like

Re: Patches for trivial bugs sitting in bugzilla -> trivial patch policy?

2014-06-27 Thread Till Maas
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 10:05:31AM +0200, Dan Horák wrote: > oh, that's an impressive list, but I would like see to one more thing > there - links to upstream bug reports where relevant (eg. fixing > configure stuff), because we usually need them fixed in upstreams too Yes, I missed this as well.

Re: Patches for trivial bugs sitting in bugzilla -> trivial patch policy?

2014-06-27 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 10:47:09 +0200 Florian Weimer wrote: > On 06/26/2014 06:42 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Another idea that leaps to mind is to add more provenpackagers... > > have we set the bar too high so no one wants to apply? > > Debian has packages in collab-maint, where any Debian Develop

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Deji Akingunola (fas: deji)

2014-06-27 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 22:03:30 +0800 Christopher Meng wrote: > My opinion is, you should only comaintain what you want, not take over > other's packages. > > If FESCo member could give consent of adding someone as an admin(not > the point of the contact) of a package instead of orphaning lots of >

Re: Patches for trivial bugs sitting in bugzilla -> trivial patch policy?

2014-06-27 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Fri, 2014-06-27 at 12:48 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > So just to clarify here: the idea behind my proposal is not > necessarily > to aid people who often fix large number of small bugs across > packages, > for such people it is best if they applied for proven packager > status. > What I'm more

Re: Patches for trivial bugs sitting in bugzilla -> trivial patch policy?

2014-06-27 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Fri, 2014-06-27 at 08:58 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > This consideration actually is pretty much irrelevant when it comes > to > bugs. The only thing that counts is Fedora end-user experience, to > whom > it's quite irrelevant who fixes a bug. > > In other words, if bug affects users, these

Re: Koji EPEL 6 building issue: warning: %post(shared-mime-info-0.70-4.el6.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 127

2014-06-27 Thread Miroslav Suchý
On 06/27/2014 04:19 PM, Dominic Hopf wrote: Greetings, I'm having an issue when trying to build a package for EPEL6, see the root.log here: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3518/7083518/root.log Any ideas if i'm doing something wrong or if this is a serious issue? Regards, Domi

Koji EPEL 6 building issue: warning: %post(shared-mime-info-0.70-4.el6.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 127

2014-06-27 Thread Dominic Hopf
Greetings, I'm having an issue when trying to build a package for EPEL6, see the root.log here: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3518/7083518/root.log Any ideas if i'm doing something wrong or if this is a serious issue? Regards, Dominic -- Diese E-Mail ist nicht mit GPG sig

Re: delta rpms - can we turn them off

2014-06-27 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Troy Dawson wrote: > The fact that Fedora practically forces people to use delta rpm's has > rattled my cage for quite a while. > [Snipped] --- Does it force you to do them like yum does? > [Snipped] You keep calling it force while acknowledging it is m

delta rpms - can we turn them off

2014-06-27 Thread Troy Dawson
Hi, I have a very small server room. It has very good network, but lots of not very powerful computers. Many of them are ARM based. As I hear about ARM users taking 8 hours to update 1 package (I've had it take 12 hours to fail to update a package) I irritates me. The fact that Fedora practical

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Deji Akingunola (fas: deji)

2014-06-27 Thread Christopher Meng
My opinion is, you should only comaintain what you want, not take over other's packages. If FESCo member could give consent of adding someone as an admin(not the point of the contact) of a package instead of orphaning lots of packages, that will be helpful. Thanks. -- devel mailing list devel@li

Re: Looking for co-maintainers

2014-06-27 Thread Simone Caronni
Hello, On 27 June 2014 12:52, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:> Currently guacamole-client is in FTBFS in rawhide [2] and I couldn't find > > any help for fixing it due to a Maven bug [3], that requires a specific > > Fedora workaround that I frankly don't understand [4]. On RHEL 7, and > > Fedora 19/20

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Deji Akingunola (fas: deji)

2014-06-27 Thread Frantisek Kluknavsky
On 06/26/2014 10:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 18:19:32 +0200 Sandro Mani wrote: Hi, Given that no-one seems to know how to contact deji, I'd like to request the takeover of scotch. as a fesco member I can ack this. We will be orphaning his packages and you can pick up scot

Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 27 June 2014 15:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting

2014-06-27 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
- Original Message - > Agenda: > - Collect and discuss candidates for open positions in WG > - Updated on help for Base WG (pknirsch) > - Open floor Unfortunately I can't attend today, I have conflicting meeting today :(. R. > Thanks & regards, Phil > > -- > Philipp Knirsch

[Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 27 June 2014 15:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting

2014-06-27 Thread Phil Knirsch
Agenda: - Collect and discuss candidates for open positions in WG - Updated on help for Base WG (pknirsch) - Open floor Thanks & regards, Phil -- Philipp Knirsch | Tel.: +49-711-96437-470 Manager Core Services| Fax.: +49-711-96437-111 Red Hat GmbH | Emai

Re: Patches for trivial bugs sitting in bugzilla -> trivial patch policy?

2014-06-27 Thread Mikolaj Izdebski
On 06/26/2014 08:01 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On 2014-06-26 11:17, Richard Hughes wrote: >> On 26 June 2014 17:02, Simone Caronni wrote: >>> +1 from me! >> >> If it's a trivial patch then I think it makes sense to just do it. >> From someone that touches hundreds of different projects every m

Re: Looking for co-maintainers

2014-06-27 Thread Mikolaj Izdebski
On 06/27/2014 09:45 AM, Simone Caronni wrote: > Hello, > > I'm looking for co-maintainers for the Guacamole [1] stack packages. It is > an HTML 5 plugin-less remote desktop for VNC, RDP, SSH, Telnet and Spice > (WIP). Upstream is really responsive, software is updated frequently and > it's really

Re: Patches for trivial bugs sitting in bugzilla -> trivial patch policy?

2014-06-27 Thread Sandro Mani
On 26.06.2014 21:40, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:42:17 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Another idea that leaps to mind is to add more provenpackagers... have we set the bar too high so no one wants to apply? Trivial bug fixing across the project seems to be a reasonable ju

Re: Patches for trivial bugs sitting in bugzilla -> trivial patch policy?

2014-06-27 Thread Olav Vitters
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 03:27:21PM -0500, Mukundan Ragavan wrote: > Isn't it best for the project as a whole to have the bar for proven > packager high? :) I think it is detrimental. If someone has loads of time to do bugfixes across packages, let them. I do loads and loads of trivial bugfixes (no

Re: Patches for trivial bugs sitting in bugzilla -> trivial patch policy?

2014-06-27 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 06/27/2014 10:46 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: On 06/27/2014 08:58 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: This consideration actually is pretty much irrelevant when it comes to bugs. The only thing that counts is Fedora end-user experience, to whom it's quite irrelevant who fixes a bug. Is this really true?

Re: Patches for trivial bugs sitting in bugzilla -> trivial patch policy?

2014-06-27 Thread Florian Weimer
On 06/26/2014 06:42 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Another idea that leaps to mind is to add more provenpackagers... have we set the bar too high so no one wants to apply? Debian has packages in collab-maint, where any Debian Developer can make changes and upload them. In Debian, this is purely a soc

Re: Patches for trivial bugs sitting in bugzilla -> trivial patch policy?

2014-06-27 Thread Florian Weimer
On 06/27/2014 08:58 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: This consideration actually is pretty much irrelevant when it comes to bugs. The only thing that counts is Fedora end-user experience, to whom it's quite irrelevant who fixes a bug. Is this really true? I'm under the impression that Fedora also car

Re: Patches for trivial bugs sitting in bugzilla -> trivial patch policy?

2014-06-27 Thread Dan Horák
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 17:53:08 -0500 Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On 2014-06-26 15:33, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 13:01:05 -0500 Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > >> This seems to be particularly needed around mass rebuilds, which > >> IMHO should be an "all-hands-on-deck" time. For example,

Re: Patches for trivial bugs sitting in bugzilla -> trivial patch policy?

2014-06-27 Thread Richard Hughes
On 26 June 2014 23:53, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > Here are my unreviewed patches from last week or earlier, oldest to newest: Someone make this person a provenpackager. Richard. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code

Looking for co-maintainers

2014-06-27 Thread Simone Caronni
Hello, I'm looking for co-maintainers for the Guacamole [1] stack packages. It is an HTML 5 plugin-less remote desktop for VNC, RDP, SSH, Telnet and Spice (WIP). Upstream is really responsive, software is updated frequently and it's really amazing. I've been able to throw a bunch of Citrix XenApp

Re: Patches for trivial bugs sitting in bugzilla -> trivial patch policy?

2014-06-27 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 06/27/2014 08:26 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: I'm not sure if it's so great idea for all bugzillas. Some packagers prefer to add patches first into upstream then carry a patch for many releases. This consideration actually is pretty much irrelevant when it comes to bugs. The only thing that