On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 10:05:31AM +0200, Dan Horák wrote: > oh, that's an impressive list, but I would like see to one more thing > there - links to upstream bug reports where relevant (eg. fixing > configure stuff), because we usually need them fixed in upstreams too
Yes, I missed this as well. Also IIRC the guidelines demand an patch status comment for each patch in the spec file, so just adding patch without noting why it is not upstreamable or information about when/how it was upstreamed is bad and should IMHO not be done by provenpackagers. Regards Till -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
