Reposted from
http://fedoramagazine.org/five-things-in-fedora-this-week-2014-06-03/
Fedora is a big project, and it’s hard to follow it all. This series
highlights interesting happenings in five different areas every week.
It isn’t comprehensive news coverage — just quick summaries with links
to
On 03.06.2014 23:20, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/lcms/bugs/all lists a CVE. If
lcms-11 is no longer going to be maintained in Fedora that (and any
other) security flaws won't be addressed. It's therefore advisable
for them to update to the new version of lcms
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 12:35:00PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> What "Fedora" exactly is the image going to contain? Fedora Server?
> Fedora Cloud? Will it be a part of either of those products? If not,
> what is its status, exactly? Who's responsible for it? Is it considered
> a primary or fron
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/lcms/bugs/all lists a CVE. If
lcms-11 is no longer going to be maintained in Fedora that (and any
other) security flaws won't be addressed. It's therefore advisable
for them to update to the new version of lcms if feasible. The
affected packager would like
On Tuesday, June 3, 2014, 2:37:49 AM, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 23:54:10 +0200
> Till Maas wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:36:28PM -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
>>
>> > Please do not start deleting ppc32-only packages.
>> >
>> > A few of us would like to resurrect ppc32, like
On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 18:56 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jaroslav Reznik wrote, on behalf of Matthias Clasen:
> > The Software Collections repositories will be enabled by default.
>
> So we now allow shipping the configuration for third-party repositories,
> even enabled by default? Is April 1st
On 06/01/2014 05:24 AM, Till Maas wrote:
> R-bigmemory spot, spot
RETIRED
> log4net spot, cicku, spot
Fixed and built in rawhide:
log4net-1.2.13-1.fc21
> netgospot, spot
On Fri, 2014-04-11 at 14:19 +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> = Proposed Self Contained Change: Docker Container Image =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Docker_Container_Image
>
> Change owner(s): Lokesh Mandvekar , Dennis Gilmore
>
>
> This is Fedora running inside Docker. Currently,
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> -- Running report_uReport ---
> Server responded with an error: 'Validation failed: Element 'frames' is
> missing'
> reporter-ureport failed with exit code 1
> ('report_uReport' exited with 1)
>
I'm seeing the same, and have been for several
-- Running report_uReport ---
Server responded with an error: 'Validation failed: Element 'frames' is missing'
reporter-ureport failed with exit code 1
('report_uReport' exited with 1)
--- Running report_EmergencyAnalysis ---
Compressing data
Sending /var/tmp/oops-2014-06-03-13:41:11-7574-0.tar.gz
Hey folks! Just a note that I've put up the validation matrices for June
2014 (thanks pwhalen and satellit for the reminders):
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_21_Rawhide_2014_06_Install
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_21_Rawhide_2014_06_Base
please enter resu
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 10:39:56PM +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>
> > # repoquery --whatrequires liblcms.so.1 --source
> > cinepaint-1.4-5.fc20.src.rpm
> > cmyktool-0.1.6-0.6.pre1.fc20.src.rpm
> > DevIL-1.7.8-16.fc20.src.rpm
> > entangle-0.5.3-2
On 05/29/2014 06:31 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:17:39AM +0200, Jan Kaluža wrote:
Hi,
I'm playing with an idea of building lua libraries against compat-lua to
allow luajit working with them. My initial motivation for this is that there
are projects which don't work with Lu
No agenda, meeting cancelled.
Marcela
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 02.06.2014 23:07, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 10:39:56PM +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
python-pillow-2.2.1-4.fc20.src.rpm
This one can be fixed by upgrading to 2.3.0 (or greater. 2.4.0 is current).
2.4.0 is what's in rawhide. Not sure if that's safe to push back to f20
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 10:39:56PM +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm orphaning lcms, this package has seen few security issue and upstream
> claim it's deprecated over lcms2
>
> # repoquery --whatrequires liblcms.so.1 --source
> entangle-0.5.3-2.fc20.src.rpm
FYI the repo you're poi
Hi,
On 06/02/2014 10:39 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm orphaning lcms, this package has seen few security issue and upstream
> claim it's deprecated over lcms2
>
> rhel 7 doesn't depends on it for the few package, so it might be an option
> not to build lcms support for certain pac
17 matches
Mail list logo
