On 04/05/2014 08:08 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
> Anyone know why? Is there some optional package providing smbtree now?
# repoquery --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=rawhide --whatprovides \
/usr/bin/smbtree
samba-client-2:4.1.4-1.fc21.x86_64
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303
Anyone know why? Is there some optional package providing smbtree now?
--
"The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant
words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation)
Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!
Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/
--
devel
On Sat, 2014-04-05 at 22:14 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> However, while testing this, I noticed that COPR repo metadata
> includes
> all older versions of packages ever built in the COPR. This
> unfortunately means that DNF is free to pick older packages to satisfy
> dependencies if it can't work o
On 04/04/2014 05:55 PM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
> Perhaps a versioned dependency on glib2 would be worth adding somewhere,
> but anyway I would not see this problem if this were a normal Fedora update,
> because then I'd get the package for both archs.
Good idea. I've now added versioned dependencie
Not to speak of Norrbotten, a really small part of
the world :)
--alec
On 4/5/14, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
wrote:
> 2014-04-03 7:50 GMT-03:00 Oden Eriksson :
>> Hello,
>
> Hi Oden,
>
> Small Linux world, isn't it ? :-)
>
>> Been active with packaging, productization and maintaining pa
On Sat, 05 Apr 2014 09:08:57 -0600
Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Like wise. The one change that might be nice would be to try would be
> to consolidate the broken deps a bit - just a single note that a
> package has broken dep in all arches (and listing those deps) rather
> than repeating three times
2014-04-03 7:50 GMT-03:00 Oden Eriksson :
> Hello,
Hi Oden,
Small Linux world, isn't it ? :-)
> Been active with packaging, productization and maintaining packages for
> Mandriva Linux since 1999 and thought I should give it a try at fedora.
>
> First cut is this one:
>
> https://bugzilla.re
On 04/03/2014 11:08 AM, Jan Staněk wrote:
as Oracle is unlikely to re-license the libdb6 back to GPL,
Just to precise in such license matters, most of the code in older
releases was covered by the Sleepycat license, a copyleft license
generally thought to be compatible with the GPL (version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/04/2014 12:45 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 04/04/2014 11:44 AM, Oden Eriksson wrote:
>> fredagen den 4 april 2014 09.32.06 skrev Orion Poplawski:
>>> A number of rpms currently ship .orig files, which are
>>> presumably from patching the fi
On 04/04/2014 01:17 PM, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
> On Friday, April 4, 2014, 1:42:49 PM, Matthew Milleru wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 11:32:57AM -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
>>> As far as I am concerned they are very useful. In more detail I am
>>> looking mostly at "Broken deps" and "Summaries",
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 22:34 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> The gnome-3.12 copr includes a couple of low-level package updates
> that
> change abi/api that affects other desktops, notably:
> upower-0.99
> PackageKit-0.9.x
>
> Are these 2 required by gnome-3.12 or would it be possible to use the
> (cu
On Fri, 2014-04-04 at 17:55 +0200, Michal Schmidt wrote:
> I had the same problem. It turned out I was missing the glib2 package
> update from the COPR. The reason was that I had both glib2.x86_64 and
> glib2.i686 installed, but I only enabled the x86_64 COPR. dnf silently
> skipped updating the pa
Hi,
I just submitted the package-catkin_lint for review. Please feel free to
swap reviews :)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084681
I haven't been able to get the tests in the source to run yet. Any
pointers there will be appreciated.
--
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur (FranciscoD)
ht
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
> On 04/04/2014 05:40 PM, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
>> First after the upgrade I didn't even boot to GDM. Too bad I didn't
>> debug it because I had already been considering a clean install, so I
>> did it right away. My setup was not typical, I ha
Matthias Clasen píše v Čt 03. 04. 2014 v 10:20 -0400:
> Hey,
>
> so the time has come to consider this - thanks to the great work of
> Richard and Kalev on the copr, we have a set of 3.12 packages that have
> already received fairly wide testing.
>
> But we should be careful, so I want to ask for
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 01:42:49PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 11:32:57AM -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> > As far as I am concerned they are very useful. In more detail I am
> > looking mostly at "Broken deps" and "Summaries", with only an occasional
> > peek at a
16 matches
Mail list logo
