On 04/04/2014 05:55 PM, Michal Schmidt wrote: > Perhaps a versioned dependency on glib2 would be worth adding somewhere, > but anyway I would not see this problem if this were a normal Fedora update, > because then I'd get the package for both archs.
Good idea. I've now added versioned dependencies to a few more places. However, while testing this, I noticed that COPR repo metadata includes all older versions of packages ever built in the COPR. This unfortunately means that DNF is free to pick older packages to satisfy dependencies if it can't work out a transaction with the latest version. For example, gtk3-3.12.0-2 now has a versioned dep on glib2(x86-64) >= 2.40.0, but that doesn't help much if DNF ends up pulling in gtk3-3.12.0-1 instead :( -- Kalev -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
