Re: advertisement in packaged software (e.g. Firefox)

On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 10:31:04 -0500 Matthias Clasen wrote: > I can't imagine having very obnoxious and prominents advertisements in > the flagship applications that we install by default. But an > application that is otherwise useful to our users should probably not > be banned from the package un

Re: Unresponsive maintainer - pidgin package

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/12/2014 12:47 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > Hi Jan, > > On Monday, 10 February 2014 at 13:35, Jan Synacek wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 02/10/2014 01:32 PM, Jan Synacek wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>

Summary/Minutes for today's FESCo Meeting (2014-02-12)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2014-02-12) === Meeting started by abadger1999 at 18:01:58 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-02-12/fesco.2014-02-12-18.01.log.html . Meeting summar

Re: Why libicu soname bump required harfbuzz package to be built twice?

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Parag N(पराग़) wrote: > Hi, >From the yesterday's pkgs git commit logs I see 3-4 people built few > packages for libicu soname bump. I am not sure why a single person can't > carry such a few package rebuilds for libicu soname bump. >Whoever (people names) w

Re: Branched iso

thank so much dan :) On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:12 AM, Dan Mashal wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Carlos Morel-Riquelme > wrote: > > Hi guys , i have a question , i use fedora 20 branched and work fine , > also > > i can contribute to the comunity send bugs error and testing new > pac

Re: Branched iso

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Carlos Morel-Riquelme wrote: > Hi guys , i have a question , i use fedora 20 branched and work fine , also > i can contribute to the comunity send bugs error and testing new packages :) > , now i don't now if i can update to fedora 21 branched when this is out. > >

Why libicu soname bump required harfbuzz package to be built twice?

Hi, From the yesterday's pkgs git commit logs I see 3-4 people built few packages for libicu soname bump. I am not sure why a single person can't carry such a few package rebuilds for libicu soname bump. Whoever (people names) want to rebuild packages should announce on devel list first. Look

Branched iso

Hi guys , i have a question , i use fedora 20 branched and work fine , also i can contribute to the comunity send bugs error and testing new packages :) , now i don't now if i can update to fedora 21 branched when this is out. its possible ? Regards -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraprojec

Re: Educating packagers about always making changes in devel / rawhide first

PS: I wrote: > The patch still applies cleanly to current git master. I'm going to attach > it to Trac. https://trac.fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5854 Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code

Re: LinuxCNC RTAI kernel

On 13.02.2014 00:54, Christopher Meng wrote: 2014-2-12 PM6:32于 "Sandro Mani" > 写道： > By the way, concerning OpenCASCADE, this would also open up the possibility for packaging Code-Aster and Salome for Fedora. I once started looking at packaging them, but stalled

Re: LinuxCNC RTAI kernel

2014-2-12 PM6:32于 "Sandro Mani" 写道： > By the way, concerning OpenCASCADE, this would also open up the possibility for packaging Code-Aster and Salome for Fedora. I once started looking at packaging them, but stalled of since it's quite an effort. Anyone else interested in joining the effort? Eric

Re: LinuxCNC RTAI kernel

On Feb 9, 2014 12:30 PM, "John Morris" wrote: > > On 02/09/2014 06:27 AM, Sandro Mani wrote: > > > > On 09.02.2014 09:16, John Morris wrote: > >> My goal for the forthcoming LinuxCNC release is readiness for inclusion > >> in both Fedora and Debian. > >> > > Wow exciting, thanks! How are you plann

Re: advertisement in packaged software (e.g. Firefox)

On 12 February 2014 14:44, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Matthew Miller > wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 03:36:00PM +0100, Kai Engert wrote: >>> Question (1) >>> Are we allowed to ship software in Fedora that dynamically loads >>> advertisements from the web and shows th

Re: Educating packagers about always making changes in devel / rawhide first

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 12.02.2014 20:46, schrieb Josh Boyer: >> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Reindl Harald >> wrote: >>> >>> Am 12.02.2014 20:26, schrieb Peter Oliver: On 10 February 2014 16:42, Till Maas wrote: > Isn't AutoQA already runnin

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2014-02-13 17:00 UTC)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2014-02-13 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. rktime): 2014-02-13 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PST 2014-02-13 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EST 2014-02-13 1

Re: Educating packagers about always making changes in devel / rawhide first

Am 12.02.2014 20:46, schrieb Josh Boyer: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> Am 12.02.2014 20:26, schrieb Peter Oliver: >>> On 10 February 2014 16:42, Till Maas wrote: >>> Isn't AutoQA already running these kind of checks? >>> >>> Here's an example: >>> https://admi

Re: Educating packagers about always making changes in devel / rawhide first

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 12.02.2014 20:26, schrieb Peter Oliver: >> On 10 February 2014 16:42, Till Maas wrote: >> >>> Isn't AutoQA already running these kind of checks? >> >> Here's an example: >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-1847/Atomic

Re: advertisement in packaged software (e.g. Firefox)

On 02/12/2014 08:30 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: This is slightly different too. The safe browsing list itself is not a ping -- it's only pulled down and checked locally. There's only a "ping" when there is a match, and that ping uses a hashed partial copy. Google also claims in a FAQ that log data

Re: Educating packagers about always making changes in devel / rawhide first

Am 12.02.2014 20:26, schrieb Peter Oliver: > On 10 February 2014 16:42, Till Maas wrote: > >> Isn't AutoQA already running these kind of checks? > > Here's an example: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-1847/AtomicParsley-0.9.5-2.fc20 worthless as long "results are informati

Re: advertisement in packaged software (e.g. Firefox)

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 02:17:28PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: > Well ok if we go down this road, then you should also ask to disable the > not very well know call home to check for malware feature. That feature > means every Mozilla browser *always* pings Google to check for > blacklisted sites and I

Re: advertisement in packaged software (e.g. Firefox)

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 14:17:28 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: Well ok if we go down this road, then you should also ask to disable the not very well know call home to check for malware feature. That feature means every Mozilla browser *always* pings Google to check for blacklisted sites and I am

Re: Educating packagers about always making changes in devel / rawhide first

On 10 February 2014 16:42, Till Maas wrote: > Isn't AutoQA already running these kind of checks? Here's an example: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-1847/AtomicParsley-0.9.5-2.fc20 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis

Re: advertisement in packaged software (e.g. Firefox)

On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 10:32 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 18:25:48 +0200, >Nikos Roussos wrote: > >On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 16:58 +0100, H. Guémar wrote: > >> My *personal* opinion is that we should disable this kind of feature > >> by default. > > > >On a side note, why

Re: advertisement in packaged software (e.g. Firefox)

On 02/12/2014 04:58 PM, H. Guémar wrote: My *personal* opinion is that we should disable this kind of feature by default. My personal opinion is to ban and remove such features and not only to disable it by fault. firefox's defaults also should be altered to point to an "empty home page" shou

[perl-CGI] 3.65 bump

commit 8ab913dabac17c9ec937694c34073d2b357d8dca Author: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Wed Feb 12 17:41:16 2014 +0100 3.65 bump .gitignore|1 + perl-CGI.spec |5 - sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore in

File CGI.pm-3.65.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by jplesnik

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-CGI: ca72eb908ce8a147831ed88d2bed8506 CGI.pm-3.65.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/p

Re: advertisement in packaged software (e.g. Firefox)

On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 10:32 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 18:25:48 +0200, >Nikos Roussos wrote: > >On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 16:58 +0100, H. Guémar wrote: > >> My *personal* opinion is that we should disable this kind of feature > >> by default. > > > >On a side note, why

Re: advertisement in packaged software (e.g. Firefox)

On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 16:58:34 +0100 H. Guémar wrote: > My *personal* opinion is that we should disable this kind of feature > by default. +1 > Actually, unless it tracks users, i don't think that our guidelines > forbids it, though it may influence our choice for the packages set > installed by

Re: advertisement in packaged software (e.g. Firefox)

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 18:25:48 +0200, Nikos Roussos wrote: On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 16:58 +0100, H. Guémar wrote: My *personal* opinion is that we should disable this kind of feature by default. On a side note, why not disable also Google as the default searchbox engine and replace it with a

Re: advertisement in packaged software (e.g. Firefox)

On 02/12/2014 11:55 AM, Nikos Roussos wrote: On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 16:58 +0100, H. Guémar wrote: My *personal* opinion is that we should disable this kind of feature by default. On a side note, why not disable also Google as the default searchbox engine and replace it with a non-profit one?

Re: advertisement in packaged software (e.g. Firefox)

On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 16:58 +0100, H. Guémar wrote: > My *personal* opinion is that we should disable this kind of feature > by default. On a side note, why not disable also Google as the default searchbox engine and replace it with a non-profit one? (I'm not stating my opinion here, just trying

Re: advertisement in packaged software (e.g. Firefox)

On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 16:47 +0100, Petr Viktorin wrote: > On 02/12/2014 04:31 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote: > >>> > >>> Are we allowed to ship software in Fedora that dynamically loads > >>> advertisements from the web and shows them to users? > >> > >> I think "allowed" is probably the wrong term to

Re: advertisement in packaged software (e.g. Firefox)

On 02/12/2014 11:28 AM, H. Guémar wrote: My *personal* opinion is that we should disable this kind of feature by default. +1 Actually, unless it tracks users, i don't think that our guidelines forbids it, though it may influence our choice for the packages set installed by default. I accept

File IO-Socket-IP-0.28.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by psabata

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IO-Socket-IP: af171292d769374c0a3fe7f7bc0b757c IO-Socket-IP-0.28.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai

additional repository with {experimental,incubating} content

Yesterday we spoke at Env and Stacks WG about Fedora additional repository. I was wondering what might other products need to put there. Will be the content experimental? Would it be the content just developing (not good for main Fedora repository) or simply not good to became Fedora package, b

Re: advertisement in packaged software (e.g. Firefox)

My *personal* opinion is that we should disable this kind of feature by default. Actually, unless it tracks users, i don't think that our guidelines forbids it, though it may influence our choice for the packages set installed by default. Has anyone tried to contact Mozilla Corporation about it so

[perl-IO-Socket-IP] 0.28 bump

commit b700fd574d05fda9de9b5fcf0d903b7520fa0e17 Author: Petr Šabata Date: Wed Feb 12 16:55:48 2014 +0100 0.28 bump .gitignore |1 + perl-IO-Socket-IP.spec |5 - sources|2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/.git

Re: advertisement in packaged software (e.g. Firefox)

On 02/12/2014 03:36 PM, Kai Engert wrote: Are we allowed to ship software in Fedora that dynamically loads advertisements from the web and shows them to users? I see no reason why to forbid it (from my POV). It is always decision of upstream. And either that program is good enough that users w

Re: Heads-up: updating python-sphinx to 1.2.1 in Rawhide

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/07/2014 04:06 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > Dear all, > > Unless there are objections, I will be updating the python-sphinx > documentation generator in Rawhide to the latest 1.2.1 release. > > For the convenience of maintainers of affec

Re: Phabricator - notifications for patch reviewers

> This sounds great.. but what is Herald? Is it a webapp? Can you link > us to more instructions? It's a 'tool' inside Phab: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/herald/ I covered it a bit in the Phab's FAQ: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Phabricator _

Re: advertisement in packaged software (e.g. Firefox)

On 02/12/2014 04:31 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote: Are we allowed to ship software in Fedora that dynamically loads advertisements from the web and shows them to users? I think "allowed" is probably the wrong term to use here. Fedora packaging rules on what is allowed to be included have pretty mu

[perl-DateTime-Set] Created tag perl-DateTime-Set-0.3400-1.fc21

The lightweight tag 'perl-DateTime-Set-0.3400-1.fc21' was created pointing to: 27c0a93... Update to 0.3400 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-

Re: Fedora GSOC 2014

> but it looks more like copy of last years page then live and up to date information ... the linked ideas page has definitely last year content. > I agree, I think it would be useful to post this link across other mailing lists to invite participation by others as well. >From my end, I'll update

Re: advertisement in packaged software (e.g. Firefox)

> > > > Are we allowed to ship software in Fedora that dynamically loads > > advertisements from the web and shows them to users? > > I think "allowed" is probably the wrong term to use here. Fedora > packaging rules on what is allowed to be included have pretty much > focused on legality of pa

[perl-DateTime-Set] Update to 0.3400

commit 27c0a93950954a643defc486260cd459aacf386d Author: Paul Howarth Date: Wed Feb 12 15:13:52 2014 + Update to 0.3400 - New upstream release 0.3400 - Documentation and packaging fixes - Version number using 4 digits perl-DateTime-Set.spec |9 +++-- source

Re: Educating packagers about always making changes in devel / rawhide first

On 10.02.2014 17:11, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 13:14 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I've just upgraded my main workstation form F-20 to rawhide, and during >> the distro-sync I noticed that several packages in rawhide are older then >> in F-20. >> >> Although there

Re: advertisement in packaged software

On 2014-02-12, Michael Scherer wrote: > Le mercredi 12 février 2014 à 07:11 -0500, Matthew Miller a écrit : >> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:08:20PM +, Petr Pisar wrote: >> > > Are there any existing packages that already do that? >> > vim advertises ICCF to make a donation for children in Uganda

Re: advertisement in packaged software (e.g. Firefox)

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 03:36:00PM +0100, Kai Engert wrote: > On Mi, 2014-02-12 at 10:46 +0100, Kai Engert wrote: > > Do the Fedora guidelines allow packaging of software that will show > > advertisement to the user? > > > > Are there any existing packages that already do that? > > There are mul

[perl-qpid_proton/f20: 6/6] Merge branch 'master' into f20

commit 9ac958d0868075cba4ce156eb458df1fac709015 Merge: 1449eca d41d741 Author: Darryl L. Pierce Date: Wed Feb 12 09:34:32 2014 -0500 Merge branch 'master' into f20 perl-qpid_proton.spec |9 - 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http:/

Re: advertisement in packaged software (e.g. Firefox)

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 03:36:00PM +0100, Kai Engert wrote: >> Question (1) >> Are we allowed to ship software in Fedora that dynamically loads >> advertisements from the web and shows them to users? > > I think this might need to be broken

[perl-qpid_proton/f20] (6 commits) ...Merge branch 'master' into f20

Summary of changes: da9d3f1... Rebased on Proton 0.5. (*) d1a2122... Added the specific Perl provides for Proton. (*) 4524e63... Limited the provides to just qpid::proton::Constants. (*) f61bbd0... Rebased on Qpid Proton 0.6. (*) d41d741... Updated the Provides to include (*) 9ac958d..

[Bug 1048812] perl-version-0.9906 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048812 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-version-0.99.07-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You a

Re: advertisement in packaged software (e.g. Firefox)

On Mi, 2014-02-12 at 09:39 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 03:36:00PM +0100, Kai Engert wrote: > > Question (1) > > Are we allowed to ship software in Fedora that dynamically loads > > advertisements from the web and shows them to users? > > I think this might need to be b

[Bug 1060463] ctstream-13 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060463 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- ctstream-13-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

Re: advertisement in packaged software (e.g. Firefox)

On Mi, 2014-02-12 at 10:46 +0100, Kai Engert wrote: > Do the Fedora guidelines allow packaging of software that will show > advertisement to the user? > > Are there any existing packages that already do that? There are multiple open questions that need answers. I wanted to get the first question

Re: advertisement in packaged software (e.g. Firefox)

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 03:36:00PM +0100, Kai Engert wrote: > Question (1) > Are we allowed to ship software in Fedora that dynamically loads > advertisements from the web and shows them to users? I think this might need to be broken down or clarified. Otherwise, any web browser is out. -- Mat

Re: advertisement in packaged software

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:46:13 +0100, Kai Engert wrote: Do the Fedora guidelines allow packaging of software that will show advertisement to the user? If the software is free software, we should be able to remove the ad code. We might need to do some additional changes to avoid trademark

Re: State of Python 3 as default in Fedora

Porting authconfig may not be necessary at all, actually. One of the discussions we had during DevConf is that we're likely going to replace authconfig with a new library. It's unclear yet if this will be Python or a C library, but if it's Python, we'll make Python 3 support mandatory. OK, I'll

[Bug 1064271] tests failing on s390(x)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064271 --- Comment #5 from Dan Horák --- it doesn't - http://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1351908 :-( and thanks for the hint the buildroot for perl-Net-SSLeay-1.58-1.fc21 uses the same NVRs as build on primary with the exception

Re: State of Python 3 as default in Fedora

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/12/2014 07:52 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hi, > > I've just published a blogpost that summarizes what's going on > with Python 3 as default in Fedora. > > You can find it here: > > http://eng.hroncok.cz/2014/02/12/python3-fedora-default/ > > Fe

Re: advertisement in packaged software

On 02/12/2014 01:23 PM, Michael Scherer wrote: Le mercredi 12 février 2014 à 07:11 -0500, Matthew Miller a écrit : On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:08:20PM +, Petr Pisar wrote: Are there any existing packages that already do that? vim advertises ICCF to make a donation for children in Uganda.

[Bug 1064271] tests failing on s390(x)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064271 --- Comment #4 from Paul Howarth --- Does perl-Net-SSLeay-1.57-1.fc21 still build OK? It looks like the module is failing to load at all, which looks like perhaps a toolchain issue, but there's very little difference in the buildroots. -- Y

Re: Fedora GSOC 2014

Dne 12.2.2014 10:17, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a): > Hi, > > Do we have someone coordinating the Fedora project for the GSOC of this year? > > I may have an idea for a project but my google-fu do not return a wiki page for > 2014. > > > Thanks, > Pierre > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GSOC_2014 b

[Bug 167354] Review Request: amavisd-new

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167354 --- Comment #39 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=GrN5kOOZOJ&a=cc_unsubscribe

[Bug 167354] Review Request: amavisd-new

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167354 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this ma

[Bug 1031573] amavisd-new-2.8.1 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031573 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|st...@silug.org |j.orti.alca...@gmail.com

Re: State of Python 3 as default in Fedora

About boto: Mitch Garnaat (upstream maintainer) is focusing on botocore and awscli, botocore is a rethinking of boto low-level plumbing which is python3 compatible. In the long run, boto3 will be based upon botocore and support python3. I have packages of botocore and awscli, i still have to finish

State of Python 3 as default in Fedora

Hi, I've just published a blogpost that summarizes what's going on with Python 3 as default in Fedora. You can find it here: http://eng.hroncok.cz/2014/02/12/python3-fedora-default/ Feel free to post any comments on my blog or here on the mailing list(s). -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +42077797

Re: advertisement in packaged software

Le mercredi 12 février 2014 à 07:11 -0500, Matthew Miller a écrit : > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:08:20PM +, Petr Pisar wrote: > > > Are there any existing packages that already do that? > > vim advertises ICCF to make a donation for children in Uganda. > > Even leaving aside the whole charity

[Bug 1062968] systemd failed to run vncserver due to permission issues

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062968 Lukas Vrabec changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(yevgeniy.melnichu

Re: advertisement in packaged software

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:08:20PM +, Petr Pisar wrote: > > Are there any existing packages that already do that? > vim advertises ICCF to make a donation for children in Uganda. Even leaving aside the whole charity / good cause vs. selling consumer goods aspect, I think a message about donati

Re: advertisement in packaged software

On 2014-02-12, Kai Engert wrote: > Do the Fedora guidelines allow packaging of software that will show > advertisement to the user? > > Are there any existing packages that already do that? > vim advertises ICCF to make a donation for children in Uganda. -- PEtr -- devel mailing list devel@list

Re: advertisement in packaged software

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:52:27AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > >Do the Fedora guidelines allow packaging of software that will show > >advertisement to the user? > I think it's difficult define what precisely is an advertisement, > but I hope Fedora will be able to avoid this trap, particularly

Re: LinuxCNC RTAI kernel

On 11.02.2014 18:10, Przemek Klosowski wrote: On 02/09/2014 03:21 PM, John Morris wrote: On 02/09/2014 01:53 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: OpenCASCADE should be in fedora soonish actually, see [1]. Woo hoo, news to me! You made my day. (I'm actually one of the OpenCASCADE & FreeCAD maintainers in

Re: advertisement in packaged software

On 02/12/2014 10:46 AM, Kai Engert wrote: Do the Fedora guidelines allow packaging of software that will show advertisement to the user? I think it's difficult define what precisely is an advertisement, but I hope Fedora will be able to avoid this trap, particularly because advertising is so

advertisement in packaged software

Do the Fedora guidelines allow packaging of software that will show advertisement to the user? Are there any existing packages that already do that? Kai -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fed

Fedora GSOC 2014

Hi, Do we have someone coordinating the Fedora project for the GSOC of this year? I may have an idea for a project but my google-fu do not return a wiki page for 2014. Thanks, Pierre pgpH3zlfxN7lG.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admi