On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 13:21 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Has that been tried before? It sounds like a better approach.
Not while I've been around, at least.
> Where is the human to notice "comments after EOL" and act accordingly?
There are always a minimum of two people active on any ticket
That's not necessary abcboard is not used and has been removed from newer uboot
builds uEnv.text files.
Dennis
On February 7, 2014 3:13:27 AM CET, Marcelo Barbosa
wrote:
>Peter,
>
> Changed in this part:
>
>Change one option in this file(only BeagleBone Black):
>
>vi /run/media/$USER/uboot/u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/01/2014 03:23 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> A number of packages install files to /etc/rpm in Rawhide; the
> proper place for macros.* is /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d for rpm >= 4.11.
> And no matter what the location, these files should not be marked
> as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062424
Murray McAllister changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mmcal...@redhat.com
--- Comment #
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062424
Murray McAllister changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-Capture-Tiny: insecure |CVE-2014-1875
|te
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062424
Murray McAllister changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||CVE-2014-1875
--
You are receivi
On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 14:28 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > Why would it not install xorg-x11-drv-cirrus when it sees the physical
> > card?
>
> We don't have anything like the kernel's modaliases for X drivers, at
> least not exposed in a way anaconda could use.
Of course, it's possible to do th
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 4:13 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> npajkovs:
Weird, In Dec 2013 he(staff@RH) did an update to ipraf-ng
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970742
--- Comment #2 from Ken Dreyer ---
Created attachment 860373
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=860373&action=edit
Update to Test::File::ShareDir 0.3.3.
Hi Iain, Path::Tiny is now in Fedora (bug 1003660).
Here's a patch again
Peter,
Changed in this part:
Change one option in this file(only BeagleBone Black):
vi /run/media/$USER/uboot/uEnv.txt
abcboard=am335x-bone > abcboard=am335x-boneblack
Added.
firemanxbr
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >I adjusted this documentation in wiki:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058709
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DBD-SQLite-1.37-5.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058723
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DBD-Pg-2.19.3-4.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058709
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DBD-SQLite-1.40-3.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1052853
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Throwable-0.102080-11. |perl-Throwable-0.102080-11.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1052853
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058723
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DBD-Pg-2.19.3-6.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
Yes please take it.
This package on EPEL has permission problem.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
>I adjusted this documentation in wiki:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/F20/Installation#For_the_BeagleBone_Black
>
>Added this important step to create image of Fedora 20 for BeagleBone
> Black board.
"this important step" being what exactly?
Peter
--
devel mailing l
On 02/06/2014 01:42 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Does any packager use yum-builddep bash completion and would like
> to explain it to me?
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/884303
I don't know about that in particular, but one handy trick is to use
bash complete-filename (M-/) instead of the genera
Does any packager use yum-builddep bash completion and would like
to explain it to me?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/884303
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 11:06:07AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> So, all those bugs stay open on the EOL version until EOL+1?
>
> That seems poor to me. What do we do if someone clears needinfo and
> says: Yes, this still affects me, I am running EOL release. Please fix
> it.
>
> We cannot, the EOL
On Thu, 06 Feb 2014 22:07:52 +0100, Juan Orti Alcaine wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Last week, I notified the devel list about Steven Pritchard (FAS: steve) been
> unresponsive [1], and after many unsuccessful attempts to get bug #695589
> fixed
> [2], I request to take over the package amavisd-new.
>
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
656
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
146
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11560/fail2ban-0.8.10-4.el5
110
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
656
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
85
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-12079/bip-0.8.9-1.el6
49
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA
Hello,
Last week, I notified the devel list about Steven Pritchard (FAS: steve) been
unresponsive [1], and after many unsuccessful attempts to get bug #695589 fixed
[2], I request to take over the package amavisd-new.
Any objection?
Thank you.
[1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/dev
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 09:49:26AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Your whole proposal more or less *is* the heuristic 'don't autoclose
> bugs with comments', because of how needinfo works in RH bugzilla. It's
> not a status (as you imply by writing NEEDINFO) but a flag. If you set
> the needinfo f
On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Reindl Harald wrote:
which is user 0
that is yours, an not only yours
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023820
This workaround solved my problem:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023788#c2
basically:
cat > /etc/systemd/system/sshd-shutdown.service
On Feb 6, 2014 11:06 AM, "Kevin Fenzi" wrote:
>
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2014 04:00:17 -0500
> Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> > I would like to see one of the following, in order of preference:
> >
> > 1. Step one: when a release hits EOL, move the bugs to NEEDINFO with
> > a notice similar to the current
Hey,
This is Vidun. I would like to get involved in the Google Summer Of Code
program with Fedora. I have an idea in mind which I would like to suggest
and probably work on. The idea description as of now is too vague but I
hope it drives my point. I'm looking for suggestions and feedback from the
Am 06.02.2014 20:59, schrieb Paul Wouters:
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>>> Regularly, we get tests failing because the VM does not boot within 60
>>> seconds, and seems to hang at:
>>>
>>> "a stop job is running for User Manager for 0"
>>
>> here you go
>>
>> https://bugzill
On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Reindl Harald wrote:
Regularly, we get tests failing because the VM does not boot within 60
seconds, and seems to hang at:
"a stop job is running for User Manager for 0"
here you go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023820
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_
Am 06.02.2014 20:43, schrieb Paul Wouters:
>
> I'm using a minimal netinstall version of fedora20 for testing using
> KVM. We very often cycle these machines (once per test, we run hundreds
> of tests)
>
> Regularly, we get tests failing because the VM does not boot within 60
> seconds, and see
I'm using a minimal netinstall version of fedora20 for testing using
KVM. We very often cycle these machines (once per test, we run hundreds
of tests)
Regularly, we get tests failing because the VM does not boot within 60
seconds, and seems to hang at:
"a stop job is running for User Ma
On Thu, 6 Feb 2014 04:00:17 -0500
Matthew Miller wrote:
> I would like to see one of the following, in order of preference:
>
> 1. Step one: when a release hits EOL, move the bugs to NEEDINFO with
> a notice similar to the current one. (Essentially moving the
> current warning back a little
On Feb 6, 2014, at 12:39 AM, Dariusz J. Garbowski wrote:
> On 05/02/14 05:46 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
>> On 02/04/2014 06:18 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>> And then we can definitely justify making them bigger. 550MB, or even 1GB.
>>> It's neutral to plus
>>> for performance for either HDDs or
On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 04:00 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> Additionally, but requiring some development, we could add some heuristics
> like: don't autoclose bugs with many incoming duplicate pointers, or
> possibly (as David suggests) bugs with comments, or bugs which have been
> reopened, or (he
Hey guys,
I adjusted this documentation in wiki:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/F20/Installation#For_the_BeagleBone_Black
Added this important step to create image of Fedora 20 for BeagleBone
Black board.
Best Regards
firemanxbr
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorap
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/06/2014 02:39 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 2:49 AM, Miroslav Suchý
> wrote:
> >
> >> On 02/05/2014 08:24 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> >>
> >>> Are there official
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/06/2014 02:39 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 2:49 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
>> On 02/05/2014 08:24 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>
>>> Are there official guidelines on how to handle selinux contexts in
>>> packaging? I can stil
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 11:11 AM, H. Guémar wrote:
> I'm not fond of keeping spins around when we're focusing on products.
> That gives the message that they are second-class citizens in Fedora.
>
In my view, this not supposed to be a discussion about numbering classes /
keeping score.
Rather, I
Hello,
dnf-0.4.13 is out [1], [2]. F20 version will follow shortly. We ship
Delta RPM support, bash completion and keepcache again in this version.
Remember to come meet the team at DevConf.cz this weekend.
Ales
[1] http://dnf.baseurl.org/2014/02/06/dnf-0-4-13-released/
[2] http://akozumpl.g
Hi,
On Saturday, 2014-01-25 09:47:28 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > If time permits I'd like to do an upgrade of ICU to 52.1 next week,
> > which leads to the usual soname bump.
> >
> > As quite a lot of packages are affected by this, is anyone objecting
> > and can point out a better time for th
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 2:49 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> On 02/05/2014 08:24 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
>> Are there official guidelines on how to handle selinux contexts in
>> packaging? I can still only find the draft which
>> seems way more complicated than necessary for my needs.
>>
>> I'm work
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 07:30:44AM -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > 2. As #1, but with no new CLOSED:EOL resolution. Instead, use WONTFIX
> > or and add a ClosedEOL keyword automatically. This is uglier than
> > the above but requires no bugzilla change.
> I'm not sure adding a new EOL st
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 01:21:53PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Where is the human to notice "comments after EOL" and act accordingly?
Theeeoretically, the package maintainer.
In the prototypical version of this back in the ancient days, I actually
put myself on the CC list of all of the clos
- Original Message -
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 02:50:59PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > The problem is that no-one seems to come up with an alternative that's
> > any better. Leaving bugs on EOL versions open to rot away and be ignored
> > is no use. We *could* give everyone privs to re
- Original Message -
> Like this:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959071
>
> I specifically followed up to say the issue continues in Fedora 19,
> and nothing changed. The bug tracker should not expire bugs if there's
> been a comment after the EOL warning.
The bug bot is re
On Wed, 05 Feb 2014 14:50:59 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 22:48 +, Colin Macdonald wrote:
> > On 05/02/14 22:42, David Timothy Strauss wrote:
> > > This is also not the first time this has happened to me.
> >
> > I'll chime in: when I first switched to Fedora (F14/15
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 02:50:59PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> The problem is that no-one seems to come up with an alternative that's
> any better. Leaving bugs on EOL versions open to rot away and be ignored
> is no use. We *could* give everyone privs to re-open closed bugs, I
> guess, and I p
On 02/05/2014 08:24 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
Are there official guidelines on how to handle selinux contexts in packaging? I
can still only find the draft which
seems way more complicated than necessary for my needs.
I'm working on a package that uses mongodb internally (runs it's own instance).
thank so much adam :)
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 5:17 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 05:03 -0300, Carlos Morel-Riquelme wrote:
> > Hi guys i have running rawhide in my laptop and is update , all work
> > fine for me
> > but i don't understand why update-testing have different ve
On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 05:03 -0300, Carlos Morel-Riquelme wrote:
> Hi guys i have running rawhide in my laptop and is update , all work
> fine for me
> but i don't understand why update-testing have different version of
> packages in comparison with rawhide
>
> example the following builds have bee
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 02:05:06PM -0800, David Timothy Strauss wrote:
> > You just need to change the Version tag.
> That is not something I appear to have access to do. And, if I don't,
> very few people do.
The person who *reported* the bug can (although there possibly may be some
cases where t
Hi guys i have running rawhide in my laptop and is update , all work fine
for me
but i don't understand why update-testing have different version of
packages in comparison with rawhide
example the following builds have been pushed to Fedora 20 updates-testing
NetworkManager-0.9.9.0-29.git2014013
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 01:51:41PM -0800, David Timothy Strauss wrote:
> Like this:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959071
> I specifically followed up to say the issue continues in Fedora 19,
> and nothing changed. The bug tracker should not expire bugs if there's
> been a comment af
55 matches
Mail list logo
