On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 01:21:53PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > Where is the human to notice "comments after EOL" and act accordingly?
Theeeoretically, the package maintainer. In the prototypical version of this back in the ancient days, I actually put myself on the CC list of all of the closed bugs. But there are several times more bugs than there used to be, and I think that would consume a whole full-time person at least for a while. > How many tickets would be affected by a "comment after EOL"? It's kind of hard to construct the exact search because the Fedora EOL script takes some time to run, and I don't think bugzilla allows anything like "comment from not $GIVENUSER after comment from $GIVENUSER". If anyone does know how to do that, help wanted. :) > I've posted about it in 2008 already, and I still think the auto-closing > leads to hiding crap under the carpet. I think it's acknowledgement that we don't have resources to fix all of the crap. But I'd like if we could better identify the important cases where we actually *should* make sure issues are addressed, while finding the right balance between maintainer and user/reported burdens. -- Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- <mat...@fedoraproject.org> -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
