On Jan 16, 2014 10:19 AM, "Andrew Lutomirski" wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 11:29 +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> >> On Út, 2014-01-14 at 13:13 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Adam Williamson <
awi
On 01/16/2014 01:38 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Jan 16, 2014, at 1:41 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
The other thing -- getting unicode to include standard symbols -- is
happening. That's why we have 💩 . Yay standards!
Oh man. Change that to 144pt. Is it chocolate soft serve with a smile? Or is
On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 20:18 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> personally if a GTK user does not want GTK3 i want a pure
> QT firefox to get rid of GTK-dialogs
>
> i know that will not happen, but on the KDE desktop *any* GTK2 or GTK3
> application is much more disturbing as the difference GTK2/GTK3
W
On Jan 16, 2014, at 1:41 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 09:13:03AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> Then get the Unicode people sign off on treating your special special
>> characters as text, otherwise it's just an abuse of the system. If all
>> the people who want to do th
On 16/01/14 15:38, Dan Williams wrote:
>> I bet ya the hang has something to do with these messages:
>> >
>> > (bridge0): IPv4 config waiting until carrier is on
>> > (bridge0): IPv6 config waiting until carrier is on
>> > Activation (bridge0) Stage 3 of 5 (IP Configure Start) complete
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:44:12PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Well, it does seem that they're using the Private Use Areas, which are
> > specfically reserved for basically this purpose.
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_Use_Areas
> Well, kinda. That still only works as long as you ca
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 12:44 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 15:41 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 09:13:03AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > Then get the Unicode people sign off on treating your special special
> > > characters as text, otherwise i
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 15:41 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 09:13:03AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Then get the Unicode people sign off on treating your special special
> > characters as text, otherwise it's just an abuse of the system. If all
> > the people who want to
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 09:13:03AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Then get the Unicode people sign off on treating your special special
> characters as text, otherwise it's just an abuse of the system. If all
> the people who want to do this get together and get a set of agreed upon
> generic icon
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 14:53 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote:
>
> On 16/01/14 14:39, Steve Dickson wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 16/01/14 14:09, Dan Williams wrote:
> >> Also, if wouldn't mind passing along the systemd journal output for
> >> NetworkManager, that might help us figure out what's going on:
> >>
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:44:34AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > If someone else uses GPLed binaries from a COPR repo and fulfills
> > their source obligations by pointing to the repository we host, it's
> > technically their problem if our repository goes away, but it would
> > be a friendly gestu
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.
mojomojo has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA)
On i386:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA)
On armhfp:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requir
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu has broken dependencies in the rawhide
tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::MultiForm)
On i386:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML:
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 14:10:31 -0600
Richard Shaw wrote:
> > I would've expected anything that exists in epel6 and doesn't exist
> > in rhel7 to get an epel7 branch. It seems a bit ludicrous doing it
> > manually
It's not. There's a bunch of things that are in epel6 that are
pointless to have in e
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 14:10 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 07:38 -0700, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Richard Shaw
> wrote:
>
>> > > I noticed that EPEL 7 branches were created for several of my packages
>> > > that
>> > > have el6 branches, but not all of them. I didn't request them (yet) so
>> > > I'm
>> > > wondering, are some packages automatically added or did someone else
>> > > request
>> > > them as a dependency t
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 07:38 -0700, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Richard Shaw
> wrote:
> > > I noticed that EPEL 7 branches were created for several of my packages
> that
> > > have el6 branches
On 16/01/14 14:39, Steve Dickson wrote:
>
>
> On 16/01/14 14:09, Dan Williams wrote:
>> Also, if wouldn't mind passing along the systemd journal output for
>> NetworkManager, that might help us figure out what's going on:
>>
>> journalctl -b _SYSTEMD_UNIT=NetworkManager.service
> The log is at:
On 16/01/14 14:09, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 13:53 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Has anybody had any luck with getting bridges
>> consistently up in running in either F19 or F20?
>> I know I have not...
>>
>> I go into setup/networks. Add a bridge which creates
>
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 07:38 -0700, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > I noticed that EPEL 7 branches were created for several of my packages that
> > have el6 branches, but not all of them. I didn't request them (yet) so I'm
> > wondering,
On Qui, 2014-01-16 at 12:47 +0100, Martin Stransky wrote:
> New builds are available at copr [1]. Package firefox-gtk3-29.0-3
> contains working NPAPI plugin support, so flash and other should work there.
>
> Please report any issue to bugzila (firefox component) and note it's the
> gtk3 port.
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 07:39 +0100, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
> ===
> #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2014-01-15)
> ===
>
>
> Meeting started by mmaslano at 18:00:34 UTC. The full logs are available
> at
> http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedo
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 13:53 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Has anybody had any luck with getting bridges
> consistently up in running in either F19 or F20?
> I know I have not...
>
> I go into setup/networks. Add a bridge which creates
> two file in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts
>
>
Hello,
Has anybody had any luck with getting bridges
consistently up in running in either F19 or F20?
I know I have not...
I go into setup/networks. Add a bridge which creates
two file in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts
ifcfg-Bridge_connection_1
ifcfg-bridge0_slave_1
The contents seem reasonab
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 11:29 +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote:
>> On Út, 2014-01-14 at 13:13 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Adam Williamson
>> > wrote:
>> > > On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 12:41 -0800, Andrew Lutomi
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 11:29 +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> On Út, 2014-01-14 at 13:13 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Adam Williamson
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 12:41 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> > >> I have some trivial cleanups I want to make t
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 18:37 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le Jeu 16 janvier 2014 18:13, Adam Williamson a écrit :
> > On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 10:52 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 22:31 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 22:59 -0700, T.C. Hollingswor
On Jan 16, 2014, at 10:13 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> At least in a toolkit you can implement the kind of thing suggested on
> the Firefox bug, but still - does this look like awesome pseudo-code to
> you?
>
> if $thing is Unicode character;
>render_unicode($thing);
> OH OOPS EXCEPT if $
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:52:09 -0500,
Matthias Clasen wrote:
We've been discussing this as an option for rendering symbolic icons in
GTK+ too.
But hopefully you won't be claiming the character set is unicode and
relying on a specific font containing glyphs for bogus code points.
People
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 11:33:48 -0500
Matthew Miller wrote:
> If someone else uses GPLed binaries from a COPR repo and fulfills
> their source obligations by pointing to the repository we host, it's
> technically their problem if our repository goes away, but it would
> be a friendly gesture to at l
Le Jeu 16 janvier 2014 18:13, Adam Williamson a écrit :
> On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 10:52 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>> On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 22:31 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 22:59 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
>> >
>> > > * Another individual thought that all web a
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 10:52 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 22:31 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 22:59 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> >
> > > * Another individual thought that all web authors are stupid for
> > > wanting to use fancy fonts and tha
On Qui, 2014-01-16 at 12:47 +0100, Martin Stransky wrote:
> contains working NPAPI plugin support,
That is a good new,
about drop gtk 1 , IIRC gtk 1 just exit because someone want maintain
xmms in Fedora .
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fed
mkrizek claimed this task.
TASK DETAIL
https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T52
To: mkrizek
Cc: kparal, qa-devel, tflink
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47675/0001-Ticket-47675-logconv-errors-when-search-has-invalid-.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 22:31 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 22:59 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
>
> > * Another individual thought that all web authors are stupid for
> > wanting to use fancy fonts and that I am wasting my time. (He might
> > be right about that last bit.
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Perl-OSType:
7b0795b82471322ec32d267c333dc895 Perl-OSType-1.007.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail
commit 4c7ba402487c10921ba047c6287de0da368bd06c
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Thu Jan 16 16:41:58 2014 +
Update to 1.007
- New upstream release 1.007
- Added 'android' as a Unix-type OS
- Update stopwords patch
...ords.patch => Perl-OSType-1.007-stopwords.patch |2
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 05:24:04PM +0100, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> > gesture to at least keep the source RPMs around.
> The thing is those copr repos will likely depend on EOLed Fedora
> repos. Do we keep *those* around? I guess the answer will be different
> for each mirror. Some will keep th
Matthew Miller writes:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 09:16:44AM +0100, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
>> While the last option is probably best, I'm not sure if this is
>> worth the effort. How many people will appreciate having archived
>> old repos?
>
> If someone else uses GPLed binaries from a COPR repo a
Would anyone mind sharing their mock configurations for EPEL 7?
/etc/mock/epel-7-i386.cfg
/etc/mock/epel-7-x86_64.cfg
It looks like mock-1.1.35-1.fc19.noarch doesn't ship these files yet.
- Ken
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-de...@lists.fedoraproject
Related to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1052181 that i filed
some days ago.
feel free to update with info on that on :)
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> Would anyone mind sharing their mock configurations for EPEL 7?
>
> /etc/mock/epel-7-i386.cfg
> /etc/mock/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 02:03:14PM +0100, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> I am working on a draft common crypto policy for Fedora. The idea is to
> be able to set a security level for all TLS/SSL connections in a system
> (which will of course allo
Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 01/15/2014 05:31 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Thanks Panu. Is there a way to get rpmbuild to be more verbose about
the finding requires stage? I tried using -vv with rpmbuild and didn't
notice any additional output.
Just added this:
http://rpm.org/wiki/PackagerDocs/De
Hi,
I just deployed new version of Copr to
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/
I deployed it mostly to get rig of few tracebacks we get regularly.
But there is some enhancements as well:
* https is available. Self signed certificate right now. Final
certificate is on the way.
* no need to enter
On 01/09/2014 04:04 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 01/09/2014 01:23 PM, William Cohen wrote:
>> On 01/09/2014 01:29 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>> On 01/09/2014 10:48 AM, William Cohen wrote:
PAPI-5.3.0 came out at the beginning of December 2013
(http://icl.cs.utk.edu/papi/news/news.htm
Hi Richard,
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I noticed that EPEL 7 branches were created for several of my packages that
> have el6 branches, but not all of them. I didn't request them (yet) so I'm
> wondering, are some packages automatically added or did someone else reques
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 09:16:44AM +0100, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
> While the last option is probably best, I'm not sure if this is
> worth the effort. How many people will appreciate having archived
> old repos?
If someone else uses GPLed binaries from a COPR repo and fulfills their
source obligati
On 01/15/2014 11:17 AM, Jan Kaluža wrote:
On 01/15/2014 08:28 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 01/15/2014 02:56 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Hi all,
[I posted this to the packaging list a few days ago, but haven't gotten
any responses, so I want to open this to a wider audience in the hope of
gettin
Am 16.01.2014 14:55, schrieb Bruno Wolff III:
> Also sort of related is people who use MS 1252 but claim the character set is
> iso-8859-1
blame the firefox developers first and the fools (also Mozilla)
who ignores doctypes and follow HTML5
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=890478#c
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 22:31:56 -0800,
Adam Williamson wrote:
If anyone overrides font choices in their browser config and wonders why
an increasing number of sites - inc. github, and the wordpress admin
interface - seem to display weird hieroglyphs all over the place, it's
because of this "
I saw the announcement a week or so ago but it didn't appear to answer my
questions...
I noticed that EPEL 7 branches were created for several of my packages that
have el6 branches, but not all of them. I didn't request them (yet) so I'm
wondering, are some packages automatically added or did some
On 01/15/2014 05:31 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Panu Matilainen wrote:
Also FYI, /usr/lib/rpm/find-requires (or -provides) is not what's used
during rpmbuild unless specifically overridden to use that legacy
mechanism.
Thanks Panu. Is there a way to get rpmbuild to be more verbose about
the fin
Hello,
I am working on a draft common crypto policy for Fedora. The idea is to
be able to set a security level for all TLS/SSL connections in a system
(which will of course allow the user to use any application-specific
overrides).
The draft change is at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Cr
On 01/16/2014 01:04 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 16.01.2014 12:56, schrieb Martin Stransky:
On 01/14/2014 08:18 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 14.01.2014 19:12, schrieb Maros Zatko:
On 01/14/2014 03:38 PM, H. Guémar wrote:
What's the point ?
Personally, it's mainly about not throwing gnome 3 H
Am 16.01.2014 12:56, schrieb Martin Stransky:
> On 01/14/2014 08:18 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 14.01.2014 19:12, schrieb Maros Zatko:
>>> On 01/14/2014 03:38 PM, H. Guémar wrote:
What's the point ?
>>> Personally, it's mainly about not throwing gnome 3 HIG at people
>>
>> personally
On 01/14/2014 08:18 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 14.01.2014 19:12, schrieb Maros Zatko:
On 01/14/2014 03:38 PM, H. Guémar wrote:
What's the point ?
Personally, it's mainly about not throwing gnome 3 HIG at people
personally if a GTK user does not want GTK3 i want a pure
QT firefox to get ri
On 01/14/2014 07:12 PM, Maros Zatko wrote:
On 01/14/2014 03:38 PM, H. Guémar wrote:
What's the point ?
Personally, it's mainly about not throwing gnome 3 HIG at people.
There's absolutely no benefit in keeping Gtk+2 longer.
Gtk+ 2.24.0 has been released 3 years ago (january, 2011) and is only
On 01/14/2014 06:31 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Is it possible to split the NSAPI components out into a sub package
and hence remove the dependence on gtk2 for those people that don't
use NSAPI plugins?
You can build your own package at copr. We can add some config flags to
firefox spec to make
New builds are available at copr [1]. Package firefox-gtk3-29.0-3
contains working NPAPI plugin support, so flash and other should work there.
Please report any issue to bugzila (firefox component) and note it's the
gtk3 port.
Thanks!
ma.
[1] http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/stransky/Fire
On 2014-01-15, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Thanks Petr. I knew that was the older method, but from what I read
> in the guidelines, I didn't think it was known to be broken. The Perl
> guidelines say:
>
> "In the past, several other methods were given for doing this
> filtering. Those shou
Dne 15.1.2014 17:51, Dridi Boukelmoune napsal(a):
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Dne 14.1.2014 21:41, Andrew Lutomirski napsal(a):
>>> I have some trivial cleanups I want to make to a package a maintain.
>>> These cleanups are trivial enough that I don't think they're wor
Dne 15.1.2014 18:12, Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 02:16:29PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Actually I'd really love to see some possibility for private branches.
>> Now, it is possible to push whatever branch (take it literally) you have
>> in your local git repo into dist
- Original Message -
> On 01/16/2014 09:05 AM, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
> > I'm still unsure what it will mean for existing Fedora 18 repository. I
> > you want to discuss it, you are welcome to copr-devel@ mailing list.
>
> So in 3 months I had to come with some solution what to do with old
On 01/16/2014 09:05 AM, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
I'm still unsure what it will mean for existing Fedora 18 repository. I
you want to discuss it, you are welcome to copr-devel@ mailing list.
So in 3 months I had to come with some solution what to do with old
repositories. Options which comes to my
On 01/14/2014 10:31 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
As of 14th January 2014, Fedora 18 has reached its end of life for
updates and support. No further updates, including security updates,
will be available for Fedora 18. A previous reminder was sent on
December 18th [0].
How does this affect Copr?
I
67 matches
Mail list logo
