On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 07:13 +0100, Jean François Martinez wrote:
> > A GUI program would not fix your problem. If os-prober isn't finding your
> > CentOS install, a GUI boot manager wouldn't either. I suggest filing a bug
> > and attaching the following;
> >
>
> In fact when run grub2-mkconfig
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 12:54:36 -0700
Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Jan 13, 2014, at 12:56 AM, Jean François Martinez wrote:
> >
> > It is refreshing to see I am not alone. Grub2 has the syndrome of
> > "developpers becaming infatuated and not hiving a hoot about erfs err, I
> > meant users".
>
Hi all,
I've gotten a build tag f21-llvm for attempting to rebase rawhide to llvm 3.4,
so far I've started just getting llvm built into the buildroot,
and once it gets past arm it seems like it should succeed.
That leaves the fun of rebasing and fixing all the llvm dependant packages:
mesa
Open
Dear Sir
I am a new subscriber to the devel list. I want to introduce myself to the list
and break some ice. I am a young and humble C programmer, although I have
experience programming in other languages as Basic and Java. I am using Linux
since it was only Red Hats (before the blue Fedora),
On 01/06/2014 05:40 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Garrett Holmstrom
> wrote:
>> On 2014-01-02 16:38, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Go for it. Do I need to re-orphan it?
>>
>>
>> I believe so.
>
> Done. I didn't see any obvious way to directly transfer the
I've taken rawhide/f20 and el6 branch of netpipe, anyone else
comaintainers are welcome.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 01/13/2014 03:26 PM, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
> I just deployed new version of Copr at:
> http://copr.fedoraproject.org
>
> It have only one feature: you can now build in epel-7-x86_64!
>
> To be precise - the name "epel" is little bit misleading, because it is right
> now based on RHEL 7 Beta
Kevin Fenzi a écrit :
> Greetings.
>
> The following packages have been orphaned due to their former
> maintainer removing themselves from the packager group:
>
> NetPIPE
> checkdns
taken, co-maintainers welcome
> pxe-kexec (epel5/6 only)
>
> Thanks,
>
> kevin
> --
> devel mailing list
>
Greetings.
The following packages have been orphaned due to their former
maintainer removing themselves from the packager group:
NetPIPE
checkdns
pxe-kexec (epel5/6 only)
Thanks,
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 1:30 AM, Mark Chappell wrote:
>
> On 10 January 2014 21:54, Jerry James wrote:
>
>> Well, there's a comprehensible error message! Anyway, does anybody have
>> an alternate means of contacting Mark?
>>
>
> Apologies for the delay in responding (and thanks to Michael for po
I just deployed new version of Copr at:
http://copr.fedoraproject.org
It have only one feature: you can now build in epel-7-x86_64!
To be precise - the name "epel" is little bit misleading, because it is
right now based on RHEL 7 Beta and does not include EPEL repo, because
it does not exist
[Moving this to the libguestfs mailing list]
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 03:05:14PM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 01/13/2014 11:49 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:20:22AM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> >> Secondly we
Greetings.
Packages currently using the _hardened_build macro that also use
libtool may have been built only with "partial" RELRO instead of full
RELRO protections.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security_Features_Matrix#Built_with_RELRO
A workaround has been added today to the redhat-rpm-confi
>>> Ahh, Okay. The package is build with Gtk3 toolkit [1] (the recent
>>> official
>>> ones are Gtk2) so it's a regular Gtk3 app which should better fit to
>>> Gnome 3
>>> desktop, use themes/skins and so.
>>>
>>> The long term plan is to switch Fedora Firefox to Gtk3 so this is just a
>>> tech pre
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 9:22 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Seg, 2014-01-13 at 16:53 +0100, Martin Stransky wrote:
>> On 01/13/2014 04:48 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > Am 13.01.2014 16:41, schrieb Josh Boyer:
>> >> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Martin Stransky
>> >> wrote:
>> >>> On
On Seg, 2014-01-13 at 16:53 +0100, Martin Stransky wrote:
> On 01/13/2014 04:48 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >
> >
> > Am 13.01.2014 16:41, schrieb Josh Boyer:
> >> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Martin Stransky
> >> wrote:
> >>> On 01/13/2014 04:29 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> On Mon, J
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1052435
Bug ID: 1052435
Summary: Missing RPM dependencies
Product: Fedora
Version: 20
Component: amavisd-new
Assignee: st...@silug.org
Reporter: d...@mrns.nl
QA Contact: ex
Am 13.01.2014 20:50, schrieb Martin Stransky:
> On 01/13/2014 05:57 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Martin Stransky wrote:
>>> On 01/13/2014 04:41 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> I don't say it's important/newsworthy. It's just FYI. Please ignore if
> you're n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/13/2014 11:49 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:20:22AM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>> Secondly we prevent even unconfined_t from putting down labels on the
>> file system that the kernel does not understand. IE If I am
On Jan 13, 2014, at 12:56 AM, Jean François Martinez wrote:
>
> It is refreshing to see I am not alone. Grub2 has the syndrome of
> "developpers becaming infatuated and not hiving a hoot about erfs err, I
> meant users".
In a sense, they're right, because they're making something that user
On 01/13/2014 05:57 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Martin Stransky wrote:
On 01/13/2014 04:41 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
I don't say it's important/newsworthy. It's just FYI. Please ignore if
you're not interested.
Ok, I'll rephrase.
I'm interested but I have no ide
On Jan 13, 2014, at 5:24 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> On 01/10/2014 11:57 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 14:30 +0100, Harald Hoyer wrote:
>>>
>>> That's the reason we came up with
>>> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Specifications/BootLoaderSpec/
>>>
>>> and even have a patch
On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 14:29 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
> [obexfs]
> obexfs-0.12-7.fc20.i686 requires libopenobex.so.1
So, this is orphaned, and the code has now actually been rolled into
obexftp upstream. The build of obexftp I did yesterday includes the
obexfs and obexautofs util
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 10:16:52 -0800
Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > You can also "after some research"
> > modify the dnf-makecache.service file
> > to change the frequency of makecache.
>
> It's a lot cleaner to just define a metadata expiry time in the
> repository config file.
Discovered aft
jdulaney closed this task as "Resolved".
TASK DETAIL
https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T20
To: jdulaney
Cc: qa-devel
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
jdulaney added a comment.
Done, pushed to git.
TASK DETAIL
https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T20
To: jdulaney
Cc: qa-devel
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 08:42 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 08:37:57AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > that's included into other PAM stacks that require authentication. By
> > default, this is prepared by authconfig, but there are situations
> > where an admin would like
On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 08:45 +, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jan 2014 14:06:30 -0500
> "Garry T. Williams" wrote:
>
>
> >
> > sudo dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing clean expire-cache
> > sudo dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing upgrade kernel\*
> >
>
> You can also "after some res
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Probably this needs to go to FESCo/FPC, but what about
> package-specific CAs? For example, I have a pattern I was thinking
> about adding to the tog-pegasus that causes it to do the following:
>
> 1. Create an x509v3 certificate and key w
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 18:21:28 -0700
Tim Flink wrote:
> # Fedora QA Devel Meeting
> # Date: 2014-01-13
> # Time: 17:00 - 19:00 UTC
> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
> # Location: #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net
There was some miscommunication about the meeting channe
On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 08:39 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 04:39:12PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > You're preaching to the choir. But if in practice people really don't
> > deploy things via the distribution packages, it doesn't matter how
> > awesomely secure the distr
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Martin Stransky wrote:
> On 01/13/2014 04:41 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't say it's important/newsworthy. It's just FYI. Please ignore if
>>> you're not interested.
>>
>>
>> Ok, I'll rephrase.
>>
>> I'm interested but I have no idea how this is different fr
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:20:22AM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> Secondly we prevent even unconfined_t from putting down labels on
> the file system that the kernel does not understand. IE If I am
> building a F21 image on a RHEL6 box, it would blow up in enforcing
> mode if run as unconfined_t.
Change in ownership over the last 168 hours
===
3 packages were orphaned
eclipse-subclipse [devel] was orphaned by akurtakov
Subversion Eclipse plugin
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/eclipse-subclipse
umlgra
On 01/13/2014 04:55 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:49:09 +0100
Martin Stransky wrote:
Ahh, Okay. The package is build with Gtk3 toolkit [1] (the recent
official ones are Gtk2) so it's a regular Gtk3 app which should
better fit to Gnome 3 desktop, use themes/skins and so.
I h
tflink added a dependency: T39: Investigate documentation systems for taskotron
and related sub-projects
TASK DETAIL
https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T28
To: tflink
Cc: qa-devel, tflink
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-de...@lists.fedoraproje
Yeah I opened that awhile ago, so hopefully someone will respond to that
soon and I'll get a sponsor soon. In the meantime I also built xcape.
-Matt
On 01/13/2014 10:28 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Matt Robinson wrote:
I built compton, a compositing manager for X. I've had strange
problems
Am 13.01.2014 16:55, schrieb Frank Murphy:
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:49:09 +0100
> Martin Stransky wrote:
>
>> Ahh, Okay. The package is build with Gtk3 toolkit [1] (the recent
>> official ones are Gtk2) so it's a regular Gtk3 app which should
>> better fit to Gnome 3 desktop, use themes/skins an
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 04:39:10PM +0100, H. Guémar wrote:
> As far as i'm concerned, the draft is good enough to be submitted to the
> FPC.
> Still, i'm not confident enough in my go skills to suggest it :)
Me either, but I won't let that stop me.
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/382
--
M
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:49:09 +0100
Martin Stransky wrote:
> Ahh, Okay. The package is build with Gtk3 toolkit [1] (the recent
> official ones are Gtk2) so it's a regular Gtk3 app which should
> better fit to Gnome 3 desktop, use themes/skins and so.
>
I have Xfce but is it ok to test it?
If it
On 01/09/2014 04:04 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 01/09/2014 01:23 PM, William Cohen wrote:
>> On 01/09/2014 01:29 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>> On 01/09/2014 10:48 AM, William Cohen wrote:
PAPI-5.3.0 came out at the beginning of December 2013
(http://icl.cs.utk.edu/papi/news/news.htm
On 01/13/2014 04:48 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 13.01.2014 16:41, schrieb Josh Boyer:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
On 01/13/2014 04:29 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Martin Stransky
wrote:
Hi guys,
first $SUBJ is available at:
http:/
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
> On 01/13/2014 04:41 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't say it's important/newsworthy. It's just FYI. Please ignore if
>>> you're not interested.
>>
>>
>> Ok, I'll rephrase.
>>
>> I'm interested but I have no idea how this is different f
On 01/13/2014 04:41 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
I don't say it's important/newsworthy. It's just FYI. Please ignore if
you're not interested.
Ok, I'll rephrase.
I'm interested but I have no idea how this is different from every
other Firefox build that Fedora provides. Could you elaborate on the
ch
Am 13.01.2014 16:41, schrieb Josh Boyer:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
>> On 01/13/2014 04:29 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Martin Stransky
>>> wrote:
Hi guys,
first $SUBJ is available at:
http://stransky.fe
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
> On 01/13/2014 04:29 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Martin Stransky
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> first $SUBJ is available at:
>>>
>>> http://stransky.fedorapeople.org/FirefoxGtk3/
>>>
>>> It's just a sr
On 01/13/2014 04:29 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
Hi guys,
first $SUBJ is available at:
http://stransky.fedorapeople.org/FirefoxGtk3/
It's just a src.spm and plugin support it not finished (don't browse youtube
;-)) but may work as a preview.
As far as i'm concerned, the draft is good enough to be submitted to the
FPC.
Still, i'm not confident enough in my go skills to suggest it :)
H.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject
On Po, 2014-01-13 at 08:37 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 01/12/2014 08:17 AM, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
> > I just wonder why `authconfig` creates: /etc/pam.d/system-auth ->
> > system-auth-ac /etc/pam.d/postlogin -> postlogin-ac
> > /etc/pam.d/password-auth -> password-auth-ac etc.
> >
> > Wh
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> first $SUBJ is available at:
>
> http://stransky.fedorapeople.org/FirefoxGtk3/
>
> It's just a src.spm and plugin support it not finished (don't browse youtube
> ;-)) but may work as a preview.
>
> I'll provide Fedora builds a
The lightweight tag 'perl-aliased-0.31-1.el7' was created pointing to:
8f4b999... Update to 0.31
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 04:11:23PM +0100, H. Guémar wrote:
> there's a draft, i suggest that you start checking it.
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Go
> Taking a peek at Debian and OpenSuSE Go guidelines might be worthy:
> http://pkg-go.alioth.debian.org/packaging.html
> http://en.o
Matt Robinson wrote:
I built compton, a compositing manager for X. I've had strange problems with
xcompmgr before and I've since switched to compton, so I thought it would be a
good idea to build it. I just looked in koji, but it seems to be in there, just
not updated for f20. Should I contact th
My apologies for linking opensuse guidelines, i missed that point in your
mail.
H.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/10/2014 10:47 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> El Fri, 10 Jan 2014 18:31:13 -0700 Tim Flink escribió:
>> On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 15:35:59 -0800 Adam Williamson
>> wrote:
>
>>> On Fri, 2014-01-10 at 17:33 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
El Fri, 10 Jan
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Martin Stransky wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> first $SUBJ is available at:
>
> http://stransky.fedorapeople.org/FirefoxGtk3/
>
> It's just a src.spm and plugin support it not finished (don't browse youtube
> ;-)) but may work as a preview.
>
> I'll provide Fedora builds a
The lightweight tag 'perl-Digest-MD4-1.9-1.el7' was created pointing to:
85a130e... Update to 1.9
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Hi guys,
first $SUBJ is available at:
http://stransky.fedorapeople.org/FirefoxGtk3/
It's just a src.spm and plugin support it not finished (don't browse
youtube ;-)) but may work as a preview.
I'll provide Fedora builds and repo later.
ma.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi,
there's a draft, i suggest that you start checking it.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Go
Taking a peek at Debian and OpenSuSE Go guidelines might be worthy:
http://pkg-go.alioth.debian.org/packaging.html
http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Packaging_Go
Best regards,
H.
--
devel m
Hi all,
Long time ago I submitted a package written in go, then we found that
no guidelines at that moment, it's hard to review it properly.
Now since docker and many golang tools are accepted in Fedora, can
someone prepare a guideline for Go?
I got some ideas from SUSE's, but not sure if it's a
Adam Williamson wrote:
> So to bring it to the context of Fedora.next - if some of the
> 'Fedora.next' products want to have the capability to deploy 'stable',
> i.e. bundled, stacks, then I think they should be 'allowed' to do so (in
> the sense that we can't really stop them), but the mechanisms
I built compton, a compositing manager for X. I've had strange problems
with xcompmgr before and I've since switched to compton, so I thought it
would be a good idea to build it. I just looked in koji, but it seems to
be in there, just not updated for f20. Should I contact the current
maintaine
Compose started at Mon Jan 13 05:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for i386
--
[OpenEXR_CTL]
OpenEXR_CTL-1.0.1-16.fc20.i686 requires libImath.so.6
OpenEXR_CTL-1.0.1-16.fc20.i686 requires libIlmThread.so.6
OpenEXR_CTL-1.0.1-16
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:38:39 +0100
Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> No. This command is accepted (to my surprise). But it delete nothing.
> And just create new directory sturcture in '/var/cache/yum/x86_64/*'.
>
That does suck then
if someone with more that F20 cache needs to clean.
as Harald posted yo
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 08:37:57AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> that's included into other PAM stacks that require authentication. By
> default, this is prepared by authconfig, but there are situations
> where an admin would like to take control (and not risk that later
> passes of authconfig
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 04:39:12PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> You're preaching to the choir. But if in practice people really don't
> deploy things via the distribution packages, it doesn't matter how
> awesomely secure the distribution packages are. Something that you're
> not using is never
On 01/13/2014 09:57 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:53:53 +0100
> Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
>> On 01/13/2014 08:56 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
>>> to be certain you can do "dnf(yum) --enablerepo=* clean all"
>>> if your intention is truly to remove all cache.
>>
>> Not true if you ever
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/12/2014 08:17 AM, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
> I just wonder why `authconfig` creates: /etc/pam.d/system-auth ->
> system-auth-ac /etc/pam.d/postlogin -> postlogin-ac
> /etc/pam.d/password-auth -> password-auth-ac etc.
>
> Why those links and why -a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1052197
Bug ID: 1052197
Summary: perl-Test-Most-0.33 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Test-Most
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: jples...@red
Am 13.01.2014 09:57, schrieb Frank Murphy:
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:53:53 +0100
> Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
>> On 01/13/2014 08:56 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
>>> to be certain you can do "dnf(yum) --enablerepo=* clean all"
>>> if your intention is truly to remove all cache.
>>
>> Not true if you ever
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021855
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-Shipwright-2.4.38 is |perl-Shipwright-2.4.39 is
On 01/10/2014 11:57 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 14:30 +0100, Harald Hoyer wrote:
>> On 01/02/2014 11:32 PM, Jean François Martinez wrote:
>>> I have a nice booter setup and a nice _main_ Linux installation. Last thing
>>> I would want is a distribution I am _testing_, that
On 01/13/2014 07:04 AM, Felix Miata wrote:
> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858448 is openSUSE bug. Is
> upstream
> better for a rough parallel for Fedora, or bugzilla.redhat.com, or something
> else? If upstream, where exactly is upstream for reporting poor man page
> content?
http
WG meeting will be at 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting on Freenode.
== Topic ==
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mmaslano/Draft:Env_and_Stack_PRD#Tasks
Those who can't attend the meeting should comment the draft on mailing
list. The deadline for document is next Monday (20th January).
--
devel
On 13/01/14 10:14, Frank Murphy wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:33:09 +
Tom Hughes wrote:
You can also "after some research"
modify the dnf-makecache.service file
to change the frequency of makecache.
I don't think that will help as that service simply controls when it
considers updating -
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:33:09 +
Tom Hughes wrote:
> > You can also "after some research"
> > modify the dnf-makecache.service file
> > to change the frequency of makecache.
>
> I don't think that will help as that service simply controls when it
> considers updating - the expire_metadata set
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:51:27 +
Frank Murphy wrote:
> Where is this setting?
> besides metadata expire in *.repos.
> I couldn't find in on the wiki
Duh! man 8 dnf.conf,
so behaviour can be changed without running
dnf clean * && dnf update
for those that may want it,
by adding it in.
___
Re
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:33:09 +
Tom Hughes wrote:
the expire_metadata setting still applies,
Where is this setting?
besides metadata expire in *.repos.
I couldn't find in on the wiki
___
Regards,
Frank
www.frankly3d.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.f
On 13/01/14 08:45, Frank Murphy wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jan 2014 14:06:30 -0500
"Garry T. Williams" wrote:
sudo dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing clean expire-cache
sudo dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing upgrade kernel\*
You can also "after some research"
modify the dnf-makecache.service f
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:53:53 +0100
Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> On 01/13/2014 08:56 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> > to be certain you can do "dnf(yum) --enablerepo=* clean all"
> > if your intention is truly to remove all cache.
>
> Not true if you ever used --releasever option.
>
dnf --enablerepo=* --
On 01/13/2014 07:32 AM, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
>
> Let leave yum as is, but let try to redefine this behavior for dnf:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1052020
If you want this change please vote for this bug (by adding yourself to CC of
that bug). Otherwise it will stay as
CLOSED WO
On 01/13/2014 08:56 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> to be certain you can do "dnf(yum) --enablerepo=* clean all"
> if your intention is truly to remove all cache.
Not true if you ever used --releasever option.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCE, RHCDS
Red Hat, Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys
On Sun, 12 Jan 2014 14:06:30 -0500
"Garry T. Williams" wrote:
>
> sudo dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing clean expire-cache
> sudo dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing upgrade kernel\*
>
You can also "after some research"
modify the dnf-makecache.service file
to change the frequency of ma
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:36:38 +0100
Alec Leamas wrote:
> If you continue reading the thread you'll see what happened (short
> story: too late fo rme)
> --alec
>
>
Refreshing my email would have helped, too early for me :(
___
Regards,
Frank
www.frankly3d.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@list
If you continue reading the thread you'll see what happened (short story:
too late fo rme)
--alec
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 00:43:13 +0100
> Alec Leamas wrote:
>
> > First of all, this is not, and have never been a question of disabled
> > repos
On 10 January 2014 21:54, Jerry James wrote:
> Well, there's a comprehensible error message! Anyway, does anybody have
> an alternate means of contacting Mark?
>
Apologies for the delay in responding (and thanks to Michael for poking me
through other channels) I'm hideously behind on my Fedora
86 matches
Mail list logo
