On 12/11/2013 11:00 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Brendan Jones wrote:
What is the best way to handle this case:
qWarning(QObject::tr("Client name '%1' occupied.").arg(name).toUtf8());
something like, or can I make it simpler:
qWarning("%s",qPrintable(QObject::tr("Client name '%1'
occupied.").arg(n
At the Fedora 20 Final Go/No-Go Meeting that just occurred, it was
agreed to Go with the Fedora 20 by Fedora QA and Fedora Development.
Fedora Release Engineering to be notified.
"#agreed Fedora QA and Fedora Development are both Go; Fedora Release
Engineering to be notified (with possibility to r
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 06:44:09PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 12/12/2013 06:02 PM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
> > - Review latest WGs planing and PRD state and impacts on Base
> It's the other way around as in the WG's have to be in alignment how
> the impact of Base affects them.
I hope
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 06:50:31PM +0100, Phil Knirsch wrote:
> Now, to figure our how the build chains for these packages look like
> i've cobbled together a (really bad) hack using python and
> repoclosure that basically takes a set of packages as an input
> (actually a set of requirements) and t
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 09:44:43PM +0100, Mattias Ellert wrote:
> tis 2013-12-10 klockan 12:18 -0500 skrev Darryl L. Pierce:
>
> > > Of all the packages I
> > > maintain, only one was affected by this issue. That one was easily
> > > solvable by deleting the bundled swig generated code in the sour
On 12/12/2013 06:02 PM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
- Review latest WGs planing and PRD state and impacts on Base
?
It's the other way around as in the WG's have to be in alignment how the
impact of Base affects them.
JBG
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapro
Agenda:
- Buildreq cleanup initiative
- Review latest WGs planing and PRD state and impacts on Base
- Open Floor
Please send any other topics as usual to the list and/or bring them up
at the start of the meeting.
See you all tomorrow!
Thanks & regards, Phil
--
Philipp Knirsch
Hi everyone.
During last weeks Base WG discussion about package set and self hosting
of Base we came to a point where especially the self hosting of Base
would currently look absurd as we'd require more than 2000 components to
do so.
For that reason we'd like to propose the following initiat
Hi,
2013/12/12 Bruno Wolff III
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 15:17:33 +,
> "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:33:34PM +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>>
>>> The beauty of ecryptfs is that I can encrypt one dir - not whole file
>>> system.
>>>
>>
>> What's the concern
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 15:17:33 +,
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:33:34PM +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
The beauty of ecryptfs is that I can encrypt one dir - not whole file
system.
What's the concern with encrypting the whole filesystem? It's better
for you
Dne 12.12.2013 14:42, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 01:23:12PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 10.12.2013 14:20, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 02:52:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
I am at a point where I think it starts to look good, the uni
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:33:34PM +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> The beauty of ecryptfs is that I can encrypt one dir - not whole file
> system.
What's the concern with encrypting the whole filesystem? It's better
for you because you leave significant personal information all over
the disk, e
On 13 November 2013 16:59, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 04:57:38PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 14:52:27 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>>
>> > The development instance of pkgdb2 is at:
>> >
>> > http://209.132.184.188/
>>
>> That page says "Vers
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 01:23:12PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 10.12.2013 14:20, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> >On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 02:52:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >>I am at a point where I think it starts to look good, the unit-tests are
> >>passing
> >>and I seem to be ab
Dne 10.12.2013 14:20, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 02:52:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
I am at a point where I think it starts to look good, the unit-tests are passing
and I seem to be able to do what I want with it. Thus I thought this would be a
good time to ca
Compose started at Thu Dec 12 08:11:11 UTC 2013
Broken deps for i386
--
[LuxRender]
LuxRender-1.0-16.fc21.i686 requires libImath-2_0.so.10
LuxRender-1.0-16.fc21.i686 requires libIlmThread-2_0.so.10
LuxRender-1.0-16.fc2
Compose started at Thu Dec 12 08:16:58 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[avro]
avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-mapreduce
avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-client
[blueman]
blueman-1.23-7
Hi there,
Getting a spec for NetworkManager-iodine took minutes (pretty similar to
the NetworkManager-ssh one, which I also maintain).
It's here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040459
Happy to review anything else in return, however I'm aware I'm not a very
experienced packager.
T
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>> * Should packages that ship their own cacerts be patched to use Shared
>> System Certificates instead? [I think the answer to this is yes]
>> * If the package contains a cacert t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
Final RC1 images have been uploaded to EC2 and are available at
ami-3b361952 : us-east-1 image for i386
ami-1337187a : us-east-1 image for x86_64
additionally if your looking to the AMI's they have been added to files
in the release tree
ht
On 12/12/2013 09:15 AM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
>> How is a new user or a GUI-only person
>
> Well, you were talking about someone who had just used rpm -qf, so in
> that context rpm -qi made a lot of sense.
Yes, you're right, in that context, it makes sense.
> For example: https://apps.fedorapro
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 09:02 +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
> On 12/12/2013 04:19 AM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 17:18 +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
> >> The idea behind is:
> >>
> >> you have some application with an issue/error. You'll do rpm -qf
> >> and will get a package name
On 12/12/2013 04:19 AM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 17:18 +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
>> The idea behind is:
>>
>> you have some application with an issue/error. You'll do rpm -qf
>> and will get a package name, not necessarily the source
>> package name.
>> When filing a bug ag
23 matches
Mail list logo
