Why aren't we using libvirt plugin in Vagrant?

2013-11-10 Thread Peeyush Gupta
 Hi all, In relation to the change proposed here :  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Vagrant, I was wondering why aren't we using libvirt plugin instead of KVM plugin? The thing is libvirt is used more commonly than KVM, and could result in better implementation. Is there any specific rea

Re: unaccessability

2013-11-10 Thread Les Howell
On Sun, 2013-11-10 at 01:40 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 10.11.2013 01:35, schrieb Les Howell: > > On Sat, 2013-11-09 at 22:47 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > >> On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 12:28:46 -0500 (EST), Christian Schaller wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> The core principle of the installer is th

Re: unaccessability

2013-11-10 Thread Elad Alfassa
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > The updater could continue to cover *all* packages as registered in the > RPM database. > It already does Btw, currently, when I run "gnome-software" and click "Updates", it > claims "Software is up to date", but Yum finds updates: > >

Re: unaccessability

2013-11-10 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le Dim 10 novembre 2013 22:22, Lennart Poettering a écrit : > On Fri, 08.11.13 17:22, Kevin Fenzi (ke...@scrye.com) wrote: > >> > > GNOME supports the Terminal key just fine. But just having your >> > > commandd run in a terminal is not quite enough to give it an >> > > identity as a separate appl

Re: unaccessability

2013-11-10 Thread Ian Malone
On 10 November 2013 20:55, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sun, 10 Nov 2013 18:02:46 +, Ian Malone wrote: > >> You are arguing that system management should only be possible through >> a GUI where the affected components are themselves graphical. > > No, not at all. > >> Please take some time to

Re: unaccessability

2013-11-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 08.11.13 17:22, Kevin Fenzi (ke...@scrye.com) wrote: > > > GNOME supports the Terminal key just fine. But just having your > > > commandd run in a terminal is not quite enough to give it an > > > identity as a separate application - to the rest of the system it > > > will appear just as a

Re: hardlink command

2013-11-10 Thread Jon
In my opinion the -c option is the most rational use of hardlink, except where the files are empty. In the later case touch can be used align the timestamps before you decide to combine the inode. $ touch -r test1 test2 Regards, -Jon Disnard On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Brendan Jones wr

Re: unaccessability

2013-11-10 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sun, 10 Nov 2013 18:02:46 +, Ian Malone wrote: > You are arguing that system management should only be possible through > a GUI where the affected components are themselves graphical. No, not at all. > Please take some time to reflect on how ridiculous that is. http://fedoraproject.org/c

Re: hardlink command

2013-11-10 Thread Brendan Jones
On 11/10/2013 09:07 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote: hardlink -n -v -v I would look at the modification datetime. studiodesktop:/tmp $ echo "test" > test1 (wait at least a second) studiodesktop:/tmp $ echo "test" > test2 studiodesktop:/tmp $ hardlink -n -v -v tes* Directories 0 Objects 2 IFREG 2

hardlink command

2013-11-10 Thread Sergio Belkin
I've found the interesting tool hardlink, supposedly it scans directories looking for duplicates files and eventually can consolidate them using hardlinks Well it doesn't work for me, eg: [sergio@madryn tmp]$ ls /tmp/test1 /tmp/test2 /tmp/test1: alpha /tmp/test2: alpha [sergio@madryn tmp]$ hardl

Re: unaccessability

2013-11-10 Thread Ian Malone
On 10 November 2013 15:06, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sun, 10 Nov 2013 01:35:41 +, Ian Malone wrote: > >> > Please don't let it install applications, which cannot be started via the >> > graphical desktop user interface (such as a menu system or a list of >> > installed Applications). Users,

Self Introduction

2013-11-10 Thread Ben Nemec
Hi, I'm looking to become a co-maintainer on at least one package (and likely more in the near future), and I see one of the steps is an introduction to the list, so here goes: I was recently hired by Red Hat to work on the OpenStack project, and I've been involved to one extent or another wit

Re: unaccessability

2013-11-10 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sun, 10 Nov 2013 01:35:41 +, Ian Malone wrote: > > Please don't let it install applications, which cannot be started via the > > graphical desktop user interface (such as a menu system or a list of > > installed Applications). Users, who install software with the help of a > > graphical pro

rawhide report: 20131110 changes

2013-11-10 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Sun Nov 10 08:15:02 UTC 2013 Broken deps for i386 -- [OpenEXR_CTL] OpenEXR_CTL-1.0.1-16.fc20.i686 requires libImath.so.6 OpenEXR_CTL-1.0.1-16.fc20.i686 requires libIlmThread.so.6 OpenEXR_CTL-1.0.1-16

Re: [Base] Summary/Minutes from today's Base WG meeting (2013-11-08)

2013-11-10 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/08/2013 11:51 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > > == > #fedora-meeting: Fedora Base Design Working Group (2013-11-08) > =