On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 09:31 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> But this all is not the point, these are additional goodies. The main
> point of bmaptool is in having the bmap file, and _then_ you get real
> speed-up, based on the sparseness of the original image.
Just as a rough demonstration, as I
On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 17:48 +0200, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 04:58:16PM +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > Hi Fedora developers,
>
> > $ dd if=Fedora-x86_64-19-20130627-sda.raw of=/dev/sdd
> > 4194304+0 records in
> > 4194304+0 records out
> > 2147483648 bytes (2.1 GB) copied
Hi,
I intend to upgrade OpenSceneGraph on rawhide to OpenSceneGraph-3.2.0
throughout today.
As a consequence of this, all libraries provided by OpenSceneGraph will
see an SONAME bump, requiring all packages depending on them to be rebuilt.
May-be, I am missing some, but so far, I am aware a
Additional agenda item:
Mattdm, sgallagh, and I were talking about the general fesco sentiment
towards mattdm's fedora future direction proposal and the multiple fedora
products idea at post-flock breakfast. My understanding is that the
sentiment was that it would be a board decision whether to g
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2013-08-14 18:00 UTC'
Links to all tickets below
On Ter, 2013-08-13 at 19:54 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Christopher Meng wrote:
>
> > Can we modify all affected specs to solve the problem?
>
> Better to just not modify glibc in a way that's not backward compatible.
I take a look in "my" Virtualbox.spec and it use /sbin/ldconfig but not
in Req
Christopher Meng wrote:
> Can we modify all affected specs to solve the problem?
Better to just not modify glibc in a way that's not backward compatible.
-- rex
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: ht
Can we modify all affected specs to solve the problem?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Taken.
Sent from Note I
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
I'm trying to get pylint updated to the long awaited v1.0.0 release and
they went and renamed one of the dependent packages. A review would be
appreciated.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996780
Packages for all of pylint on f19 are here:
http://bcl.fedorapeople.org/python-astroid/
T
On Ter, 2013-08-13 at 16:13 -0400, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hi,
> I believe there's something wrong in Koji Rawhide buildroot, as it
> appears nothings provides /sbin/ldconfig.
>
> DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: foo
> DEBUG util.py:264: Requires: /sbin/ldconfig
repoquery --releas
On 08/13/2013 10:19 PM, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 04:13:20PM -0400, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I believe there's something wrong in Koji Rawhide buildroot, as it
>> appears nothings provides /sbin/ldconfig.
>>
>> DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: foo
>> DEBUG util.py:264:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 04:13:20PM -0400, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hi,
> I believe there's something wrong in Koji Rawhide buildroot, as it
> appears nothings provides /sbin/ldconfig.
>
> DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: foo
> DEBUG util.py:264: Requires: /sbin/ldconfig
>
> http://koj
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hi,
> I believe there's something wrong in Koji Rawhide buildroot, as it appears
> nothings provides /sbin/ldconfig.
>
> DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: foo
> DEBUG util.py:264: Requires: /sbin/ldconfig
>
> http://kojipkgs.fed
Hi,
I believe there's something wrong in Koji Rawhide buildroot, as it
appears nothings provides /sbin/ldconfig.
DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: foo
DEBUG util.py:264: Requires: /sbin/ldconfig
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2927/5812927/root.log
Is this somethin
Here is a status update, many orphans were adopted, but some new
appeared:
Package(co)maintainers
bluecoveorphan
cal3d orphan
dayplanner orphan, rakesh
derelictorphan, bi
On 08/13/2013 08:06 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> The page looks good, thanks for coordination. Just could you please extend
> the scope with resolution for mate bt? Also for contingency plan, I'd like
> to see a real deadline - Beta as a point to revert things as a coordination
> would be needed. O
- Original Message -
> On 08/02/2013 10:15 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > Let me know - I'd like to have this one as a Change if it's going to F20
>
> I have been coordinating with various people and looks like all teams
> are go. NetworkManager and PulseAudio changes are slightly lagging
What's the interval of repomd changes, daily? What approximate percentage of
the entire repomd changes between day 1 and day 7? If the delta is
comparatively small to full metadata files, what about implementing a daily
repomd_delta sorta like deltarpms?
I see both yum and dnf downloading large
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 04:58:16PM +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> Hi Fedora developers,
> $ dd if=Fedora-x86_64-19-20130627-sda.raw of=/dev/sdd
> 4194304+0 records in
> 4194304+0 records out
> 2147483648 bytes (2.1 GB) copied, 799.487 s, 2.7 MB/s
1.) Seems to be a slow USB flash drive.
2.) Wha
- Original Message -
> On 08/02/2013 10:15 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > Let me know - I'd like to have this one as a Change if it's going to F20
>
> I have been coordinating with various people and looks like all teams
> are go. NetworkManager and PulseAudio changes are slightly lagging
Hi Fedora developers,
I would like suggest you to take a look at bmaptool, which you can use
for flashing Fedora ISO images to USB sticks (or other block devices).
Let me set the scene. In order to flash a Fedora ISO image, typically
first download the image and then use dd to copy it to the USB
On 08/13/2013 02:28 PM, Rave it wrote:
> Other probs are:
> 1. gnome-bluetooth upstream has removed the fallback icon for autostart in
> session,...no systray icon in other DE than gnome itself.
> 2. if gnome revert this change in upstream 'OnlyShowIn=MATE" needs to be
> added.
> 3. Also runt
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 07:58:37 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> > Ok, I've been getting these messages for a while but I'm not the package
> > owner for I didn't worry about it, however, it's been a couple of weeks
> so
> > I decided to take a
Am Tue, 13 Aug 2013 12:00:01 +
schrieb devel-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org:
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 11:26:05 +0200
> From: Kalev Lember
> To: Development discussions related to Fedora
>
> Subject: Re: BlueZ Status in Fedora.
> Message-ID: <5209fbad.50...@gmail.com>
> Co
On 08/13/2013 12:50 PM, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
Hi,
There is a new bugfix release of DNF available in F19[1] and Rawhide
today. The most visible change is that the package downloads slowdown
has been fixed. For the full release notes please see [2]
[1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dnf-
Quoting Petr Hracek (2013-08-13 12:28:05)
> Hi folks,
>
> I have just a short question regarding default applications in Fedora.
>
> Let's say the I have install Fedora 19 (w/o upgrade) and I would like to
> know what is default PDF viewer, etc.
>
> Is there any command in Fedora which returns m
Hi,
There is a new bugfix release of DNF available in F19[1] and Rawhide
today. The most visible change is that the package downloads slowdown
has been fixed. For the full release notes please see [2]
[1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dnf-0.3.11-1.git7d717c7.fc19
[2] http://akozumpl
On 08/13/2013 12:28 PM, Petr Hracek wrote:
Let's say the I have install Fedora 19 (w/o upgrade) and I would like to
know what is default PDF viewer, etc.
Is there any command in Fedora which returns me default application?
I think it's "xdg-mime query default application/pdf".
--
Florian Wei
Hi folks,
I have just a short question regarding default applications in Fedora.
Let's say the I have install Fedora 19 (w/o upgrade) and I would like to
know what is default PDF viewer, etc.
Is there any command in Fedora which returns me default application?
Thank you in advance
greetings
On Fri, 2 Aug 2013 09:10:02 -0500, Juan Rodriguez wrote:
> I've tried contacting Valmantas Paliska (The original Blueman developer)
> but I don't expect him to return to the project after over a year of
> absence.
>
> LXDE (and other lightweight environments) are indeed the reason I'd keep
> the
On 08/13/2013 11:11 AM, Rave it wrote:
> mate-bluetooth doesn't support bluez5, and upstream doesn't have started to
> port it.
> I don't expect that is is ready before f20 alpha or beata.
> So it would be very nice not to push bluez5 into f20.
> Also Cristofph Wickert asked me to clean up runtime
Am Tue, 13 Aug 2013 08:34:53 +
schrieb devel-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org:
> Message: 13
> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 01:03:20 +0200
> From: Kalev Lember
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: BlueZ Status in Fedora.
> Message-ID: <520969b8.1030...@gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/p
On 12 August 2013 16:07, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> In fact, how do you even know that there is a new package without
> downloading the new metadata?
We do download the new metadata, but in a temp "throwaway" location
(only the repomd and updateinfo) -- in an ideal world we'd have
something smaller
On 12 August 2013 19:36, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> I could see doing this, but it is a non-trivial change to how the
> repositories are made, and there aren't really any resources assigned to
> work on that. I can give some pointers to where and what would need changed,
> if you're interested in lo
> After some investigation, this is a packaging bug of
> rubygem-term-ansicolor in its latest version. See my comment in you bug
> report :)
Yes, the original bug is already in Bugzilla[1].
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972544
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.o
36 matches
Mail list logo
