Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Apache OpenOffice

Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 04:55:55PM +, James Hogarth wrote: Since this has been approved I'm curious as to the method by which the non-conflict with LO is to be achieved... We've looked at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:EnvironmentModules under FESCo's reco

Re: Frequent dbus(?) crashes with Samsung 840 Pro SSD

On Feb 18, 2013, at 10:13 PM, Digimer wrote: > what's "offline data collection"? http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/man/smartctl.8.html Read in particular the paragraph containing the word unfortunate. > 0x0009 2 19 Transition from drive PhyRdy to drive PhyNRdy Have you had ab

Re: Frequent dbus(?) crashes with Samsung 840 Pro SSD

On 02/18/2013 11:24 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: On Feb 18, 2013, at 8:44 PM, Digimer wrote: I went so far as to install Windows 7 on the 840 Pro, downloaded and ran Samsung's own tool to verify it was at the latest firmware and was healthy. The smartctl is below. update-smart-drivedb smartctl

Re: Should MariaDB touch my.cnf in %post?

Hi, Andrew! On Feb 18, Andrew Rist wrote: > No, it's not crippleware - it's the world's most popular open source > database software. A world's most popular open source database software can be crippleware too. Wikipedia defines crippleware as " Deliberately limited programs are usually freewa

Re: Frequent dbus(?) crashes with Samsung 840 Pro SSD

On Feb 18, 2013, at 8:44 PM, Digimer wrote: > > I went so far as to install Windows 7 on the 840 Pro, downloaded and ran > Samsung's own tool to verify it was at the latest firmware and was healthy. > The smartctl is below. update-smart-drivedb smartctl -t long /dev/sda smartctl -x /dev/sda

Re: Frequent dbus(?) crashes with Samsung 840 Pro SSD

On 02/18/2013 09:50 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: On Feb 18, 2013, at 7:20 PM, Digimer wrote: Two days ago, I reinstalled F18 on my Corsair drive. I had the Samsung connected as a USB drive to restore my files and after a few hours, the system locked up again ('tail -n 100' below). I pulled the S

Re: Frequent dbus(?) crashes with Samsung 840 Pro SSD

On Feb 18, 2013, at 7:20 PM, Digimer wrote: > Two days ago, I reinstalled F18 on my Corsair drive. I had the Samsung > connected as a USB drive to restore my files and after a few hours, the > system locked up again ('tail -n 100' below). I pulled the Samsung out of the > laptop and booted wi

Frequent dbus(?) crashes with Samsung 840 Pro SSD

Last weekend, I both a new Samsung 840 Pro 256GB SSD. Prior to this, I was using a Corsair Performance Pro 256 SSD without issue (F17 had been upgrade to F18 about a week before). I got the drive to do a fresh install. From last weekend until Saturday, I would get ~2~3 hard crashes a day. Gnom

Re: Keystone on Rawhide tracebacks around sqlalchemy

On 02/19/2013 12:56 AM, Pete Zaitcev wrote: Greetings: When I try to run Keystone, it blows up with this: File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/migrate/versioning/schema.py", line 10, in from sqlalchemy import exceptions as sa_exceptions ImportError: cannot import name exceptions py

Re: Should MariaDB touch my.cnf in %post?

No, it's not crippleware - it's the world's most popular open source database software. MySQL Community Edition is available under the GPL license and is supported by a huge and active community of open source developers [1]. Among the many recent improvements are some substantial performance

Keystone on Rawhide tracebacks around sqlalchemy

Greetings: When I try to run Keystone, it blows up with this: File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/migrate/versioning/schema.py", line 10, in from sqlalchemy import exceptions as sa_exceptions ImportError: cannot import name exceptions python-sqlalchemy-0.8.0-0.1.b1.fc19.x86_64 opensta

Re: 64-bit stat (or not) in 32-bit Fedora binaries

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2/18/13 6:37 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Eric Sandeen writes: > >> and it's not just weird obscure packages: >> >> # ./summarize-stat.pl `rpm -ql sendmail` > > This is not accurate. -ql will also list directories, and summarize-stat.pl > then pr

Re: 64-bit stat (or not) in 32-bit Fedora binaries

Eric Sandeen writes: and it's not just weird obscure packages: # ./summarize-stat.pl `rpm -ql sendmail` This is not accurate. -ql will also list directories, and summarize-stat.pl then proceeds to chew on every file in that directory. pgp3mZDihNsQh.pgp Description: PGP signature -- dev

Re: Mass closing EOL bugs should not close bugs with pending updates

On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote: > Despite of the question whether it's right or wrong it's a manual > process and we cannot rely it really happens. On the other hand changing > the script to not close any bugs which are ON_QA is easy. > > So what is so bad about ignoring

Re: 64-bit stat (or not) in 32-bit Fedora binaries

On 2/18/13 5:11 PM, John Reiser wrote: > On 02/18/2013 01:33 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> XFS recently defaulted to allowing > 32 bit inode numbers, and btrfs can let >> inode numbers creep past 2^32 as well. >> >> While most applications don't care one bit about st_ino returned from a >> stat() ca

Re: 64-bit stat (or not) in 32-bit Fedora binaries

On 02/18/2013 01:33 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > XFS recently defaulted to allowing > 32 bit inode numbers, and btrfs can let > inode numbers creep past 2^32 as well. > > While most applications don't care one bit about st_ino returned from a > stat() call, the sad fact is that you'll get EOVERFLOW

Re: Mass closing EOL bugs should not close bugs with pending updates

Am Montag, den 18.02.2013, 07:12 -0500 schrieb Jaroslav Reznik: > - Original Message - > > Am Sonntag, den 17.02.2013, 14:46 +0100 schrieb Tadej Janež: > > > On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 12:02 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote: > > > > > > > > I found that a couple of F16 bugs were closed by endofli

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: systemd/udev Predictable Network Interface Names

On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 01:57:42PM -0600, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > If we can solve the installtime naming convention choice to not > > eliminate biosdevname, be able to disable systemd/udevd naming, and > > have the default be possible on a per-system-vendor basis, and solve > > the NPAR/SR-IOV/M

Re: Should MariaDB touch my.cnf in %post?

On 18/02/13 09:36 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Hi On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: "which fool has written" was not and is not offending That's where we disagree. It might not be in your local culture but you are in a international mailing list and would do well to m

Re: ntfs-3g critpath update for F18 needs karma

On 18/02/13 07:26 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Note that there are two -1's on that which apply to older versions of testdisk, since fixed so those don't apply any more. (Who is "thl"?) D'oh, sorry I didn't update that. I wonder if an improvement to f-e-k may be possible here, so if an upda

64-bit stat (or not) in 32-bit Fedora binaries

XFS recently defaulted to allowing > 32 bit inode numbers, and btrfs can let inode numbers creep past 2^32 as well. While most applications don't care one bit about st_ino returned from a stat() call, the sad fact is that you'll get EOVERFLOW from stat32 if the inode number is too big to fit in

Re: Mass closing EOL bugs should not close bugs with pending updates

On 18/02/13 12:03 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 07:12:01AM -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: As you can see the bugs were already ON_QA before they were closed WONTFIX. But for F16 - it's true - the fix is not going to be available in F16, thus WONTFIX. Correct resolution is to

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

On 18 February 2013 12:57, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > On 02/18/2013 07:58 PM, Ian Malone wrote: >> >> On 18 February 2013 10:37, Olav Vitters wrote: >> >> >>> I'm trying to collect feedback, I'd expect some respect instead of one >>> liners. Loads of people working in Fedora don't follow devel@ beca

Re: Mass closing EOL bugs should not close bugs with pending updates

On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 07:12:01AM -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > As you can see the bugs were already ON_QA before they were closed > > WONTFIX. > But for F16 - it's true - the fix is not going to be available in F16, > thus WONTFIX. Correct resolution is to bump version to F17/F18 or clone bug

Re: ntfs-3g critpath update for F18 needs karma

On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 06:48:24PM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 18.02.2013 16:26, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-1536/testdisk-6.13-5.fc18.1,ntfs-3g-2013.1.13-1.fc18.1 > > > > This update needs karma. Apparently I can't push it other

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Apache OpenOffice

On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 04:55:55PM +, James Hogarth wrote: > > Since this has been approved I'm curious as to the method by which the > non-conflict with LO is to be achieved... > I don't know the answer to this. Hopefully Andrea is pondering it and working with the libreoffice maintainers i

Re: ntfs-3g critpath update for F18 needs karma

On 18.02.2013 16:26, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-1536/testdisk-6.13-5.fc18.1,ntfs-3g-2013.1.13-1.fc18.1 > > This update needs karma. Apparently I can't push it otherwise, even > though it works fine for me. > > Note that there are two -1's o

Re: Should MariaDB touch my.cnf in %post?

Hi On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > "which fool has written" was not and is not offending > That's where we disagree. It might not be in your local culture but you are in a international mailing list and would do well to moderate your language and be less emotional

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Apache OpenOffice

Hi On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:25 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > But this is the silliest nitpick from my question which is surrounding the > next steps for AOO, how the conflicts will be resolved and how the package > is being treated (pick up an orphaned package or a new package) plus who > the mai

[perl-POE-Component-Child] Fix the dependencies and re-enable tests

commit b91fd393f8295c1f6d84153b54e11151dbc1e25b Author: Petr Šabata Date: Mon Feb 18 18:28:22 2013 +0100 Fix the dependencies and re-enable tests POE-Component-Child-rt70701.patch | 12 +++ perl-POE-Component-Child.spec | 59 +++-- 2 files chang

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Apache OpenOffice

> > Apache Openoffice has no connection to Oracle > > No it has more of a link with IBM - but I'm not talking about who the corporate sponsor is but rather the principles involved... In the MySQL thread Oracle had to be given a reminder about friendship being an important principle... and here we

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Apache OpenOffice

Hi On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:55 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > This made me think of the reminder that had to be given to Oracle about > the Fedora principles and how friendship is a key one... > > Apache Openoffice has no connection to Oracle Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproje

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: NetworkManager Bonding Support

> How about bridging? Sorry for thw noise in case if it's already supported > by NM. > There's a separate proposal for that which got submitted on the ML: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NetworkManagerBridging -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproje

Re: Should MariaDB touch my.cnf in %post?

Am 18.02.2013 17:23, schrieb James Hogarth: > You keep bringing up the bump needed in 5.5.10 but that's out of context for > this - anyone running against less > than 5.5.10 would not be relevant to this discussion (as they'd have a > similar issue updating to any MySql release > that is 5.5.1

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Apache OpenOffice

> > > > Will Andrea be maintainer of the package or someone else in the AOO group? > There didn't seem to be much enthusiasm there in packaging themselves... > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/openoffice-dev/201302.mbox/%3c5112b95e.3010...@apache.org%3E > > That was the last message the

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: NetworkManager Bonding Support

2013-01-30 14:01 keltezéssel, Jaroslav Reznik írta: = Features/NetworkManagerBonding = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NetworkManagerBonding Feature owner(s): Pavel Šimerda , Dan Williams NetworkManager should be able to configure bond master interfaces with commonly used options and

[perl/f18] Add NAME headings to CPAN modules

commit 2d4821d272a5daa44687b4f66554746ccc6c5d56 Author: Petr Písař Date: Mon Feb 18 15:52:11 2013 +0100 Add NAME headings to CPAN modules ...PAN-add-NAME-headings-in-modules-with-POD.patch | 80 perl.spec | 10 ++- 2 files

Re: Fedora 16 EOL Bugzilla Closure - strange behavior?

- Original Message - > Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > - Original Message - > > > I wouldn't be surprised if whatever script is used to do the mass > > > closings > > > does a first pass generating the list of bugs that need closing, > > > and > > > then does > > > a second pass closing

Re: Fedora 16 EOL Bugzilla Closure - strange behavior?

Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > - Original Message - > > I wouldn't be surprised if whatever script is used to do the mass > > closings > > does a first pass generating the list of bugs that need closing, and > > then does > > a second pass closing them unconditionally. If someone changes the > >

Re: Should MariaDB touch my.cnf in %post?

> hard to say which tools users have running which are > built against MySQL 5.5 and not part of fedora and > if they break, and yes for users this is a topic beause > the distribution / OS for the user is a platform for > his work and tools and not the one and only > > Ah but the context of the fe

Re: Should MariaDB touch my.cnf in %post?

Am 18.02.2013 16:37, schrieb Miloslav Trmač: > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Reindl Harald > wrote: >> as said - this is thin ice >> remember MySQL 5.5.10 >> >> you can not expect real binary compatibility over the >> whole release cycle and if it slightly breaks it starts >> to get funny i

[389-devel] please review: Ticket 528 - RFE - get rid of instance specific scripts

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/528 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/528/0001-Ticket-528-RFE-get-rid-of-instance-specific-scripts.patch -- Mark Reynolds Red Hat, Inc mreyno...@redhat.com -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.or

Re: Should MariaDB touch my.cnf in %post?

On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 02:59:01PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > On Sunday 17 February 2013 at 20:42:07, Reindl Harald wrote: > > "which fool has written" was not and is not offending > > > > in EVERY situation in real life the question to the quote you stripped > > would have been clearly "Welcher

Re: Should MariaDB touch my.cnf in %post?

On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 18.02.2013 10:58, schrieb Honza Horak: >> It seems the words could have been chosen less absolutely (changed a little >> bit at [1]), but in case you don't >> agree with the official MariaDB statement, that "For all practical purposes,

[perl-POE-Component-SNMP] Fix the dependencies and clean the spec up a bit

commit a8063822e482859bd0461029529a3dc0a93ce304 Author: Petr Šabata Date: Mon Feb 18 16:32:02 2013 +0100 Fix the dependencies and clean the spec up a bit perl-POE-Component-SNMP.spec | 37 + 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) --- diff

Re: Should MariaDB touch my.cnf in %post?

Am 18.02.2013 10:58, schrieb Honza Horak: > On 02/16/2013 02:23 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> >> Am 16.02.2013 01:29, schrieb Toshio Kuratomi: >>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 02:05:48PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: * even MySQL 5.5 had a HIDDEN soname break on a minor update with the

Re: Should MariaDB touch my.cnf in %post?

Am 17.02.2013 20:37, schrieb Rahul Sundaram: > On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Kevin Kofler > wrote: > > Please take into account that English is not Harald's (nor my, for that > matter) first language. It's already hard to be polite when one's angry, >

ntfs-3g critpath update for F18 needs karma

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-1536/testdisk-6.13-5.fc18.1,ntfs-3g-2013.1.13-1.fc18.1 This update needs karma. Apparently I can't push it otherwise, even though it works fine for me. Note that there are two -1's on that which apply to older versions of testdisk, since fixed

Re: Mass closing EOL bugs should not close bugs with pending updates

- Original Message - > Hi Rezza, > > Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > I removed the "clone" part as most people were screaming [1] - but > > for > > this case it's probably the best resolution - close F16 as WONTFIX, > > and > > properly close F17 and F18 bugs (just the overhead...). > > As one

Re: Should MariaDB touch my.cnf in %post?

On 02/16/2013 01:10 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 01:00:38PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote: On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 3:28 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: It's all going to depend on what we want the upgrade experience to be like for people going from f18 to f19. I believe that FE

Re: headsup for llvm-3.2

On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Jens Petersen wrote: >> Are there any plans to bring this to F18? > > Good question > >> There was talk about bringing 3.1 to F17 including some support from >> the Mesa guys but then nothing actually happened. I would really >> like it if I could go through F18 w

Re: Should MariaDB touch my.cnf in %post?

On Sunday 17 February 2013 at 20:42:07, Reindl Harald wrote: > "which fool has written" was not and is not offending > > in EVERY situation in real life the question to the quote you stripped > would have been clearly "Welcher Trottel hat dann die Feature-Page > geschrieben" in my native language,

Re: Mass closing EOL bugs should not close bugs with pending updates

Hi Rezza, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > I removed the "clone" part as most people were screaming [1] - but for > this case it's probably the best resolution - close F16 as WONTFIX, and > properly close F17 and F18 bugs (just the overhead...). As one of the people who were screaming ;-) , I'd suggest j

Re: Mass closing EOL bugs should not close bugs with pending updates

Il giorno dom, 17/02/2013 alle 17.32 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil ha scritto: > On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Christoph Wickert > wrote: > > Am Sonntag, den 17.02.2013, 16:12 -0500 schrieb Orcan Ogetbil: > >> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote: > >> > Am Sonntag, den 17.02.2013,

[Bug 912269] perl-Encode-2.48 is available

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912269 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

On 02/18/2013 07:58 PM, Ian Malone wrote: On 18 February 2013 10:37, Olav Vitters wrote: I'm trying to collect feedback, I'd expect some respect instead of one liners. Loads of people working in Fedora don't follow devel@ because of the attitude displayed here. I often get questioned wtf I sp

Re: Should MariaDB touch my.cnf in %post?

On 02/18/2013 11:05 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 18.02.2013 10:58, schrieb Honza Horak: It seems the words could have been chosen less absolutely (changed a little bit at [1]), but in case you don't agree with the official MariaDB statement, that "For all practical purposes, MariaDB is a binary

Re: Should MariaDB touch my.cnf in %post?

On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote: > What happens when MariaDB and Mysql start diverging? Will it be > impossible to have a client that connects to both mysql and mariadb > servers ? The protocol (http://dev.mysql.com/doc/internals/en/client-server-protocol.html) seems t

Re: Mass closing EOL bugs should not close bugs with pending updates

- Original Message - > > > > NEXTRELEASE should be great. > > 28 days is not enough...Somebody never subscribe devel ,even their > email address is invalid. You don't have to subscribe to devel to get EOL notification. It's usually sent to every bug reported to the affected version an

Re: Mass closing EOL bugs should not close bugs with pending updates

- Original Message - > Am Sonntag, den 17.02.2013, 14:46 +0100 schrieb Tadej Janež: > > On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 12:02 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote: > > > > > > I found that a couple of F16 bugs were closed by endoflife@fp.o > > > even > > > though there were pending updates for F17 and F18

Retiring tilda in rawhide

Hi all, I am going to retire tilda in fedora rawhide in the near future. Upstream is mostly dead and I had to maintain a lot of patches. Since the new Xfce4-terminal also gained a dropdown mode, I don't have any further value in tilda and so I would like to retire it and would advise all the users

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

On 18 February 2013 10:37, Olav Vitters wrote: > I'm trying to collect feedback, I'd expect some respect instead of one > liners. Loads of people working in Fedora don't follow devel@ because of > the attitude displayed here. I often get questioned wtf I spend the time > to proceed anyway. > It

Re: Mass closing EOL bugs should not close bugs with pending updates

Florian Weimer wrote: > On 02/18/2013 01:33 AM, Christopher Meng wrote: >> NEXTRELEASE should be great. >> >> 28 days is not enough...Somebody never subscribe devel ,even their email >> address is invalid. > > Each bug report receives a reminder, at which point interested parties > can clone or r

Re: Fedora 16 EOL Bugzilla Closure - strange behavior?

- Original Message - > On 02/15/2013 05:41 AM, Tadej Janež wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Here is an example: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736498 > > I filled this bug during the F-16 Graphics test week. > > After the Fedora EOL reminder and before the bug was closed, I > > trie

Re: Should MariaDB touch my.cnf in %post?

Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> Please take into account that English is not Harald's (nor my, for that >> matter) first language. It's already hard to be polite when one's angry, >> but it's all the harder in a foreign language. > > English isn't m

Re: headsup for llvm-3.2

> Are there any plans to bring this to F18? Good question > There was talk about bringing 3.1 to F17 including some support from > the Mesa guys but then nothing actually happened. I would really > like it if I could go through F18 without having to build my own > private parallel installable llv

Re: Problem in Installing Fedora 17

Sorry... Reboot after, fsck will check your filesystems... On Feb 17, 2013 5:38 PM, "Rajat Seth" wrote: > While installing fedora 17, i am getting the following error again and > again > > "unrecoverable error > > ext4 filesystem check failure on /dev/sda3 > > file system errors left uncorrected

[389-devel] (no subject)

-- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 02:14:30PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Olav Vitters wrote: > > 1. Show sessions before selecting/entering the user: > >Means basically including something like 'default session' or > >'previous session' > > That's how the rest of the world does it… > > > 2. Show s

[perl-podlinkcheck] Upload sources

commit f22e3fdaa1fbf441fcae964ae34e0d86dd86757a Author: Petr Písař Date: Mon Feb 18 11:00:08 2013 +0100 Upload sources .gitignore |1 + sources|2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 1120e4a..9f3c308 100644 --- a/.

Re: Should MariaDB touch my.cnf in %post?

On 02/16/2013 02:23 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 16.02.2013 01:29, schrieb Toshio Kuratomi: On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 02:05:48PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: * even MySQL 5.5 had a HIDDEN soname break on a minor update with the need of rebuild depending packages and now people will explai

Re: Problem in Installing Fedora 17

Hi! Have you tried with # touch /forcefsck ? Do on rescue mode as root Greetings! On Feb 17, 2013 5:38 PM, "Rajat Seth" wrote: > While installing fedora 17, i am getting the following error again and > again > > "unrecoverable error > > ext4 filesystem check failure on /dev/sda3 > > file system

Re: F-19 mass rebuild failures

Quoting Peter Robinson (2013-02-16 20:22:54) > Hello All, > > If you receive a failure email from the mass rebuild please remember > you need to fix your broken packages. If you're unsure if you're > package is broken or unsure check out the failure list here to see if > you're package is on on th

Re: Mass closing EOL bugs should not close bugs with pending updates

On 02/18/2013 01:33 AM, Christopher Meng wrote: NEXTRELEASE should be great. 28 days is not enough...Somebody never subscribe devel ,even their email address is invalid. Each bug report receives a reminder, at which point interested parties can clone or reassign it to a more recent Fedora rel

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

> You have two possibilities: > > 1. Show sessions before selecting/entering the user: >Means basically including something like 'default session' or >'previous session' > 2. Show sessions after selecting/entering the user: >Means you can show the actual session that will be chosen. >