Re: Enlightenment for Fedora

2013-01-02 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 10:47 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: > This is E17, right? E16 is already there, isn't it? > Yes. From a packaging stand point, they don't have anything in common Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinf

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: DualstackNetworking - proper dual stack IPv4 and IPv6 networking

2013-01-02 Thread John Reiser
On 01/02/2013 05:20 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 03.01.2013 02:08, schrieb John Reiser: >> I'd like to use ipv6 for my computers, >> but my ipv4-only consumer devices (TV, Roku, HVAC, etc.) >> and ipv4-because-ipv6-is-buggy devices (mythtv) >> must continue to inter-operate to/from/with Fedora >

Re: Enlightenment for Fedora

2013-01-02 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
This is E17, right? E16 is already there, isn't it? On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 6:49 AM, Edward Mann wrote: > On 02.01.2013 08:12, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > Hi > > Forgot to add > > Elementary https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891282 > Efreet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.c

f18beta + texlive 2012: usable texinfo, docbook, doxygen pdf toolchains

2013-01-02 Thread Benjamin De Kosnik
From: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-November/173356.html Now: Resolved, success. With fixes, am now able to build all the gcc docs in html/xml/pdf/epub/info, whatever. Phew! With caveats, as filed in Bugzilla under Fedora18, annoated below: 1. doxygen Added doxygen deps

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: DualstackNetworking - proper dual stack IPv4 and IPv6 networking

2013-01-02 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 03.01.2013 02:08, schrieb John Reiser: >> = Features/DualstackNetworking = >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DualstackNetworking > > I'd like to use ipv6 for my computers, > but my ipv4-only consumer devices (TV, Roku, HVAC, etc.) > and ipv4-because-ipv6-is-buggy devices (mythtv) > m

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: DualstackNetworking - proper dual stack IPv4 and IPv6 networking

2013-01-02 Thread John Reiser
> = Features/DualstackNetworking = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DualstackNetworking I'd like to use ipv6 for my computers, but my ipv4-only consumer devices (TV, Roku, HVAC, etc.) and ipv4-because-ipv6-is-buggy devices (mythtv) must continue to inter-operate to/from/with Fedora. --

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: DualstackNetworking - proper dual stack IPv4 and IPv6 networking

2013-01-02 Thread William Brown
On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 00:01 +, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 9:48 PM, William Brown wrote: > > On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 21:06 +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > >> > = Features/DualstackNetworking = > >> > https://fedorapr

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: DualstackNetworking - proper dual stack IPv4 and IPv6 networking

2013-01-02 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 9:48 PM, William Brown wrote: > On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 21:06 +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: >> > = Features/DualstackNetworking = >> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DualstackNetworking > > I think that this is

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: DualstackNetworking - proper dual stack IPv4 and IPv6 networking

2013-01-02 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 21:06 +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > = Features/DualstackNetworking = > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DualstackNetworking > > (Sending to the list instead of using the wiki talk page to hopefully > gather

Fedora ARM weekly status meeting minutes 2012-01-02

2013-01-02 Thread Paul Whalen
Good day all, Thanks to those who were able to join us for the weekly status meeting today. For those that were unable, the minutes are posted below: Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2013-01-02/fedora-meeting-1.2013-01-02-21.00.html Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedo

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: DualstackNetworking - proper dual stack IPv4 and IPv6 networking

2013-01-02 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 08:18:19AM +1030, William Brown wrote: > > > = Features/DualstackNetworking = > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DualstackNetworking > > 1) For a user, there is no option in NetworkManager to enable dhcp6c > from the gui. By Default, this option is "not listed" i

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: DualstackNetworking - proper dual stack IPv4 and IPv6 networking

2013-01-02 Thread William Brown
On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 21:06 +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > = Features/DualstackNetworking = > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DualstackNetworking I think that this is a really good goal. I can identify the following that probab

Re: Whats happened to SELinux commands and directories on F18 ?

2013-01-02 Thread Lukas Berk
Hey, [...] > > audit2allow is in policycoreutils-python these days I believe. > At least in rawhide (not sure about F18), audit2allow seems to have been moved from policycoreutils-python to policycoreutils-devel. Cheers, Lukas pgpIekEL1GU_L.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: DualstackNetworking - proper dual stack IPv4 and IPv6 networking

2013-01-02 Thread Miloslav Trmač
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > = Features/DualstackNetworking = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DualstackNetworking (Sending to the list instead of using the wiki talk page to hopefully gather more information from networking experts. The recent-ish bugzilla a

Re: rawhide report: 20121226 changes

2013-01-02 Thread Bill Nottingham
Bruno Wolff III (br...@wolff.to) said: > On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 12:08:31 +0100, > Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > >Hm, wondering why there are not automatically filled bugs about > >broken dependencies. Wouldn't it be easier for tracking such > >issues? > > The owners get warning messages every comp

Proposed F19 Feature: DualstackNetworking - proper dual stack IPv4 and IPv6 networking

2013-01-02 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce list. FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the announcement. = Features/DualstackNetworking = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fea

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2013-01-02)

2013-01-02 Thread Kevin Fenzi
=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2013-01-02) === Meeting started by nirik at 18:00:15 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-01-02/fesco.2013-01-02-18.00.log.html . Meeting summary

Fedora ARM weekly status meeting 2013-01-02

2013-01-02 Thread Paul Whalen
Happy New Year all, This weeks Fedora ARM status meeting will take place today (Wednesday Jan 2nd) in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode. Times in various time zones (please let us know if these do not work): PDT: 1pm MDT: 2pm CDT: 3pm EDT: 4pm UTC: 8pm BST: 9pm CST: 10pm Current items on the agenda

Proposed F19 Feature: 3D Printing - Bring 3D printing tools to Fedora

2013-01-02 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce list. FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the announcement. = Features/3D Printing = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/3D

[perl-App-cpanminus] 1.5019 bump

2013-01-02 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 201579e922f4361bbfa324d9478551eb4877aa11 Author: Petr Písař Date: Wed Jan 2 17:47:49 2013 +0100 1.5019 bump .gitignore |1 + perl-App-cpanminus.spec | 31 +-- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 11 del

File App-cpanminus-1.5019.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

2013-01-02 Thread Petr Pisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-App-cpanminus: 77d24addb973a09bd1e0de6fe2f776d0 App-cpanminus-1.5019.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org

Proposed F19 Feature: Pillow - Replace PIL (python-imaging) with Pillow, an actively maintained fork

2013-01-02 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce list. FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the announcement. = Features/Pillow = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Pillo

Re: rawhide report: 20121226 changes

2013-01-02 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 12:08:31 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: Hm, wondering why there are not automatically filled bugs about broken dependencies. Wouldn't it be easier for tracking such issues? The owners get warning messages every compose. That helps with notification. -- devel mailing list

Re: Enlightenment for Fedora

2013-01-02 Thread Edward Mann
On 02.01.2013 08:12, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > Forgot to add > > Elementary https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891282 [10] Efreet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890909 [11] > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >> Hi >> >> As of now, I ha

Re: Pillow, actively developed and (mostly) python3 compatible PIL (python-imaging)

2013-01-02 Thread Sandro Mani
On 02.01.2013 15:11, Matthew Miller wrote: On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 05:17:04PM +0100, Sandro Mani wrote: I've written a feature page for the PIL->Pillow switch here [1]. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Pillow Does the package dependency list change at all? I ask because cloud-init c

Re: Enlightenment for Fedora

2013-01-02 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi Forgot to add Elementary https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891282 Efreet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890909 On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > As of now, I have submitted Enlightenment and all it dependencies for > review.

Re: Pillow, actively developed and (mostly) python3 compatible PIL (python-imaging)

2013-01-02 Thread Matthew Miller
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 05:17:04PM +0100, Sandro Mani wrote: > I've written a feature page for the PIL->Pillow switch here [1]. > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Pillow Does the package dependency list change at all? I ask because cloud-init currently pulls python-imaging in to our def

Re: Enlightenment for Fedora

2013-01-02 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi As of now, I have submitted Enlightenment and all it dependencies for review. evas-generic-loaders has already been approved and built for Rawhide. Rest of them are listed below. Thanks to Edward Mann, Emmanuel Seyman, Michael Scherer, Terje and others who have helped out with this effor

F-18 Branched report: 20130102 changes

2013-01-02 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Wed Jan 2 09:15:46 UTC 2013 Summary: Added Packages: 0 Removed Packages: 0 Upgraded Packages: 0 Compose finished at Wed Jan 2 13:38:45 UTC 2013 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

rawhide report: 20130102 changes

2013-01-02 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Wed Jan 2 08:15:06 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [dogtag-pki] dogtag-pki-10.0.0-0.16.b3.fc19.noarch requires dogtag-pki-server-theme >= 0:10.0.0 [ember] ember-0.6.3-3.fc19.x86_64 requires libOgreMain.

[Test-Announce] Fedora 18 Go/No-Go Meeting, Thursday, January 03 @ 17:00 UTC (12pm Eastern, 9am Pacific)

2013-01-02 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-1 for this important meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 18. Thursday, January 03, 2013 @17:00 UTC (12:00 EST/09:00 PST/18:00 CET) "Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet to determine if th

Re: rawhide report: 20121228 changes

2013-01-02 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 2.1.2013 13:19, Panu Matilainen napsal(a): On 01/02/2013 01:53 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 28.12.2012 15:39, Michael Scherer napsal(a): [root] root-graf3d-gl-5.34.02-1.fc19.x86_64 requires libGLEW.so.1.7()(64bit) doesn't even let a srpm be created on F18, and fail on this line : %if %{

Re: Ruby 2.0 in F19

2013-01-02 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 2.1.2013 12:08, Stijn Hoop napsal(a): Hi, On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:59:46 +0100 Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 21.12.2012 20:58, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky napsal(a): Why don't we just ship 'rvm' or 'rbenv' and force everyone to manage their own Ruby environments? ;-) There used to be RVM in Fedora, bu

Re: rawhide report: 20121228 changes

2013-01-02 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 01/02/2013 01:53 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 28.12.2012 15:39, Michael Scherer napsal(a): [root] root-graf3d-gl-5.34.02-1.fc19.x86_64 requires libGLEW.so.1.7()(64bit) doesn't even let a srpm be created on F18, and fail on this line : %if %{?fedora}%{!?fedora:0} >= 17 || %{?rhel}%{!?rhel:

Re: rawhide report: 20121228 changes

2013-01-02 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 28.12.2012 15:39, Michael Scherer napsal(a): [root] root-graf3d-gl-5.34.02-1.fc19.x86_64 requires libGLEW.so.1.7()(64bit) doesn't even let a srpm be created on F18, and fail on this line : %if %{?fedora}%{!?fedora:0} >= 17 || %{?rhel}%{!?rhel:0} >= 7 ( and as a side note, the spec

Re: rawhide report: 20121226 changes

2013-01-02 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 26.12.2012 23:49, Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): [ansible] ansible-fireball-0.9-1.fc19.noarch requires python-keyczar ansible-node-fireball-0.9-1.fc19.noarch requires python-keyczar Should be fixed tomorrow now that python-keyczar is approved. [cp2k] cp2k-mpich2-2.3-1.fc19.

Re: Ruby 2.0 in F19

2013-01-02 Thread Stijn Hoop
Hi, On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:59:46 +0100 Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 21.12.2012 20:58, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky napsal(a): > > Why don't we just ship 'rvm' or 'rbenv' and force everyone to > > manage their own Ruby environments? ;-) > > There used to be RVM in Fedora, but we dropped it, since it canno

Re: system-config-firewall conntrack patch

2013-01-02 Thread Vít Ondruch
Thanks Andrew, I am forwarding this to system-config-firewall maintainers, who might be interested. Vít Dne 24.12.2012 21:02, Andrew Wyatt napsal(a): Howdy folks, saw that you hadn't patched system-config-firewall to support conntrack so I thought I'd send our patch your way. Not a large

Re: Self Introduction

2013-01-02 Thread Mo Morsi
On 12/21/2012 05:06 PM, Moses Mendoza wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm interested in becoming a Fedora package maintainer, thought I'd > throw out the self-introduction. A bit about me: I currently work as a > release engineer at Puppet Labs in Portland, Oregon, and before that > was a Mac sysadmin for

[Test-Announce] 2013-01-02 @ 17:00 UTC - F18 Final Blocker Bug Review #8

2013-01-02 Thread Tim Flink
# F18 Final Blocker Review meeting #8 # Date: 2013-01-02 # Time: 17:00 UTC (12:00 EST, 09:00 PST) # Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net After the break, it's time to start reviewing blocker and NTH bugs again. We'll be running through the final blockers and nice-to-haves. The current

Re: Ruby 2.0 in F19

2013-01-02 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 21.12.2012 20:58, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky napsal(a): Sigh ... now there are *three* incompatible Ruby syntax / semantics "standards" to deal with. Don't spread FUD please. Why don't we just ship 'rvm' or 'rbenv' and force everyone to manage their own Ruby environments? ;-) There used to

Re: Where are we going? (Not a rant)

2013-01-02 Thread Erwin Waterlander
Chris Smart schreef, Op 2-1-2013 8:53: On 12/07/2012 11:53 PM, Tomas Radej wrote: One of the results was a conversation I had with a few guys to whom I recommended Fedora as a development environment. It showed me that there's indeed something wrong. While they all said that Fedora's features we