Tons of updates to the http://isitfedoraruby.com webapp!
Much appreciation goes out to Nico, Mark, Animesh, and Kendhia (all
cc'd) who have all added all of the following features recently.
In no particular order:
- Now hosted on Openshift!!!
- Integrated it w/ jenkins so whenever we push to th
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 12:16 -0500, Basil Mohamed Gohar wrote:
> > Perhaps there's a way to support SMB printing without 39MB of
> > additional disk usage?
> >
> > Richard
> Alternatively, maybe the dialog that searches for network printers can
> offer the option to install the necessary packages w
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:56:36PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Yuck! I really don't see why we should be granting this type of exceptions.
> libexec and share exist for a reason. Helper binaries need to be in libexec,
> unit files in share, I think allowing systemd to dump everything (and in
>
Thanks for the redirect. I've taken it to the rpmfusion folks.
ccbKevin Kofler wrote:Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> - not sure if this is the right ml
It's not. ;-)
> kmod-nvidia is definitely not in the official Fedora repos, it's in
> rpmfusion
Right, thus this belongs to rpmfusion-devel.
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 00:06 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 18:30 +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> >> Probably
> >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ChangeInImplicitDSOLinking
> >>Mirek
> >
> > Jeez, Ubuntu still hasn't done that?
>
> I don
Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> - not sure if this is the right ml
It's not. ;-)
> kmod-nvidia is definitely not in the official Fedora repos, it's in
> rpmfusion
Right, thus this belongs to rpmfusion-devel.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedora
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 18:30 +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>> Probably
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ChangeInImplicitDSOLinking
>>Mirek
>
> Jeez, Ubuntu still hasn't done that?
I don't think ANY other distro has done that pointless incompatible change
(exc
Tomas Mraz wrote:
> * AGREED: 1. systemd is granted an exception to put helper
> applications in /usr/lib/systemd (t8m, 19:03:17)
> * AGREED: 2. the systemd unit files of all the packages are granted an
> exception to be under /usr/lib/systemd (t8m, 19:03:33)
Yuck! I really don't see
Am Mittwoch, 19. Dezember 2012, 14:30:53 schrieb Neil Horman:
> Hey all-
> I've got this package I'm trying to get reviewed:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884291
>
> Will to swap for it if anyone is interested.
>
> Neil
I'll do the review. Please have a look at my open revi
On Mon, 03.12.12 10:04, Vratislav Podzimek (vpodz...@redhat.com) wrote:
> The "conversion" (as systemd-localed calls it) works really poorly also
> for the Czech keymaps/layouts. 'cz' X11 layout is "converted" to
> 'cz-lat2' which works like 'us' until you hit the "Pause Break" key.
> This is real
On 19/12/12 21:35, Adrian wrote:
> *From*: Bryn M. Reeves On 19/12/12 17:30, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>> Probably http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ChangeInImplicitDSOLinking
>>Mirek
> So why does this bug not show itself on Suse, and any of the Debian based
> builds?
They presumably haven
On 12/16/2012 05:54 AM, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 2:01 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>>
>>> spring-91.0-1.fc18.src.rpm
>>
>> Failed to build, but not my fault:
>>
>> /lib64/libIrrXML.so.1: undefined reference to
>> `irr::core::LOCALE_DECIMAL_POINTS'
>> collect2: error: ld returned
-Original Message-
From: Bryn M. Reeves
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
Cc: Miloslav Trmač
Subject: Re: fltk
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 18:01:40 +
On 19/12/12 17:30, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 6:2
On 12/19/2012 12:30 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
Hey all-
I've got this package I'm trying to get reviewed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884291
Will to swap for it if anyone is interested.
How come nobody ever bothers to add any description of said package to these
type of e
This thread is no longer providing useful info and is drifting into
personal attacks.
Lets just drop it now unless someone has something new to add?
thanks,
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai
Am 19.12.2012 20:50, schrieb Ozan Çağlayan
> Don't let me list all the applications that comes shipped within that
> I never use starting with evolution, rhythmbox, backup, cheese,
> empathy, a bunch of games, etc.
and you think it gets better introduce additional deps
there are still way too mu
Am 19.12.2012 20:26, schrieb Chris Murphy:
>
> On Dec 19, 2012, at 12:05 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>>
>> and i would file a bug if something pulls samba-client as
>> dependency - there are still WAY too much useless dependencies
>> like colord and i refuse to accept more of them!
>
> If you
> printing OVER SAMBA is NOT a basic task
> it is not common for the normal enduser
>
> it may be common in company networks
> but there should nobody have to add a printer by himself
>
>> @Ozan: File a bug and ask for the dep to be added
>
> and i would file a bug if something pulls samba-client a
Hey all-
I've got this package I'm trying to get reviewed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884291
Will to swap for it if anyone is interested.
Neil
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This week's Fedora ARM status will take place today (Wednesday, Dec
> 12th) in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode. I will run the meeting with
> Brendan as Paul is on PTO today. Please ping us on #fedora-arm with
> additional topics on IR
On Dec 19, 2012, at 12:05 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> and i would file a bug if something pulls samba-client as
> dependency - there are still WAY too much useless dependencies
> like colord and i refuse to accept more of them!
If you have a b&w display and only b&w printers, then colord woul
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-12-19)
===
Meeting started by t8m at 18:00:39 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-12-19/fedora-meeting.2012-12-19-18.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 19.12.2012 17:58, schrieb drago01:
>> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Reindl Harald
>> wrote:
>>> Am 19.12.2012 15:29, schrieb Ozan Çağlayan:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Reindl Harald
wrote:
> because most peopl
Am 19.12.2012 17:58, schrieb drago01:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 19.12.2012 15:29, schrieb Ozan Çağlayan:
>>> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Reindl Harald
>>> wrote:
because most people the days are using network-printers
even the cheap HP printer
Hello,
This week's Fedora ARM status will take place today (Wednesday, Dec
12th) in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode. I will run the meeting with
Brendan as Paul is on PTO today. Please ping us on #fedora-arm with
additional topics on IRC also. I will be at the dentist soon, so Brendan
may start the
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 11:12 -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 19 December 2012 10:58, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 18:34 +0100, Thomas Bendler wrote:
> >> 2012/12/18 Adam Williamson
> >> Just for interest, here's the current (and likely final) state
> >>
On 19 December 2012 10:58, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 18:34 +0100, Thomas Bendler wrote:
>> 2012/12/18 Adam Williamson
>> Just for interest, here's the current (and likely final) state
>> of
>> minimal install package set for f18 vs. f17.
>> [..
On 19/12/12 17:30, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
>> On Fedora the following command fails:
>>
>> g++ -I/usr/include/freetype2 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE
>> -D_THREAD_SAFE -D_REENTRANT -pipe -Wall -fexceptions -O2 -ffast-math
>> -finli
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 18:34 +0100, Thomas Bendler wrote:
> 2012/12/18 Adam Williamson
> Just for interest, here's the current (and likely final) state
> of
> minimal install package set for f18 vs. f17.
> [...]
>
>
> Can you also point to a page with the hole list
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 18:30 +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
> > On Fedora the following command fails:
> >
> > g++ -I/usr/include/freetype2 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE
> > -D_THREAD_SAFE -D_REENTRANT -pipe -Wall -fexceptions -O2 -
2012/12/18 Adam Williamson
> Just for interest, here's the current (and likely final) state of
> minimal install package set for f18 vs. f17.
> [...]
>
Can you also point to a page with the hole list of packages in minimal?
Otherwise you need to know what was allready in minimal back in f17.
Re
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
> On Fedora the following command fails:
>
> g++ -I/usr/include/freetype2 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE
> -D_THREAD_SAFE -D_REENTRANT -pipe -Wall -fexceptions -O2 -ffast-math
> -finline-functions -fomit-frame-pointer -DNDEBUG -g
On 19/12/12 15:12, Adrian wrote:
> -Wl,-z,relro -lfltk
Which is pretty close to what you get on current Ubuntu:
root@u1210-vm1:~# grep PRETTY /etc/os-release
PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu quantal (12.10)"
root@u1210-vm1:~# dpkg -s libfltk1.1 | head -2
Package: libfltk1.1
Status: install ok installed
root
On 12/19/2012 12:00 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:58 AM, drago01 wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Reindl Harald
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 19.12.2012 15:29, schrieb Ozan Çağlayan:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Reindl Harald
wrote:
> because most peop
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 11:56 -0500, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
> > It's the other way around. If libfoo 1.0.0 linked with -lbar and -lm,
> > and then you upgraded to libfoo 1.0.1 which *no longer* links to -lm,
> > now stuff that links to libfoo
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:58 AM, drago01 wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 19.12.2012 15:29, schrieb Ozan Çağlayan:
>>> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Reindl Harald
>>> wrote:
because most people the days are using network-printers
even the
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 19.12.2012 15:29, schrieb Ozan Çağlayan:
>> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Reindl Harald
>> wrote:
>>> because most people the days are using network-printers
>>> even the cheap HP printers having WLAN/LAN and working without
>>> a
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
> It's the other way around. If libfoo 1.0.0 linked with -lbar and -lm,
> and then you upgraded to libfoo 1.0.1 which *no longer* links to -lm,
> now stuff that links to libfoo might fail if those things did not
> specifically request -lm them
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 11:23 -0500, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > In some cases you can get DSO linking errors when you don't explicitly link
> > to those other packages. People building from source might not care, but
> > this can cause probl
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Adrian wrote:
> This attitude is why people leave redhat for debian/ubuntu, get fltk right
> and the rest will follow.
> We have tested already.
Adrian, no disrespect intended— but I believe you are making a mistake
here. It looks like package you're having trou
i did like that but it doesnt work.
I updated Fedora 14 32 bit. then i installed driver from intelligraphic.org.
know Fedora 14 is start but after that stuck.
On 12/18/12, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Ter, 2012-12-18 at 10:39 +0200, Ebru Arslan wrote:
>> libdrm revision is 2.2.22 but i configure 2.4.
This attitude is why people leave redhat for debian/ubuntu, get fltk
right and the rest will follow.
We have tested already.
-Original Message-
From: Adam Jackson
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
Subject: Re: fltk
Date: We
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> In some cases you can get DSO linking errors when you don't explicitly link
> to those other packages. People building from source might not care, but
> this can cause problems for official builds.
Can you elaborate on this or point me to
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 01:55 +1000, Adrian wrote:
> No it is not, the reason flrig cannot be built in fedora as it is easy
> in Ubuntu. Lets not get behind the 8 ball.
Assuming by flrig you mean this:
http://www.w1hkj.com/downloads/flrig/flrig-1.3.09.tar.gz
Then flrig itself is not exactly blamel
No it is not, the reason flrig cannot be built in fedora as it is easy
in Ubuntu. Lets not get behind the 8 ball.
-Original Message-
From: Susi Lehtola
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: fltk
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 17:22:05
Am 19.12.2012 15:29, schrieb Ozan Çağlayan:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> because most people the days are using network-printers
>> even the cheap HP printers having WLAN/LAN and working without
>> any windows crap
>
> Agree but it doesn't change the fact that ther
Am 19.12.2012 14:37, schrieb Ozan Çağlayan:
> I'm trying to add a SAMBA printer through control-center in F18. As
> far as I can understand, this is still only supported through
> system-config-printer and not from printer panel in
> gnome-control-center. Besides that since samba-client is not in
On 12/19/2012 04:22 PM, Susi Lehtola wrote:
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 01:12:38 +1000
Adrian wrote:
Please guys get your act together on fltk, the yum build is
ridiculous;
[root@fedora18desk ~]# fltk-config --ldflags
-Wl,-z,relro -lfltk
should be (built from source)
[root@fedora18desk ~]# fltk-
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 17:22:05 +0200,
Susi Lehtola wrote:
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 01:12:38 +1000
I'm guessing your build from source is a static one. The shared library
in Fedora is already linked to all of the above libraries, so if one
only uses fltk then one only needs to link to -lfltk.
I
So we see by the use of physiology, and the material rights of
substitution how resolve can be found.
Adrian ... vk4tux
-Original Message-
From: Adrian
Reply-to: linux...@yahoogroups.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Cc: linux...@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [linuxham] fltk
Date: Thu, 20
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 01:12:38 +1000
Adrian wrote:
>
> Please guys get your act together on fltk, the yum build is
> ridiculous;
>
> [root@fedora18desk ~]# fltk-config --ldflags
>
> -Wl,-z,relro -lfltk
>
> should be (built from source)
>
> [root@fedora18desk ~]# fltk-config --ldflags
> -L/usr
Please guys get your act together on fltk, the yum build is ridiculous;
[root@fedora18desk ~]# fltk-config --ldflags
-Wl,-z,relro -lfltk
should be (built from source)
[root@fedora18desk ~]# fltk-config --ldflags
-L/usr/local/lib -lfltk -lXext -lXft -lfontconfig -lXinerama -lpthread
-ldl -lm
On 12/19/2012 03:51 PM, Charlie Bennett wrote:
Hi All -
Are there plans to promote the kmod-nvidia packages for 3.6.10 on F17
from testing to updates?
- not sure if this is the right ml, kmod-nvidia is definitely not in the
official Fedora repos, it's in rpmfusion
--Jirka
Thanks,
cc
Hi All -
Are there plans to promote the kmod-nvidia packages for 3.6.10 on F17
from testing to updates?
Thanks,
ccb
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 19.12.2012 14:37, schrieb Ozan Çağlayan:
>> I'm trying to add a SAMBA printer through control-center in F18. As
>> far as I can understand, this is still only supported through
>> system-config-printer and not from printer panel in
>>
Hi,
I'm trying to add a SAMBA printer through control-center in F18. As
far as I can understand, this is still only supported through
system-config-printer and not from printer panel in
gnome-control-center. Besides that since samba-client is not installed
by
default, system-config-printer is not
Compose started at Wed Dec 19 09:16:31 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[marble]
1:python-marble-4.9.4-1.fc18.x86_64 requires sip-api(8) >= 0:8.1
[python-fedmsg-meta-fedora-infrastructure]
python-fedmsg-meta-fedora-infrastru
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT, 19:00 CEST) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #615 Strategy for services
58 matches
Mail list logo
