# F18 Final Blocker Review meeting #6
# Date: 2012-12-19
# Time: 17:00 UTC (12:00 EST, 09:00 PST)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
The list of blocker and nth bugs is still really long and we're running
out of time. We may keep the meeting to 3 hours but will probably keep
going
Hello all,
Having just been kindly sponsored by Kalev, I guess it's time for the
obligatory Self Introduction :)
First some background stuff: I'm from Switzerland, and have just
received my degree in Computational Sciences and Engineering from ETH.
I've been a Fedora user since F11, and have
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 09:38:24PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 1 - Here:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Input_device_configuration#system-setup-keyboard
>
> we need update this because:
> Command system-setup-keyboard is not present in F18, now we got
> localectl set-x11-keymap.
was a
2012/12/18 Simo Sorce :
> On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 18:43 +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Samba3 configuration on my development server is fairly simple. Do I
>> need to change something in the /etc/samba/smb.conf after update to
>> Samba4?
>>
>> I don't see anything about migration here
>
Summary of changes:
fd4129d... Update to latest upstream release. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fe
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 18:43 +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Samba3 configuration on my development server is fairly simple. Do I
> need to change something in the /etc/samba/smb.conf after update to
> Samba4?
>
> I don't see anything about migration here
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
Summary of changes:
fd4129d... Update to latest upstream release. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fe
On Ter, 2012-12-18 at 10:39 +0200, Ebru Arslan wrote:
> libdrm revision is 2.2.22 but i configure 2.4.40. but system still see
> previous one. so my all autogen.sh working result is fail.
Do the package for libdrm and upgrade with rpm -Uvh
#cd fedora-scm/
#git clone git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 10:15 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> FYI:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188542
>
> This package review has been submitted more then six years ago. With
> more then 150 comments in BZ. And now finally get accepted into Fedora.
> I would like to thanks Lee for
Hi,
Samba3 configuration on my development server is fairly simple. Do I
need to change something in the /etc/samba/smb.conf after update to
Samba4?
I don't see anything about migration here
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Samba4
so I assume that it will be trouble-free. Am I too big opti
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/532
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/532/0001-Ticket-532-RUV-is-not-getting-updated-for-both-Maste.patch
--
Mark Reynolds
Red Hat, Inc
mreyno...@redhat.com
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.o
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 11:14 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> A big part of my problem is that I see little notice that there is a
> problem.
You have very clearly not even tried to look.
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-November/173833.html
79 messages in that thread, by my c
OK, so maybe I an nuts but it seems to me that there is this 800 pound
gorilla wondering around the Fedora 18 tent and its name is firewalld!
Or it with respect to virtual guests and libvirt (since libvirt is a
critical part of networking support).
Maybe I am missing some critical information
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 14:47:09 +0100, Brendan Jones wrote:
> What is truly amazing is that the submitter was FE-NEEDSPONSOR the whole
> time. Kudos
Not really. It has been the submitter's only package review request.
Possibly without a request to become a co-maintainer of other packages
in the Fed
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 10:15:39 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> FYI:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188542
>
> This package review has been submitted more then six years ago. With
> more then 150 comments in BZ. And now finally get accepted into Fedora.
> I would like to thanks Lee fo
On 12/18/2012 01:21 PM, Mario Ceresa wrote:
I deeply admire Lee's perseverance! My oldest was 3 years and I felt
trapped in the "Neverending Story" :)
Out of curiosity, could you post a link to the oldest one?
Best,
Mario
What is truly amazing is that the submitter was FE-NEEDSPONSOR the whol
Compose started at Tue Dec 18 09:15:57 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[marble]
1:python-marble-4.9.4-1.fc18.x86_64 requires sip-api(8) >= 0:8.1
[python-fedmsg-meta-fedora-infrastructure]
python-fedmsg-meta-fedora-infrastru
Compose started at Tue Dec 18 08:15:13 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[Agda]
Agda-2.3.0.1-4.fc19.x86_64 requires
ghc(Agda-2.3.0.1-ad754944fc95f11aa3b4710387ff959a)
[ansible]
ansible-fireball-0.9-1.fc19.noarch requires pyt
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Mario Ceresa wrote:
> I deeply admire Lee's perseverance! My oldest was 3 years and I felt
> trapped in the "Neverending Story" :)
>
> Out of curiosity, could you post a link to the oldest one?
It seems this one is even older:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.
I deeply admire Lee's perseverance! My oldest was 3 years and I felt
trapped in the "Neverending Story" :)
Out of curiosity, could you post a link to the oldest one?
Best,
Mario
On 18 December 2012 10:15, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> FYI:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188542
>
> Thi
FYI:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188542
This package review has been submitted more then six years ago. With
more then 150 comments in BZ. And now finally get accepted into Fedora.
I would like to thanks Lee for his incredible patience.
Now oldest review in queue is "only" 5 ye
libdrm revision is 2.2.22 but i configure 2.4.40. but system still see
previous one. so my all autogen.sh working result is fail.
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Seg, 2012-12-17 at 19:12 +0300, Ebru Arslan wrote:
> > another problem.
> > fedora14 libdrm_2.2.22 doesnt u
22 matches
Mail list logo
