# F18 Final Blocker Review meeting #1
# Date: 2012-11-28
# Time: 17:00 UTC (12:00 EST, 09:00 PST)
# Location: #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net
I know everyone's excited for the next round of blocker review but
there are already quite a few proposed blocker and nth bugs on the list
and we have to get
- Original Message -
> From: "Alexander Aristotle Davis"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Cc: "jon vanalten"
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 5:58:27 AM
> Subject: RE: need help with a package
>
> hello Jon,
>
> thanks for responding to my email,
>
> I will l
On , Edward Mann wrote:
> I would like to be the maintainer for
the Enlightenment e17 for Fedora. I am sending this e-mail to seek
guidance and also a sponsor. Getting e17 on Fedora i will need to build
and install the following packages
>
> eina - Core data structure
library.
>
> eet - Da
I would like to be the maintainer for the Enlightenment e17 for
Fedora. I am sending this e-mail to seek guidance and also a sponsor.
Getting e17 on Fedora i will need to build and install the following
packages
eina - Core data structure library.
eet - Data
encode/decode and storage library
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 1:08 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> Since I'll no longer need these for my day job I'm going to orphan them
> rather than neglect them. Free for the taking!
>
> sigul (mitr is a co-maintainer)
Taken.
Mirek
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.f
Hi folks,
The logs from the FESCo townhall are below. Please do take time out to
go through them if you missed the townhall:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-townhall/2012-11-27/fesco-townhall.2012-11-27-16.59.html
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-townhall/2012-11-27/fesco-townhal
David Howells wrote:
> > A better way to do this might be to make the header installation discard the
> > "_UAPI" prefix that got added.
>
> As the attached patch.
Now upstream.
David
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Again, if they are doing this then they are already violating the GPL
> by shipping GPLv2 code that links to non-free software. The v2 versus
> v3 thing is a red herring.
And yet again, you forgot about the "GPLv2+ with exceptions".
I think the both of us can keep doing this dance for ever, bu
On 27 November 2012 15:22, Zdenek Pavlas wrote:
> Or, maybe it's PackageKit, trying to fetch changelogs
> of updated packages, without updating primary metadata first?
Plausible, given PK tries to use a larger cache time than yum by default.
Richard.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproj
On 11/27/2012 10:08 AM, Debarshi Ray wrote:
>> OK, so there are some proprietary or otherwise encumbered plugins that might
>> not be GPLv3-compatible but might be compatible with GPLv2.
>
> You again missed the "GPLv2 with exceptions" part.
>
>>> Plus, this practice of either using LGPLv2+ or G
> /pub/fedora/linux/updates/17/x86_64/repodata/34881e74623de1754bf0e12f01884bea615fdcee05eded189f22d41bf9d4260b-other.sqlite.bz2
>
> That file no longer exists; it was on my mirror from 21:12 Monday to
> 22:17 Tuesday.
>
> I'm guessing there's either a yum bug or a
> broken repo push that is:
>
>
Debarshi Ray writes:
> [...] You don't think that it is a problem that our downstreams
> might inadvertently end up violating the GPL by shipping GPLv3 code
> that links to non-free software? [...]
It is not *our* problem.
- FChE
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://adm
Hello everybody,
there's recently been quite a lot development going on upstream. I'm trying to
keep up, fixing bugs as they come and updating/dropping patches. I would like to
encourage those of you using rawhide to be suspicious of anything that you find
(if only slightly) weird in iputils and t
hello,
I will like to keep the rssh package alive.
I am already a member of FAS2, I am having trouble adopting the package
can you guide me on the steps necessary to adopt the package?
Alex
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/
On 11/26/2012 08:29 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Ralf Corsepius said:
Well, dlopen'ed modules/plugins aren't directly linked, i.e. there is
only an indirect dependency. AFAICT (IANAL), this is what makes the
legal key-difference.
IANAL either, but neither is what matters in the leg
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:28:35AM +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/27/2012 02:03 AM, Alexander Aristotle Davis wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > A package called rssh has been marked as duplicate on Bugzilla and
> > I am working on a 2.3.3 version and
> OK, so there are some proprietary or otherwise encumbered plugins
> that might not be GPLv3-compatible but might be compatible with GPLv2.
You again missed the "GPLv2 with exceptions" part.
>> Plus, this practice of either using LGPLv2+ or GPLv2+ with exceptions for
>> applications is so widesp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/27/2012 02:03 AM, Alexander Aristotle Davis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A package called rssh has been marked as duplicate on Bugzilla and
> I am working on a 2.3.3 version and would like to update it to a
> new release. Could you please inform me why thi
18 matches
Mail list logo
