On Mon, 08 Oct 2012 18:15:52 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> Because I haven't entirely run kicking and screaming from attempting to
> package nodejs, I (FAS: "patches") will take:
Do you think you would be able to make somewhere buildable packages of
nodejs (before you can manage to push it t
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 02:18:10AM +0300, Serge wrote:
> Obviously this won't go in F18. But it mostly works, you can test it:
> 0. Get Fedora17 LiveCD
> 1. Boot it with additional kernel params:
> selinux=0 systemd.log_level=debug systemd.log_target=console init=/bin/bash
> 2. When you get the
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 02:18:10AM +0300, Serge wrote:
> * /root was initially on a root partition because 'root' user should be
> able to login even when all other FS (including /usr) are not mounted.
> Since now it can't do anything without /usr anyway, /root dir don't have
> to be in /.
I want
Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) said:
> > is any current data
> > available about how our minimal footprint got worse/better over time in
> > both terms of packages and disk space, and which packages are to blame
> > for it?
> >
> > If the libmicrohttpd dep really is problematic I am happy to split
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On 10/03/2012 02:23 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> As a result of FESCO ticket 952*, Lubomir Rintel's 200+ packages are
>> in need of new maintainers. Under normal circumstances we'd simply
>> orphan them all, but given the large number we want to ha
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Correct. Note that this is not accessible at all, by default, and mostly
> a preview for now. Later on we will add http digest auth and proper TLS
> support (including client certs) if people want to control
> access. (thankfully, l
Hello.
Modern Fedora had 14 non-empty root directories:
/boot
/bin
/dev
/etc
/home
/lib
/proc
/root
/run
/sbin
/sys
/tmp
/usr
/var
Original UsrMove had "fixed" just 3 of them. But the rest are still there.
What do you think about fixing them all?
Instead of all these d
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 12:14 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Mon, 08.10.12 19:37, Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) wrote:
>> We support a "minimal installation" target
>> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MinimalPlatform ), and this
>> really doesn't seem like something that should be incl
On Mon, 8 Oct 2012 18:16:28 -0400
Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 11:18:33PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
> > > That is a web application.
> > No it isn't.
> > > The software has to be stored somewhere to
> > > be gotten from.. and that requires disk space, front end servers,
> > > and o
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 11:18:33PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
> > That is a web application.
> No it isn't.
> > The software has to be stored somewhere to
> > be gotten from.. and that requires disk space, front end servers, and
> > other infrastructure.
> This is not about a webportal just some fi
Please add these two to the list:
* meld (EPEL 5, EPEL 6)
* opengl-games-utils (EPEL 6)
Thanks.
--
Peter Gordon (codergeek42)
Who am I? :: http://thecodergeek.com/about-me
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.
On Mon, 08.10.12 19:37, Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) wrote:
> > The live-syncing logging logic that is available in 184 as a preview is
> > based on JSON and HTTP (in order to build as much on existing standards
> > as possible, and get best integration with other systems). In order to
> > keep
On 8 October 2012 15:09, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 8 October 2012 14:39, drago01 wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Stephen John Smoogen
>> wrote:
>>> [...] There needs to be web design, web
>>> application coding, processes for getting applications in and
>>> approved, servers an
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 03:09:38PM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> Dude.. metadata has to be served from something. It has to be updated
> from somewhere.. it has to have some sort of way to get to the client.
> That is a web application. The software has to be stored somewhere to
Well, looks
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 11:09:17PM +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> > Is there more?
> You'll need icons, licenses, ratings, reviews and a (much) more detailed
> description than the one in the .desktop file. Bonus points if you include
> screenshots as well.
Oh; yes -- that's an Open Collaboratio
Christoph Wickert (christoph.wick...@gmail.com) said:
> one more question: How can one install something that is neither an
> 'environment' nor a minimal install install? Say I want openbox as
> window manager, how would I do that?
>
> openbox is in the group 'window-managers', but that group is
Christoph Wickert (christoph.wick...@gmail.com) said:
> In order to reduce the size of the F18 Xfce spin, I wanted to edit comps
> - but decided to not do so until I fully understand what is going on. I
> seem to have missed a lot since since last our discussion at Blacksburg,
> so have a lot of q
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Przemek Klosowski
> Date: Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 12:06 PM
> Subject: Re: Packages in need of new maintainers
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
>
> On 10/03/2012 02:23 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>>
>> A
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 8 October 2012 14:39, drago01 wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Stephen John Smoogen
>> wrote:
>>> [...] There needs to be web design, web
>>> application coding, processes for getting applications in and
>>> approved, se
On 8 October 2012 14:39, drago01 wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> [...] There needs to be web design, web
>> application coding, processes for getting applications in and
>> approved, servers and disk space for this. Those are the hardest part
>> and it is a
* Matthew Miller [08/10/2012 23:04] :
>
> Is there more?
You'll need icons, licenses, ratings, reviews and a (much) more detailed
description than the one in the .desktop file. Bonus points if you include
screenshots as well.
Emmanuel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://
On Mon, 8 Oct 2012 22:39:21 +0200
drago01 wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Stephen John Smoogen
> wrote:
> > [...] There needs to be web design, web
> > application coding, processes for getting applications in and
> > approved, servers and disk space for this. Those are the hardest
> >
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 10:39:21PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
> No one but Tim asked for a web based solution. We don't need an
> application submission process either, just present the applications
> we have in a more usable manner (i.e applications not packages).
> The code for a native application su
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> [...] There needs to be web design, web
> application coding, processes for getting applications in and
> approved, servers and disk space for this. Those are the hardest part
> and it is a blocker because if no one is around to keep a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863734
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Template-Toolkit-2.24-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Template-Toolkit-2.24-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
Troy Dawson píše v Po 08. 10. 2012 v 14:48 -0500:
> On 10/05/2012 04:43 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I have updated mongodb from 2.0.7 to 2.2.0.
> > It is currently going through the normal channels for rawhide and Fedora 18.
> >
> > 10gen has a very good track record for being backwards
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> swing-layout -- Natural layout for Swing panels
>
I'll take this since is a dep of Omegat.
FAS name: olea
--
Ismael Olea
http://olea.org/diario/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/l
Hi,
2012/10/8 Troy Dawson :
> On 10/05/2012 04:43 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I have updated mongodb from 2.0.7 to 2.2.0.
>> It is currently going through the normal channels for rawhide and Fedora 18.
>>
>> 10gen has a very good track record for being backwards compatible.
>> According to
On 5 October 2012 15:42, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 5 October 2012 16:19, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
>> 1) Software Center based on PackageKit by Matthias
>> 2) Light Software Center - a new app based on PackageKit from the
>> beginning
>> 3) Apper already supports AppStream [2]
>
> Basically, Fedora
On 10/05/2012 04:43 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
> Hello,
> I have updated mongodb from 2.0.7 to 2.2.0.
> It is currently going through the normal channels for rawhide and Fedora 18.
>
> 10gen has a very good track record for being backwards compatible.
> According to their documentation "When upgrading
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 07:37:42PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>>> We support a "minimal installation" target
>>> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MinimalPlatform ), and th
The lightweight tag 'perl-Class-Load-XS-0.06-1.fc19' was created pointing to:
917540e... Update to 0.06
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-dev
The lightweight tag 'perl-Class-Load-XS-0.06-1.fc18' was created pointing to:
917540e... Update to 0.06
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-dev
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 07:37:42PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>> We support a "minimal installation" target
>> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MinimalPlatform ), and this
>> really doesn't seem like something that should be include
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 07:37:42PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> We support a "minimal installation" target
> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MinimalPlatform ), and this
> really doesn't seem like something that should be included, for the
> same reason we don't ship a disabled-by-default
A few minor changes to the Fedora Packaging Guidelines have been made:
---
The Ruby Packaging guidelines were updated to reflect the fact that
rubygem packages must have a Requires: rubygems, because that package
(rubygems) owns the RubyGems? directory structure.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/P
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 08.10.12 14:50, Petr Pisar (ppi...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>> Am I the only one who raised his eyebrow when today's systemd update to
>> systemd-194-1.fc18 pulled in libmicrohttpd and qrencode-libs?
>
> The live-syncing logging logic
On Mon, 08.10.12 11:49, Matthew Miller (mat...@fedoraproject.org) wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 02:50:23PM +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > Am I the only one who raised his eyebrow when today's systemd update to
> > systemd-194-1.fc18 pulled in libmicrohttpd and qrencode-libs?
>
> In terms of _siz
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 11:49:47AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> In terms of *policy*, it does seem like this may be headed towards the path
> of an eventual realization that putting all this functionality into one
> monolithic package has some drawbacks.
(A concern Lennart addresses in his messa
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Nikos Roussos
wrote:
> **
> On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 16:49 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
> On 10/08/2012 10:49 AM, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
> > Reindl Harald píše v Ne 07. 10. 2012 v 20:02 +0200:
> >> Am 07.10.2012 19:55, schrieb drago01:
> >>> Maybe maybe not. The point
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 02:50:23PM +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> Am I the only one who raised his eyebrow when today's systemd update to
> systemd-194-1.fc18 pulled in libmicrohttpd and qrencode-libs?
In terms of _size_, there's not much concern, as these are both very small
libraries.
In terms of *
On Mon, 08.10.12 14:50, Petr Pisar (ppi...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Am I the only one who raised his eyebrow when today's systemd update to
> systemd-194-1.fc18 pulled in libmicrohttpd and qrencode-libs?
The live-syncing logging logic that is available in 184 as a preview is
based on JSON and HTTP (i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863991
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
Package perl-Coro-6.09-2.fc18:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 16:49 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 10/08/2012 10:49 AM, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
> > Reindl Harald píše v Ne 07. 10. 2012 v 20:02 +0200:
> >> Am 07.10.2012 19:55, schrieb drago01:
> >>> Maybe maybe not. The point is that a fancy software shop would result
> >>> into this "o
> From: Petr Pisar
> Am I the only one who raised his eyebrow when today's systemd update to
> systemd-194-1.fc18 pulled in libmicrohttpd and qrencode-libs?
I suspect it has to do with this feature:
http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Systemd-to-secure-system-log-information-against-attacks-1
On 10/08/2012 10:49 AM, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
Reindl Harald píše v Ne 07. 10. 2012 v 20:02 +0200:
Am 07.10.2012 19:55, schrieb drago01:
Maybe maybe not. The point is that a fancy software shop would result
into this "old mother" type of user consider to use fedora.
A user ultimately don't care
Am I the only one who raised his eyebrow when today's systemd update to
systemd-194-1.fc18 pulled in libmicrohttpd and qrencode-libs?
-- Petr
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Am 08.10.2012 10:49, schrieb Jiri Eischmann:
> Reindl Harald píše v Ne 07. 10. 2012 v 20:02 +0200:
>> why have we different operating systems and distributions if all
>> satisfies the same user-base for every price? there is also a need
>> for a clean and straight forwarded linux without compromi
Compose started at Mon Oct 8 08:15:10 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[PyKDE]
PyKDE-3.16.6-10.fc18.x86_64 requires sip-api(8) >= 0:8.1
[PyQt]
PyQt-3.18.1-12.fc18.x86_64 requires sip-api(8) >= 0:8.1
[almanah]
almana
Hi!
This is a reminder for special FESCo/FPGM/Fedora QA meeting to
decide if Fedora 18 is ready to freeze (based on Fedora 18 Beta
criteria [1]). The goal is to avoid the long freeze period if we
know, we are not yet ready to fulfil Beta criteria.
Join us on FreeNode.org #fedora-meeting-1 channel
Compose started at Mon Oct 8 09:15:23 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[almanah]
almanah-0.8.0-7.fc18.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-3.0.so.3()(64bit)
almanah-0.8.0-7.fc18.x86_64 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.16()(64bit)
commit df63c4a9588ecdc250324861848c050aaf441a45
Author: Petr Šabata
Date: Mon Oct 8 14:09:57 2012 +0200
1.3110 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Dancer.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitigno
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Dancer:
5de184e2439d7d07b0aa15fd133efe57 Dancer-1.3110.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listi
On 10/08/2012 10:49 AM, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
And why are noobs something unwanted?
As I said above, most new computer science students at our local
technical university are Linux noobs who would appreciate something like
this. They have potential to be good contributors in a few years if
Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863785
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 09:32:33PM +0300, Nikos Roussos wrote:
> I still haven't understand what it takes to get this started. Besides of
> course from having some people dedicating some time on that. Convincing
> infrastructure team is the first step? Does this need to get through FESCO
> first?
On 10/06/2012 08:42 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Questions, feedback, thoughts or rants anybody?
This is something you should be asking on the -test list where the QA
community resides
JBG
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/de
Reindl Harald píše v Ne 07. 10. 2012 v 20:02 +0200:
> Am 07.10.2012 19:55, schrieb drago01:
> > Maybe maybe not. The point is that a fancy software shop would result
> > into this "old mother" type of user consider to use fedora.
> > A user ultimately don't care about packages but about application
tim.laurid...@gmail.com píše v Ne 07. 10. 2012 v 18:51 +0200:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Jiri Eischmann
> wrote:
> Hi,
> the possibility of Software Center in Fedora has already been
> discussed
> several times, last time a few month ago.
> I re
59 matches
Mail list logo
