Re: 'newpackager' is not in FAS, or How to co-maintain a package before getting sponsored

2012-09-28 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 02:00:36PM +0800, Robin Lee wrote: > On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 12:24:40PM +0800, Robin Lee wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III > > > > wrote: > > > >     >

Re: 'newpackager' is not in FAS, or How to co-maintain a package before getting sponsored

2012-09-28 Thread Robin Lee
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 12:24:40PM +0800, Robin Lee wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III < > ti...@math.uh.edu> > > wrote: > > > > > "RL" == Robin Lee writes: > > > > RL> Hi, all I want to follow t

Re: 'newpackager' is not in FAS, or How to co-maintain a package before getting sponsored

2012-09-28 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 12:24:40PM +0800, Robin Lee wrote: > On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III > wrote: > > > "RL" == Robin Lee writes: > > RL> Hi, all I want to follow the route [1] to bring up a new > RL> packager. > > Then why not follow the procedur

Re: 'newpackager' is not in FAS, or How to co-maintain a package before getting sponsored

2012-09-28 Thread Robin Lee
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > "RL" == Robin Lee writes: > > RL> Hi, all I want to follow the route [1] to bring up a new > RL> packager. > > Then why not follow the procedure you referenced? It tells you what to > do, which involves opening a ticket in the

Re: 'newpackager' is not in FAS, or How to co-maintain a package before getting sponsored

2012-09-28 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "RL" == Robin Lee writes: RL> Hi, all I want to follow the route [1] to bring up a new RL> packager. Then why not follow the procedure you referenced? It tells you what to do, which involves opening a ticket in the appropriate trac instance. - J< -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedor

'newpackager' is not in FAS, or How to co-maintain a package before getting sponsored

2012-09-28 Thread Robin Lee
Hi, all I want to follow the route [1] to bring up a new packager. But when I try to approve commit privilege for him, pkgdb says: "... must be in one of these groups: ('cvsadmin', 'packager', 'provenpackager', 'newpackager') to hold the commit acl" I think he should join the 'newpackager' FAS gr

Re: Heads up: My FC18 i686 vhost was bricked by lastest updates.

2012-09-28 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 11:32:32 -0400 John Ellson wrote: > Caution (it might just be me, but just in case...) > > I can no longer boot my Fedora 18, i686, virtual host this morning > after "yum update" > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861130 > > > I suspect, but can't verify quick

Re: request: remove "gd.tuwien.ac.at" from mirror-lists

2012-09-28 Thread Kevin Kofler
Reindl Harald wrote: > i am here at vienna ona glass fiber > > * 4 hops UPC > * 4 hops Vienna University Computer Center - ACOne > > and the same from a 100 Mbit UPC-Fiber-Power at the > other end of the city - not realistic that it would be > faster anywhere in austria FYI, try hardcoding mirro

review swap

2012-09-28 Thread Martin Gansser
Hi, I would be willing to swap a review of vdr-markad [1] in rpmfusion for another review, be it RPM Fusion or Fedora, preferably not something overly complex. Feel free to contact me if you are interested. Cheers, Martin [1] https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2319 -- devel mailing

rawhide report: 20120928 changes

2012-09-28 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Fri Sep 28 08:15:06 UTC 2012 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [almanah] almanah-0.8.0-7.fc18.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-3.0.so.3()(64bit) almanah-0.8.0-7.fc18.x86_64 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.16()(64bit)