Re: request for approval to upgrade asciidoc package

2012-07-26 Thread Christopher Meng
A small request:Can you package it into EPEL6? I found this one only shipped in EPEL5,therefore why not ship it into EPEL6? -- Best Regards, Christopher Meng--'Cicku' Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora Project and Contributor of GNU. Blog:http://cicku.me Social:http://about.me/cicku -- deve

Re: request for approval to upgrade asciidoc package

2012-07-26 Thread Dan Allen
Btw, here's the full changelog for AsciiDoc: http://www.methods.co.nz/asciidoc/CHANGELOG.html Oh yeah, btw, the latest version is 8.6.8 :) I've also attached a diff of the output when I run the asciidoc test suite on version 8.4.5 and 8.6.7. While all the documents are parsed correctly, you'll n

request for approval to upgrade asciidoc package

2012-07-26 Thread Dan Allen
I'm seeking request for approval to upgrade the asciidoc package [1]. The latest version of AsciiDoc is 8.6.7, released this month. The version currently packaged is 8.4.5, released May 2009 (not exactly what we would call *first*). An issue request has already been filed for this upgrade [2] and

Re: dracut > 009-12 never made it to f15-stable

2012-07-26 Thread Bill McGonigle
On 07/26/2012 04:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: You can build them from git I suppose. Wow, I took a few minutes to learn how to use fedpkg and I have to say it makes this embarrassingly easy! Kudos to the team. dracut-009-15.fc15 worked just as expected. f15->f17 went flawlessly and saved me

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v4] Retiring packages for F-18

2012-07-26 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 15:45 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 13:15 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > Package qtparted (fails to build) > > > > H... > > > > http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/qtparted > > > > 750566 Fedora new qtparted won't install because it is

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v4] Retiring packages for F-18

2012-07-26 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 19:52 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Jesse Keating writes: > > On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 15:37 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > >> The date is useful for making it > >> immediately obvious how up-to-date a package is, I guess, but it has no > >> really key function for differentiating b

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v4] Retiring packages for F-18

2012-07-26 Thread Tom Lane
Bruno Wolff III writes: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 18:24:52 -0400, >Bill Nottingham wrote: >> Updated with new list of packages that have failed to build. >> Package stratagus (fails to build) > statagus is currently FTBFS because it isn't using the newer libpng API. > Assuming that's all t

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v4] Retiring packages for F-18

2012-07-26 Thread Tom Lane
Jesse Keating writes: > On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 15:37 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> The date is useful for making it >> immediately obvious how up-to-date a package is, I guess, but it has no >> really key function for differentiating builds any more.) > It's not even that. With CVS you could

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v4] Retiring packages for F-18

2012-07-26 Thread Jesse Keating
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 15:37 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > The date is useful for making it > immediately obvious how up-to-date a package is, I guess, but it has no > really key function for differentiating builds any more.) It's not even that. With CVS you could have done a checkout of a tag

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v4] Retiring packages for F-18

2012-07-26 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 13:15 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > Package qtparted (fails to build) > > H... > > http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/qtparted > > 750566Fedora new qtparted won't install because it is from F15 > and requires libparted.so.0, and F16 has so.1 > 802782

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v4] Retiring packages for F-18

2012-07-26 Thread Adam Williamson
n the past. > I'm willing to help with this if you like. Just for the record - Jon went ahead and applied Jonathan's patch, but it did not correctly follow the pre-release naming guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages I've gone ahe

Re: Debugging Fedora UEFI boot problems on Intel DQ77MK

2012-07-26 Thread Gerry Reno
On 07/26/2012 05:12 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 08:59:20PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > >> When booting Fedora 17 x64 there's the GRUB bootloader with graphical >> background image, >> I let it boot the default entry "Fedora 17", I see it the allocating memory >> page

Re: Debugging Fedora UEFI boot problems on Intel DQ77MK

2012-07-26 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 08:59:20PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > When booting Fedora 17 x64 there's the GRUB bootloader with graphical > background image, > I let it boot the default entry "Fedora 17", I see it the allocating memory > pages, loading VMLINUZ etc, > and then the display mode /

Re: Debugging Fedora UEFI boot problems on Intel DQ77MK

2012-07-26 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 04:44:03PM -0400, Gerry Reno wrote: > On 07/26/2012 04:31 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 02:44:24PM -0400, Gerry Reno wrote: > >> There are missing Ivy Bridge definitions in the intel_chipset.h file in > >> libdrm which causes machines with Ivy Bridg

Re: dracut > 009-12 never made it to f15-stable

2012-07-26 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 14:41 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 09:34:37 -0700 > "Brian C. Lane" wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 10:43:07AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 02:04:13 -0400 > > > Bill McGonigle wrote: > > > > That leaves us with no yum upgrade p

Re: Debugging Fedora UEFI boot problems on Intel DQ77MK

2012-07-26 Thread Gerry Reno
On 07/26/2012 04:31 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 02:44:24PM -0400, Gerry Reno wrote: >> There are missing Ivy Bridge definitions in the intel_chipset.h file in >> libdrm which causes machines with Ivy Bridge >> CPU's w/embedded iGPU to fail when starting X. >> >> As I said

Re: dracut > 009-12 never made it to f15-stable

2012-07-26 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 09:34:37 -0700 "Brian C. Lane" wrote: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 10:43:07AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 02:04:13 -0400 > > Bill McGonigle wrote: > > > That leaves us with no yum upgrade path from 15 to 17 (due to > > > infrastructure details, not functio

Re: dracut > 009-12 never made it to f15-stable

2012-07-26 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 16:32:51 -0400 Bill McGonigle wrote: > On 07/25/2012 12:43 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Change the link to: > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=266766 > > That's 013-15.fc16; we need 009-13, -14, or -15.fc15. Those seem to > all be deleted from koji, even

Re: dracut > 009-12 never made it to f15-stable

2012-07-26 Thread Bill McGonigle
On 07/25/2012 12:43 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Change the link to: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=266766 That's 013-15.fc16; we need 009-13, -14, or -15.fc15. Those seem to all be deleted from koji, even source. Is source kept in git for older builds? -Bill -- Bill McGon

Re: Debugging Fedora UEFI boot problems on Intel DQ77MK

2012-07-26 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 02:44:24PM -0400, Gerry Reno wrote: > There are missing Ivy Bridge definitions in the intel_chipset.h file in > libdrm which causes machines with Ivy Bridge > CPU's w/embedded iGPU to fail when starting X. > > As I said in the bug, installing libdrm 2.4.37 from bodhi fixed

Re: Debugging Fedora UEFI boot problems on Intel DQ77MK

2012-07-26 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 02:36:39PM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > On 07/26/2012 06:32 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > > >I have a new Intel DQ77MK motherboard, based on the Intel Q77 chipset. > >CPU is Intel Ivy Bridge i7-3770. > >I'm running the latest BIOS version (0048), and UEFI boot is enable

Re: Debugging Fedora UEFI boot problems on Intel DQ77MK

2012-07-26 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 03:52:25PM -0400, Peter Jones wrote: > On 07/26/2012 01:59 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > >"noefi" kernel cmdline option didn't help unfortunately. > > > >When booting Fedora 17 x64 there's the GRUB bootloader with graphical > >background image, I let it boot the default entry

Re: Debugging Fedora UEFI boot problems on Intel DQ77MK

2012-07-26 Thread Peter Jones
On 07/26/2012 01:59 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: "noefi" kernel cmdline option didn't help unfortunately. When booting Fedora 17 x64 there's the GRUB bootloader with graphical background image, I let it boot the default entry "Fedora 17", I see it the allocating memory pages, loading VMLINUZ etc,

Re: Debugging Fedora UEFI boot problems on Intel DQ77MK

2012-07-26 Thread Peter Jones
On 07/26/2012 02:36 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote: On 07/26/2012 06:32 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: I have a new Intel DQ77MK motherboard, based on the Intel Q77 chipset. CPU is Intel Ivy Bridge i7-3770. I'm running the latest BIOS version (0048), and UEFI boot is enabled in the BIOS. I take it

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v4] Retiring packages for F-18

2012-07-26 Thread Jonathan Dieter
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 13:47 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Jonathan Dieter (jdie...@lesbg.com) said: > >> On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 18:24 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > >> > Package numptyphysics (fails to build) > >> > >> I've updated this to b

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v4] Retiring packages for F-18

2012-07-26 Thread Jerry James
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Package gnofract4d (fails to build) > comaintained by: firewing Fixed in Rawhide, with F16 and F17 builds coming soon. Firewing is both maintainer and comaintainer; I've applied to comaintain. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.o

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v4] Retiring packages for F-18

2012-07-26 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 13:47 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Jonathan Dieter (jdie...@lesbg.com) said: > >> On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 18:24 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > >> > Package numptyphysics (fails to build) > >> > >> I've updated this to b

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v4] Retiring packages for F-18

2012-07-26 Thread Andreas Bierfert
On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 18:24 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Updated with new list of packages that have failed to build. > Package fbdesk (fails to build) > Package gimmix (fails to build) > Package libopensync-plugin-opie (fails to build) Fixed. -- Andreas Bierfert signature.asc Description:

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v4] Retiring packages for F-18

2012-07-26 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Jonathan Dieter (jdie...@lesbg.com) said: >> On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 18:24 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: >> > Package numptyphysics (fails to build) >> >> I've updated this to build and posted at >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id

Re: Debugging Fedora UEFI boot problems on Intel DQ77MK

2012-07-26 Thread Gerry Reno
There are missing Ivy Bridge definitions in the intel_chipset.h file in libdrm which causes machines with Ivy Bridge CPU's w/embedded iGPU to fail when starting X. As I said in the bug, installing libdrm 2.4.37 from bodhi fixed the issue on my F17 machine. On 07/26/2012 02:05 PM, Gerry Reno w

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v4] Retiring packages for F-18

2012-07-26 Thread Bill Nottingham
Jonathan Dieter (jdie...@lesbg.com) said: > On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 18:24 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Package numptyphysics (fails to build) > > I've updated this to build and posted at > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843250 > > If a package FTBFS and the current maintainer doe

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v4] Retiring packages for F-18

2012-07-26 Thread Bill Nottingham
80 (karlthe...@gmail.com) said: > libgtksourceviewmm can be safely (?) dropped since it is no more > actively maintained and all packages i'm aware of that relied on it > moved to newer gtksourceviewmm{,3} packages (repoquery didn't find any > other packages relying on it) If you want to get this

Re: Debugging Fedora UEFI boot problems on Intel DQ77MK

2012-07-26 Thread Przemek Klosowski
On 07/26/2012 06:32 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: I have a new Intel DQ77MK motherboard, based on the Intel Q77 chipset. CPU is Intel Ivy Bridge i7-3770. I'm running the latest BIOS version (0048), and UEFI boot is enabled in the BIOS. I take it that this one doesn't have the secure boot yet? Th

Boost 1.50 built into a side tag

2012-07-26 Thread Petr Machata
Hi all, this is to let you know that boost has been upgraded to 1.50, sans Python 3 support, which will arrive later. After complaints in past years, we decided to request a dedicated side-tag ("f18-boost") not to break a hundred or so packages that depend on it in Rawhide. As always, all client

Re: dracut > 009-12 never made it to f15-stable

2012-07-26 Thread Brian C. Lane
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 10:43:07AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 02:04:13 -0400 > Bill McGonigle wrote: > > That leaves us with no yum upgrade path from 15 to 17 (due to > > infrastructure details, not functionality). I think that means > > preupgrade won't work either (though

Re: Debugging Fedora UEFI boot problems on Intel DQ77MK

2012-07-26 Thread Gerry Reno
I encountered a similar problem when using a new Intel Xeon (Ivy Bridge) CPU. The issue occurred with Ivy Bridge w/iGPU onboard. Ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840180 . -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Debugging Fedora UEFI boot problems on Intel DQ77MK

2012-07-26 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 01:17:58PM -0400, Peter Jones wrote: > On 07/26/2012 06:32 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > >UEFI boot fails with all of the listed operating systems. Symptoms: > > > >- I get the Fedora/RHEL EFI boot menu, and I let it boot with the default > >options. > >- I get text on the sc

Re: Debugging Fedora UEFI boot problems on Intel DQ77MK

2012-07-26 Thread Peter Jones
On 07/26/2012 06:32 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: UEFI boot fails with all of the listed operating systems. Symptoms: - I get the Fedora/RHEL EFI boot menu, and I let it boot with the default options. - I get text on the screen about allocating memory pages for Linux-EFI, loading VMLINUZ, etc. - Th

Review swap for a package rename...

2012-07-26 Thread Darryl L. Pierce
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841648 I've renamed rubygem-qpid to rubygem-qpid-messaging and would like to do a review swap with anybody else who has a Ruby package to be reviewed. -- Darryl L. Pierce http://mcpierce.multiply.com/ "What do you care what people think, Mr. Feynman?"

[perl-Business-ISBN-Data] Created tag perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20120719.001-1.fc18

2012-07-26 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20120719.001-1.fc18' was created pointing to: a6d326a... Update to 20120719.001 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v4] Retiring packages for F-18

2012-07-26 Thread Michael Schwendt
> Package txt2man (fails to build) Fixed. Everything needed to fix it was in the f15 branch, whereas master was older and incomplete and had failed to build for f16 already. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v4] Retiring packages for F-18

2012-07-26 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 18:55:19 +0400, Peter Lemenkov wrote: 2012/7/26 Bruno Wolff III : Package stratagus (fails to build) statagus is currently FTBFS because it isn't using the newer libpng API. Assuming that's all that's wrong with it, I'll be able to fix this soon. Just fyi - there

Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete

2012-07-26 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:27:40AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > > I could have sworn I had, but releng trac disagrees, I seem to have > stopped at the "mark retired in pkgdb" step. Fixing. > > But that raises its own question, why is that not sufficient to get > the package blocked? I mean, bes

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v4] Retiring packages for F-18

2012-07-26 Thread Peter Lemenkov
2012/7/26 Bruno Wolff III : >> Package stratagus (fails to build) > > > statagus is currently FTBFS because it isn't using the newer libpng API. > Assuming that's all that's wrong with it, I'll be able to fix this soon. Just fyi - there is a new version 2.2.6 released and it seems that the develo

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v4] Retiring packages for F-18

2012-07-26 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 18:24:52 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: Updated with new list of packages that have failed to build. Package stratagus (fails to build) statagus is currently FTBFS because it isn't using the newer libpng API. Assuming that's all that's wrong with it, I'll be able t

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v4] Retiring packages for F-18

2012-07-26 Thread Jonathan Dieter
On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 18:24 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Package numptyphysics (fails to build) I've updated this to build and posted at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843250 If a package FTBFS and the current maintainer doesn't fix it, will we have a chance to take ownership of i

Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete

2012-07-26 Thread Adam Jackson
On 7/26/12 3:25 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 El Wed, 25 Jul 2012 12:03:46 -0400 Adam Jackson escribió: On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 18:11 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f18-needsbuilt.html How is this list generated? It claim

Re: Exchanging reviews.

2012-07-26 Thread Patrick Uiterwijk
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/823105 - erlang-riak_control - Admin UI for Riak > * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/841766 - erlang-riak_search - Full-text > search engine based on Riak I'll review these. If you could check * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841418 - prey - Open-source ant

Exchanging reviews.

2012-07-26 Thread Peter Lemenkov
Hello. I've got a couple of packages to review - both builds fine in Koji (and one passes all the tests - other doesn't have tests unfortunately): * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/823105 - erlang-riak_control - Admin UI for Riak * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/841766 - erlang-riak_search - Full-text se

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v4] Retiring packages for F-18

2012-07-26 Thread Michael Schwendt
> Package qtparted (fails to build) H... http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/qtparted 750566 Fedora new qtparted won't install because it is from F15 and requires libparted.so.0, and F16 has so.1 802782 Fedora new qtparted fails to install due to missing dependency 715847 Fedora new

Re: avant-window-navigator (awn) in Fedora 17

2012-07-26 Thread ニール・ゴンパ
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 5:26 AM, tim.laurid...@gmail.com < tim.laurid...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Damian Ivanov > wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> awn has been orphaned in F17 because latest bzr fails to build >> (0.4.1-XXX), though latest stable (0.4.0) builds fine.

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v4] Retiring packages for F-18

2012-07-26 Thread Michael Schwendt
> Package audtty (fails to build) Fixed (as this has been spotted on Dennis' list a few days ago already). -- Fedora release 17 (Beefy Miracle) - Linux 3.4.6-2.fc17.x86_64 loadavg: 0.14 0.13 0.24 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listin

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v4] Retiring packages for F-18

2012-07-26 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 09:54:03 +0200, 80 wrote: > Hi, > > libgtksourceviewmm can be safely (?) dropped since it is no more > actively maintained and all packages i'm aware of that relied on it > moved to newer gtksourceviewmm{,3} packages (repoquery didn't find any > other packages relying on it) >

Debugging Fedora UEFI boot problems on Intel DQ77MK

2012-07-26 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
Hello, I hope someone here can help me out.. I have a new Intel DQ77MK motherboard, based on the Intel Q77 chipset. CPU is Intel Ivy Bridge i7-3770. I'm running the latest BIOS version (0048), and UEFI boot is enabled in the BIOS. I've tried UEFI booting the following operating systems from bur

Re: avant-window-navigator (awn) in Fedora 17

2012-07-26 Thread tim.laurid...@gmail.com
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Damian Ivanov wrote: > Hello all, > > awn has been orphaned in F17 because latest bzr fails to build > (0.4.1-XXX), though latest stable (0.4.0) builds fine. see > > https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=avant-window-navigator&project=home%3Adamianator%3

avant-window-navigator (awn) in Fedora 17

2012-07-26 Thread Damian Ivanov
Hello all, awn has been orphaned in F17 because latest bzr fails to build (0.4.1-XXX), though latest stable (0.4.0) builds fine. see https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=avant-window-navigator&project=home%3Adamianator%3Afedora PS: Is there any chance Fedora will deprecate koj in favou

retiring Pimlico suite of apps (contacts / dates / tasks)

2012-07-26 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi All, The pimlico suite of apps originally designed for phones but useful standalone have been dead upstream for quite some time and with the restructuring of evolution are often breaking. Upstream gnome now has standalone Contacts and Calendar apps with a Tasks app planned and there's others th

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2012-07-23)

2012-07-26 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
- Original Message - > - 元のメッセージ - > | Akira TAGOH wrote: > | > I admit simply enabling force-auto-hinting isn't enough. we > | > definitely > | > need to optimize a lot to make it more better. > | > | The FreeType autohinter has been developed for years, leading to > | what > | we

Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete

2012-07-26 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 25.7.2012 18:03, Adam Jackson napsal(a): On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 18:11 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f18-needsbuilt.html How is this list generated? It claims vbetool needs rebuilding, but vbetool has been deadpackaged. - ajax On contrary, jruby is marked as

Re: Replacing grubby with grub2-mkconfig in kernel install process

2012-07-26 Thread Paul Howarth
On 07/25/2012 11:24 PM, Adrian Alves wrote: On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 2:03 AM, Chris Murphy mailto:li...@colorremedies.com>> wrote: On Jun 21, 2012, at 12:42 AM, Juan Orti Alcaine wrote: > To change your default option, just edit /etc/default/grub and set > GRUB_DEFAULT to match th

Re: [Fontconfig] Heads up: Droid fonts update in Rawhide

2012-07-26 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le Jeu 26 juillet 2012 09:32, Akira TAGOH a écrit : > Well, I see what Nicolas wants to do here. since Japanese characters > on Unicode's CJK Unified Ideographs is a subset of Chinese characters, > I think he wanted to avoid picking Droid Sans Japanese up for Chinese > anyway. Ideally, I'd like

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2012-07-23)

2012-07-26 Thread Benny Amorsen
Tomasz Torcz writes: > Which is which? There are some example here: > http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/tmp/hints/ > *-autohint variants are clearly blurred, while -*hintfull are eligible. As far as I can tell subpixel rendering is disabled in these examples. Is that relevant today, when almost

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v4] Retiring packages for F-18

2012-07-26 Thread 80
Hi, libgtksourceviewmm can be safely (?) dropped since it is no more actively maintained and all packages i'm aware of that relied on it moved to newer gtksourceviewmm{,3} packages (repoquery didn't find any other packages relying on it) repoquery --whatrequires "libgtksourceviewmm-1.0.so.2()(64b

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2012-07-23)

2012-07-26 Thread Akira TAGOH
- 元のメッセージ - | Akira TAGOH wrote: | > I admit simply enabling force-auto-hinting isn't enough. we | > definitely | > need to optimize a lot to make it more better. | | The FreeType autohinter has been developed for years, leading to what | we | have now. It is totally unreasonable to expect

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v4] Retiring packages for F-18

2012-07-26 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 04:41:09PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 23:53 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 06:24:52PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > Package rpmdepsize (fails to build) > > > comaintained by: rjones > > > > Wooaa there, this i

Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete

2012-07-26 Thread Dennis Gilmore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 El Wed, 25 Jul 2012 12:03:46 -0400 Adam Jackson escribió: > On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 18:11 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > > http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f18-needsbuilt.html > > How is this list generated? It claims vbetool needs rebuilding, but > v